Aalberts, Tanja E., and Werner, Wouter, ‘Sovereignty beyond borders: sovereignty, self-defense, and the disciplining of the state’, in Adler-Nissen, R. and Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (eds.), Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abeyratne, R. I. R., ‘Air carrier liability and state responsibility for the carriage of inadmissible persons and refugees’, (1998) 10 International Journal of Refugee Law675–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.), Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Allains, Jean, ‘The jus cogens nature of non-refoulement’, (2001) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law533–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip (ed.), Human Rights Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘The myopia of handmaidens: international lawyers and globalization’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘Downsizing the state in human rights discourse’, in Dorden, N. and Grifford, P. (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001), pp. 357–68.Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, ‘The “not-a-cat” syndrome: can the international human rights regime accommodate non-state actors?’, in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-state Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F., Local Remedies in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Andrisani, P. J., Hakim, S., and Savas, E. S., The New Public Management: Lessons from Innovating Governors and Mayors (Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anker, Deborah E., ‘Refugee law, gender and the human rights paradigm’, (2002) 15 Harvard Human Rights Journal133–54.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., Farrell, T., and Lambert, H., International Law and International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayling, J., and Grabosky, P., ‘Policing By command: enhancing law enforcement capacity through coercion’, (2006) 28 Law and Policy420–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Christine, ‘The evolution of immigration detention in the UK: the involvement of private prison companies’, RSC Working Paper No. 27, Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford (2005).

Barnes, Richard, ‘Refugee law at sea’, (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Laura, ‘Global governance and the evolution of the international refugee regime’, New Issues in Refugee Research No. 54, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, 2002.

Barnidge, Robert P. Jr, Non-state Actors and Terrorism: Applying the Law of State Responsibility and the Due Diligence Principle (The Hague: Asser Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barutciski, Michael, and Suhrke, Astrid, ‘Lessons from the Kosovo refugee crisis: innovations in protection and burden-sharing’, (2001) 14 (2) Journal of Refugee Studies95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Robert J., ‘Britain and the 1933 Refugee Convention: national or state sovereignty?’, (1999) 11 International Journal of Refugee Law597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bello, Judith Hippler, and Kokott, Juliane, ‘Amuur v. France’, (1997) 91 (1) American Journal of International Law147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bem, Kazimierz, ‘The coming of a “blank cheque” – Europe, the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol’, (2004) 16 International Journal of Refugee Law609–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bem, K., Field, N., and Meyer, S., ‘A price too high: the cost of Australia's approach to asylum-seekers’, A just Australia and Oxfam Australia, August 2007.

Berman, Franklin, ‘Jurisdiction: the state’, in Capps, P., Evans, M. D. and Konstadinidis, S. (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 2–15.Google Scholar

Betts, Alexander, ‘International cooperation between North and South to enhance refugee protection in regions of origin’, RSC Working Paper No. 25, Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford, 2005.

Betts, Alexander, ‘Towards a Mediterranean solution? Implications for the region of origin’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law652–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigo, Didier, ‘When two become one: internal and external securitisations in Europe’, in Kelstrup, M. and Williams, M. C. (eds.), International Relations and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 171–205.Google Scholar

Bigo, Didier, ‘Security and Immigration: towards a critique of the governmentality of unease’, (2002) 27 Alternatives63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigo, Didier, and Guild, Elspeth (eds.), Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe (London: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar

Bina, Mark, ‘Private military contractor liability and accountability after Abu Ghraib’, (2005) 39 John Marshall Law Review1237–50.Google Scholar

Bohr, Niels, Atomfysik og Menneskelig Erkendelse (Copenhagen: Schultz, 1957).Google Scholar

Bostock, Chantal Marie-Jeanne, ‘The international legal obligations owed to the asylum seekers on the MV Tampa’, (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boswell, Christina, ‘The “external dimension” of EU immigration and asylum policy’, (2003) 79 International Affairs619–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brittain-Catlin, William, Offshore: The Dark Side of the Global Economy (New York: Picador, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005).Google Scholar

Brouwer, Andrew, and Kumin, Judith, ‘Interception and asylum: when migration control and human rights collide’, (2003) 21 (4) Refuge6–24.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The UN Human Rights Committee’, (2001) 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law341–98.Google Scholar

Bullard, Alice, Human Rights in Crisis (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar

Burchill, Richard, ‘International human rights law: struggling between apology and Utopia’, in Bullard, A. (ed.), Human Rights in Crisis (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 49–68.Google Scholar

Byrne, R., Noll, G., and Vedsted-Hansen, J., New Asylum Countries? Migration Control and Refugee Protection in an Enlarged European Union, vol. 4 of Guild, E. and Niessen, J. (eds.), Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).

Cacciaguidi-Fahy, S., ‘The Law of the Sea and Human Rights’, (2007) 19 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law85–107.Google Scholar

Camilleri, Joseph A., and Falk, Jim, The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992).Google Scholar

Capps, P., Evans, M. D., and Konstadinidis, S. (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

Carling, Jørgen, ‘The merits and limitations of Spain's high-tech border control’, Migration Information Source, June 2007.

Cassarino, Jean-Pierre, ‘Informalising readmission agreements in the EU neighbourhood’, (2007) 42 (2) International Spectator179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassel, Douglass, ‘Extraterritorial application of inter-American human rights instruments’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 175–82.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Terrorism, Politics and the Law (Cambridge: Polity Press, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3).Google Scholar

Castles, Stephen, and Miller, Mark J., The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, 3rd edn (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar

Cerna, Christina, ‘Extraterritorial application of the human rights instruments of the inter-American system’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 141–74.Google Scholar

Cerone, John, ‘Out of bounds? Considering the reach of international human rights law’, Working Paper No. 5, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, New York, 2006.

Chimni, B. S., ‘The geopolitics of refugee studies and the practice of international institutions: a view from the South’, (1999) 11 (4) Journal of Refugee Studies350–74.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S. (ed.), International Refugee Law – A Reader (New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2000).Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘A critique of the public/private dimension’, (1999) 10 (2) European Journal of International Law387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge, ‘The doctrine of state responsibility as a potential means of holding private actors accountable for human rights’, (2004) 5 (1) Melbourne Journal of International Law1–36.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas, ‘Fair balance: a study of proportionality, subsidiarity and primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights’, University of Copenhagen, 2008.

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-state Actors (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clapham, Christopher, ‘Sovereignty and the third world state’, (1999) 47 (3) Political Studies522–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Tom, ‘Rights-based refuge, the potential of the 1951 Convention and the need for authoritative interpretation’, (2004) 16 International Journal of Refugee Law584–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cockayne, James, ‘Make or buy? Principal–agent theory and the regulation of private military companies’, in Chesterman, S. and Lehnart, C. (eds.), From Mercenaries to Markets (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, James R., ‘Constraining modern mercenarism’, (2004) 55 Hastings Law Journal1493–537.Google Scholar

Coleman, Nils, European Readmission Policy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Collinson, Sarah, ‘Visa requirements, carrier sanctions, “safe third countries” and “readmission”: the development of an asylum “buffer zone” in Europe’, (1996) 21 (1) Transactions76–90.Google Scholar

Coomans, Fons, and Kamminga, Menno T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004).Google Scholar

Cour Bødtcher, Anne, and Hughes, Jane, ‘The effects of legislation imposing fines on airlines for transporting undocumented passengers’, in Kjærum, M. (ed.), The Effects of Carrier Sanctions on the Asylum System (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council and the Danish Center of Human Rights, 1991), pp. 6–13.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew, ‘Human rights in the realm of order: sanctions and extraterritoriality’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 233–58.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, and Hyndman, Patricia, ‘Three heresies in the application of the Refugee Convention’, (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3) 1 International Journal of Refugee Law155–79.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, and Olleson, Simon, ‘The continuing debate on a UN convention on state responsibility’, (2005) 54 (4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly959–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruz, Antonio, ‘Carriers’ liability in the member states of the European Union', CCME Briefing Paper No. 17, Churches' Commission for Migrants in Europe, Brussels (1994).

Cruz, Antonio, Shifting Responsibility: Carriers' Liability in the Member States of the European Union and North America (Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books, 1995).Google Scholar

Davy, Ulrike, Asyl und Internationales Flüchtlingsrecht, vol. I, Völkerrechtlicher Rahmen (Vienna: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1996).Google Scholar

Dickinson, Laura, ‘Contract as a tool for regulating PMCs’, in Chesterman, S. and Lehnart, C. (eds.), From Mercenaries to Markets (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duffy, Helen, The “War on Terror” and the Framework of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘International law: torn between coexistence, cooperation and globalization. General conclusions’, (1998) 9 (2) European Journal of International Law278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durieux, François, and McAdam, Jane, ‘Non-Refoulement through time: the case for a derogation clause to the Refugee Convention in mass influx emergencies’, (2004) 16 International Journal of Refugee Law4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Alice, ‘The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and the Detention of Refugees’, (2008) 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly789–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, T., New Horizons in International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992).Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm D., ‘State responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights: role and realm’, in Fitzmaurice, M. and Sarooshi, D. (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 139–60.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Human rights: a descending spiral’, in Wilson, R. A. (ed.), War on Terror (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 225–41.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, ‘Relative normativity in international law’, (1993) 4 European Journal of International Law305–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feller, Erika, ‘Transport carriers and refugee protection’, in Kjærum, M. (ed.), The Role of Airline Companies in the Asylum Procedure (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council, 1988), pp. 6–13.Google Scholar

Feller, Erika, ‘Carrier sanctions and international law’, (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3) 1 International Journal of Refugee Law48–66.Google Scholar

Feller, Erika, ‘Asylum, migration and refugee protection: realities, myths and the promise of things to come’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law509–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernando, Basil, ‘The role of NGOs in policy-making: campaigns against torture as an illustration’, in Dhundale, L. and Andersen, E. A. (eds.), Revisiting the Role of Civil Society in Promoting Human Rights (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2004), pp. 143–63.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Löhr, Tillmann, Border Control at Sea: Requirements under International Human Rights and Refugee Law (Berlin:European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, 2007).Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, J., ‘Revitalizing the 1951 Refugee Convention’, (1996) 9 Harvard Human Rights Journal229–53.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, J., ‘Temporary protection of refugees: elements of a formalized regime’, (2000) 94 (2) American Journal of International Law279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flinders, Matthew, ‘The politics of public–private partnerships’, (2006) 7 (2) British Journal of Politics and International Relations215–39.Google Scholar

Ford, Richard T., ‘Law's territory (a history of jurisdiction)’, (1999) 97 Michigan Law Review843–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsythe, David P., Human Rights in International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality (London: Penguin Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Fourlanos, Gerassimos, Sovereignty and the Ingress of Aliens (Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International, 1986).Google Scholar

Friedmann, Wolfgang, The Changing Structure of International Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1964).Google Scholar

Furuseth, Rita, ‘Creating security through immigration control: an analysis of European immigration discourse and the development towards a common EU asylum and immigration policy’, NUPI Report 274, Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt, Oslo, 2003.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Hans, Flygtningeret (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1465 UNTS 85).Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘The risk of migration control: a reflexive analysis of the common EU asylum and immigration policy’, master's thesis, University of Copenhagen, 2005.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘Outsourcing migration management: EU, power, and the external dimension of asylum and immigration policy’, DIIS Working Paper 2006/1, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, 2006.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘Filtering out the risky migrant: migration control, risk theory and the EU’, AMID Working Paper 52/2006, Academy for Migration Studies in Denmark, Aalborg, 2006.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘EU's Umulige Grænsekontrol’, (2006) 2 Udenrigs69–79.Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘The extraterritorialisation of asylum and the advent of “protection lite”’, Working Paper 2007/2, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, 2007.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, ‘The refugee, the sovereign and the sea: EU interdiction policies in the Mediterranean’, in Adler-Nissen, R. and Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (eds.), Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (New York: Palgrave, 2008), pp. 171–96.Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, and Aalberts, Tanja, ‘Sovereignty at sea: the law and politics of saving lives in the Mare Liberum’, DIIS Working Paper 2010/18, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, 2010.

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, and Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ‘An introduction to sovereignty games’, in Adler-Nissen, R., and Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (eds.), Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (New York: Palgrave, 2008).Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Hans, ‘The right to seek revisited: on the UN Human Rights Declaration Article 14 and access to asylum procedures in the EU’, (2008) 10 (4) European Journal of Migration and Law439–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garlick, Madeline, ‘The EU discussions on extraterritorial processing’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law601–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gatev, Ivaylo, ‘Very remote control: policing the outer perimeter of the EU neighbourhood’, paper presented at the External Dimension of European Immigration Policies, European University Institute, Florence, 23–24 November 2006.

Gatev, Ivaylo, ‘Border security in the eastern neighbourhood: where biopolitics and geopolitics meet’, (2008) 13 European Affairs Review97–116.Google Scholar

Gavouneli, Maria, Functional Jurisdiction in the Law of the Sea (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geddes, Andrew, ‘Migration as foreign policy? The external dimension of EU action on migration and asylum’, SIEPS Report 2009:2, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, Stockholm, 2009.

Gibney, Mark, ‘In search of US refugee policy’, in Forsythe, D. P. (ed.), The United States and Human Rights: Looking Inward and Outward (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000), pp. 52–72.Google Scholar

Gibney, Mark, International Human Rights Law: Returning to Universal Principles (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).Google Scholar

Gibney, Mark, and Skogly, Sigrun (eds.), Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations (University of Pennsylvania Press: 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibney, Mark, Tomaševski, Katarina, and Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Transnational state responsibility for violations of human rights’, (1999) 12 Harvard Human Rights Journal267–96.Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew J., and Hansen, Randall, ‘Asylum policy in the West: past trends, future possibilities’, WIDER Discussion Paper, UNU/WIDER, Helsinki, 2003.

Gil-Bazo, Maria-Teresa, ‘The practice of Mediterranean states in the context of the European Union's Justice and Home Affairs External Dimension: the safe third country concept revisited’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law571–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Gondek, Michal, ‘Extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights: territorial focus in the age of globalization’, (2005) Netherlands International Law Review348–87.

Gondek, Michal, The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2009).Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, ‘Non-refoulement and the new asylum seekers’, in Martin, D. (ed.), The New Asylum Seekers: Refugee Law in the 1980s (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1986).

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, ‘The Haitian refoulement case: a comment’, (1994) 6 International Journal of Refugee Law103–9.Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, The Refugee in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, ‘The right to leave, return and remain’, in Gowlland-Debbas, V. (ed.), The Problem of Refugees in the Light of Contemporary International Law Issues (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996), pp. 93–108.Google Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, ‘Article 31 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: non-penalisation, detention, and protection’, in Feller, E., Nicholson, F. and Türk, V. (eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 185–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin-Gill, Guy, and McAdam, Jane, The Refugee in International Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Gorlick, Brian, ‘The Convention and the Committee against Torture: a complementary protection regime for refugees’, (1999) 11 International Journal of Refugee Law479–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gornig, Gilbert-Hanno, Das Refoulement-Verbot im Völkerrecht (Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1987), vol. XVIII.Google Scholar

Grahl-Madsen, Atle, Commentary on the Refugee Convention 1951 Articles 2–11, 13–37 (Geneva: Division of International Protection of the United High Commissioner for Refugees, 1963 (republished 1997)).Google Scholar

Grahl-Madsen, Atle, Territorial Asylum (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1980).Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Jurisdiction, NATO and the Kosovo conflict’, in Capps, P., Evans, M. D. and Konstadinidis, S. (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth, ‘Moving the borders of Europe’, inaugural professorial lecture delivered at CPO Wisselleerstoel at the University of Nijmegen, 30 May 2001.

Guild, Elspeth, ‘The border abroad – visas and border controls’, in Groenendijk, K., Guild, E. and Minderhoud, P. (eds.), In Search of Europe's Borders (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth, ‘Jurisprudence of the ECHR: lessons for the EU asylum policy’, in Sousa, M. C. D. U. and Bruycker, P. (eds.), The Emergence of a European Asylum Policy (Brussels: Bruylant, 2004), pp. 329–42.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth, ‘Seeking asylum: storm clouds between international commitments and EU legislative measures’, (2004) 29 European Law Review198–218.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth, ‘The Borders of the European Union: Visas and carrier sanctions’, (2004) 7 (3) Tidsskriftet Politik34–43.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth, ‘What is a neighbour? Examining the EU neighbourhood policy from the perspective of movement of persons’, paper presented at Western NIS Forum for Refugee-Assisting NGOs, Yalta, 1–3 June 2005.

Guild, Elspeth, ‘The Europeanisation of Europe's asylum policy’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law630–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilfoyle, Daniel, Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guiraudon, Virginie, ‘Before the EU border: remote control of the “huddled masses”’, in Groenendijk, K., Guild, E. and Minderhoud, P. (eds.), In Search of Europe's Borders (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 191–214.Google Scholar

Guiraudon, Virginie, ‘The constitution of a European immigration policy domain: a political sociology approach’, (2003) 10 Journal of European Public Policy263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guiraudon, Virginie, ‘Enlisting third parties in border control: a comparative study of its causes and consequences’, paper presented at Managing International and Inter-Agency Cooperation at the Border, Geneva, 13–15 March 2003.

Guiraudon, Virginie, and Lahav, Gallya, ‘The state sovereignty debate revisited: the case of migration control’, (2000) 33 Comparative Political Studies751–78.Google Scholar

Haddad, Emma, ‘The refugee: the individual between sovereigns’, (2003) 17 Global Society297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hailbronner, Kay, ‘Asylrecht in Völkerrecht’, in Beitz, W. and Wollenschläger, M. (eds.), Handbuch des Asylrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1980).Google Scholar

Hailbronner, Kay, ‘Non-refoulement and “humanitarian” refugees: customary international law or wishful legal thinking?’, in Martin, D. (ed.), The New Asylum Seekers: Refugee Law in the 1980s (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988), pp. 128–36.Google Scholar

Hailbronner, Kay, ‘Comments on the rights to leave, return and remain’, in Gowlland-Debbas, V. (ed.), The Problem of Refugees in the Light of Contemporary International Law Issues (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996), pp. 109–18.Google Scholar

Hänggi, H., and Tanner, F., ‘Promoting security sector governance in the EU's neighbourhood’, Chaillot Paper No. 80, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2005.

Harvey, Colin, ‘Regionalism, asylum and solidarity in Europe’, in Harding, C. and Lim, C. M. (eds.), Renegotiating Westphalia (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999), pp. 219–56.Google Scholar

Harvey, C., and Barnidge, R. P. J., ‘Human rights, free movement, and the right to leave in international law’, (2007) 19 International Journal of Refugee Law1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James, ‘The emerging politics of non-entrée’, (1992) 91 Refugees40–1.Google Scholar

Hathaway, James, ‘New directions to avoid hard problems: the distortion of the palliative role of refugee protection’, (1995) 8 Journal of Refugee Studies288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James, The Rights of Refugees under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James, ‘Forced migration studies: could we agree just to “date”?’, (2007) 20 Journal of Refugee Studies349–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, James, ‘Leveraging asylum’, (2010) 45 Texas International Law Journal503–36.Google Scholar

Hathaway, James (ed.), Reconceiving International Refugee Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar

Hathaway, James, and Dent, John A., Refugee Rights: Report on a Comparative Survey (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J., Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture (Stanford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, ‘International law: politics, values and functions’, (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3-IV) 216 Recueil des cours, Collected Courses.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, ‘Notes from the President’, ASIL Newsletter, Sept.–Oct. 1993.

Henkin, Louis, International Law: Politics and Values (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, ‘That “S” word: sovereignty, and globalization, and human rights, etc.’, (1999) 68 (1) Fordham Law Review1–14.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The legal bases of jurisdiction’, in Olmstead, C. J. (ed.), Extra-territorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: International Law Association/ESC Publishing, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1465 UNTS 85), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hoppe, Carsten, ‘Passing the buck: state responsibility for private military companies’, (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law989– 1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Jane, and Liebaut, Fabrice (eds.), Detention of Asylum-Seekers in Europe: Analysis and Perspectives (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).Google Scholar

Hurwitz, Agnès, The Collective Responsibility of States to Protect Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huysmans, Jef, ‘The European Union and the Securitization of migration’, (2000) 38 Journal of Common Market Studies751–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,ICMPD, Irregular Transit Migration in the Mediterranean – Some Facts, Futures and Insights (Vienna: ICMPD, 2004).Google Scholar

Isenberg, Davis, ‘A government in search of cover’, in Chesterman, S. and Lehnart, C. (eds.), From Mercenaries to Markets (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamminga, Menno T., and Scheinin, Martin, The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. O., ‘Hobbes's dilemma and institutional change in world politics: sovereignty in international society’, in Holm, H. H. and Sørensen, G. (eds.), Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War (Boulder: Westview, 1995).Google Scholar

Kessing, Peter Vedel, ‘Skal danske styrker i udlandet overholde Danmarks menneskeretlige forpligtelser?’, (2007) 1 Juristen.Google Scholar

Kessing, Peter Vedel, ‘Terrorbekæmpelse og menneskeret’, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Law, Copenhagen University, 2008.

Kjær, Kim U., Den retlige regulering af modtagelsen af asylansøgere i en europæisk kontekst (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2001).Google Scholar

Kjærum, Morten, ‘The role of airline companies in the asylum procedure’, Group of Experts under the Auspices of European Consultation on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), Danish Refugee Council, Copenhagen, 1988.

Kjølbro, Jon Fridrik, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention – for praktikere, 2nd edn (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2007).Google Scholar

Klaauw, Johanne, ‘European asylum policy and the global protection regime: challenges for UNHCR’, in Lavenex, S. and Ucarer, E. M. (eds.), Migration and the Externalities of European Integration (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 33–54.Google Scholar

Klepp, Silja, ‘A double bind: Malta and rescue of unwanted migrants at sea’, paper presented at Exploratory Workshop: The Human Costs of Border Control in the Context of EU Maritime Migration Systems, Vreije University, Amsterdam, 25–27 October 2009.

Kneebone, Susan, ‘The Pacific plan: the provision of “effective protection”?’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law696–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘The “Haiti paradigm” in United States human rights policy’, (1994) 103 Yale Law Journal2391–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers' Publishing Company, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hierarchy in international law: a sketch’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law566–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty – Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., ‘The hole in the whole: sovereignty, shared sovereignty, and international law’, (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law1075–101.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge University Press, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3).Google Scholar

Kruse, Inke, ‘Creating Europe outside Europe: externalities of the EU migration regime’, paper presented at ECPR Conference, Theories of Europeanisation. Marburg, 18–21 September 2003.

Lahav, Gallya, ‘Migration and security: the role of non-state actors and civil liberties in liberal democracies’, Second Coordination Meeting on International Migration, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, 2003.

Lambert, Hélène, ‘Protection against refoulement from Europe: human rights law comes to the rescue’, (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landgren, Karin, ‘Deflecting international protection by treaty: bilateral and multilateral accords on extradition, readmission and the inadmissibility of asylum requests’, New Issues in Refugee Research No. 10, UNHCR, Geneva, 1999.

Larsen, Kjetil M., ‘Territorial non-application of the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2009) 78 Nordic Journal of International Law73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lassen, Nina, and Hughes, Jane, ‘Safe Third Countries’: Policies in European Countries (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council, 1997).Google Scholar

Lassen, N., Selm, J. v., and Doomernik, J., ‘The transfer of protection status in the EU, against the background of the common European asylum system and the goal of a uniform status, valid throughout the Union, for those granted asylum’, European Commission, Brussels, 25 June 2004.

Lauterpacht, Elihu, and Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The scope and content of the principle of non-refoulement: opinion’, in Feller, E., Türk, V. and Nicholson, F. (eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 87–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the Permanent Court of Justice (New York: Longman, Green & Co., 1934).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice, 2nd edn (London: Stevens & Sons, Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, 516 UNTS 205).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Restrictive interpretation and the principle of effectiveness in the interpretation of treaties’, (Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 75 UNTS 287) 26 British Yearbook of International Law48–85.Google Scholar

Lavenex, Sandra, Safe Third Countries: Extending the EU Asylum and Immigration Policies to Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Central European University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Lavenex, Sandra, ‘Shifting up and out: the foreign policy of European immigration control’, (2006) 29 West European Politics329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavenex, Sandra, and Ucarer, Emek U., ‘The External Dimension of Europeanization: The Case of Immigration Policies’, (2004) 39 (4) Cooperation and Conflict417–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavenex, Sandra, and Ucarer, Emek U. (eds.), Migration and the Externalities of European Integration (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002).Google Scholar

Lawson, Rick, ‘Out of control – state responsibility and human rights: will the ILC's definition of the “act of state” meet the challenges of the nation state in the 21st century?’, in Castermans-Holleman, M. C., Hoof, G. and Smith, J. (eds.), The Role of the Nation State in the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Peter Baehr (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998), pp. 91–116.Google Scholar

Lawson, Rick, ‘Life after Banković: on the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 83–123.Google Scholar

Lawson, Rick, ‘The concept of jurisdiction in the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Slot, P. J. and Bulterman, M. (eds.), Globalisation and Jurisdiction (Leiden: Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 202–18.Google Scholar

Lawson, Rick, ‘Moving beyond Banković: the gradually expanding reach of the European Convention on Human Rights’, paper presented at International Society for Military Law and the Law of War, XVIIth Congress, Scheveningen, 16–21 May 2006.

Leander, Anna, Eroding State Authority? Private Military Companies and the Legitimate Use of Force (Rome: Centro Militare di Studi Strategici, 2006).Google Scholar

Leander, Anna, ‘The impunity of private authority: understanding PSC accountability’, paper presented at Standing Group of International Relations, ECPR, University of Turin, 12–15 September 2007.

Leben, Charles, ‘Symposium: the changing structure of international law revisited: by way of introduction’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law399–408.Google Scholar

Legomsky, Stephen H., ‘Secondary refugee movements and the return of asylum seekers to third countries: the meaning of effective protection’, (2003) 15 International Journal of Refugee Law567–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legomsky, Stephen H., ‘The USA and the Caribbean interdiction programme’, (2006) 18 International Journal of Refugee Law677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehnart, Chia, ‘Private military companies and state responsibility’, IILJ Working Paper 2007/2, Institute for International Law and Justice, New York University School of Law, New York, 2007.

Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Soering case’, (1991) 85 American Journal of International Law128–49.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, Ulf, Om tolkningen av traktater (Lund: Lund University, 2001).Google Scholar

Lindsnæs, Birgit, and Lindholdt, Lone, ‘National human rights institutions: standard setting and achievements’, in Stokke, H. and Tostensen, A. (eds.), Human Rights Development Yearbook 1998 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar

Logan, Charles H., Private Prisons: Cons and Pros (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Longo, Michael, Constitutionalising Europe: Processes and Practices (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar

Lorenzen, Peer, Rehof, Lars A., Trier, Troels, Holst-Christensen, Nina, and Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention: med kommentarer (art 1–10) (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2003).Google Scholar

Loucaides, Loukis G., ‘Determining the extra-territorial effect of the European Convention: facts, jurisprudence and the Banković case’, (2006) 4 European Human Rights Law Review391–407.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Jurisdiction’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 335–60.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucht, Hans, ‘Ud af den globale verdens skygger’, (2007) (2) Den Ny Verden73–82.

Lutterbeck, Derek, ‘Policing Migration in the Mediterranean’, (2006) 11 (1) Mediterranean Politics59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, M., Forced Back: International Refugee Protection in Theory and Practice (Washington, DC: Refugees International, 2004).Google Scholar

McAdam, Jane, ‘Seeking asylum under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: a case for complementary protection’, (2006) 14 International Journal of Children's Rights251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAdam, Jane, Complementary Protection in International Refugee Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert, and Forgia, Rebecca, ‘Taking off the blindfolds: torture by non-state actors’, (2001) 1 Human Rights Law Review189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert, and Simons, Penelope, ‘Responsibility beyond borders’, (2007) 70 Modern Law Review598–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Douglas, (ed.), Private Prisons and the Public Interest (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

McGoldrick, Dominic, ‘Extraterritorial effect of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004).Google Scholar

McKenzie, Evan, Privatopia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Magner, Tara, ‘The less than “Pacific” solution for asylum seekers in Australia’, (2004) 16 International Journal of Refugee Law53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law (Oxford: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Mandal, Ruma, ‘Protection mechanisms outside the 1951 Convention (“complementary protection”)’, Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, UNHCR, Geneva, 2005.

Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘Extending judicial control in international law: human rights treaties and extraterritoriality’, (2005) 9 International Journal of Human Rights147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matas, David, ‘Carrier sanctions: alternatives or amendments to existing legislation’, in Kjærum, M. (ed.), The Effects of Carrier Sanctions on the Asylum System (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council and the Danish Center of Human Rights, 1991), pp. 27–34.Google Scholar

Mathew, Penelope, ‘Australian refugee protection in the wake of the Tampa’, (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law661–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijers, H., ‘Possibilities for guaranteeing transport to refugees’, in Kjærum, M. (ed.), The Role of Airline Companies in the Asylum Procedure (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council, 1988), pp. 16–23.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, ‘Extraterritoriality of human rights treaties’, (1995) 89 American Journal of International Law78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milano, Enrico, Unlawful Territorial Situations in International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marco, ‘From compromise to principle: clarifying the concept of state jurisdiction in human rights treaties’, (2008) 8 Human Rights Law Review411–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miltner, Barbara, ‘Rescue-at-sea and maritime interceptions: issues of refugee protection’, paper presented at Talking across Borders: New Dialogues in Forced Migration Studies, 10th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration, Centre for Refugee Studies, York University, Toronto, 18–22 June 2005.

Miltner, Barbara, ‘Case comment: broadening the scope of extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2007) 2 European Human Rights Law Review172–82.Google Scholar

Mohamedou, Mohammad-Mahmoud, ‘The effectiveness of national human rights institutions’, in Lindsnæs, B., Lindholdt, L. and Yigen, K. (eds.), National Human Rights Institutions: Articles and Working Papers (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2001), pp. 49–58.Google Scholar

Mole, Nuala, ‘Case analysis: Issa v. Turkey: delineating the extra-territorial effect of the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2005) European Human Rights Law Review86–91.

Morgenthau, Hans J., ‘The problem of sovereignty reconsidered’, (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UNGA Res. 217A(III)) 48 Columbia Law Review341–65.Google Scholar

Morris, Jessica, ‘The spaces in between: American and Australian interdiction policies and their implications for the refugee protection regime’, (2003) 21 (4) Refuge51–62.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Frances, ‘Implementation of the Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Act 1987: privatising immigration functions at the expense of international obligations', (1997) 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly586–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, Frances, and Türk, Volker, ‘Refugee protection in international law: an overview’, in Feller, E., Türk, V. and Nicholson, F. (eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Nicolaidis, Kalypso, and Tong, Joyce L., ‘Diversity or cacophony? The continuing debate of new sources of international law’, (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law1349–75.Google Scholar

Niessen, Jan, and Schibel, Yongmi, ‘International migration and relations with third countries: European and US approaches’, MPG Occasional Paper, Migration Policy Group, Berlin, May 2004.

Noll, Gregor, Negotiating Asylum: The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2000).Google Scholar

Noll, Gregor, ‘Visions of the exceptional: legal and theoretical issues raised by transit processing centres and protection zones’, (2003) 5 European Journal of Migration and Law303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noll, Gregor, ‘Seeking asylum at embassies: a right to entry under international law?’, (2005) 17 International Journal of Refugee Law542–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noll, Gregor, ‘Asylum claims and the translation of culture into politics’, (2006) 41 Texas International Law Journal491–501.Google Scholar

Noll, Gregor, ‘The politics of saving lives: interception, search and rescue and the question of human rights at sea’, paper presented at The Future of Asylum Policy in the European Union, Turku, 10 October 2006.

Noll, G., Fagerlund, J., and Liebaut, F., ‘Study on the feasibility of processing asylum claims outside the EU against the background of the common European asylum system and goal of a common asylum procedure’, European Commission, 2003.

Noll, G., and Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Non-communitarians: refugee and asylum policies’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The European Union and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Nowak, Manfred, UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary (Kehl am Rhein: Engel, 1993).Google Scholar

O'Boyle, Richard, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: a comment on life after Banković’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004).Google Scholar

Okoth-Obbo, Georges, ‘Coping with a complex refugee crisis in Africa: issues, problems and constraints for refugee and international law’, in Gowlland-Debbas, V. (ed.), The Problem of Refugees in the Light of Contemporary International Law: Papers Presented at the Colloquium Organized by the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva 26 and 27 May 1994 (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996).Google Scholar

Olmstead, Cecil J. (ed.), Extra-territorial Application of Laws and Responses Thereto (Oxford: International Law Association/ESC Publishing, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1465 UNTS 85).Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa, Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edn (Harlow: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Restrictive interpretation of human rights treaties in the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law529–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osbourne, Davis, and Gaebler, Ted, Reinventing Government (New York: Addison-Wesley, 1992).Google Scholar

Palan, Ronen, ‘Tax havens and the commercialization of state sovereignty’, (2002) 56 International Organization151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palan, Ronen, The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places and Nomad Millionaires (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Pastore, Ferruccio, ‘Aeneas’ route: Euro-Mediterranean relations and international migration', in Lavenex, S. and Ucarer, E. M. (eds.), Migration and the Externalities of European Integration (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 105–23.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Michael Purchardt, ‘Territorial Jurisdiction in Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2004) 73 Nordic Journal of International Law279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellet, Alain, ‘“Human rightism” and international law’, (2000) Italian Yearbook of International Law3–16.

Peral, Luis, ‘EU protection scheme for refugees in the region of origin: problems of conditionality and coherence’, paper presented at ESIL Research Forum on International Law: Contemporary Issues, Geneva, 26–28 May 2005.

Plender, Richard, and Mole, Nuala, ‘Beyond the Geneva Convention: constructing a de facto right of asylum from international human rights instruments’, in Nicholson, F. and Twomey, P. (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 81–105.Google Scholar

Pugh, Michael, ‘Drowning not waving: boat people and humanitarianism at sea’, (2004) 17 Journal of Refugee Studies50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘The changing international framework for dealing with non-state actors’, in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-state Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 37–89.Google Scholar

Reydams, Luc, Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Riedel, Eibe, ‘Standards and sources: farewell to the exclusivity of the sources triad in international law’, (1991) 2 European Journal of International Law58–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rijpma, Jorrit J., ‘Building borders: the regulatory framework for the management of the external border of the European Union’, doctoral dissertation, European University Institute, Florence, 2009.

Robinson, Nehemiah, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: Its History, Contents and Interpretation – A Commentary (New York: Institute for Jewish Affairs, 1953).Google Scholar

Rodger, Jessica, ‘Defining the parameters of the non-refoulement principle’, LLM research paper international law, Faculty of Law, Victoria University, Wellington, 2001.

Rodier, Claire, ‘Analysis of the external dimension of the EU's asylum and immigration policies’, European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Directorate B – Policy Department, 2006.

Ross, Alf, Lærebog i Folkeret, 4th edn (Copenhagen: Munksgaards Forlag, 1961).Google Scholar

Roxstrom, Erik, Gibney, M., and Einarsen, T., ‘The NATO bombing case (Banković et al. v. Belgium et al.) and the limits of Western human rights protection’, (2005) 23 Boston University International Law Journal56–136.Google Scholar

Rozental, S., ‘Om komplementaritet i atomfysikken’, (1955) Fysisk Tidsskrift325–42.

Rudolph, Christopher, ‘Globalization and security: migration and the evolving conceptions of security in statecraft and scholarship’, (2003) 13 (1) Security Studies1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruff, Anne, ‘The Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Act 1987: its implications for refugees and airlines', (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3) 1 International Journal of Refugee Law481–500.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations’, (1993) 47 (1) International Organization139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutinwa, Bonaventure, ‘The end of asylum? The changing nature of refugee policies in Africa’, New Issues in Refugee Research Working Paper No. 5, UNHCR, Geneva, 1999.

Sakellaropoulos, Spyros, ‘Towards a declining state? The rise of the headquarters state’, (2007) 71 (1) Science and Society7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salcedo, Juan A. C., ‘Reflections on the existence of a hierarchy of norms in international law’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salter, Mark B., ‘Governmentalities of an airport: heterotopia and confession’, (2007) 1 (1) International Political Sociology49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samers, Michael, ‘An emerging geopolitics of illegal immigration in the European Union’, (2004) 6 (1) European Journal of Migration and Law27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Scheinin, Martin, ‘State responsibility, good governance and indivisible human rights’, in Sano, H.-O. and Alfredsson, G. (eds.), Human Rights and Good Governance: Building Bridges (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002), pp. 29–45.Google Scholar

Scheinin, Martin, ‘Extraterritorial effect of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M. T. (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 73–82.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum (New York: Telos Press, 2003 [1950]).Google Scholar

Scholten, Sophie, and Minderhoud, Paul, ‘Regulating immigration control: carrier sanctions in the Netherlands’, (2008) 10 European Journal of Migration and Law123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schutter, Olivier, ‘Extraterritorial jurisdiction as a tool for improving the human rights accountability of transnational corporations’, Background paper to the SRSG on human rights and transnational corporations, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, New York, 2006.

Schwarz, Rolf, and Jütersonke, Oliver, ‘Divisible sovereignty and the reconstruction of Iraq’, (2005) 26 Third World Quarterly649–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scobbie, Ian, ‘The theorist as a judge: Hersch Lauterpacht's concept of the international judicial function’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law264–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selm, Joanne, ‘Access to procedures, “safe third countries”, “safe countries of origin” and “time limits”’, Global Consultations on International Protection, Third Track, Background Paper, UNHCR, Geneva, 2001.

Shahabuddeen, Mohammed, ‘Developing countries and the idea of international law’, in Macdonald, R. (ed.), Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994), pp. 721–36.Google Scholar

Sianni, Areti, ‘Interception practices in Europe and their implications’, (2003) 21 (4) Refuge25–34.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘International human rights and general international law: a comparative analysis’, in Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Vol. 4, Book 2 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995), pp. 153–236.Google Scholar

Singer, Peter W., Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Singer, Peter W., ‘War, profits, and the vacuum of law: privatized military firms and international law’, (2004) 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law521–49.Google Scholar

Sinha, S. Prakash, Asylum and International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skogly, Sigrun, Beyond National Borders: States' Human Rights Obligations in International Cooperation (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2006).Google Scholar

Skogly, Sigrun, and Gibney, Mark, ‘Transnational human rights obligations’, (2002) 24 Human Rights Quarterly781–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Brian D., State Responsibility and the Marine Environment: The Rules of Decision (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Sørensen, G., ‘Sovereignty: change and continuity in a fundamental institution’, (1999) 47 Political Studies590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiermann, Ole, Enten & Eller: Studier i suverænitetsbegreber (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 1995).Google Scholar

Spiermann, Ole, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiermann, Ole, Moderne Folkeret, 3rd edn (Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2006).Google Scholar

Spijkerboer, Thomas, ‘The human cost of border control’, (2007) 9 European Journal of Migration and Law127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Henry, ‘International protection of human rights’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 753–82.Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry and Alston, Philip (eds.), International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Sterkx, Steven, ‘Curtailing the comprehensive approach: governance export in EU asylum and migration policy’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Uppsala, 13–18 April 2004.

Steyn, Johan, ‘Guantánamo Bay: the legal black hole’, (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stuart, Allison, ‘The inter-American system of human rights and refugee protection: post 11 September 2001’, (2005) 24 (2) Refugee Survey Quarterly67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sur, Serge, ‘The state between fragmentation and globalization’, (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takkenberg, A., and Tahbaz, C., The Collected Travaux Préparatoires of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Amsterdam: Dutch Refugee Council, 1990).Google Scholar

Taylor, Savitri, ‘Australia's implementations of its non-refoulement obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, (1994) 17 University of New South Wales Law Journal432–74Google Scholar

Taylor, Savitri, ‘Protection elsewhere/nowhere’, (2006) 181 International Journal of Refugee Law283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Günther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘State responsibility and the country of origin’, in Gowlland-Debbas, V. (ed.), The Problem of Refugees in the Light of Contemporary International Law Issues (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996), pp. 59–80.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Turner, Simon, Munive, Jairo, and Sørensen, Ninna N., ‘European attitudes and policies towards the migration/development nexus’, in Sørensen, N. N. (ed.), Mediterranean Transit Migration (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2006), pp. 67–100.Google Scholar

Turpin, James, ‘The jurisdictional art of separation: the role of jurisdiction in the management of territorial and self-determination disputes – mixed jurisdiction in the Anglo-French condominium of the New Hebrides 1906–1980’, doctoral dissertation, European University Institute, Florence, 2002.

,UNHCR, The State of the World's Refugees: In Search of Solutions (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

,UNHCR, The State of the World's Refugees: Human Displacement in the New Millennium (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Vandvik, Bjarte, ‘Extraterritorial border controls and responsibility: a view from ECRE’, (2008) Amsterdam Law Forum27–36.

Vattel, E., The Law of Nations (Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson & Co., 1883).Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Transporters’ responsibilities under the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation', in Kjærum, M. (ed.), The Role of Airline Companies in the Asylum Procedure (Copenhagen: Danish Refugee Council, 1988), pp. 14–16.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Sanktioner mod transportselskaber med “inadmissible passengers”’, (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3) 71 Juristen219–33.Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Privatiseret Retshåndhævelse og Kontrol’, in Adrian, L. (ed.), Ret og Privatisering (Copenhagen: Gad Jura, 1995).Google Scholar

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Europe's response to the arrival of asylum seekers: refugee protection and immigration control’, New Issues in Refugee Research No. 6, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, 1999.

Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, ‘Non-admission policies and the right to protection: refugees’ choice vs. states' exclusion?', in Nicholson, F. and Twomey, P. (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 269–88.Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred, and Simma, Bruno, Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1465 UNTS 85).Google Scholar

Verkuil, Paul R., Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do about It (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Neil, ‘Late sovereignty in the European Union’, in Walker, N. (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

Wasem, Ruth Ellen, ‘Cuban migration policy and issues’, CRS Report for Congress RS20468, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, 2007.

Watson, James Shand, Theory and Reality in the International Protection of Human Rights (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1999).Google Scholar

Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards relative normativity in international law?’, (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law413–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiner, Myron, ‘Ethics, national sovereignty and the control of immigration’, (1996) 30 International Migration Review171–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weinzierl, Ruth, Border Management and Human Rights: A Study of EU Law and the Law of the Sea (Berlin: Deutches Institut für Menchenrechte, 2007).Google Scholar

Weis, Paul, The Refugee Convention, 1951: The Travaux Préparatoires Analysed with a Commentary by the Late Dr Paul Weis (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Werlau, Maria C., ‘International law and other considerations on the repatriation of the Cuban balseros by the United States’, (2004) 14 Cuba in Transition202–12.Google Scholar

Werner, Wouter, ‘State sovereignty and international legal discourse’, in Werner, W. and Dekker, I. F. (eds.), Governance and International Legal Theory (Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar

Werner, Wouter, and Wilde, Jaap, ‘The endurance of sovereignty’, (2001) 7 European Journal of International Relations283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilde, Ralph, ‘Legal “black hole”? Extraterritorial state action and international treaty law on civil and political rights’, (2005) 26 Michigan Journal of International Law739–806.Google Scholar

Wilde, Ralph, ‘Opinion: The “legal space” or “espace juridique” of the European Convention on Human Rights: is it relevant to extraterritorial state action?’, (2005) 2 European Human Rights Law Review115–24.Google Scholar

Willheim, Ernst, ‘MV Tampa: The Australian Response’, (2003) 15 International Journal of Refugee Law159–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiseberg, Laurie S., ‘The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the protection and enforcement of human rights’, in Symonides, J. (ed.), Human Rights: International Protection, Monitoring, Enforcement (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003), pp. 347–72.Google Scholar

Zolberg, Aristide, ‘The formation of new states as a refugee-generating process’, (1983) 467 (1) The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zolberg, Aristide, ‘Matters of State’, in Hirschman, C., Kasinitz, P. and DeWind, J. (eds.), The Handbook on International Immigration (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999), pp. 71–93.Google Scholar

Zolberg, Aristide, ‘Beyond the crisis’, in Benda, P. M. and Zolberg, A. (eds.), Global Migrants, Global Refugees (New York: Berghahn Books, 2001), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar