In this paper we prove that any Turing machine that uses only a finite computational space for every input cannot solve an uncomputable problem even when it runs in accelerated mode. We also propose two ways to define the language accepted by an accelerated Turing machine. Accordingly, the classes of languages accepted by accelerated Turing machines are the closure under Boolean operations of the sets Σ1 and Σ2.

We study computably enumerable (c.e.) prefix codes that are capable of coding all positive integers in an optimal way up to a fixed constant: these codes will be called universal. We prove various characterisations of these codes, including the following one: a c.e. prefix code is universal if and only if it contains the domain of a universal self-delimiting Turing machine. Finally, we study various properties of these codes from the points of view of computability, maximality and density.

Computational indistinguishability is a notion in complexity-theoretic cryptography and is used to define many security criteria. However, in traditional cryptography, proving computational indistinguishability is usually informal and becomes error-prone when cryptographic constructions are complex. This paper presents a formal proof system based on an extension of Hofmann's SLR language, which can capture probabilistic polynomial-time computations through typing and is sufficient for expressing cryptographic constructions. In particular, we define rules that directly justify the computational indistinguishability between programs, and then prove that these rules are sound with respect to the set-theoretic semantics, and thus the standard definition of security. We also show that it is applicable in cryptography by verifying, in our proof system, Goldreich and Micali's construction of a pseudorandom generator, and the equivalence between next-bit unpredictability and pseudorandomness.

It is an empirical observation arising from the study of higher type computability that a wide range of approaches to defining a class of (hereditarily) total functionals over leads in practice to a relatively small handful of distinct type structures. Among these are the type structure C of Kleene–Kreisel continuous functionals, its effective substructure Ceff and the type structure HEO of the hereditarily effective operations. However, the proofs of the relevant equivalences are often non-trivial, and it is not immediately clear why these particular type structures should arise so ubiquitously.

In this paper we present some new results that go some way towards explaining this phenomenon. Our results show that a large class of extensional collapse constructions always give rise to C, Ceff or HEO (as appropriate). We obtain versions of our results for both the ‘standard’ and ‘modified’ extensional collapse constructions. The proofs make essential use of a technique due to Normann.

Many new results, as well as some previously known ones, can be obtained as instances of our theorems, but more importantly, the proofs apply uniformly to a whole family of constructions, and provide strong evidence that the three type structures under consideration are highly canonical mathematical objects.

This article gives an overview of automatic amortized resource analysis (AARA), a technique for inferring symbolic resource bounds for programs at compile time. AARA has been introduced by Hofmann and Jost in 2003 as a type system for deriving linear worst-case bounds on the heap-space consumption of first-order functional programs with eager evaluation strategy. Since then AARA has been the subject of dozens of research articles, which extended the analysis to different resource metrics, other evaluation strategies, non-linear bounds, and additional language features. All these works preserved the defining characteristics of the original paper: local inference rules, which reduce bound inference to numeric (usually linear) optimization; a soundness proof with respect to an operational cost semantics; and the support of amortized analysis with the potential method.

The last years have seen an increasing interest in classifying (existence claims in) classical mathematical theorems according to their strength. We pursue this goal from the refined perspective of computational complexity. Specifically, we establish that rigorously solving the Dirichlet Problem for Poisson's Equation is in a precise sense ‘complete’ for the complexity class ${\#\mathcal{P}}$ and thus as hard or easy as parametric Riemann integration (Friedman 1984; Ko 1991. Complexity Theory of Real Functions).

We show that the extensional ordering of the sequential functionals of pure type 3, for example, as defined via game semantics (Abramsky et al. 1994; Hyland and Ong 2000), is not cpo-enriched. This shows that this model does not equal Milner's (Milner 1977) fully abstract model for PCF.

This paper is part of a general programme of treating explicit substitutions as the primary λ-calculi from the point of view of foundations as well as applications. We work in a composition-free calculus of explicit substitutions and an augmented calculus obtained by adding explicit garbage-collection, and explore the relationship between intersection-types and reduction.

We show that the terms that normalise by leftmost reduction and the terms that normalise by head reduction can each be characterised as the terms typable in a certain system. The relationship between typability and strong normalisation is subtly different from the classical case: we show that typable terms are strongly normalising but give a counterexample to the converse. Our notions of leftmost and head reduction are non-deterministic, and our normalisation theorems apply to any computations obeying these strategies. In this way we refine and strengthen the classical normalisation theorems. The proofs require some new techniques in the presence of reductions involving explicit substitutions. Indeed, our proofs do not rely on results from classical λ-calculus, which in our view is subordinate to the calculus of explicit substitution.

It is well-known that cellular automata can be characterized as the set of translation-invariant continuous functions over a compact metric space; this point of view makes it easy to extend their definition from grids to Cayley graphs. Cayley graphs have a number of useful features: the ability to graphically represent finitely generated group elements and their relations; to name all vertices relative to an origin; and the fact that they have a well-defined notion of translation. We propose a notion of graphs, which preserves or generalizes these features. Whereas Cayley graphs are very regular, generalized Cayley graphs are arbitrary, although of a bounded degree. We extend cellular automata theory to these arbitrary, bounded degree, time-varying graphs. The obtained notion of cellular automata is stable under composition and under inversion.

We give a logic-independent semantics for predefined (data) types within the categorical abstract model theoretic framework of the theory of institutions. We develop a generic interpolation result for this semantics, which can be easily applied to various concrete situations from the theory and practice of specification and programming. Our study of interpolation is motivated by a number of important applications to computing science, especially in the area of structured specifications.

We show that the disintegration operator on a complete separable metric space along a projection map, restricted to measures for which there is a unique continuous disintegration, is strongly Weihrauch equivalent to the limit operator Lim. When a measure does not have a unique continuous disintegration, we may still obtain a disintegration when some basis of continuity sets has the Vitali covering property with respect to the measure; the disintegration, however, may depend on the choice of sets. We show that, when the basis is computable, the resulting disintegration is strongly Weihrauch reducible to Lim, and further exhibit a single distribution realizing this upper bound.

The exponential modality of linear logic associates to every formula A a commutative comonoid !A which can be duplicated in the course of reasoning. Here, we explain how to compute the free commutative comonoid !A as a sequential limit of equalizers in any symmetric monoidal category where this sequential limit exists and commutes with the tensor product. We apply this general recipe to a series of models of linear logic, typically based on coherence spaces, Conway games and finiteness spaces. This algebraic description unifies for the first time a number of apparently different constructions of the exponential modality in spaces and games. It also sheds light on the duplication policy of linear logic, and its interaction with classical duality and double negation completion.

Multirelational semantics are well suited to reasoning about programs involving two kinds of non-determinism. This paper lays the categorical foundations for an algebraic calculus of multirelations.

A notion of bilattice was first proposed by Ginsberg as a general framework for many applications. Related notions were further investigated and applied for various goals by Fitting. In the present paper a general definition of bilattices is proposed, which covers all particular cases that have actually been used in the literature. It is shown also that in the finite case every bilattice in our sense is graphically representable by a special type of a two-dimensional diagram.

P systems with active membranes are a class of bioinspired computing models, where the rules are used in the non-deterministic maximally parallel manner. In this paper, first, a new variant of timed P systems with active membranes is proposed, where the application of rules can be regulated by promoters with only two polarizations. Next, we prove that any Turing computable set of numbers can be generated by such a P system in the time-free way. Moreover, we construct a uniform solution to the $\mathcal{SAT}$ problem in the framework of such recognizer timed P systems in polynomial time, and the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system is demonstrated by an instance. Compared with the existing methods, the P systems constructed in our work require fewer necessary resources and RS-steps, which show that the solution is effective to NP-complete problem.

We prove the decidability of the logic T→ of Ticket Entailment. This issue was first raised by Anderson and Belnap within the framework of relevance logic, and is equivalent to the question of the decidability of type inhabitation in simply typed combinatory logic with the partial basis BB′IW. We solve the equivalent problem of type inhabitation for the restriction of simply typed lambda calculus to hereditarily right-maximal terms.

Differential categories are now an established abstract setting for differentiation. However, not much attention has been given to the process which is inverse to differentiation: integration. This paper presents the parallel development for integration by axiomatizing an integral transformation, sA: !A → !A ⊗ A, in a symmetric monoidal category with a coalgebra modality. When integration is combined with differentiation, the two fundamental theorems of calculus are expected to hold (in a suitable sense): a differential category with integration which satisfies these two theorems is called a calculus category.

Modifying an approach to antiderivatives by T. Ehrhard, we define having antiderivatives as the demand that a certain natural transformation, K: !A → !A, is invertible. We observe that a differential category having antiderivatives, in this sense, is always a calculus category.

When the coalgebra modality is monoidal, it is natural to demand an extra coherence between integration and the coalgebra modality. In the presence of this extra coherence, we show that a calculus category with a monoidal coalgebra modality has its integral transformation given by antiderivatives and, thus, that the integral structure is uniquely determined by the differential structure.

The paper finishes by providing a suite of separating examples. Examples of differential categories, integral categories and calculus categories based on both monoidal and (mere) coalgebra modalities are presented. In addition, differential categories which are not integral categories are discussed and vice versa.

We show that a set of finite graphs of tree-width at most k is recognizable (with respect to the algebra of graphs with an unbounded number of sources) if and only if it is recognizable with respect to the algebra of graphs of tree-width at most k with at most k sources.

In a PCF-like call-by-name typed λ-calculus with a minimal fixpoint operator, ‘parallelor’, Plotkin's ‘continuous existential quantifier’ ∃ and recursive types together with constructors and destructors, all computable objects can be denoted by terms of the programming language. According to A. Meyer's terminology (cf. Meyer (1988)), such a programming language is called universal in the sense that any extension of it must be conservative, as all computable objects can already be expressed by program terms.

As a byproduct, we get that, in principle, recursive types could be totally avoided, as they appear as syntactically expressible retracts of the non-recursive type → , where and are the flat domains of natural numbers and boolean values, respectively.

Category theory offers a unified mathematical framework for the study of specifications and programs in a variety of styles, such as procedural, functional and concurrent. One way that these different languages may be treated uniformly is by generalising the definitions of some standard categorical concepts. In this paper we reproduce in the generalised theory analogues of some standard theorems on isomorphism, and outline their applications to programming languages.