Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Cosmology
- 2 The early history of CBR studies
- 3 Radio astronomy
- 4 The spectrum of the CBR
- 5 What we learn from observations of the CBR spectrum
- 6 Searches for anisotropy in the CBR on large angular scales
- 7 Searches for anisotropy in the CBR on small angular scales
- 8 What do we learn from the angular distribution of the CBR?
- Appendix A A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s
- Appendix B Cosmic blackbody radiation
- Appendix C Recent results
- Index
Appendix B - Cosmic blackbody radiation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Cosmology
- 2 The early history of CBR studies
- 3 Radio astronomy
- 4 The spectrum of the CBR
- 5 What we learn from observations of the CBR spectrum
- 6 Searches for anisotropy in the CBR on large angular scales
- 7 Searches for anisotropy in the CBR on small angular scales
- 8 What do we learn from the angular distribution of the CBR?
- Appendix A A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s
- Appendix B Cosmic blackbody radiation
- Appendix C Recent results
- Index
Summary
One of the basic problems of cosmology is the singularity characteristic of the familiar cosmological solutions of Einstein's field equations. Also puzzling is the presence of matter in excess over antimatter in the universe, for baryons and leptons are thought to be conserved. Thus, in the framework of conventional theory we cannot understand the origin of matter or of the universe. We can distinguish three main attempts to deal with these problems.
The assumption of continuous creation (Bondi and Gold 1948; Hoyle 1948), which avoids the singularity by postulating a universe expanding for all time and a continuous but slow creation of new matter in the universe.
The assumption (Wheeler 1964) that the creation of new matter is intimately related to the existence of the singularity, and that the resolution of both paradoxes may be found in a proper quantum mechanical treatment of Einstein's field equations.
The assumption that the singularity results from a mathematical over-idealization, the requirement of strict isotropy or uniformity, and that it would not occur in the real world (Wheeler 1958; Lifshitz and Khalatnikov 1963).
If this third premise is accepted tentatively as a working hypothesis, it carries with it a possible resolution of the second paradox, for the matter we see about us now may represent the same baryon content of the previous expansion of a closed universe, oscillating for all time.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 3K: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation , pp. 357 - 363Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995