London’s seasonal foreign trade reflected its access to northern and continental Europe and the City’s association with the East and West Indies, but coal and other coastal trades dominated daily port activity. London was a tidal river port centred below London Bridge, with waterfront industry spread more widely. Organisationally, it was complex, with many different interests. As foreign trade increased, legal restrictions on landing places for foreign produce were blamed by merchants for congestion. A campaign by mercantile interests for the introduction of docks followed. The author examines the motives here. For leading West India merchants, specialised dock facilities would enable them to control and discipline a directly employed labour force, reducing theft. The eventual outcome, the construction of docks by joint-stock companies, owed much to State support. Its involvement went beyond the introduction of docks. For the government, this was an element of a warehousing scheme designed to develop London as an entrepôt. General port efficiency would be promoted by appointing the Corporation of London as harbour authority.

This chapter explores how differing expectations and experiences manifest in diagnostic interactions in the memory clinic. We do this by microanalysing communication in dementia diagnosis feedback meetings, focusing on instances of misalignment between doctors and the person living with dementia. We examine three videos from a dataset of 101 recordings from two areas in the UK, collected as part of the ShareD study. We present different interactional contexts where the person receiving a dementia diagnosis choose to align or misalign with the doctors’ interactional projects of diagnosis delivery, prescribing medication and recommending support. Examination of these instances suggests that misalignment between the assessment of symptoms may, at least in part, reflect interactional facework in the face of dementia as a challenge to self-identity.

As earlier chapters have made clear, the twenty-first century multinational enterprise (MNE) is markedly different from its twentieth century ancestors. It has been transformed by an environment in which multiple, often conflicting forces accelerate simultaneously. The globalization and deglobalization of markets, the acceleration of product and technology life cycles, the assertion of national governments’ demands, and, above all, the intensification of global competition have created an environment of complexity, diversity, and change for most of today’s MNEs.

This chapter will guide a candidate in pathology topics that regularly appear in Section 1 of the FRCS(Tr&Orth) exam. The chapter asks questions dealing with avascular necrosis, clotting abnormalities and fracture healing. The chapter provides detailed explanations of the SBA questions asked.

This chapter will guide a candidate in the knee questions and topics that regularly appear in Section 1 of the FRCS(Tr&Orth) exam. The chapter deals with trauma, elective arthroplasty and soft tissue knee questions. Up to date information, higher order SBA questions and detailed explanations along with an evidence based approach to the most appropriate answer.

We have come a long way to arrive at this point. It all began with a question regarding what Christology and biology might have in common. The question immediately prompted the observation that Christology and biology together entail a central proposition: that God became incarnate as a human being, a particular rational–moral biological organism shaped by evolution. Although the connection between Christianity’s claim to Incarnation and contemporary biology had never been explored in the science–religion literature, we sought to remedy that deficiency in this book. From this starting point – the relation of Christology and biology – we explored a range of important topics familiar to the science–religion discussion. In the process, we hoped to discover much about our own humanity from theological and scientific perspectives, and therefore much about the humanity that Jesus Christ took on.

In Chapter 4, we review the multi-disciplinary organizational control literature, synthesize its key elements, and present a comprehensive theoretical framework that includes the dimensions of organizational control, the control functions or mechanisms describing how the control dimensions influence outcomes, the control outcomes, and key contingencies. We further submit our framework to an empirical test by examining the proposed relationships with a multidisciplinary meta-analysis of 293 articles, published between 1967 and 2022, that analyzed 310 independent samples, for a total sample size of 110,585. The results of this analysis provide broad support for the key tenets of organizational control theory, including antecedents and control–outcome relationships.

The results also suggest the presence of numerous context factors and contingencies, as well as significant interaction effects between controls, including both complementary and substitution effects among controls. Together, these results attest to the powerful impact, but also the causal complexity, of organizational control.

This is a reprinting of Bohr’s note to Nature advertising his forthcoming response to the EPR paper. It is very brief but contains in essence the argumentative tack Bohr would in fact employ in his full response to EPR.