The primary objective was to determine the rate of clinical actions taken post-discharge on updated microbiology results by an ID pharmacist-led team. Secondary objectives were to describe the microbiology results requiring intervention, characterize interventions by type and severity, and determine time from result to clinical review.

Retrospective cohort study.

Four hospitals within Mayo Clinic, including two large academic centers and two Mayo Clinic Health System sites.

Adult patients at four sites within Mayo Clinic from 1/1/2019 to 2/28/2023. Eligible patients had a hospitalization with an ID consult and an updated microbiology result reported after discharge.

Pharmacists reviewed a report of selected patients with microbiology tests that resulted post-discharge within the last 24–96 hours. Interventions were recorded electronically in real-time by the pharmacist. Of those patient encounters with an intervention, a sample of 200 patient encounters was randomly selected for detailed chart abstraction.

A total of 6,792 encounters with at least one microbiology result reviewed post-discharge were identified. Of these encounters, 1977 (29%) had at least one resulting intervention. Median time from test update to clinical review was 27.2 hours (IQR 21.6–69.6). The highest severity ratings, in which failure to intervene may have resulted in patient harm, were assigned to the intervention in 28% of cases.

For patients seen by an inpatient ID consult service, a post-hospital discharge microbiology result review process performed by ID-trained pharmacists effectively addressed abnormal results during the transition of care. Similar processes may be considered at other institutions.

Inpatient antibiotic use increased during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to determine whether these changes persisted in persons with and without COVID-19 infection.

Retrospective cohort analysis.

108 Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities.

Persons receiving acute inpatient care from January 2016 to October 2022.

Data on antibacterial use, patient days present, and COVID-19 care were extracted from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 days present (DP) were calculated and stratified by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined antibiotic classes.

Antibiotic use increased from 534 DOT/1000 DP in 11/2019–2/2020 to 588 DOT/1000 DP in 3/2020–4/2020. Subsequently, antibiotic use decreased such that total DOT/1000 DP was 2% less in 2020 as a whole than in 2019. Driven by treatment for community acquired pneumonia, antibiotic use was 30% higher in persons with COVID-19 than in uninfected persons in 3/2020–4/2020, but only 4% higher for the remainder of 2020. In 2022 system-wide antibiotic use was 9% less in persons with COVID-19; however, antibiotic use remained higher in persons with COVID-19 in 25% of facilities.

Although antibiotic use increased during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, overall use subsequently decreased to below previous baseline levels and, in 2022, was less in persons with COVID-19 than in persons without COVID-19. However, further work needs to be done to address variances across facilities and to determine whether current levels of antibiotic use in persons with COVID-19 are justified.

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is typically associated with serious physical illnesses that are prevalent in palliative care. However, individuals with mental illnesses may also experience such severity that life becomes intolerable. In February 2020, the previous German law prohibiting PAS was repealed. Patients with severe mental illnesses are increasingly likely to approach physicians with requests for PAS.

To explore the ethical and moral perspectives of medical students and physicians when making individual decisions regarding PAS.

An anonymised digital survey was conducted among medical students and physicians in Germany. Participants were presented with a case vignette of a chronically depressed patient requesting PAS. Participants decided on PAS provision and assessed theoretical arguments. We employed generalised ordinal regression and qualitative analysis for data interpretation.

A total of N = 1478 participants completed the survey. Of these, n = 470 (32%) stated that they would refuse the request, whereas n = 582 (39%) would probably refuse, n = 375 (25%) would probably agree and n = 57 (4%) would definitely agree. Patient-centred arguments such as the right to self-determination increased the likelihood of consent. Concerns that PAS for chronically depressed patients might erode trust in the medical profession resulted in a decreased willingness to provide PAS.

Participants displayed relatively low willingness to consider PAS in the case of a chronically depressed patient. This study highlights the substantial influence of theoretical medical-ethical arguments and the broader public discourse, underscoring the necessity of an ethical discussion on PAS for mental illnesses.

This cross-sectional study aims to determine the mortality trends in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic in Flint, MI.

Records from 1,663 consecutive adult patients (≥18 years of age) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, admitted and discharged from our facility from 03/2020 through 02/2022, were abstracted and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between study explanatory variables (ie, sex, age, co-morbidities, etc.) and the primary study outcome (ie, mortality).

During the 2-year study period, the overall crude 90-day mortality rate was 16.1% (267/1663), being lowest in the period 5 (Table 1). Male sex, older age, certain co-morbidities, supplemental oxygenation use, and lack of immunization were associated with mortality. Therapeutics such as remdesivir and steroids were not associated with improved survival.

Despite substantial changes in supportive care, management and circulating variants, SARS-CoV-2 carried a significant mortality risk. Vaccination coverage in this high-risk study sample was low, at only 12%. Public health efforts should be focused at overcoming the barriers to vaccine acceptance in this high-risk unique population.

The serotonin 4 receptor (5-HT4R) is a promising target for the treatment of depression. Highly selective 5-HT4R agonists, such as prucalopride, have antidepressant-like and procognitive effects in preclinical models, but their clinical effects are not yet established.

To determine whether prucalopride (a 5-HT4R agonist and licensed treatment for constipation) is associated with reduced incidence of depression in individuals with no past history of mental illness, compared with anti-constipation agents with no effect on the central nervous system.

Using anonymised routinely collected data from a large-scale USA electronic health records network, we conducted an emulated target trial comparing depression incidence over 1 year in individuals without prior diagnoses of major mental illness, who initiated treatment with prucalopride versus two alternative anti-constipation agents that act by different mechanisms (linaclotide and lubiprostone). Cohorts were matched for 121 covariates capturing sociodemographic factors, and historical and/or concurrent comorbidities and medications. The primary outcome was a first diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-10 code F32) within 1 year of the index date. Robustness of the results to changes in model and population specification was tested. Secondary outcomes included a first diagnosis of six other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Treatment with prucalopride was associated with significantly lower incidence of depression in the following year compared with linaclotide (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.76–0.99; P = 0.038; n = 8572 in each matched cohort) and lubiprostone (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.91; P < 0.001; n = 8281). Significantly lower risks of all mood disorders and psychosis were also observed. Results were similar across robustness analyses.

These findings support preclinical data and suggest a role for 5-HT4R agonists as novel agents in the prevention of major depression. These findings should stimulate randomised controlled trials to confirm if these agents can serve as a novel class of antidepressant within a clinical setting.

Clozapine-induced inflammation, such as myocarditis and pneumonia, can occur during initial titration and can be fatal. Fever is often the first sign of severe inflammation, and early detection and prevention are essential. Few studies have investigated the effects of clozapine titration speed and concomitant medication use on the risk of clozapine-induced inflammation.

We evaluated the risk factors for clozapine-associated fever, including titration speed, concomitant medication use, gender and obesity, and their impact on the risk of fever and the fever onset date.

We conducted a case-control study. The medical records of 539 Japanese participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia at 21 hospitals in Japan who received clozapine for the first time between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Of these, 512 individuals were included in the analysis. Individuals were divided into three groups according to the titration rate recommended by international guidelines for East Asians: the faster titration group, the slower titration group and the ultra-slower titration group. The use of concomitant medications (such as antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, hypnotics and anxiolytics) at clozapine initiation was comprehensively investigated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the explanatory variables for the risk of a fever of 37.5°C or higher lasting at least 2 days.

Fever risk significantly increased with faster titration, male gender and concomitant use of valproic acid or quetiapine. No increased fever risk was detected with the use of other concomitant drugs, such as olanzapine, lithium or orexin receptor antagonists. Fever onset occurred significantly earlier with faster titration. Multivariate analysis identified obesity as being a factor that accelerated fever onset.

A faster titration speed and concomitant treatment with valproic acid and quetiapine at clozapine initiation increased the risk of clozapine-associated fever. Clinicians should titrate clozapine with caution and consider both the titration speed and concomitant medications.

Depressive disorders in adolescents affect all aspects of life and impose a very large burden of disease. Sleep is frequently affected by depression and is crucial for facing challenges during development. One of the postulated reasons for depression-induced sleep disruption is dysregulation of the physiological stress system.

To investigate the links of adolescent depressive disorders with subjective sleep quality, objective sleep quality, and the course of cortisol and alpha-amylase after awakening.

We compared subjective sleep quality (via daily questionnaires) and objective sleep quality (via actigraphy measurement) of 35 adolescents with depressive disorders and 29 healthy controls over 7 consecutive days. In addition, saliva samples were collected on 3 days to examine cortisol and alpha-amylase patterns after awakening.

No significant differences in cortisol or alpha-amylase awakening responses were observed between participants with depressive disorders and healthy controls. We found severe reductions in subjective sleep quality in the depression group (Z = −5.19, P < 0.001, d = 1.80) and a prolonged actigraphy-measured sleep onset latency (Z = −2.42, P = 0.015, d = 0.64) compared with controls. Reductions in subjective sleep quality were partially correlated with objective sleep measures (sleep onset latency: r = −0.270, P = 0.004, sleep efficiency: r = 0.215, P = 0.017).

Sleep onset latency seems to aggravate depressive symptoms and to have an important role in perception of sleep quality. Adolescents with depressive disorders should be supported regarding the establishment of good sleep hygiene and avoiding activities that may impede falling asleep.

Only a third of people with dementia receive a diagnosis and post-diagnostic support. An eight session, manualised, modular post-diagnostic support system (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) – family), delivered remotely by non-clinical facilitators is the first scalable intervention to improve personalised goal attainment for people with dementia. It could significantly improve care quality.

We aimed to explore system readiness for NIDUS–family, a scalable, personalised post-diagnostic support intervention.

We conducted semi-structured interviews with professionals from dementia care services; the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided interviews and their thematic analysis.

From 2022 to 2023, we interviewed a purposive sample of 21 professionals from seven English National Health Service, health and social care services. We identified three themes: (1) potential value of a personalised intervention – interviewees perceived the capacity for choice and supporting person-centred care as relative advantages over existing resources; (2) compatibility and deliverability with existing systems – the NIDUS–family intervention model was perceived as compatible with service goals and clients’ needs, but current service infrastructures, financing and commissioning briefs constraining resources to those at greatest need were seen as barriers to providing universal, post-diagnostic care; (3) fit with current workforce skills – the intervention model aligned well with staff development plans; delivery by non-clinically qualified staff was considered an advantage over current care options.

Translating evidence for scalable and effective post-diagnostic care into practice will support national policies to widen access to support and upskill support workers, but requires a greater focus on prevention in commissioning briefs and resource planning.