Book contents
- Across Intellectual Property
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Frontispiece
- Across Intellectual Property
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Across Regimes
- Part II Across Jurisdictions
- 6 People Not Machines
- 7 Australian Legislation Abroad
- 8 ‘The Berne Convention Is Our Ideal’
- 9 A Future of International Copyright?
- 10 ‘Trade-Related’ after All?
- 11 Intellectual Property, Innovation and New Space Technology
- 12 Intellectual Property and Private International Law
- Part III Across Disciplines
- Part IV Across Professions
- Laudatio
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
6 - People Not Machines
Authorship and What It Means in International Copyright Law
from Part II - Across Jurisdictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2020
- Across Intellectual Property
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Frontispiece
- Across Intellectual Property
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Across Regimes
- Part II Across Jurisdictions
- 6 People Not Machines
- 7 Australian Legislation Abroad
- 8 ‘The Berne Convention Is Our Ideal’
- 9 A Future of International Copyright?
- 10 ‘Trade-Related’ after All?
- 11 Intellectual Property, Innovation and New Space Technology
- 12 Intellectual Property and Private International Law
- Part III Across Disciplines
- Part IV Across Professions
- Laudatio
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
This chapter recapitulates Professor Ricketson’s analysis in his 1992 Manges Lecture at Columbia Law School, presciently titled 'People or Machines: The Berne Convention and the Changing Concept of Authorship'. As Ricketson systematically developed the inquiry, it became clear that ‘People or Machines’ in fact meant ‘People Not Machines’. This chapter considers whether, more than twenty-five years later, subsequent technological developments warrant reconsideration of the human authorship premise underlying the Berne Convention. If that premise holds firm, the next question is whether non-human-generated outputs require some form of intellectual property protection. Any such regime, it should be noted, would fall outside the Berne Convention.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Across Intellectual PropertyEssays in Honour of Sam Ricketson, pp. 79 - 91Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020