Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:20:42.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robot teachers: The very idea!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Amanda Sharkey
Amanda Sharkey*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DP, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.sheffield.ac.uk/dcs/people/academics/amandasharkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insufficient attention has been paid to the use of robots in classrooms. Robot “teachers” are being developed, but because Kline ignores such technological developments, it is not clear how they would fit within her framework. It is argued here that robots are not capable of teaching in any meaningful sense, and should be deployed only as educational tools.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caro, T. M. & Hauser, M. D. (1992) Is there teaching in nonhuman animals? The Quarterly Review of Biology 67(2):151–74. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2831436 Google Scholar
Hashimoto, T., Kato, N. & Kobayashi, H. (2011) Development of educational system with the android robot SAYA and evaluation. International Journal Advanced Robotic Systems 8(3):51–61. [Special issue: Assistive Robotics] Paper available at: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/19461.pdf Google Scholar
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D. & Ishiguro, H. (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human Computer Interaction 9:61–84.Google Scholar
Movellan, J., Eckhart, M., Virnes, M. & Rodriguez, A. (2009) Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI 2009), San Diego, CA, March 11-13, 2009, pp. 307–308. ACM/IEEE Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A. & Dong, J. J. (2013) A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning 1:1–7.Google Scholar
Mutlu, B. & Szafir, D. (2012) Pay attention! Designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI 2012), Austin, Texas, May 5-10, 2012, pp. 11–20. ACM Press.Google Scholar
Pelissier, C. (1991) The anthropology of teaching and learning. Annual Review of Anthropology 20:75–95.Google Scholar
Verschueren, K. & Koomen, H. M. (2012) Teacher-child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment and Human Development 14(3):205–11.Google Scholar
Yun, S., Shin, J., Kim, D., Kim, C. G., Kim, M. & Choi, M. T. (2011) Engkey: Tele-education Robot. In: Social Robotics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Robotics, LNAI 7072, ed. Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T., pp. 142–52. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar