Book contents
- Across Intellectual Property
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Frontispiece
- Across Intellectual Property
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Across Regimes
- Part II Across Jurisdictions
- Part III Across Disciplines
- Part IV Across Professions
- 19 Intellectual Property Scholars and University Intellectual Property Policies
- 20 ‘Measuring’ an Academic Contribution
- 21 Language and Law
- 22 Intellectual Property in the Courtroom
- 23 Copyright and the ‘Profession’ of Authorship
- Laudatio
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
19 - Intellectual Property Scholars and University Intellectual Property Policies
from Part IV - Across Professions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2020
- Across Intellectual Property
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Frontispiece
- Across Intellectual Property
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Across Regimes
- Part II Across Jurisdictions
- Part III Across Disciplines
- Part IV Across Professions
- 19 Intellectual Property Scholars and University Intellectual Property Policies
- 20 ‘Measuring’ an Academic Contribution
- 21 Language and Law
- 22 Intellectual Property in the Courtroom
- 23 Copyright and the ‘Profession’ of Authorship
- Laudatio
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
When governments intensified their expectations for universities to maximise unrealised value from public research investment, universities developed policies for ownership and exploitation of intellectual property aligned with these external expectations. The stories in this chapter exemplify the critical role that intellectual property scholars performed in the 1990s and early 2000s in development of such policies. Their role appears to have diminished when policy consideration concerns procedural matters of identification and protection of intellectual property and modes for its commercialisation. However, policies are not stagnant, and intellectual property scholars remain an invaluable resource when proposals affect existing rights and responsibilities under intellectual property law
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Across Intellectual PropertyEssays in Honour of Sam Ricketson, pp. 255 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020