Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  4. Volume 12
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all volumes

Volume 12 - June 1989

Contents

Page 19 of 20

Open Peer Commentary

Continuing Commentary

Open Peer Commentary

Author's Response

Open Peer Commentary

Erratum

  • Erratum

  • Robyn M. Dawes
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, p. 187
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • In my comments in BBS (Random generators, ganzfields, analysis, and theory, 1987, 10:581-82) regarding psi, I mistakenly ascribed to Professor Honorton the position that "good experimenters knew in advance that the assertion in the paper I cited (1985), and in fact regards it as a rather foolish one (personal communication 6/25/88). This incorrect assertion was based on my inference - not his - that the most plausible alternative to optional stopping for the negative correlation between sample size and effect size (and even z-scores) was prior knowledge leading to the necessity of sampling fewer observations when the expectation of the estimated effect size was larger.

    Honorton, C. (1985) The Ganzfeld psi experiment: A critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology 49:51-91.

Front matter

  • BBS volume 12 issue 1 Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, pp. f1-f5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Author's Response

Open Peer Commentary

Author's Response

Back matter

  • BBS volume 12 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Open Peer Commentary

Front matter

  • BBS volume 12 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Open Peer Commentary

Page 19 of 20