Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:33:39.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2022

Sally Sheldon ,
Gayle Davis ,
Jane O'Neill  and
Clare Parker
Sally Sheldon
Affiliation:
University of Bristol and University of Technology Sydney
Gayle Davis
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Jane O'Neill
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Clare Parker
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Abortion Act 1967
A Biography of a UK Law
 , pp. 306 - 335
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Abort67, ‘Why We Show Images’ (2014), http://abort67.co.uk/why_we_show_images [no longer available].Google Scholar
Abortion Law Reform Association, A Report on NHS Abortion Services (London: Abortion Law Reform Association, 1997).Google Scholar
Abse, Leo, Private Member (London: Macdonald, 1973).Google Scholar
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, Induced Abortion and Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the Mental Health Outcomes of Induced Abortion, Including Their Prevalence and Associated Factors (London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, 2011).Google Scholar
Ackroyd, Peter, London: The Biography (London: Chatto & Windus, 2000).Google Scholar
Aiken, Abigail, Lohr, Patricia A., Lord, Jonathan, Ghosh, Nabanita, and Starling, Jennifer, ‘Effectiveness, Safety and Acceptability of No-Test Medical Abortion Provided via Telemedicine: A National Cohort Study’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 128 no. 9 (2021), 1464–74.Google Scholar
All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, ‘A Report into Freedom of Conscience in Abortion Provision’ (2016), www.conscienceinquiry.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Pro-Life-APPG-Freedom-of-Conscience-in-Abortion-Provision.pdfGoogle Scholar
All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, ‘Foetal Sentience & Pain: An Evidence Review’ (2020), https://lordalton.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/2020-pro-life-appg-report-on-foetal-pain.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allen, Isobel, Counselling Services for Sterilisation, Vasectomy and Termination of Pregnancy (London: Policy Studies Institute, 1985).Google Scholar
Allen, Isobel, Family Planning, Sterilisation and Abortion Services (London: Policy Studies Institute, 1981).Google Scholar
Alton, David, ‘Truth Should Speak to Power – The 50th Anniversary of the Abortion Act’ (2017), https://davidalton.net/2017/10/27/truth-should-speak-to-power-the-50th-anniversary-of-the-abortion-act-text-of-a-speech-delivered-outside-of-the-british-parliament-on-the-50th-anniversary-of-legislation-that-has-claimed-more-than/Google Scholar
Alton, David, What Kind of Country? (Basingstoke: Marshall Pickering, 1988).Google Scholar
Alton, David with Holmes, Alison, Whose Choice Anyway? The Right to Life (Basingstoke: Marshall Pickering, 1988).Google Scholar
Amery, Fran, Beyond Pro-Life and Pro-Choice: The Changing Politics of Abortion in Britain (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Amery, Fran, ‘Social Questions, Medical Answers: Contesting British Abortion Law’, Social Politics, vol. 21 no. 1 (2013), 26–49.Google Scholar
Anitha, Sundari and Gill, Aisha K., ‘Making Politics Visible: Discourses on Gender and Race in the Problematisation of Sex-Selective Abortion’, Feminist Review, vol. 120 no. 1 (2018), 1–19.Google Scholar
Archbishop Cranmer, ‘Kevin (Lord) Shinkwin Appointed to Equality and Human Rights Commission’ (2017), https://archbishopcranmer.com/kevin-lord-shinkwin-equality-human-rights-commission/Google Scholar
Argent, Vincent and Pavey, Lin, ‘Can Nurses Legally Perform Surgical Induced Abortion?’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 33 no. 2 (2007), 79–82.Google Scholar
ARK, ‘Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey’ (2016), www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2016/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
ARK, ‘Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey, 2018’ (2019), www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2018/Google Scholar
Armstrong, Liz and McChlery, Anne, ‘No More Reservations About Abortion Rights: The Scottish Abortion Campaign Comments’, Engender, no. 16 (1997), 7.Google Scholar
Ashton, J. R., Chamberlain, A., Dennis, K. J., Rowe, R. G., Waters, W. E., and Wheeller, M. J., ‘The Wessex Abortion Studies: II. Attitudes of Consultant Gynaecologists to Provision of Abortion Services’, Lancet, vol. 315 no. 8160 (1980), 140–42.Google Scholar
Attar Taylor, Eleanor, ‘British Attitudes to Abortion’ (2017), www.natcen.ac.uk/blog/british-attitudes-to-abortionGoogle Scholar
Attar Taylor, Eleanor and Scott, Jacqueline, ‘Gender: New Consensus or Continuing Battleground?’ in Phillips, Daniel, Curtice, John, Phillips, Miranda and Perry, Jane (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 35th Report (London: The National Centre for Social Research, 2018), pp. 56–85.Google Scholar
Back Off Scotland, ‘About’ (2021), www.backoffscotland.comGoogle Scholar
Baird, Dugald, ‘A Fifth Freedom?’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5471 (1965), 1141–48.Google Scholar
Baird, Dugald, ‘Abortion Games’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7734 (1971), 1145.Google Scholar
Baird, Dugald, ‘The Abortion Act 1967: The Advantages and Disadvantages’, Royal Society of Health Journal, vol. 90 no. 6 (1970), 291–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, Anthony and Rush, Michael, The Member of Parliament and His Information (London: Allen & Unwin, 1970).Google Scholar
Baulieu, Etienne-Emile, The Abortion Pill (London: Century, 1992).Google Scholar
Bazlinton, Chris and Cowen, Anne, The Guardian Directory of Pressure Groups and Representative Organisations (London: Wilton House Publications, 1976).Google Scholar
BBC, ‘Gay Britannia’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05bbtf2Google Scholar
BBC, ‘Abortion on Trial’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09b1z7nGoogle Scholar
BBC Radio 5, ‘Sarah Ewart’s Abortion Journey from Northern Ireland’ (2013), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01jmx4xGoogle Scholar
BBC Radio 4, ‘Born with Down’s’ (2008), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00fkx0mGoogle Scholar
BBC Radio 4, ‘The Moral Maze: 50 Years of the Abortion Act’ (2017), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097c1g3Google Scholar
BBC Radio 4, ‘The Reunion: Stonewall’ (2009), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mpmm4Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Berer, Marge, ‘Abortion Notification Forms’, Lancet, vol. 319 no. 8276 (1982), 857.Google Scholar
Berić, Berislav M. and Kupresanin, Milan, ‘Vacuum Aspiration Using Pericervical Block for Legal Abortion as an Outpatient Procedure up to the 12th Week of Pregnancy’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7725 (1971), 619–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berne, Eric, Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships (London: Penguin, 1964).Google Scholar
Bianchi, Diana W., Oepkes, Dick, and Ghidini, Alessandro, ‘Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis 1: Should Noninvasive DNA Testing Be the Standard Screening Test for Down Syndrome in All Pregnant Women?’, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 34 no. 1 (2014), 6–11.Google Scholar
Bigman, Fran, ‘Abortion in American Film since 2001’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology (2017), https://oxfordre.com/criminology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-16Google Scholar
Black, Julia, My Foetus (Channel 4, 2004).Google Scholar
Black, Julia, ‘Regulatory Conversations’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 29 no. 1 (2002), 163–96.Google Scholar
BMA, ‘Agenda of Annual Representative Meeting’, British Medical Journal (17 June 1978) 1633.Google Scholar
BMA, The Removal of Criminal Sanctions for Abortion: BMA Position Paper (London: British Medical Association, 2019).Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon, Devolution in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Boothroyd, Betty, Betty Boothroyd: The Autobiography (London: Arrow, 2001).Google Scholar
Bourne, Aleck, A Doctor’s Creed: Memoirs of a Gynaecologist (London: Gollancz, 1962).Google Scholar
Boutwood, Anne, ‘The Effect of the Act on Gynaecological Practice’ in Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969), pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
Bovey, Nigel, ‘MP Calls for Lower Abortion Time Limit’, The War Cry: Fighting for Hearts and Souls, no. 6812 (2007), 4–5.Google Scholar
Boyle, Mary and McEvoy, Jane, ‘Putting Abortion in Its Social Context: Northern Irish Women’s Experiences of Abortion in England’, Health, vol. 2 no. 3 (1998), 283–304.Google Scholar
BPAS, Abortion: Trusting Women to Decide and Doctors to Practice (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2015).Google Scholar
BPAS, ‘Back Off’ (2014), https://back-off.org/Google Scholar
BPAS, ‘BPAS Launches Emergency Abortion Pills by Post for Women in Northern Ireland amid Shameful Political Gameplay with Women’s Health during the Covid-19 Pandemic’ (2020), www.bpas.org/about-our-charity/press-office/press-releases/bpas-launches-emergency-abortion-pills-by-post-for-women-in-northern-ireland-amid-shameful-political-gameplay-with-women-s-health-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/Google Scholar
BPAS, Britain’s Abortion Law: What It Says and Why (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2013), www.reproductivereview.org/images/uploads/Britains_abortion_law.pdfGoogle Scholar
BPAS, ‘JR76 Case Report’ (c. 2018), www.bpas.org/media/3060/jr76-case-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
BPAS, ‘Medically Complex Women and Abortion Care’ (2018), www.bpas.org/media/2074/briefing-medically-complex-women-and-abortion-care.pdfGoogle Scholar
BPAS, ‘We Trust Women: About the Campaign’ (2019), https://wetrustwomen.org.uk/about-the-campaign/Google Scholar
Brazier, Alex and Fox, Ruth, ‘Enhancing the Backbench MP’s Role As a Legislator: The Case for Urgent Reform of Private Members Bills’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 63 no. 1 (2010), 201–11.Google Scholar
Brewer, Colin and Huntingford, Peter J., ‘Mortality from Abortion: The NHS Record’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6136 (1978), 562.Google Scholar
Briggs, Eleanor M. and Mack, Alison E., ‘Termination of Pregnancy in the Unmarried’, Scottish Medical Journal, vol. 17 no. 12 (1972), 398–400.Google Scholar
Bristow, Jennie, ‘Misoprostol and the Transformation of the “Abortion Pill”’, Abortion Review (2011), www.abortionreview.org/index.php/site/article/908/ [no longer available].Google Scholar
British Humanist Association, ‘Health and Social Care Bill, 2010–2011 Report Stage: Nadine Dorries’ “Informed Consent” Amendments’ (2011), https://humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/bha-briefing-2011-health-social-care-bill.pdfGoogle Scholar
British Museum, ‘Desire, Love, Identity: Exploring LGBTQ Histories’ (2018), https://blog.britishmuseum.org/desire-love-identity-exploring-lgbtq-histories/Google Scholar
Brook, ‘Crisis Pregnancy Centres’ (2014), https://legacy.brook.org.uk/attachments/crisis_preg_centres_rept_10.2.14-2hiFINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brooke, Stephen, Sexual Politics: Sexuality, Family Planning and the British Left from the 1880s to the Present Day (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Brookes, Barbara, Abortion in England, 1900–1967 (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
Brown, Callum G., Religion and the Demographic Revolution: Women and Secularisation in Canada, Ireland, UK and USA since the 1960s (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Brown, Callum G., The Death of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularisation 1800–2000 (London and New York: Routledge, 2nd edition, 2009).Google Scholar
Bruce, Fiona (Chair), ‘Parliamentary Inquiry into Abortion on the Grounds of Disability’ (2013), https://dontscreenusout.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Abortion-and-Disability-Report-17-7-13.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve, British Gods: Religion in Britain since 1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Brudenell, Michael, ‘Foreword’ in Hordern, Anthony, Legal Abortion: The English Experience (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971), pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar
Bryan, Beverly, Dadzie, Stella, and Scafe, Suzanne, The Heart of the Race: Black Women’s Lives in Britain (London: Virago, 1985).Google Scholar
Cameron, I. T., Michie, A. F., and Baird, D. T., ‘Therapeutic Abortion in Early Pregnancy with Antiprogestogen RU486 Alone or in Combination with Prostaglandin Analogue (Gemeprost)’, Contraception, vol. 34 no. 5 (1986), 459–68.Google Scholar
Campbell, Emma and Clancy, Siobhan, ‘From Grassroots to Government: Arts Engagement Strategies in Abortion Access Activism in Ireland’ in MacQuarrie, Colleen, Bloomer, Fiona, Pierson, Claire, and Stettner, Shannon (eds), Crossing Troubled Waters: Abortion in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Prince Edward Island (Prince Edward Island: Island Studies Press, 2018), pp. 204–34.Google Scholar
Campbell, Stuart, ‘4D and Prenatal Bonding: Still More Questions than Answers’, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 27 no. 3 (2006), 243–44.Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission, ‘Findings of Termination of Pregnancy Inspections Published’ (2012), www.cqc.org.uk/content/findings-termination-pregnancy-inspections-publishedGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Patrick, Abortion and Other Pregnancy-Related Risk Factors in Female Breast Cancer (London: Pension and Population Research Institute, 2001).Google Scholar
Carson, W. G., ‘Symbolic and Instrumental Dimensions of Early Factory Legislation: A Case Study in the Social Origins of Criminal Law’ in Hood, Roger (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy (London: Heinemann, 1974), pp. 107–38.Google Scholar
Cates, Willard, Grimes, David A., and Schulz, Kenneth F., ‘The Public Health Impact of Legal Abortion: 30 Years Later’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 35 no. 1 (2003), 25–28.Google Scholar
CEDAW, Inquiry Concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 (New York: Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 2018).Google Scholar
Chalmers, Iain and Anderson, Anne, ‘Factors Affecting Gestational Age at Therapeutic Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 299 no. 7764 (1972), 1324–26.Google Scholar
Charnock, Hannah, ‘“This Haunting Sadness”: Press Coverage of John Corrie’s Abortion (Amendment) Bill, 1979–1980’, Women’s History, vol. 2 no. 5 (2016), 16–22.Google Scholar
Cheetham, Juliet, ‘The Lane Committee’, comments made at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled?, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Christian Concern, ‘Abortion at Home: A Mystery Client Investigation’ (2021), https://christianconcern.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CC-Resource-Abortion-At-Home-A-Mystery-Client-Investigation-201210.pdfGoogle Scholar
Christian Concern, ‘Abortion for “Any Reason” Other than Sex-Selection, Says BPAS’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/news/abortion-for-any-reason-other-than-sex-selection-says-bpas/Google Scholar
Christian Concern, ‘DIY Abortion Policy Led to Home Abortion at 28 Weeks’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/comment/diy-abortion-policy-led-to-home-abortion-at-28-weeks/Google Scholar
Christian Concern, ‘Targeted Abortion Campaign Launched’ (2008), https://archive.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/abortion/targeted-abortion-campaign-launchedGoogle Scholar
Christian Concern, ‘Why We’re Taking “DIY” Abortion Case to Court of Appeal’ (2020), https://christianconcern.com/comment/why-were-taking-diy-abortion-case-to-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar
Christians in Parliament, ‘Fiona Bruce MP’ (2021), www.christiansinparliament.org.uk/about/members-stories/fiona-bruce-mp/Google Scholar
Church of England Board for Social Responsibility, Abortion: An Ethical Discussion (London: Church Information Office, 1965).Google Scholar
Church of England and Child Poverty Action Group, ‘“No one Knows What the Future Can Hold”: The Impact of the Two-Child Limit after Three Years’ (2020), https://cpag.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/policypost/No-one-knows-what-the-future-can-hold-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Clark, M., Forstner, I., Pond, D. A., and Tredgold, R. F., ‘Sequels of Unwanted Pregnancy: A Follow-up of Patients Referred for Psychiatric Opinion’, Lancet, vol. 292 no. 7566 (1968), 501–03.Google Scholar
Clements, Ben, ‘Religion and the Sources of Public Opposition to Abortion in Britain: The Role of “Belonging”, “Behaving” and “Believing”’, Sociology, vol. 48 no. 2 (2014), 369–86.Google Scholar
Clements, Ben and Field, Clive D., ‘Abortion and Public Opinion in Great Britain: A 50-Year Retrospective’, Journal of Beliefs & Values, vol. 39 no. 4 (2018), 429–44.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Linda, Healing a Father’s Heart: A Post-Abortion Bible Study for Men (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1996).Google Scholar
Cochrane, Rosemary A. and Cameron, Sharon T., ‘Attitudes of Scottish Abortion Care Providers towards Provision of Abortion after 16 Weeks’ Gestation within Scotland’, European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, vol. 18 no. 3 (2013), 215–20.Google Scholar
Colvin, Madeleine, ‘The Legal Situation’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Commons Select Committee, ‘Formal Minutes – Science and Technology Committee (Commons)’ (c. 2019), https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/formal-minutes/Google Scholar
Condon, Guy and Hazard, Dave, Fatherhood Aborted: The Profound Effects of Abortion on Men (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2001).Google Scholar
Cook, Hera, The Long Sexual Revolution: English Women, Sex and Contraception, 1800–1975 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Corbyn, Jeremy, ‘50 Years Ago Today …’ (2017), https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/923869622193008641Google Scholar
Cornerstone Group, ‘About Us’ (n.d.), https://cornerstonegroup.wordpress.com/about/Google Scholar
Cossey, Dilys, ‘The Politics of the Abortion Pill: Breaking Down Barriers’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 52–57.Google Scholar
Cotterell, Roger, The Sociology of Law: An Introduction (London: Butterworths, 2nd edition, 1992).Google Scholar
Coulter, Colin, ‘Direct Rule and the Unionist Middle Classes’ in English, Richard and Walker, Graham S. (eds), Unionism in Modern Ireland (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 169–91.Google Scholar
Cowan, David and Wincott, Daniel, ‘Exploring the Legal’ in Cowan, David and Wincott, Daniel (eds), Exploring the ‘Legal’ in Socio-Legal Studies (London: Palgrave, 2015), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Crowter, Heidi, ‘Downright Discrimination: Stop the Govt Singling Out Disabled Babies’, CrowdJustice.com (2021), www.crowdjustice.com/case/downrightdiscrimination/Google Scholar
Curtice, John, Clery, Elizabeth, Perry, Jane, Phillips, Miranda, and Rahim, Nilufer (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 36th Report (London: The National Centre for Social Research, 2019).Google Scholar
Dabner, Jack Duane, The Silent Scream (American Portrait Films, 1984).Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger and Davis, Gayle, The Sexual State: Sexuality and Scottish Governance, 1950–80 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Davis, Gayle and Davidson, Roger, ‘“The Fifth Freedom” or “Hideous Atheistic Expediency”: The Medical Community and Abortion Law Reform in Scotland, c.1960–75’, Medical History, vol. 50 no. 1 (2006), 29–48.Google Scholar
Davis, Gayle, O’Neill, Jane, Parker, Clare, and Sheldon, Sally, ‘All Aboard the “Abortion Express”: Geographic Variability, Domestic Travel and the 1967 British Abortion Act’ in Sethna, Christabelle and Davis, Gayle (eds), Abortion across Borders: Transnational Travel and Access to Abortion Services (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
de Londras, Fiona, ‘“A Hope Raised and then Defeated”? The Continuing Harms of Irish Abortion Law’, Feminist Review, vol. 124 no. 1 (2020), 33–50.Google Scholar
Dee, Olivia, The Anti-Abortion Campaign in England, 1966–1989 (New York: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Deitch, Rodney, ‘Challenge Deferred over Abortion Notification Forms’, Lancet, vol. 319 no. 8271 (1982), 575–76.Google Scholar
Department of Health, ‘An Investigation into the BPAS Response into the Requests for Late Abortions – A Report from the CMO’ (2005), https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080728104226/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4119591Google Scholar
Department of Health, Guidance for Health and Social Care Professionals on Termination of Pregnancy in Northern Ireland (Belfast: DHSSPS, 2016).Google Scholar
Department of Health, Guidance in Relation to Requirements of the Abortion Act 1967 (London: Department of Health, 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Health, Letter from the CMO to PCT and SHA Chief Executives (21 September 2005), https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080728104226/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4119591Google Scholar
Department of Health, ‘Matching Department of Health Abortion Notifications and Data from the National Down’s Syndrome Cytogenetic Register, 2013’ (2015), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433397/DH_NDSCR_matching_report_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Health, The Limited Circumstances for a Lawful Termination of Pregnancy in NI: A Guidance Document for Health and Social Care Professionals on Law and Clinical Practice, draft version (Belfast: DHSSPS, 2013).Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Care, ‘Abortion Statistics 2020: Data Tables’ (2021), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/992250/abortion-statistics-2020-data-tables_Final.odsGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Care, ‘Sex Ratios at Birth in Great Britain, 2013-17’ (2019), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/837965/Sex_ratios_at_birth_in_GB__2013–17.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Care, ‘The Abortion Act 1967 – Approval of a Class of Places’ (2018), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/768059/Approval_of_home_use_for_the_second_stage_of_early_medical_abortion.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Care, ‘The Abortion Act 1967 – Approval of a Class of Places’ (2020), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/876740/30032020_The_Abortion_Act_1967_-_Approval_of_a_Class_of_Places.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Cmnd 9314 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1984).Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security, The Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material for Research: Report of the Advisory Group (Peel Report) (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1972).Google Scholar
Department of Justice, The Criminal Law on Abortion. Lethal Foetal Abnormality and Sexual Crime. A Consultation on Amending the Law by the Department of Justice (Belfast: Department of Justice, 2014).Google Scholar
Department of Justice, The Criminal Law on Abortion. Lethal Foetal Abnormality and Sexual Crime. Response to the Consultation and Policy Proposals (Belfast: Department of Justice, 2015).Google Scholar
Department of Justice and Department of Health, Report of the Working Group on Fatal Fetal Abnormality Healthcare and the Law on Termination of Pregnancy for Fatal Fetal Abnormality: Proposals to the Minister of Health and the Minister of Justice (2018), www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/report-fatal-fetal-abnormality-April-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Devlin, David, ‘Book for Burning?’, The General Practitioner (20 January 1978).Google Scholar
Devlin, Patrick, Easing the Passing: The Trial of Doctor John Bodkin Adams (London: Faber and Faber, 1986).Google Scholar
Dickens, Bernard, Abortion and the Law (London: MacGibbon & Key, 1966).Google Scholar
Diggory, P. L. C., ‘Some Experiences of Therapeutic Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 293 no. 7600 (1969), 873–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diplock, Kenneth, The Court as Legislators (Birmingham: Holdsworth Club, 1965).Google Scholar
Donald, Ian, ‘Naught for Your Comfort’, Journal of the Irish Medical Association, vol. 65 (1972), 279–89.Google Scholar
Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release: Woman with Down’s Syndrome Launches Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law’ (2020), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-woman-with-downs-syndrome-launches-landmark-case-against-uk-govt-over-discriminatory-abortion-law/Google Scholar
Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release: Woman with Down’s Syndrome’s Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law Plans to Go onto Court of Appeal’ (2021), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar
Don’t Screen Us Out, ‘Press Release – Woman with Down’s Syndrome’s Landmark Case against UK Govt over Discriminatory Abortion Law to Be Heard by Court of Appeal’ (2022), https://dontscreenusout.org/press-release-woman-with-downs-syndromes-landmark-case-against-uk-govt-over-discriminatory-abortion-law-to-be-heard-by-court-of-appeal/Google Scholar
Dubow, Sara, Ourselves Unborn: A History of the Fetus in Modern America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Dubuc, Sylvie and Coleman, David, ‘An Increase in the Sex Ratio of Births to India-Born Mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for Sex Selective Abortion’, Population and Development Review, vol. 33 no. 2 (2007), 383–400.Google Scholar
Dudley-Brown, Margaret, ‘The Duties of the GP under the Abortion Act’, in Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil, Elements of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Dyer, Clare, ‘Charity Did Not Break Law in Giving Information about Late Abortions’, British Medical Journal, vol. 331 no. 7519 (2005), 716.Google Scholar
Dyer, Clare, ‘Receptionists May Not Invoke Conscience Clause’, British Medical Journal, vol. 297 no. 6662 (1988), 1493–94.Google Scholar
Education for Choice, ‘The “Parliamentary Inquiry” on Abortion and Disability’ (2013), https://educationforchoice.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-parliamentary-inquiry-on-abortion.htmlGoogle Scholar
Edwards, John, The Attorney General, Politics and the Public Interest (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R., The Population Bomb (New York: Sierra Club/Ballantine Books, 1968).Google Scholar
Engender, ‘Joint Statement on Scotland Bill, Amendment EC56, “Abortion”’ (c. 2015), www.engender.org.uk/content/publications/Joint-statement-on-Scotland-Bill—NC56—Abortion.pdf [no longer available].Google Scholar
Enright, Máiréad, McNeilly, Kathryn, and de Londras, Fiona, ‘Abortion Activism, Legal Change, and Taking Feminist Law Work Seriously’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, vol. 71 no. 3 (2020), 359–85.Google Scholar
Evangelical Alliance, ‘Question Time’ (2015), www.eauk.org/idea/question-time.cfmGoogle Scholar
Evason, Eileen, Against the Grain: The Contemporary Women’s Movement in Northern Ireland (Dublin: Attic, 1991).Google Scholar
Fairweather, Eileen, ‘The Feelings behind the Slogans’, Spare Rib, no. 87 (1979), 26–30.Google Scholar
Fairweather, Eileen, McDonough, Roisín, and McFadyean, Melanie, Only the Rivers Run Free: Northern Ireland: The Women’s War (London: Pluto, 1984).Google Scholar
Farmer, Ann, ‘Abortion: Woman’s Right or Body Parts Industry?’, Catholic Medical Quarterly, vol. 64 no. 1 (2014), www.cmq.org.uk/CMQ/2014/Feb/abortion_body_parts.htmlGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Ann, By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control and the Abortion Campaign (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ferris, Paul, The Nameless: Abortion in Britain Today (London: Penguin, 1966).Google Scholar
Fiala, Christian and Arthur, Joyce H., ‘There Is No Defence for “Conscientious Objection” in Reproductive Health Care’, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 216 (2017), 254–58.Google Scholar
Fine, Alan, ‘The Ethics of Fetal Tissue Transplants’, The Hastings Center Report, vol. 18 no. 3 (1988), 5–8.Google Scholar
Fisher, Jane, ‘Post-24 Week Termination for Fetal Anomaly – The Chilling Effect of the Jepson Campaign’ in BPAS, Britain’s Abortion Law: What It Says, and Why (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2013), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
Flynn, Paul, How to Be an MP (London: Biteback Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar
Fowkes, F. G. R., Catford, J. C., and Logan, R. F. L., ‘Abortion and the NHS: The First Decade’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 6158 (1979), 217–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FPANI, Northern Ireland Women’s European Platform, and Alliance for Choice, Submission of Evidence to the CEDAW Committee Optional Protocol: Inquiry Procedure, Transitional Justice Institute Research Paper No. 15-01 (Jordanstown: Ulster University, 2015).Google Scholar
Francome, Colin, ‘Gynaecologists and Abortion in Northern Ireland’, Journal of Biosocial Sciences, vol. 26 (1994), 389–94.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, ‘Fetal Fascinations: New Dimensions to the Medical–Scientific Construction of Fetal Personhood’ in Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie (eds), Off Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (London: Harper Collins, 1991), pp. 190–205.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, Lury, Celia, and Stacey, Jackie (eds), Off Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (London: Harper Collins, 1991).Google Scholar
Freeman, Iris, Lord Denning: A Life (London: Hutchinson, 1993).Google Scholar
Friday, Adrian, ‘Charles Goodhart: A Twentieth Century Life’ (n.d.), www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/alumni/biographies-of-zoologists/charles-goodhart-a-twentieth-century-lifeGoogle Scholar
Furedi, Ann, ‘Our 10-Year Struggle to Improve Abortion Care’, Abortion Review, vol. 34 (2011), 1.Google Scholar
Furedi, Ann, The Moral Case for Abortion (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Galligan, Yvonne, ‘Women in Northern Ireland’s Politics: Feminising an “Armed Patriarchy”’ in Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda (eds), Representing Women in Parliament: A Comparative Study (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 204–20.Google Scholar
Gallup, ‘Abortion’ (2019), https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspxGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Wahlberg, Ayo, ‘Selective Reproductive Technologies’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 43 (2014), 201–16.Google Scholar
Ganatra, Bela, Gerdts, Caitlin, Rossier, Clémentine, Johnson, Brooke Ronald Jr, Tuncalp, Özge, Assifi, Anisa, Sedgh, Gilda, Singh, Susheela, Bankole, Akinrinola, Popinchalk, Anna, Bearak, Jonathan, Kang, Zhenning, and Alkema, Leontine, ‘Global, Regional, and Subregional Classification of Abortions by Safety, 2010–14: Estimates from a Bayesian Hierarchical Model’, Lancet, vol. 390 no. 10110 (2017), 2372–81.Google Scholar
Gardner, Greg, ‘Abortion and Breast Cancer – Is There a Link?’ Triple Helix (2003), www.cmf.org.uk/resources/publications/content/?context=article&id=1088Google Scholar
Geiringer, David, The Pope and the Pill: Sex, Catholicism and Women in Post-War England (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
General Synod of the Church of England, ‘Valuing People with Down’s Syndrome’, GS 2088 (2018), www.churchofengland.org/sites/default/files/2018-01/GS%202088%20-%20Valuing%20People%20with%20Down%27s%20Syndrome.pdfGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, The Transformation of Intimacy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gill, Robin, Theology Shaped by Society (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Gillings, Mark and Pollard, Joshua, ‘Non-portable Stone Artifacts and Contexts of Meaning’, World Archaeology, vol. 31 no. 2 (1999), 179–93.Google Scholar
Gillon, Raanon, ‘Ethics of Fetal Brain Cell Transplants’, British Medical Journal, vol. 296 no. 6631 (1988), 1212–13.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, P. R., ‘Glanville Llewelyn Williams 1911–1997’, Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 115 (2002), 411–35.Google Scholar
Go, Attie T. J. I., van Vugt, John M. G., and Oudejans, Cees B. M., ‘Non-invasive Aneuploidy Detection Using Free Fetal DNA and RNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Progress and Future Possibilities’, Human Reproduction Update vol. 17 no. 3 (2011), 372–82.Google Scholar
Goldthorp, W. O., ‘Ten Minute Abortions’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6086 (1977), 562–64.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gerald, The Criminal Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Green & Son, 1967).Google Scholar
Gosden, Chris and Marshall, Yvonne, ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’, World Archaeology, vol. 31 no. 2 (1999), 169–78.Google Scholar
Government Equalities Office, ‘New Commissioner for the Equality and Human Rights Commission’ (2017), www.gov.uk/government/news/new-commissioner-for-the-equality-and-human-rights-commissionGoogle Scholar
Government of the UK, ‘Temporary Approval of Home Use for Both Stages of Early Medical Abortion’ (2020), www.gov.uk/government/publications/temporary-approval-of-home-use-for-both-stages-of-early-medical-abortion [no longer available].Google Scholar
Gray, Ann-Marie, ‘Attitudes to Abortion in Northern Ireland’ (2017), www.ark.ac.uk/publications/updates/update115.pdf [no longer available].Google Scholar
Gray, Ann-Marie, Horgan, Goretti, and Devine, Paula, ‘Do Social Attitudes to Abortion Suggest Political Parties in Northern Ireland Are Out of Step with Their Supporters?’ (2018), www.ark.ac.uk/pdfs/Features/feature7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gray, Ann-Marie and Wellings, Kaye, ‘Is Public Opinion in Support of Decriminalisation?’ in Sheldon, Sally and Wellings, Kaye (eds), Decriminalising Abortion in the UK: What Would It Mean? (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020), pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
Green, Josephine M., ‘Obstetricians’ Views on Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination of Pregnancy: 1980 Compared with 1993’, British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 102 no. 3 (1995), 228–32.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Victoria and Young, Jock, Abortion in Demand (London: Pluto, 1976).Google Scholar
Gugenheim, Peter S. and Chandler, Barbara M., ‘Medical Examination of Patients Attending Registered Pregnancy Advice Bureaux’, Lancet, vol. 320 no. 8295 (1982), 436.Google Scholar
Gunn, M. J. and Smith, J. C., ‘Arthur’s Case and the Right to Life of a Down Syndrome Child’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1985 (1985), 705–15.Google Scholar
Hadley, Janet, Abortion: Between Freedom and Necessity (London: Virago, 1997).Google Scholar
Hadley, Janet, ‘The “Awfulisation” of Abortion’, Choices, vol. 26 no. 1 (1997), 7–8.Google Scholar
Halfmann, Drew, Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Hall, Lesley, Sex, Gender and Social Change in Britain since 1880 (London: Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar
Hallgarten, Lisa, ‘Abortion Narratives: Moving from Statistics to Stories’, Lancet, vol. 391 no. 10134 (2018), 1988–89.Google Scholar
Ham, Christopher, Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 4th edition, 1999).Google Scholar
Hamet, Camille and Robin, Serena, ‘Take the Boat’ (2015), https://m.imdb.com/title/tt4948196/Google Scholar
Hamill, Evelyn and Ingram, I. M., ‘Psychiatric and Social Factors in the Abortion Decision’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 5901 (1974), 229–32.Google Scholar
Han, Sallie, ‘Pregnant with Ideas: Concepts of the Fetus in the Twenty-First-Century United States’ in Han, Sallie, Betsinger, Tracy K., and Scott, Amy B. (eds), The Anthropology of the Fetus: Biology, Culture and Society (New York and Oxford: Berghahn, 2018), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol and Rawlings, Richard, Pressure through Law (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Harrington, John, ‘Of Paradox and Plausibility: The Dynamic of Change in Medical Law’, Medical Law Review, vol. 22 no. 3 (2014), 305–24.Google Scholar
Harrington, John, Towards a Rhetoric of Medical Law (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Harrington, John, Series, Lucy, and Ruck-Keene, Alexander, ‘Law and Rhetoric: Critical Possibilities’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 2 (2019), 302–27.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Abortion Law Reform: The English Experience’, Melbourne University Law Review, vol. 8 no. 3 (1972), 388–411.Google Scholar
Hayes, Graeme and Lowe, Pam, ‘“A Hard Enough Decision to Make”: Anti-Abortion Activism outside Clinics in the Eyes of Clinic Users, A Report on the Comments Made by BPAS Services Users’ (2015), www.aston.ac.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=256682Google Scholar
Hayward, Katy and McManus, Cathal, ‘Neither/Nor: The Rejection of Unionist and Nationalist Identities in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland’, Class and Capital, vol. 43 no. 1 (2019), 139–55.Google Scholar
Hervey, Tamara and Sheldon, Sally, ‘Abortion by Telemedicine in Northern Ireland: Patient and Professional Rights to Free Movement across Borders’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, vol. 68 no. 1 (2017), 1–33.Google Scholar
HESA, ‘Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2019/20’ (2021), www.hesa.ac.uk/news/27-01-2021/sb258-higher-education-student-statisticsGoogle Scholar
Hewson, Barbara, ‘Clinical Negligence: Denied Access’, Legal Week (7 December 2005).Google Scholar
HFEA, Donated Ovarian Tissue in Embryo Research and Assisted Conception: Public Consultation Document (London: HFEA, 1994).Google Scholar
Hill, Myrtle, Women in Ireland: A Century of Change (Belfast: Blackstaff Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Hindell, Keith, A Gilded Vagabond (Brighton: Book Guild Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar
Hindell, Keith and Simms, Madeleine, Abortion Law Reformed (London: Peter Owen, 1971).Google Scholar
Hodges, Mark, ‘UK Is Paying an Abortion Activist $600K+ to Write a Book about Abortion for Children’ (2017), www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-oks-600k-for-womens-activist-to-write-abortion-textbook-for-schoolkidsGoogle Scholar
Hoggart, Lesley, ‘Socialist Feminism, Reproductive Rights and Political Action’, Capital & Class, vol. 24 no. 1 (2000), 95–125.Google Scholar
Hoggart, Lesley, Newton, Victoria Louise, and Bury, Louise, ‘“Repeat Abortion”: A Phrase to be Avoided? Qualitative Insights into Labelling and Stigma’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 43 no. 1 (2017), 26–30.Google Scholar
Hoggett, A. J. C., ‘The Abortion Act 1967’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1968 (1968), 247–58.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Nick, Reicher, Steve, and Saleem, Jannat, ‘Constructing Women’s Psychological Health in Anti-Abortion Rhetoric’, The Sociological Review, vol. 44 no. 3 (1996), 539–64.Google Scholar
Hordern, Anthony, Legal Abortion: The English Experience (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Horgan, Goretti, ‘A Holy Alliance? Obstacles to Abortion Rights in Ireland North and South’ in Quilty, Aideen, Kennedy, Sinead, and Conlon, Catherine (eds), The Abortion Papers Ireland Vol. II (Dublin: Attic Press, 2015), pp. 244–55.Google Scholar
Horgan, Goretti and O’Connor, Julia S., ‘Abortion and Citizenship Rights in a Devolved Region of the UK’, Social Policy and Society, vol. 13 no. 1 (2014), 39–49.Google Scholar
Horobin, Gordon, Experience with Abortion: A Case Study of North-East Scotland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
House of Commons, First Report from the Select Committee on Abortion, 1975–1976, Vol. 1: Report, HC 573-I (1976).Google Scholar
House of Commons, Special Reports and Minutes of Evidence of the Select Committee on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill, 1974–1975, HC 692-II (1975).Google Scholar
House of Commons Committee on Standards, All-Party Parliamentary Groups Sixth Report of Session 2013–14, HC 357 (2013).Google Scholar
House of Commons Library, Women in Parliament and Government, Briefing Paper Number 01250 (2019).Google Scholar
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law: Fifth Report of Session 2004-5, HC7-I (2005).Google Scholar
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967: Twelfth Report of Session 2006–7, Vol. 1, HC 1045-I (2007).Google Scholar
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967: Twelfth Report of Session 2006–7, Vol. 2, HC 1045-II (2007).Google Scholar
House of Commons Social Services Committee, Abortion Act 1967 ‘Conscience Clause’, Tenth Report, HC 123 (1990).Google Scholar
House of Commons Standing Committee C, Minutes of Proceedings on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill, HC 494 (1977).Google Scholar
House of Commons Standing Committee C, Minutes of Proceedings on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill (1979).Google Scholar
House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, Abortion Law in Northern Ireland, Eighth Report of Session 2017–19, HC 1584 (2019).Google Scholar
House of Lords, Report of the Select Committee on the Infant Life (Preservation) Bill [H.L.], HL 50 (1987–1988).Google Scholar
House of Lords, Special Report with Evidence of the Select Committee on the Infant Life (Preservation) Bill [HL], HL 153 (1986–1987).Google Scholar
Human Developmental Biology Resource, ‘General Information’ (n.d.), www.hdbr.org/general-informationGoogle Scholar
Humanists UK, ‘Anti-Abortion Activist Resigns as Equality and Human Rights Commissioner’ (2017), https://humanism.org.uk/2017/12/13/anti-abortion-activist-resigns-as-equality-and-human-rights-commissioner/Google Scholar
Huntingford, Peter, ‘The Failure of the NHS: Why the Public & the NHS Need the Charities’ in Birth Control Trust (ed.), Abortion: The NHS and the Charities, A Symposium (London: Birth Control Trust, 1977), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
ICM Unlimited, Abortion Documentary Survey (2017), www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/OlOm-Abortion-Documentary-v2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Informing Choices NI, Strategic Plan 2020–2023 (Belfast: Informing Choices NI, 2020), https://informingchoicesni.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ICNI-STRATEGIC-PLAN-20-23.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ingram, I. M., ‘Abortion Games: An Inquiry into the Working of the Act’, Lancet, vol. 298 no. 7731 (1971), 969–70.Google Scholar
Irish Catholic, ‘Nuala O’Loan’ (2021), www.irishcatholic.com/author/nualaoloan/Google Scholar
Jackson, Lucy and Valentine, Gill, ‘Performing “Moral Resistance”? Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Activism in Public Space’, Space and Culture, vol. 20 no. 2 (2017), 225–31.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Lynn, ‘Changing Intimacy: Seeking and Forming Couple Relationships’ in Abrams, Lynn and Brown, Callum G. (eds), A History of Everyday Life in Twentieth-Century Scotland (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010), pp. 76–102.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. and Wilcox, Clyde, ‘Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 56 no. 4 (2003), 489–500.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Alice, Law for the Rich: A Plea for the Reform of the Abortion Law (London: Victor Gollancz, 1960).Google Scholar
Jepson, Joanna, ‘The Empty Hanger’, www.emptyhanger.co.uk/ [no longer available].Google Scholar
Jolly, Margaretta, ‘“The Feelings behind the Slogans”: Abortion Campaigning and Feminist Mood-Work Circa 1979’, New Formations, vol. 82 no.1 (2014), 100–13.Google Scholar
Jones, Cecily, ‘“Human Weeds, Not Fit to Breed?”: African Caribbean Women and Reproductive Disparities in Britain’, Critical Public Health, vol. 23 no. 1 (2013), 49–61.Google Scholar
Jones, Ian, ‘Setting Up Services’ in Furedi, Ann (ed.), Mifepristone in Practice. Running an Early Medical Abortion Service, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 22 April 1993 at the Royal Society of Medicine (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
Jülich, Solveig, ‘Lennart Nilsson’s Child Is Born: The Many Lives of a Best-Selling Pregnancy Advice Book’, Culture Unbound, Journal of Current Cultural Research, vol. 7 no. 4 (2015), 627–48.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Ben and Unnithan, Maya, ‘Arbitrating Abortion: Sex-Selection and Care Work among Abortion Providers in England’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 39 no. 6 (2020), 491–505.Google Scholar
Katz Rothman, Barbara, The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood (London: Pandora, 2nd edition, 1993).Google Scholar
Kelly, Richard, ‘Women Members of Parliament’, House of Commons Research Briefing (2019), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn066520/Google Scholar
Kennedy, Ian and Grubb, Andrew, Medical Law (London: Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2000).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Steven, ‘Two Child Limit in Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits’, House of Commons Research Briefing (2018), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2018-0263/Google Scholar
Keown, John, ‘“Miscarriage”: A Medico-Legal Analysis’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1984 (1984), 604–14.Google Scholar
Keown, John, Abortion, Doctors and the Law: Some Aspects of the Legal Regulation of Abortion in England from 1803 to 1982 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Keown, John, ‘“Morning After” Pills, “Miscarriage” and Muddle’, Legal Studies, vol. 25 no. 2 (2005), 296–319.Google Scholar
Kerslake, D. and Casey, D., ‘Abortion Induced by Means of the Uterine Aspirator’, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 30 no. 1 (1967), 35–45.Google Scholar
Kilday, Anne-Marie and Nash, David, ‘The Silent Scream of Shame? Abortion in Modern Britain’ in Kilday, Anne-Marie and Nash, David (eds), Shame and Modernity in Britain: 1890 to the Present (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 115–67.Google Scholar
Kind to Women, ‘How the 1967 Abortion Act Changes Our Lives’ (2018), www.kindtowomen.com/Google Scholar
Kirklin, Deborah, ‘The Role of Medical Imaging in the Abortion Debate’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 30 no. 5 (2004), 426.Google Scholar
Klein, Renate, Raymond, Janice G., and Dumble, Lynette, RU 486: Misconceptions, Myths and Morals (Melbourne: Spinifex, 1991).Google Scholar
Knight, Marian, Bunch, Kathryn, Tuffnell, Derek, Shakespeare, Judy, Kotnis, Rohit, Kenyon, Sara, and Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. (eds), Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2016–18 (Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2020).Google Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor, ‘The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process’ in Appadurai, Arjun (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 64–92.Google Scholar
Labour Party, ‘It’s Time for Real Change: The Labour Party Manifesto 2019’ (2019), https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Real-Change-Labour-Manifesto-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Labour Party, Report of the 74th Annual Conference of the Labour Party (Blackpool: Labour Party, 1975).Google Scholar
Lafitte, Francois, ‘How the Charities Fill the Gap’ in Birth Control Trust, Abortion: The NHS and the Charities, A Symposium (London: Birth Control Trust, 1977), pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
Lafitte, Francois, The Abortion Hurdle Race: The Role of the Doctor as a Taker of Abortion Decisions (Solihull: BPAS, 1975).Google Scholar
Lane, Elizabeth, Hear the Other Side (London: Butterworths, 1985).Google Scholar
Lane, Elizabeth (Chair), Report of the Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act (Lane Report), Cmnd. 5579 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1974).Google Scholar
Lawson, J. B., Yare, D., Barron, S. L., Querido, A. M. E., and Phillips, P. R., ‘Management of the Abortion Problem in an English City’, Lancet, vol. 308 no. 7998 (1976), 1288–91.Google Scholar
Lawson, Nigel, The View from No. 11: Memoirs of a Tory Radical (London: Bantam, 1992).Google Scholar
Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship, ‘Mission & Vision’ (2021), https://lawcf.org/about/mission-visionGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ellie, Abortion, Motherhood and Mental Health: Medicalizing Reproduction in the United States and Great Britain (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar
Lee, Ellie, ‘Constructing Abortion as a Social Problem: “Sex Selection” and the British Abortion Debate’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 27 no. 1 (2017), 15–33.Google Scholar
Lee, Ellie, ‘The Trouble with “Smiling” Fetuses’ (2003), www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/ocr_ethical_iss_1.phpGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ellie, ‘Young Women, Pregnancy, and Abortion in Britain: A Discussion of “Law in Practice”’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 18 no. 3 (2004), 283–304.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane, Women in Britain since 1945 (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Lewis, T. R. T., ‘The Abortion Act’, British Medical Journal, vol. 1 no. 5638 (1969), 241–42.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. R. T., ‘The Abortion Act (1967): Findings of an Inquiry into the First Year’s Working of the Act Conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5708 (1970), 529–35.Google Scholar
Liberal Democrats, ‘Stop Brexit, Build a Brighter Future: Manifesto 2019’ (2019), https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/libdems/pages/57333/attachments/original/1574258742/Lib_Dem_Manifesto_2019.pdf?1574258742Google Scholar
Litchfield, Michael and Kentish, Susan, Babies for Burning (London: Serpentine, 1974).Google Scholar
Liverpool Museums, ‘Coming Out’ (2017), www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/walker/exhibitions/arts-council-collection/coming-out/index.aspx [no longer available].Google Scholar
Lohr, Patricia A., Starling, Jennifer E., Scott, James G., and Aiken, Abigail R. A., ‘Simultaneous Compared with Interval Medical Abortion Regimens Where Home Use Is Restricted’, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 131 no. 4 (2018), 635–41.Google Scholar
Lord, Jonathan M., Regan, Lesley, Kasliwal, Asha, Massey, Louise, and Cameron, Sharon, ‘Early Medical Abortion’, BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 44 no. 3 (2018), 155–58.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, ‘Parliament, Pressure Groups, Networks and the Women’s Movement: The Politics of Abortion Law Reform in Britain (1967–83)’ in Lovenduski, Joni and Outshoorn, Joyce (eds), The New Politics of Abortion (London: Sage, 1986), pp. 231–56.Google Scholar
Lowe, Pam, ‘(Re)imagining the “Backstreet”: Anti-Abortion Campaigning Against Decriminalisation in the UK’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 24 no. 2 (2019), 203–18.Google Scholar
Lowe, Pam and Hayes, Graeme, ‘Anti-Abortion Clinic Activism, Civil Inattention and the Problem of Gendered Harassment’, Sociology, vol. 53 no. 2 (2019), 330–46.Google Scholar
Lowe, Pam and Page, Sarah-Jane, ‘“On the Wet Side of the Womb”: The Construction of “Mothers” in Anti-Abortion Activism in England and Wales’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 26 no. 2 (2019), 165–80.Google Scholar
Lowe, Pam and Page, Sarah-Jane, ‘Rights-Based Claims Made by UK Anti-Abortion Activists’, Health and Human Rights, vol. 21 no. 2 (2019), 133–44.Google Scholar
Löwy, Ilana, ‘Prenatal Diagnosis, Surveillance and Risk’ in Hopwood, Nick, Flemming, Rebecca, and Kassell, Lauren (eds), Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 567–80.Google Scholar
Löwy, Ilana, ‘Prenatal Diagnosis: The Irresistible Rise of the “Visible Foetus”’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 47 part B (2014), 290–99.Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah, The Social Worlds of the Unborn (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2013).Google Scholar
Macintyre, Sally, Single and Pregnant (London: Croom Helm, 1977).Google Scholar
MacLeod, Harris, ‘82% Aware of Mad Nad’ (2012), https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2012/11/23/82-aware-mad-nadGoogle Scholar
Mansour, Diana and Stacey, Linda, ‘Abortion Methods’ in Paintin, David (ed.), Abortion Services in England and Wales (London: BCT and PAS, 1990), pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
Marsh, David and Chambers, Joanna, Abortion Politics (London: Junction Books, 1981).Google Scholar
Marshall, Kate, Real Freedom (London: Junius, 1982).Google Scholar
Marteau, Theresa M. and Drake, Harriet, ‘Attributions for Disability: The Influence of Genetic Screening’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 40 no. 8 (1995), 1127–32.Google Scholar
McAnulla, Stuart, ‘Secular Fundamentalists? Characterising the New Atheist Approach to Secularism, Religion and Politics’, British Politics, vol. 9 no. 2 (2014), 124–45.Google Scholar
McCormick, Leanne, ‘“No Sense of Wrongdoing”: Abortion in Belfast 1917–1967’, Journal of Social History, vol. 49 no. 1 (2015), 125–48.Google Scholar
McCormick, Leanne, Regulating Sexuality: Women in Twentieth-Century Northern Ireland (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
McCormick, Leanne, ‘“The Scarlet Woman in Person”: The Establishment of a Family Planning Service in Northern Ireland, 1950–1974’, Social History of Medicine, vol. 21 no. 2 (2008), 345–60.Google Scholar
McCormick, Leanne and O’Connell, Sean with Dee, Olivia and Privilege, John, Mother and Baby Homes and Magdalene Laundries in Northern Ireland, 1922–1990 (Belfast: Northern Ireland Department of Health, 2021).Google Scholar
McCullagh, Peter, Fetal Sentience (London: All-Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, 1996).Google Scholar
McGivern, Marie-Thérèse, Abortion in Northern Ireland (1980) reprinted in Bourke, Angela, Kilfeather, Siobhán, Luddy, Maria, Mac Curtain, Margaret, Meaney, Gerardine, Ni Dhonnchadha, Máirín, O’Dowd, Mary, and Wills, Clair (eds), The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing Volume V: Irish Women’s Writing and Traditions (Cork: Cork University Press and Field Day, 2002), pp. 390–91.Google Scholar
McGrane, F. and Nicholls, J., ‘Tribunal on Abortion Rights’, Spare Rib, no. 56 (1977), 26–27.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Sheelagh, ‘A Guerrilla Strategy for a Pro-Life England’, Law, Innovation and Technology, vol. 7 no. 2 (2015), 283–314.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Sheelagh and Thomson, Michael, ‘Medicine and Abortion Law: Complicating the Reforming Profession’, Medical Law Review, vol. 23 no. 2 (2015), 177–99.Google Scholar
McLaren, Hugh, ‘The Abortion Bill’, Lancet, vol. 289 no. 7489 (1967), 565–66.Google Scholar
McNay, M. B. and Fleming, J. E., ‘Forty Years of Obstetric Ultrasound 1957–97’, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 25 no. 1 (1999), 3–56.Google Scholar
Medical Protection Society, The Abortion Act 1967: Proceedings of a Symposium Held by the Medical Protection Society, in Collaboration with the RCGP at the RCOG (London: Pitman, 1969).Google Scholar
Millar, Erica, Happy Abortions: Our Bodies in the Era of Choice (London: Zed Books, 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of Truth, ‘The Anti-Abortion Lobby’s Sham Parliamentary Inquiry’ (2013), www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/03/06/the-anti-abortion-lobbys-sham-parliamentary-inquiry/Google Scholar
Mohler, Albert, ‘Carnage in the Womb: An Abortion Scandal Rocks Britain’ (2004), https://albertmohler.com/2004/10/18/carnage-in-the-womb-an-abortion-scandal-rocks-britain/Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Conscientious Objection: Personal and Professional Ethics in the Public Square’, Medical Law Review, vol. 23 no. 2 (2015), 200–20.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Doctors’ Handmaidens: The Legal Contribution’ in McVeigh, Shaun and Wheeler, Sally (eds), Law, Health and Medical Regulation (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1992).Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jonathan, ‘Law and the Demoralisation of Medicine’, Legal Studies, vol. 26 no. 2 (2006), 185–210.Google Scholar
Moon, David S., Thompson, Jennifer, and Whiting, Sophie, ‘Lost in the Process? The Impact of Devolution on Abortion Law in the United Kingdom’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 21 no. 4 (2019), 728–45.Google Scholar
Moorehead, J., ‘Boycott Call for Abortion Pill Firm's Products’ in National Abortion Campaign (ed.), RU486: A Collection of Articles and Press Cuttings on the ‘Abortion Pill’ (London: National Abortion Campaign, n.d.).Google Scholar
Morgan, Lynn M., ‘Properly Disposed of: A History of Embryo Disposal and the Changing Claims on Fetal Remains’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 21 no. 3–4 (2002), 247–74.Google Scholar
Morris, Anne E. and Jones, M. A., Blackstone’s Statutes on Medical Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10th edition, 2019).Google Scholar
Morrow, James, ‘A Constitutional Right to Rescue Unborn Children’ (1994), www.humanae-vitae.org/leaflets/constitutional.htmlGoogle Scholar
MSI Reproductive Choices, ‘Our History’ (2020), www.msichoices.org/about-us/our-history/Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Siddhartha, The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer (London: Fourth Estate, 2011).Google Scholar
Mulcahy, Linda and Sugarman, David, ‘Introduction: Legal Life Writing and Marginalized Subjects and Sources’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 1 (2015), 1–6.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael, The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Munday, Diane, ‘The Development of Abortion Services since 1968’ in Birth Control Trust and Pregnancy Advisory Service (eds), Abortion Services in England and Wales (London: Birth Control Trust, 1994), 7–16.Google Scholar
Munday, Diane, untitled presentation at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled? Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar
NAC (ed.), A Celebration of 25 Years of Safe, Legal Abortion 1967–1992 (London: NAC, 1992).Google Scholar
National Archives, ‘1967 Sexual Offences Act: 50 Years On’ (2017), https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/1967-sexual-offences-act-50-years-lgbt-history/Google Scholar
National Centre for Social Research, British Social Attitudes, no. 34 (2017), www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspxGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David, The Limits of the Legal Process: A Study of Landlords, Law and Crime (London: Academic Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Neustatter, Andrew and Newson, Gina, Mixed Feelings: The Experience of Abortion (London: Pluto, 1986).Google Scholar
Neustatter, P. L., ‘Participation of Nurses in Abortions’, Lancet, vol. 316 no. 8205 (1980) 1199–200.Google Scholar
NIALRA, Abortion in Northern Ireland: The Report of an International Tribunal (Belfast: Beyond the Pale Publications, 1989).Google Scholar
NICE and RCOG, ‘Abortion Care. NICE Guideline [NG140]’ (2019) www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140Google Scholar
NIHRC, ‘2021 Fact Sheet: Human Rights Commission Legal Action on Lack of Abortion Services in NI’ (2021), www.nihrc.org/uploads/publications/11.01.21_Fact_Sheet_Human_Rights_Commission_Legal_Action_on_Lack_of_Abortion_Services_in_NI_.pdfGoogle Scholar
Northern Ireland Office, A New Legal Framework for Abortion Services in Northern Ireland (London: Northern Ireland Office, 2019).Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ‘Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethical Issues’ (2017), www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/NIPT-ethical-issues-full-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ofcom, ‘Ofcom Broadcast and on Demand Bulletin’, no. 330 (2017), www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/102567/issue-330-broadcast-on-demand-bulletin.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics, ‘Birth Characteristics in England and Wales: 2019’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2019Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics, ‘Childbearing for Women Born in Different Years, England and Wales: 2019’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/conceptionandfertilityrates/bulletins/childbearingforwomenbornindifferentyearsenglandandwales/2019Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics, ‘Marriages in England and Wales: 2017’ (2020), www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/marriagecohabitationandcivilpartnerships/bulletins/marriagesinenglandandwalesprovisional/2017Google Scholar
Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse, ‘The Feminist Appropriation of Pregnancy Testing in 1970s Britain’, Women’s History Review, vol. 28 no. 6 (2019), 869–94.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Jane, ‘“Abortion Games”: The Negotiation of Termination Decisions in Post-1967 Britain’, History, vol. 104 no. 359 (2019), 169–88.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. T. and Watson, Isobel, ‘The Father and the Unborn Child’, Modern Law Review, vol. 38 no. 2 (1975), 174–85.Google Scholar
Ormrod, Roger, ‘A Lawyer Looks at Medical Ethics’, Medico-Legal Journal, vol. 46 no. 1 (1978), 18–32.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Catherine, ‘Advocating Abortion Rights in Northern Ireland: Local and Global Tensions’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 25 no. 6 (2016), 716–40.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Catherine, ‘Bridging the Enforcement Gap? Evaluating the Inquiry Procedure of the CEDAW Optional Protocol’, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, vol. 27 no. 1 (2019), 1–30.Google Scholar
Orr, Judith, Abortion Wars: The Fight for Reproductive Rights (Bristol: Policy Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Owen, David, Personally Speaking to Kenneth Harris (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987).Google Scholar
Owen, David, Time to Declare (London: Michael Joseph, 1991).Google Scholar
Paintin, David, Abortion Law Reform in Britain 1964–2003: A Personal Account (Stratford-upon-Avon: BPAS, 2015).Google Scholar
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ‘Guide to the Rules on All-Party Parliamentary Groups’ (2015), www.parliament.uk/documents/pcfs/all-party-groups/guide-to-the-rules-on-appgs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ‘Rectification’ (2016), www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/pcfs/rectifications/ms-fiona-bruce-rectification.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Johnston, Ron, and Stuart, Mark, ‘Voting without Party?’ in Cowley, Philip (ed.), Conscience and Parliament (London: Frank Cass 1998), pp. 146–76.Google Scholar
Pearl, David and Grubb, Andrew, ‘Protecting the Life of the Unborn Child’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 103 (1987), 340–46.Google Scholar
Sir Peel, John, Unplanned Pregnancy: Report of a Working Party of the RCOG (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1972).Google Scholar
Sir Pereira Gray, Denis, ‘The Lane Committee’, presentation at Abortion Act 1967 Conference: A Promise Fulfilled? Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 24–25 October 2017.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack, ‘Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction’, Feminist Studies, vol. 13 no. 2 (1987), 263–92.Google Scholar
Pierson, Claire and Bloomer, Fiona, ‘Anti-Abortion Myths in Political Discourse’ in MacQuarrie, Colleen, Bloomer, Fiona, Pierson, Claire, and Stettner, Shannon (eds), Crossing Troubled Waters: Abortion in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Prince Edward Island (Prince Edward Island: Island Studies Press, 2018), pp. 184–203.Google Scholar
Pipes, Mary, Understanding Abortion (London: The Women’s Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John (Chair), Review of the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Material (Polkinghorne Report), CM 762 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1989).Google Scholar
Pollitt, Katha, Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights (New York: Picador, 2015).Google Scholar
Pope, Paul VI, ‘Humane Vitae’ (1968), www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.htmlGoogle Scholar
Potts, Malcolm, Diggory, Peter, and Peel, John, Abortion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Priaulx, Nicky, ‘Pro-Life Inquiries: When Is a Parliamentary Inquiry Really a Parliamentary Inquiry?’ (2016), https://lawyersforchoice.wordpress.com/page/2/Google Scholar
Priest, R. G., ‘The Impact of the Abortion Act: A Psychiatrist’s Observations’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 121 no. 562 (1972), 293–99.Google Scholar
Prior, James, A Balance of Power (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1986).Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert N. and Schiebinger, Londa L. (eds), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Purcell, Carrie, Cameron, Sharon, Caird, Lucy, Flett, Gillian, Laird, George, Melville, Catriona, and McDaid, Lisa M., ‘Access to and Experience of Later Abortion: Accounts from Women in Scotland’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 46 no. 2 (2014), 101–08.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, Peter, Human Sentience Before Birth: Rawlinson Report (London: CARE, 1996).Google Scholar
Rawlinson, Peter, The Physical and Psycho-Social Effects of Abortion on Women: A Report by the Commission on Inquiry into the Operation and Consequences of the Abortion Act (London: CARE, 1994).Google Scholar
RCGP, ‘RCGP to Support Decriminalisation of Abortion’ (2019), www.rcgp.org.uk/about-us/news/2019/february/rcgp-to-support-decriminalisation-of-abortion.aspxGoogle Scholar
RCN, ‘Decriminalisation of Termination of Pregnancy: A Position Statement’ (2018), www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-007401Google Scholar
RCN, Response of the Royal College of Nursing to a DHSSPS Consultation on the Limited Circumstances for a Lawful Termination of Pregnancy in Northern Ireland (Belfast: Royal College of Nursing, 2013).Google Scholar
RCOG, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19) Infection and Abortion Care: Information for Healthcare Professionals’ (2020), www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-03-21-abortion-guidance.pdfGoogle Scholar
RCOG, ‘Fetal Awareness: Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice – Report of a Working Party’ (2010), www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/rcogfetalawarenesswpr0610.pdfGoogle Scholar
RCOG, ‘New Study Finds Telemedicine for Abortion Care is Safe and More Accessible’ (2021), www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/telemedicine-cohort-study-released/Google Scholar
RCOG, ‘RCOG Backs Decriminalisation of Abortion’ (2017), www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-backs-decriminalisation-of-abortion/Google Scholar
RCOG, Report on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Imposing an 18 Week Gestational Limit on Legal Abortion (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1987).Google Scholar
RCOG, The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline No. 7) (London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011).Google Scholar
Read, Melvyn D., ‘The Pro-Life Movement’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 51 no. 3 (1998), 445–57.Google Scholar
Reagan, Leslie, Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities and Abortion in Modern America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Regan, Lesley, ‘Abortion: View from Westminster’, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 143 no. 2 (2018), 133-36.Google Scholar
Richards, Clare, A World without Down Syndrome? (BBC2, 2016), www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07ycbj5Google Scholar
Right to Life, ‘Emergency’ (n.d.), https://righttolife.org.uk/emergency/ [no longer available].Google Scholar
Right to Life, ‘Medical Professionals Open Letter Regarding “Home” Abortion Schemes’ (2021), https://righttolife.org.uk/medicalletterGoogle Scholar
Roantree, Barra and Vira, Kartik, ‘The Rise and Rise of Women’s Employment in the UK’, Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note BN234 (2018), https://ifs.org.uk/uploads/BN234.pdfGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty (New York: Vintage Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie, The Visualised Foetus: A Cultural and Political Analysis of Ultrasound Imagery (Oxford: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Rossiter, Ann, Ireland’s Hidden Diaspora: The “Abortion Trail” and the Making of a London–Irish Underground 1980–2000 (London: IASC Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Rough, Elizabeth, ‘Abortion in Northern Ireland: Recent Changes to the Legal Framework’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing (2021), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8909/Google Scholar
Rowlands, Sam, ‘Day-Care Abortion in the NHS: A Survey of 12 Centres’, British Journal of Family Planning, vol. 5 (1979), 1–4.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Public Health, ‘Top 20 Public Health Achievements of the 21st Century’ (2019), www.rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/top-20-public-health-achievements-of-the-21st-century.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, Joshua, The Case for the Crown: The Inside Story of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Wellingborough: Equation, 1987).Google Scholar
Sackar, Justice John, Lord Devlin (Oxford: Hart, 2020).Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol, About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in Twenty-First Century America (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Savage, Wendy, ‘Nurses and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy’, British Medical Journal, vol. 281 no. 6253 (1980), 1491.Google Scholar
Savell, Kristin L., ‘Life and Death before Birth: 4D Ultrasound and the Shifting Frontiers of the Abortion Debate’, Journal of Law and Medicine, vol. 15 no. 1 (2007), 103–16.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, J. J., Let There Be Life (Leamington Spa: Life, 2007).Google Scholar
Science Media Centre, ‘Reaction to Evan Harris Losing His Parliamentary Seat’ (2010), www.sciencemediacentre.org/reaction-to-evan-harris-losing-his-parliamentary-seat-2/Google Scholar
Sclare, A. B. and Geraghty, B. P., ‘Termination of Pregnancy: The Nurse’s Attitude’, Nursing Mirror, vol. 140 no. 3 (1975), 59–60.Google Scholar
Scottish Trades Union Congress, Annual Report 1980 (Perth, TUC: 1980).Google Scholar
Sedgh, Gilda, Singh, Susheela, Shah, Iqbal H., Åhman, Elizabeth, Henshaw, Stanley K., and Bankole, Akinrinola, ‘Induced Abortions: Incidence and Trends Worldwide from 1995 to 2008’, Lancet, vol. 379 no. 9816 (2012), 625–32.Google Scholar
Sethna, Christabelle, ‘From Heathrow Airport to Harley Street: The ALRA and the Travel of Nonresident Women for Abortion Services in Britain’ in Sethna, Christabelle and Davis, Gayle (eds), Abortion across Borders: Transnational Travel and Access to Abortion Services (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019), pp. 46–71.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom, Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘A Missed Opportunity to Reform an Outdated Piece of Legislation’, Clinical Ethics, vol. 4 no. 1 (2009), 3–5.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law (London: Pluto, 1997).Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘British Abortion Law: Speaking from the Past to Govern the Future’, Modern Law Review, vol. 79 no. 2 (2016), 283–316.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘Empowerment and Privacy? Home Use of Abortion Pills in the Republic of Ireland’, Signs, vol. 43 no. 4 (2018), 823–49.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘Multiple Pregnancy and Re(pro)ductive Choice’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 5 (1997), 99–106.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘The Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Argument for Modernisation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 36 no. 2 (2016), 334–65.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘The Regulatory Cliff Edge between Contraception and Abortion: The Legal and Moral Significance of Implantation’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 41 no. 9 (2015), 762–65.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, ‘“Who Is the Mother to Make the Judgment?”: Constructions of Woman in UK Abortion Law’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 1 no. 1 (1993), 3–22.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, Davis, Gayle, O’Neill, Jane, and Parker, Clare, ‘Sources’ (2021), https://research.kent.ac.uk/abortion-act/sources/Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally and Fletcher, Joanne, ‘Vacuum Aspiration for Induced Abortion Could be Safely and Legally Performed by Nurses and Midwives’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 43 (2017), 260–64.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally, O’Neill, Jane, Parker, Clare, and Davis, Gayle, ‘“Too Much, Too Indigestible, Too Fast”? The Decades of Struggle for Abortion Law Reform in Northern Ireland’, Modern Law Review, vol. 83 no. 4 (2020), 761–96.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally and Wellings, Kaye, Decriminalising Abortion in the UK (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Sheldon, Sally and Kaye Wellings, ‘Introduction’ in Decriminalising Abortion in the UK (Bristol: Policy Press, 2020), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., ‘Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions under Casey/Carhart’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 117 no. 8 (2008), 1694–800.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., ‘The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Women-Protective Anti-abortion Argument’, Duke Law Journal, vol. 57 no. 6 (2008), 1641–92.Google Scholar
Silvestre, Louise, ‘The French Experiences’ in Williams, Cerys (ed.), The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone/RU486): Widening the Choice for Women, Proceedings of a conference organised by the Birth Control Trust on 26 October 1989 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (London: Birth Control Trust, 1990), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Sim, Myre, ‘Abortion and the Psychiatrist’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5350 (1963), 145–48.Google Scholar
Simms, Madeleine, ‘Britain’ in Rolston, Bill and Eggert, Anna (eds), Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1990), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Simms, Madeleine, ‘Day-Care Abortion’, Lancet, vol. 315 no. 8180 (1980), 1253.Google Scholar
Simms, Madeleine, ‘Legal Abortion in Great Britain’ in Homans, Hilary (ed.), The Sexual Politics of Reproduction (Aldershot: Gower, 1985), pp. 78–95.Google Scholar
Simms, Madeleine, ‘The Great Foetus Mystery’, New Scientist (1970), 592.Google Scholar
Simpson, A., ‘The Victorian Law of Northern Ireland’, Planned Parenthood in Europe, vol. 22 no. 3 (1993), 7.Google Scholar
Sisson, Gretchen and Kimport, Katrina, ‘Telling Stories about Abortion: Abortion-Related Plots in American Film and Television, 1916–2013’, Contraception, vol. 89 no. 5 (2014), 413–18.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol and Neale, Bren, Family Fragments? (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Smith Commission, Report of the Smith Commission for Further Devolution of Powers to the Scottish Parliament (Edinburgh: Smith Commission, 2014).Google Scholar
Smith, J. C., ‘Abortion’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1981 (1981), 322–23.Google Scholar
Smyth, Lisa, ‘The Cultural Politics of Sexuality and Reproduction in Northern Ireland’, Sociology, vol. 40 no. 4 (2006), 663–80.Google Scholar
Solinger, Rickie, Pregnancy and Power: A Short History of Reproductive Politics in America (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sood, Satya V., ‘Some Operative and Postoperative Hazards of Legal Termination of Pregnancy’, British Medical Journal, vol. 4 no. 5782 (1971), 270–73.Google Scholar
Soper, J. Christopher, Evangelical Christianity in the United States and Britain: Religious Beliefs, Political Choices (London: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar
Southall Black Sisters, ‘SBS Urges a No Vote to the Amendment on Sex Selective Abortion on the Serious Crime Bill’ (2015, republished 2019), https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/news/sbs-urges-a-no-vote-to-the-amendment-on-sex-selective-abortion-on-the-serious-crime-bill/Google Scholar
Speaking of Imelda, ‘Why Imelda?’ (2018), www.speakingofimelda.org/why-imeldaGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. C., ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), pp. 271–314.Google Scholar
SPUC, ‘At-Home Abortions: The Case against a Permanent Policy’ (2021), www.spuc.org.uk/Portals/0/ThemePluginPro/uploads/2021/3/23/SPUC%20%E2%80%93%20At-home%20abortions%20%E2%80%93%20the%20case%20against%20a%20permanent%20policy_12pp_A4_3_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
SPUC, ‘Campaigns’ (2021), www.spuc.org.uk/Get-Involved/CampaignsGoogle Scholar
SPUC, ‘Fundraise’ (2018), www.spuc.org.uk/ArticleHandler/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/383469/FundraiseGoogle Scholar
SPUC, ‘Pro-abortion House of Commons Speaker Stands Down Leaving “Untold Damage to Unborn Babies and their Mothers”’ (2019), www.spuc.org.uk/News/News-Articles/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/384203Google Scholar
SPUC, ‘SPUC Seeks Legal Recourse as Government Extends DIY at Home Abortion due to Coronavirus Crisis’ (2020), www.spuc.org.uk/News/ID/384353/SPUC-seeks-legal-recourse-as-government-extends-DIY-at-home-abortion-due-to-Coronavirus-crisisGoogle Scholar
Staham, H., Solomou, W., and Green, J., ‘Late Termination of Pregnancy: Law, Policy and Decision Making in Four English Fetal Medicine Units’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113 no. 12 (2006), 1402–11.Google Scholar
Steel, David, Against Goliath: David Steel’s Story (London: Pan Books, 1991).Google Scholar
St John-Stevas, Norman, ‘Little Enlightenment from Lane’, The Tablet, vol. 228 (1974), 362.Google Scholar
St John-Stevas, Norman, The Agonising Choice (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1971).Google Scholar
St John-Stevas, Norman, The Right to Life (London: Hodder, 1963).Google Scholar
St John-Stevas, Norman, The Two Cities (London: Faber & Faber, 1984).Google Scholar
Stith, Richard, ‘Facing the Unborn’, First Things (2015), www.firstthings.com/article/2015/08/facing-the-unbornGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, David, ‘From Legal Biography to Legal Life Writing: Broadening Conceptions of Legal History and Socio-legal Scholarship’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 42 no. 1 (2015), 7–33.Google Scholar
Swales, Kirby and Taylor, Eleanor Attar, ‘Moral Issues: Sex, Gender Identity and Euthanasia’ in National Centre for Social Research, British Social Attitudes, no. 34 (2017), www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspxGoogle Scholar
Symonds, Melanie, And Still They Weep: Personal Stories of Abortion (London: Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 1996).Google Scholar
Tansey, E. M. and Christie, D. A. (eds), Looking at the Unborn: Historical Aspects of Obstetric Ultrasound, Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine Seminar Transcript (London: Wellcome, 2000).Google Scholar
Tate Britain, ‘Queer British Art 1861–1967’ (2017), www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/exhibition/queer-british-art-1861-1967Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert Brett and Wilson, Adelyn, ‘UK Abortion Law: Reform Proposals, Private Members’ Bills, Devolution and the Role of the Courts’, Modern Law Review, vol. 82 no. 1 (2019), 71–128.Google Scholar
Temkin, Jennifer, ‘The Lane Committee Report on the Abortion Act’, Modern Law Review, vol. 37 no. 6 (1974), 657–63.Google Scholar
‘The Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Memorandum on the Abortion Act in Practice’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 120 no. 557 (1972), 449–51.Google Scholar
Third Sector, ‘Opinion: Hot Issue – Should the Government Withdraw the Annual £12m Funding to BPAS?’ (2004), www.thirdsector.co.uk/opinion-hot-issue-government-withdraw-annual-12m-funding-bpas/article/614146Google Scholar
Thomas, Gareth M., Down’s Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics: Care, Choice, and Disability in the Prenatal Clinic (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Thomlinson, Natalie, Race, Ethnicity and the Women’s Movement in England, 1968–1993 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Thomson, Jennifer, ‘Abortion Law and Scotland: An Issue of What?’, Political Quarterly, vol. 89 no. 1 (2017), 100–07.Google Scholar
Thynne, Lizzie (dir.), ‘The Feelings behind the Slogans Part 2’, commissioned for Sisterhood and After: The Women’s Liberation Oral History Project (2011), www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-feelings-behind-the-slogans-part-2Google Scholar
Todd, N. A., ‘Psychiatric Experience of the Abortion Act (1967)’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 119 no. 552 (1971), 489–95.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress, Annual Report 1975 (Blackpool, TUC: 1975).Google Scholar
Tunkel, Victor, ‘Abortion: How Early, How Late, and How Legal?’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 6184 (1979), 253–56.Google Scholar
Tunkel, Victor, ‘Modern Anti-Pregnancy Techniques and the Criminal Law’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1974 (1974), 461–71.Google Scholar
Tunnadine, David and Green, Roger, Unwanted Pregnancy – Accident or Illness? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Uberoi, Elise and Lees, Rebecca, ‘Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing (2020), https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01156/Google Scholar
Underwood, Betty, ‘The Lane Abortion Report – A Feminist View’, Spare Rib, no. 24 (1974), 22.Google Scholar
Unnithan, Maya and Dubuc, Sylvie, ‘Re-visioning Evidence: Reflections on the Recent Controversy around Gender Selective Abortion in the UK’, Global Public Health, vol. 13 no. 6 (2018), 742–53.Google Scholar
US Senate, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, ‘The Medical Evidence Concerning Fetal Pain’, First Session, 21 May 1985 (S. Hrg. 99-429, Serial No. J-99-28) http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/gdoc/hearings/8/86601288/86601288_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vallance, Elizabeth, Women in the House: A Study of Women Members of Parliament (London: Athlone Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Voas, David and Crockett, Alasdair, ‘Religion in Britain: Neither Believing nor Belonging’, Sociology, vol. 39 no. 1 (2005), 11–28.Google Scholar
Waite, Marjorie, ‘Consultant Psychiatrists and Abortion’, Psychological Medicine, vol. 4 no. 1 (1974), 76–88.Google Scholar
Ward, Margaret, ‘The Woman’s Movement in the North of Ireland’ in Hutton, Sean and Stewart, Paul (eds), Ireland’s Histories: Aspects of State, Society and Ideology (London: Routledge 1991), pp. 149–63.Google Scholar
Warden, John, ‘Abortion Minefield for Doctors’, British Medical Journal, vol. 295 no. 6605 (1987), 1076.Google Scholar
Wellcome Trust, ‘Wellcome Trust Monitor Survey Report: Tracking Public Views on Medical Research’ (2009), https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/monitor-wave1-wellcome-sep09.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wellings, Kaye, Jones, Kyle G., Mercer, Catherine H., Tanton, Clare, Clifton, Soazig, Datta, Jessica, Copas, Andrew J., Erens, Bob, Gibson, Lorna J., Macdowall, Wendy, Sonnenberg, Pam, Phelps, Andrew, and Johnson, Anne M., ‘The Prevalence of Unplanned Pregnancy and Associated Factors in Britain: Findings from the Third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3)’, Lancet, vol. 382 no. 9907 (2013), 1807–16.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Robin and Horgan, Goretti, ‘Abortion Governance in the New Northern Ireland’ in Anton, Lorena, De Zordo, Silvia, and Mishtal, Joanna (eds), A Fragmented Landscape. Abortion Governance and Associated Protest Logics in Postwar Europe (New York: Berghahn, 2016), pp. 245–65.Google Scholar
Who’s Who, ‘Corrie, John Alexander’ (2007), www.ukwhoswho.com/search?q=john+corrie&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=trueGoogle Scholar
Widdecombe, Ann, Strictly Ann: The Autobiography (London: Pheonix, 2014).Google Scholar
Wilkes, Eric, ‘Working of the Abortion Act’, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 no. 5966 (1975), 337.Google Scholar
Williams, Clare, ‘Framing the Fetus in Medical Work: Rituals and Practices’, Social Science and Medicine, vol. 60 no. 9 (2005), 2085–95.Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law (London: Faber & Faber, 1958).Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville, Textbook of Criminal Law (London: Stevens, 2nd edition, 1983).Google Scholar
Williams, Jean Morton and Hindell, Keith, Abortion and Contraception: A Study of Patients’ Attitudes (London: Political and Economic Planning, 1972).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert, ‘Successful Appeal by Royal College of Nursing on Medical Termination of Pregnancy’, Lancet, vol. 316 no. 8203 (1980), 1091.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan, Religion in Secular Life, 50 Years On (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Winn, Denise, Experiences of Abortion (London: Macdonald, 1988).Google Scholar
Wivel, Ashley, ‘Abortion Policy and Politics on the Lane Committee of Enquiry, 1971–1974’, Social History of Medicine, vol. 11 no. 1 (1998), 109–35.Google Scholar
Women in Media, A Woman’s Choice (Belfast: Women in Media, 1980).Google Scholar
Women on Waves, ‘Warning, Fake Abortion Pills for Sale Online!!’ (2021), www.womenonwaves.org/en/page/974/warning-fake-abortion-pills-for-sale-onlineGoogle Scholar
Woods, Simon and Taylor, Kenneth, ‘Ethical and Governance Challenges in Human Fetal Tissue Research’, Clinical Ethics, vol. 3 no. 1 (2008), 14–19.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia, ‘Sketch of the Past’ in Schulkind, Jeanne (ed.), Moments of Being (London: Pimlico, 2002).Google Scholar
Wright, David, Downs: The History of a Disability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Wright, Gerard, ‘Capable of Being Born Alive?’, New Law Journal, vol. 131 no. 5989 (1981), 188–89.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerard, ‘The Culture of Death: Talk Given at the Symposium of the Guild of Catholic Doctors’, Catholic Medical Quarterly (1999), www.cmq.org.uk/CMQ/1999/culture_of_death_g_wright.htmGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerard, ‘The Legality of Abortion by Prostaglandin’, Criminal Law Review, vol. 1984 (1984), 347–49.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sally Sheldon, University of Bristol and University of Technology Sydney, Gayle Davis, University of Edinburgh, Jane O'Neill, University of Edinburgh, Clare Parker, University of Adelaide
  • Book: The Abortion Act 1967
  • Online publication: 03 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677295.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sally Sheldon, University of Bristol and University of Technology Sydney, Gayle Davis, University of Edinburgh, Jane O'Neill, University of Edinburgh, Clare Parker, University of Adelaide
  • Book: The Abortion Act 1967
  • Online publication: 03 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677295.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sally Sheldon, University of Bristol and University of Technology Sydney, Gayle Davis, University of Edinburgh, Jane O'Neill, University of Edinburgh, Clare Parker, University of Adelaide
  • Book: The Abortion Act 1967
  • Online publication: 03 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677295.012
Available formats
×