Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:35:32.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Michael Gorman
Michael Gorman
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America, Washington DC
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union , pp. 167 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Compendium Theologiae in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 42: Compendium theologiae seu Brevis compilatio theologiae ad fratrem Raynaldum (Editori di San Tommaso, Roma, 1979) pp. 5–205.Google Scholar
De Ente et Essentia in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 43: De ente et essentia (Editori di San Tommaso, Roma, 1976) pp. 315–381.Google Scholar
De Principiis Naturae in Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 43: De principiis naturae ad fratrem Sylvestrum (Editori di San Tommaso, Roma, 1976) pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
De Rationibus Fidei in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 40 B: De rationibus Fidei ad cantorem Antiochenum (Ad Sanctae Sabinae, Romae, 1968).Google Scholar
In Duodecim Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio. Ed. Cathala, M.R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (2nd edn.: Marietti, Taurini-Romae, 1971).Google Scholar
In Librum Boethii De Trinitate in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 50: Super Boetium De Trinitate (Commissio Leonina-Éditions Du Cerf, Roma-Paris, 1992) pp. 1–230.Google Scholar
Quaestiones Disputatae De Anima in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 24/1: Quaestiones disputatae de anima. Ed. Bazán, B. C. (Commissio Leonina-Éditions Du Cerf, Roma-Paris, 1996).Google Scholar
Quaestiones Disputatae De Potentia in Quaestiones disputatae, t. 2: Quaestiones disputatae de potentia. Ed. Pession, P. M. (10th edn.: Marietti, Taurini-Romae, 1965) pp. 1–276.Google Scholar
Quaestio Disputata De Spiritualibus Creatoris in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 24/2: Quaestio disputata de spiritualibus creaturis. Ed. Cos, J. (Commissio Leonina-Éditions Du Cerf, Roma-Paris, 2000).Google Scholar
Quaestio Disputata De Unione Verbi Incarnati in Thomas Von Aquin: Quaestio Disputata De unione Verbi incarnati. Ed. Senner, W., Bartocci, B., and Obenauer, K. (Stuttgart: Frommann – Holzboog: 2011).Google Scholar
Quaestiones Disputatae De Veritate in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 22: Quaestiones disputatae de veritate (Ad Sanctae Sabinae/Editori di San Tommaso, Roma, 1975-1970-1972-1973-1976) 3 vol.Google Scholar
Quaestiones de Quodlibet in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 25/1: Quaestiones de quolibet. Préface. Quodlibet VII, VIII, IX, X, XI; t. 25/2: Quaestiones de quolibet. Quodlibet I, II, III, VI, IV, V, XII (Commissio Leonina-Éditions du Cerf, Roma-Paris, 1996).Google Scholar
Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi, Part III. Ed. Moos, M. F. (P. Lethielleux, Paris, 1956).Google Scholar
Summa Contra Gentiles in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnis iussu Leionis XIII P. M. edita t. 13-15: Summa Contra Gentiles (Typis Riccardi Garroni, Romae, 1918, 1926).Google Scholar
Summa Theologiae in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita t. 4-12 (Romae, 1882—).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adams, Marilyn McCord. “The Metaphysics of the Incarnation in some Fourteenth-Century Franciscans.” In Frank, William A. and Etzkorn, Girard J., eds., Essays Honoring Allan B. Wolter. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Press, 1985, pp. 21–57.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. What Sort of Human Nature? Medieval Philosophy and the Systematics of Christology. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almog, Joseph. “The Structure-in-Things: Existence, Essence and Logic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2003): 197–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Allan. “Aquinas on the Incarnation.” The New Scholasticism 56 (1982): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Allan. On Reduplication. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Corey. “Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Person, Hypostasis, and the Hypostatic Union.” The Thomist 72 (2008): 107–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Corey. “Christological Composition in Thirteenth Century Debates.” The Thomist 75 (2011): 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearsley, Patrick J. “Jesus the Son of Mary according to St. Thomas Aquinas.” Angelicum 55 (1978): 104–123.Google Scholar
Boethius, , Contra Eutychen et Nestorium, as found in Boethius, Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., and Tester, S. J., Loeb Classical Library vol. 74. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Boyle, John F. “The Twofold Division of St. Thomas’s Christology in the Tertia Pars.” The Thomist 60 (1996): 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bro, Bernard. “La notion métaphysique de tout et son application au problème théologique de l’union hypostatique.” Revue Thomiste 67 (1967): pt. 1 (29–62), pt. 2 (561–583); Revue Thomiste 68 (1968): pt. 1 (181–197), pt. 2 (357–380).Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey. “Medieval Theories of Relations.” In Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ spr2014/entries/relations-medieval/.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen F. “Thomas Aquinas and his Contemporaries on the Unique Existence in Christ.” In Emery, K. and Wawrykow, J., eds., Christ among the Medieval Dominicans. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998, pp. 220–237.Google Scholar
Bouthillier, Denise. “Le Christ en son mystère dans les Collationes du Super Isaiam de Saint Thomas d’Aquin.” In Pinto de Oliveira, C. J., ed., Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires, 1993, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Commentary on the Summa theologiae. Printed together with Leonine edition of the Summa theologiae.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia. Peter Lombard. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Corvez, M. “L’unicité d’éxistence dans le Christ.” Revue Thomiste 56 (1956): 413–426.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Aquinas on Nature, Hypostasis, and the Metaphysics of the Incarnation.” The Thomist 60 (1996): 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Richard. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, Paul G. “Instrumentum Divinitatis in Thomas Aquinas: Recovering the Divinity of Christ.” Theological Studies 52 (1991): 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauphinais, Michael and Levering, Matthew. Knowing the Love of Christ: An Introduction to the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Decaen, Chris. “Elemental Virtual Presence in St. Thomas.” The Thomist 64 (2000): 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. “Recent Work in Essentialism.” Philosophical Books 37 (1996): 1–13, 81–89.Google Scholar
Deloffre, Marie-Hélène. Quaestio disputata de unione verbi incarnati by Saint Thomas Aquinas, Translation and Commentary. Paris: J. Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar
Diepen, Hermann. “La Critique du Baslisme selon St. Thomas d’Aquin II.” Revue Thomiste 50 (1950), pp. 290–339.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. “La Problematica Dello ‘Esse’ Thomistico.” In his Tomismo e Pensiero Moderno. Roma: Pontificia Università Lateranense, 1969, pp. 103–33.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. “Essence and Modality.” In Tomblin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives, 8: Logic and Language, pp. 1–16. Ridgeview: Atascadero, 1994.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. “Senses of Essence.” In Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, ed., Modality, Morality, and Belief. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J. “Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation.” Faith and Philosophy 3 (1986): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froula, John. “Christ’s Esse Secundarium.” The Thomist 78 (2014): 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtier, Paul. “L’union hypostatique et Saint Thomas.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 7 (1930) 425–470.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Larange, Rginald. De Christo Salvatore: Commentarius in IIIam Pertem Summae Theologicae Sancti Thomae. Torino: R. Berruti, 1945.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Larange, Rginald. “Le possibilité de l’Incarnation sans aucune déviation panthéistique.” Angelicum 30 (1953): 337–346.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. The Unity of Philosophical Experience. Reprinted Westminster, MD: Christian Classics, 1982.Google Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. “Anti-Docetism in Aquinas’s Super Ioannem.” In Dauphinais, Michael and Levering, Matthew, eds., Reading John with St. Thomas. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005, pp. 254–276.Google Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. The Passions of Christ’s Soul in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Reprinted Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. “Aquinas, the Communication of Idioms, and the Suffering of Christ.” In Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 214–245.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Logical and Metaphysical Form: Lessons from the Theory of Dependence.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69 (1995): 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. The Hypostatic Union According to Thomas Aquinas. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Theology, Boston College, 1997.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Christ as Composite According to Aquinas.” Traditio 55 (2000): 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Personal Unity and the Problem of Christ’s Knowledge.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74 (2000): 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Uses of the Person-Nature Distinction in Thomas’s Christology.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 67 (2000): 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “The Essential and the Accidental.” Ratio 18 (2005): 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Independence and Substance.” International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006): 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Incarnation.” In Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore, eds., Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 428–435.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “On Substantial Independence: A Reply to Patrick Toner.” Philosophical Studies 59 (2012): 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Christological Consistency and the Reduplicative Qua.” Journal of Analytic Theology 2 (2014): 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Essentiality as Foundationality.” In Novotny, Daniel and Novak, Lukas, eds., Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics. New York and London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 119–137.Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael. “Two Types of Features: An Aristotelian Approach.” Ratio 27 (2014): 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. Philosophy and Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys. Christ in Christian Tradition, vol. 1, trans. Bowden, John, 2nd edn. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys. Christ in Christian Tradition, vol. 2, part 1, trans. Allen, Pauline and Cawte, John. London and Oxford: Mowbray, 1987.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys, in collaboration with Hainthaler, Theresia, Christ in Christian Tradition, vol. 2, part 2, trans. Cawte, John and Allen, Pauline. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. “Christ’s Act of Existence.” Downside Review 73 (1955): 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henninger, Mark. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250-1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hipp, Stephen. The Doctrine of Personal Subsistence: Historical and Systematic Synthesis. Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg, 2012.Google Scholar
Hofer, Andrew. “Dionysian Elements in Thomas Aquinas’s Christology: A Case of the Authority and Ambiguity of Pseudo-Dionysius.” The Thomist 72 (2008): 409–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Christopher. On a Complex Theory of a Simple God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Philipp. Die Gott-menschliche Einigung in Christus als Problem der speculativen Theologie seit der Scholastik. München: Heuber, 1968.Google Scholar
Kelly, Matthew J. “‘Subject,’ ‘Substance,’ and ‘Accident’ in St. Thomas.” The New Scholasticism 50 (1976): 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Libellus pro sapiente: A Criticism of Allan Bäck?s Argument against St. Thomas Aquinas? Doctrine of the Incarnation.” The New Scholasticism 58 (1984): 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “Contemporary ‘Essentialism’ vs. Aristotelian Essentialism.” In Haldane, John, ed., Mind, Metaphysics and Value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002, pp. 175–194.Google Scholar
Koster, P. “Die Menschennatur in Christus Hat Ihr Eigenes Dasein?” In Auer, J. and Volk, H., eds., Theologie in Geschichte Und Gegenwart. Munich, 1957, pp. 607–624.Google Scholar
Koterski, Joseph W. “Boethius and the Theological Origins of the Concept of Peron.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2004): 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgraf, A. M. Dogmengeschichte der Frühscholastik, 4 volumes. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 1952–1956.Google Scholar
Lafont, Ghislain. Peut-on connaître Dieu en Jésus Christ? Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1969.Google Scholar
Leroy, Marie-Vincent. “L’union selon l’hypostase d’après saint Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue Thomiste 74 (1974): 205–243.Google Scholar
Mansini, Guy. “Understanding St. Thomas on Christ’s Immediate Knowledge of God.” The Thomist 59 (1995): 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manthey, Franz. Die Sprachphilosophie des hl. Thomas von Aquin und ihre Anwendung auf Probleme der Theologie. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1937.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce. Christology in Conflict. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce. “The Dereliction of Christ and the Impassibility of God.” In Keating, James F. and White, Thomas Joseph, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009, pp. 246–298.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher. The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas: Introductory Readings. New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. “Aristotelian Essentialism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1990): 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondin, Battista. St. Thomas Aquinas’s Philosophy in the Commentary to the Sentences. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995.Google Scholar
Mondin, Battista. La cristologia di San Tommaso d’Aquino: origine, dottrine principali, attualità. Vatican City: Urbaniana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. “St. Thomas on the Identity and Unity of the Person of Christ: A Problem of Reference in Christological Discourse.” Scottish Journal of Theology 35 (1982): 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, L. O. Theology and Philosophy in the Twelfth Century: A Study of Gilbert of Porreta’s Thinking and Theological Expositions of the Doctrine of the Incarnation during the Period 1130-1180. (Acta theologica danica series) Leiden: Brill, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oderberg, David. Real Essentialism. New York: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Seung-Chan. Die Rezeption der Mittelalterlichen Sprachphilosophie in der Theologie des Thomas von Aquin. Leiden: Brill, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patfoort, A. L’unité d’être dans le Christ d’après S. Thomas; à la croisée de l’ontologie et de la christologie. Paris: Desclée, 1964.Google Scholar
Pelster, F. “La Quaestio disputata de saint Thomas ‘De unione Verbi incarnati’.” Archives de Philosophie 3 (1925): 198–245.Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Isagoge, trans. Warren, Edward W.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1975.Google Scholar
Principe, Walter. William of Auxerre’s Theology of the Hypostatic Union. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1963.Google Scholar
Principe, Walter. “St. Thomas and the Habitus-Theory of the Incarnation.” In Mauer, Armand et al., eds., St. Thomas Aquinas 1274-1974: Commemorative Studies. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1974, 381–418.Google Scholar
Raschko, Michael. “Aquinas’s Theology of the Incarnation in Light of Lombard’s Subsistence Theory.” The Thomist 65 (2001): 409–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichmann, James B. “Aquinas, Scotus and the Christological Mystery: Why Christ is not a Human Person.” The Thomist 71 (2004): 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. “Philosophy as the Handmaid of Theology: Aquinas on Christ’s Causality.” In Kerr, Fergus, ed., Contemplating Aquinas: On the Varieties of Interpretation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003, pp. 217–245.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Hale, Bob and Hoffmann, Aviv, eds., Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruello, Francis. La Christologie de Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Beauchesne, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, Victor. “Thomas Aquinas on Christ’s Esse.” The Thomist 70 (2006): 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. “On What Grounds What.” In Manley, David, Chambers, David J., and Wasserman, Ryan, eds., Metaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 347–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiltz, E. “Si Christus humanam naturam quam assumpsit deponeret.” Divus Thomas 42 (1939): 3–16.Google Scholar
Schoot, Henk J. M. Christ, the ‘Name’ of God: Thomas Aquinas on Naming Christ. Leuven: Peters, 1993.Google Scholar
Schweizer, Othmar. Person und Hypostatische Union bei Thomas von Aquin. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg, 1957.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. Ordinatio. In Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera Omnia, vols. 1–14. Città del Vaticano, Typis Vaticanis, 1950.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. Tractatus de primo principio – Abhandlung uber das erste Prinzip. Ed. and trans. Kluxen, Wolfgang. 4th edition. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2009.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Aquinas’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation.” In Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, and O’Collins, Gerald, ed., The Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. 2 vols. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Titus, Craig Stevens. “Passions in Christ: Spontaneity, Development, and Virtue.” The Thomist 73 (2009): 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. “Le thomisme dans le débat christologique contemporain.” In Bonino, Serge-Thomas, ed., Saint Thomas au XXe siècle. Paris: Saint-Paul, 1994, pp. 379–393.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas. Vol. 1, The Person and His Work. Translated by Royal, Robert. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Le Verbe incarné. 3 volumes. Paris: Editions du cerf, 2002.Google Scholar
Walgrave, J.H. “The Use of Philosophy in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas.” In Verbeke, G. and Verhelst, D., eds., Aquinas and Problems of His Time. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1976, pp. 181–193.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, Joseph Peter. “Thomas Aquinas and Christology After 1277.” In Aertsen, Jan A., Emery, Kent Jr., and Speer, Andreas, eds., Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 299–319.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, Joseph Peter. “Hypostatic Union.” In van Nieumenhove, Rik and Wawrykow, Joseph Peter, eds., The Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005, 222–251.Google Scholar
Weber, Edouard-Henri. Le Christ selon Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Desclée, 1988.Google Scholar
Weinandy, Thomas. “Aquinas and the Incarnation as Act: ‘Become’ as a Mixed Relation.” Doctor Communis 32 (1979): 15–31.Google Scholar
Weinandy, Thomas. Does God Change?: The Word’s Becoming in the Incarnation. Still River, MA: St. Bede’s Publications, 1985.Google Scholar
Weinandy, Thomas. “Aquinas: God IS Man: The Marvel of the Incarnation.” In Keating, Daniel A., Yocum, John, and Weinandy, Thomas G., eds., Aquinas on Doctrine: A Critical Introduction. London; New York: T & T Clark International, 2004, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
West, J. L. A. “Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Esse in Christ.” The Thomist 66 (2002): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, J. L. A. “Nature, Specific Difference, and Degrees of Being: Metaphysical Background to Aquinas’s Anti-Monophysite Arguments.” Nova et Vetera 3 (2005): 39–80.Google Scholar
West, J. L. A. “Aquinas on Peter Lombard and the Metaphysical Status of Christ’s Human Nature.” Gregorianum 88, 3 (2007): 557–586.Google Scholar
West, J. L. A. “The Real Distinction between Supposit and Nature.” In Wisdom’s Apprentice: Thomistic Essays in Honor of Lawrence Dewan, O.P. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
White, Kevin. “Act and Fact: On a Disputed Question in Recent Thomistic Metaphysics.” The Review of Metaphysics 68 (2014): 287–312.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas.” In Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Gorman, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316651827.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Gorman, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316651827.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Gorman, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316651827.009
Available formats
×