Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  4. Volume 29
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 29 - Winter 1990

Contents

Page 3 of 4

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Citical Notice/Étude critique

  • Waldron on Private Property*

  • Jan Narveson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    13 April 2010, pp. 133-140

  • Do individuals have a right to private property? That is the question pursued in this lengthy investigation (445 pages). Waldron distinguishes utilitarian arguments from “Right-based” ones. That is hardly an exhaustive distinction, one would think; reliance on its being so would not bode well. But having made such a distinction, he believes that the question comes to whether there are “any good right-based arguments for private property.” This, he thinks, amounts to the question: are any important individual interests served “by the existence of private property as opposed to someother sort of property regime?” The alternative, he thinks, is to turn to utilitarian arguments about property institutions, “rather than having it treated as the basis of right” (p. 5). How we are to measure “importance,” and to whom the proposed regimes are to be important is not discussed. And of course some think that we can, too, have a utilitarian-based theory of rights. And there will be other complaints about Waldron's framework; but we will not be able to go further into such matters here.

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Books Received/Livres reçus

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Front matter

  • DIA volume 29 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    13 April 2010, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Back matter

  • DIA volume 29 issue 2 Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    13 April 2010, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Page 3 of 4