Nowadays concepts, languages and models for coordination cannot leave aside the needs of the increasing number of commercial applications based on global computing over the (inter)net. For example, platforms like Microsoft .NET and Sun Microsystems Java come equipped with packages for supporting ad hoc transactional features, which are essential for most business applications. We show how to extend the coordination language par excellence (viz. Linda) with basic primitives for transactions, while retaining a formal model for its concurrent computations. This is achieved by exploiting a variation of Petri nets, called zero-safe nets, where transactions can be suitably modelled by distinguishing between stable places (ordinary ones) and zero places (where tokens can only be temporarily allocated, defining hidden states). The relevance of the transaction mechanism is illustrated in terms of expressive power. Finally, it is shown that stable places and transactions viewed as atomic steps define an abstract semantics that is apt for a fully algebraic treatment, as demonstrated via categorical adjunctions between suitable categories of nets.

Graph transitions represent an extension of the DPO approach to graph transformation for the specification of reactive systems. In this paper, we develop the theory of concurrency for graph transitions. In particular, we prove a local Church–Rosser theorem and define a notion of shift-equivalence that allows us to represent both intra-concurrency (within the specified subsystem) and inter-concurrency (between subsystem and environment). Via an implementation of transitions in terms of DPO transformations with context rules, a second, more restrictive notion of equivalence is defined that captures, in addition, the extra-concurrency (between operations of the environment). As a running example and motivation, we show how the concepts of this paper provide a formal model for distributed information systems.

This paper details a partial order semantics for families of scenarios represented by High-Level Message Sequence Charts (HMSCs): graph grammars generating event structures are used to represent HMSCs. A decision procedure for HMSC equivalence is then described. This can be considered as a first step towards the formal manipulation of scenarios.

Domain-theoretic categories are axiomatised by means of categorical non-order-theoretic requirements on a cartesian closed category equipped with a commutative monad. In this paper we prove an enrichment theorem showing that every axiomatic domain-theoretic category can be endowed with an intensional notion of approximation, the path relation, with respect to which the category Cpo-enriches.

Our analysis suggests more liberal notions of domains. In particular, we present a category where the path order is not ω-complete, but in which the constructions of domain theory (such as, for example, the existence of uniform fixed-point operators and the solution of domain equations) are available.

Algebraic CPOs naturally generalize to finitely accessible categories, and Scott domains (i.e., consistently complete algebraic CPOs) then correspond to what we call Scott-complete categories: finitely accessible, consistently (co-)complete categories. We prove that the category SCC of all Scott-complete categories and all continuous functors is cartesian closed and provides fixed points for a large collection of endofunctors. Thus, SCC can serve as a basis for semantics of computer languages.

In this note we show that quotients of countably based spaces (qcb spaces) and topological predomains, as introduced by M. Schröder and A. Simpson, are not closed under sobrification. As a consequence, replete topological predomains need not be sober, that is, in general, repletion is not given by sobrification. Our counterexample also shows that a certain tentative ‘equaliser construction’ of repletion fails for qcb spaces.

Our results also extend to the more general class of core compactly generated spaces.

We give a simple term calculus for the multiplicative exponential fragment of Classical Linear Logic, by extending Barber and Plotkin's dual-context system for the intuitionistic case. The calculus has the non-linear and linear implications as the basic constructs, and this design choice allows a technically manageable axiomatisation without commuting conversions. Despite this simplicity, the calculus is shown to be sound and complete for category-theoretic models given by *-autonomous categories with linear exponential comonads.

Bernstein coefficients provide a discrete approximation of the behaviour of a polynomial inside an interval. This can be used, for example, to isolate the real roots of polynomials. We prove formally a criterion for the existence of a single root in an interval and the correctness of the de Casteljau algorithm for computing Bernstein coefficients efficiently.

We discuss quantum algorithms based on the Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm for finding which input variables a Boolean function depends on. There are 2n possible linear Boolean functions of n input variables; given a linear Boolean function, the Bernstein–Vazirani quantum algorithm can deterministically identify which one of these Boolean functions we are given using just one single function query. We show how the same quantum algorithm can also be used to learn which input variables any other type of Boolean function} depends on. The success probability of learning that the function depends on a particular input variable depends on} the form of the Boolean function that is tested, but does not depend on the total number of input variables. We also outline a procedure based on another quantum algorithm, the Grover search, to amplify further the success probability. Finally, we discuss quantum algorithms for learning the exact form of certain quadratic and cubic Boolean functions.

We define a categorical framework, based on the notion of sketch, for specification and evaluation in the senses of algebraic specifications and algebraic programming. This framework goes far beyond our initial motivation, which was to specify computation with algebraic numbers. We begin by redefining sketches in order to deal explicitly with programs. Expressions and terms are carefully defined and studied, then quasi-projective sketches are introduced. We describe static evaluation in these sketches: we propose a rigorous basis for evalution in the corresponding structures. These structures admit an initial model, but are not necessarily equational. In Part II (Duval and Reynaud 1994), we study a more general process, called dynamic evaluation, for structures that may have no initial model.

We show that for every term graph in a left-linear but non-orthogonal term graph rewrite system, one can construct an event structure that represents all the possible reductions that can occur in reduction sequences starting from that term graph. Every finite reduction sequence from that graph corresponds to a configuration of the event structure, and Lévy-equivalent sequences correspond to the same configuration.

Garbage collection is modelled in the event structure by an ‘erases’ relation. The asymmetric conflicts that arise in non-orthogonal rewrite systems are modelled by introducing a ‘prevents’ relation. The configurations of the event structure then form the state space of an event automaton. Taking the directed completion of this space yields a prime algebraic domain.

We use Gödel's dialectica interpretation to produce a computational version of the well-known proof of Ramsey's theorem by Erdős and Rado. Our proof makes use of the product of selection functions, which forms an intuitive alternative to Spector's bar recursion when interpreting proofs in analysis. This case study is another instance of the application of proof theoretic techniques in mathematics.

We define and develop two-level type theory (2LTT), a version of Martin-Löf type theory which combines two different type theories. We refer to them as the ‘inner’ and the ‘outer’ type theory. In our case of interest, the inner theory is homotopy type theory (HoTT) which may include univalent universes and higher inductive types. The outer theory is a traditional form of type theory validating uniqueness of identity proofs (UIP). One point of view on it is as internalised meta-theory of the inner type theory. There are two motivations for 2LTT. Firstly, there are certain results about HoTT which are of meta-theoretic nature, such as the statement that semisimplicial types up to level n can be constructed in HoTT for any externally fixed natural number n. Such results cannot be expressed in HoTT itself, but they can be formalised and proved in 2LTT, where n will be a variable in the outer theory. This point of view is inspired by observations about conservativity of presheaf models. Secondly, 2LTT is a framework which is suitable for formulating additional axioms that one might want to add to HoTT. This idea is heavily inspired by Voevodsky’s Homotopy Type System (HTS), which constitutes one specific instance of a 2LTT. HTS has an axiom ensuring that the type of natural numbers behaves like the external natural numbers, which allows the construction of a universe of semisimplicial types. In 2LTT, this axiom can be assumed by postulating that the inner and outer natural numbers types are isomorphic. After defining 2LTT, we set up a collection of tools with the goal of making 2LTT a convenient language for future developments. As a first such application, we develop the theory of Reedy fibrant diagrams in the style of Shulman. Continuing this line of thought, we suggest a definition of $(\infty,1)$-category and give some examples.

Triple graph grammars (TGGs) are a well-established concept for the specification and execution of bidirectional model transformations within model driven software engineering. Their main advantage is an automatic generation of operational rules for forward and backward model transformations, which simplifies specification and enhances usability as well as consistency. In this paper we present several important results for analysing model transformations based on the formal categorical foundation of TGGs within the framework of attributed graph transformation systems.

Our first main result shows that the crucial properties of correctness and completeness are ensured for model transformations. In order to analyse functional behaviour, we generate a new kind of operational rule, called a forward translation rule. We apply existing results for the analysis of local confluence for attributed graph transformation systems. As additional main results, we provide sufficient criteria for the verification of functional behaviour as well as a necessary and sufficient condition for strong functional behaviour. In fact, these conditions imply polynomial complexity for the execution of the model transformation. We also analyse information and complete information preservation of model transformations, that is, whether a source model can be reconstructed (uniquely) from the target model computed by the model transformation. We illustrate the results for the well-known model transformation example from class diagrams to relational database models.

In this article we describe a bunch of probability logics with quantifiers over events, and develop primary techniques for proving computational complexity results (in terms of m-degrees) about these logics, mainly over discrete probability spaces. Also the article contains a comparison with some other probability logics and a discussion of interesting analogies with research in the metamathematics of Boolean algebras, demonstrating a number of attractive features and intuitive advantages of the present proposal.

is an untyped continuation-style formal language with a typed subset that provides a Curry–Howard isomorphism for a sequent calculus for implicative classical logic. can also be viewed as a language for describing nets by composition of basic components connected by wires. These features make an expressive platform on which many different (applicative) programming paradigms can be mapped. In this paper we will present the syntax and reduction rules for ; in order to demonstrate its expressive power, we will show how elaborate calculi can be embedded, such as the λ-calculus, Bloo and Rose's calculus of explicit substitutions λx, Parigot's λμ and Curien and Herbelin's .

was first presented in Lengrand (2003), where it was called the λξ-calculus. It can be seen as the pure untyped computational content of the reduction system for the implicative classical sequent calculus of Urban (2000).

This paper studies infinite graphs produced from a natural unfolding operation applied to finite graphs. Graphs produced using such operations are of finite degree and automatic over the unary alphabet (that is, they can be described by finite automata over the unary alphabet). We investigate algorithmic properties of such unfolded graphs given their finite presentations. In particular, we ask whether a given node belongs to an infinite component, whether two given nodes in the graph are reachable from one another and whether the graph is connected. We give polynomial-time algorithms for each of these questions. For a fixed input graph, the algorithm for the first question is in constant time and the second question is decided using an automaton that recognises the reachability relation in a uniform way. Hence, we improve on previous work, in which non-elementary or non-uniform algorithms were found.

Interaction nets have proved to be a useful tool for the study of computational aspects of various formalisms (e.g. λ-calculus, term rewriting systems), but they are also a programming paradigm in themselves, and this is actually how they were introduced by Lafont. In this paper we consider semi-simple interaction nets as a programming language, and present a type assignment system using intersection types. First we show that interactions preserve types (i.e., the system enjoys subject reduction), and we compare this type assignment system with the intersection systems for λ-calculus and term rewriting systems. Then we define a recursion scheme that ensures termination of all interaction sequences. By relaxing the scheme and using the type assignment system, we derive another sufficient condition for termination of interaction nets. Finally, we show that although the type system based on general intersection types is not decidable, its restriction to rank 2 types is, and we give an algorithm that computes principal types for nets.

Symmetric monoidal theories (SMTs) generalise algebraic theories in a way that make them suitable to express resource-sensitive systems, in which variables cannot be copied or discarded at will. In SMTs, traditional tree-like terms are replaced by string diagrams, topological entities that can be intuitively thought of as diagrams of wires and boxes. Recently, string diagrams have become increasingly popular as a graphical syntax to reason about computational models across diverse fields, including programming language semantics, circuit theory, quantum mechanics, linguistics, and control theory. In applications, it is often convenient to implement the equations appearing in SMTs as rewriting rules. This poses the challenge of extending the traditional theory of term rewriting, which has been developed for algebraic theories, to string diagrams. In this paper, we develop a mathematical theory of string diagram rewriting for SMTs. Our approach exploits the correspondence between string diagram rewriting and double pushout (DPO) rewriting of certain graphs, introduced in the first paper of this series. Such a correspondence is only sound when the SMT includes a Frobenius algebra structure. In the present work, we show how an analogous correspondence may be established for arbitrary SMTs, once an appropriate notion of DPO rewriting (which we call convex) is identified. As proof of concept, we use our approach to show termination of two SMTs of interest: Frobenius semi-algebras and bialgebras.

Just like any other branch of mathematics, denotational semantics of programming languages should be formalised in type theory, but adapting traditional domain theoretic semantics, as originally formulated in classical set theory to type theory has proven challenging. This paper is part of a project on formulating denotational semantics in type theories with guarded recursion. This should have the benefit of not only giving simpler semantics and proofs of properties such as adequacy, but also hopefully in the future to scale to languages with advanced features, such as general references, outside the reach of traditional domain theoretic techniques.

Working in Guarded Dependent Type Theory (GDTT), we develop denotational semantics for Fixed Point Calculus (FPC), the simply typed lambda calculus extended with recursive types, modelling the recursive types of FPC using the guarded recursive types of GDTT. We prove soundness and computational adequacy of the model in GDTT using a logical relation between syntax and semantics constructed also using guarded recursive types. The denotational semantics is intensional in the sense that it counts the number of unfold-fold reductions needed to compute the value of a term, but we construct a relation relating the denotations of extensionally equal terms, i.e., pairs of terms that compute the same value in a different number of steps. Finally, we show how the denotational semantics of terms can be executed inside type theory and prove that executing the denotation of a boolean term computes the same value as the operational semantics of FPC.