A great divide between “Ivory Tower” academics and those
engaged in applied politics characterizes popular perceptions for those on
both sides of this chasm. Yet, after spending a year in Washington, D.C.,
as part of the APSA's Congressional Fellowship Program, it is evident
that there are commonalities as well as differences between these two
groups. However, applied career opportunities are rarely investigated by
graduate students in political science, who aim instead for a tenured
position in academe. According to the most recent data collected by the
APSA, only 7 to 13% of Ph.D.s selected a non-academic position or career
track during the period from 1990 through 2000, and this trend remained
stable during the early part of this decade (Lopez 2003, 836).The author would like to thank Jeff Biggs,
director of the Congressional Fellowship Program, and Michael Brintnall of
the American Political Science Association. She also thanks Gene Alpert,
Stan Bach, Arthur Burris, Beth Fuchs, John Haskell, Scott Keeter, Bill
Koetzle, George Kundanis, Celinda Lake, Congressman Dan Lipinski, Thomas
Mann, Norm Ornstein, Neil Pinney, John Ratliff, and Ben Scott for their
contributions and insights. Those included in this study are not intended
to be an exhaustive or representative list of political science Ph.D.s
working in applied settings.