Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:04:36.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competing reasons, incomplete preferences, and framing effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2022

Richard Pettigrew Open the ORCID record for Richard Pettigrew [Opens in a new window]
Richard Pettigrew*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK [email protected] richardpettigrew.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quasi-cyclical preferences that Bermúdez ascribes to Agamemnon and others in analogous situations do not best represent them. I offer two alternative accounts. One works best if the preference ordering is taken to be the agent's personal betterness ordering of acts; the other works best if it is taken to provide a summary of the agent's dispositions to act.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e236
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broome, J. (1991). Weighing goods. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behaviour. Economica, 5(17), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15(60), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar