Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms are hypothesized to be driven by two core motivations: harm avoidance and incompleteness. While cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for OCD, many posit that OCD presentations characterized by high incompleteness may be harder to treat. The relationship between the core motivations and treatment outcomes remains to be further explored.

To investigate if harm avoidance and incompleteness decrease across group CBT and to examine the relationship between treatment outcomes and both baseline and changes in harm avoidance and incompleteness throughout treatment.

A naturalistic sample of 65 adult out-patients with OCD completed self-report questionnaires measuring OCD symptom severity and the core motivations before, during, and after 12 weeks of group CBT for OCD.

Harm avoidance and incompleteness scores significantly decreased from pre- to post-treatment. Pre-treatment harm avoidance and incompleteness levels did not predict post-treatment symptom severity, but changes in the core motivations throughout treatment were significant predictors of treatment outcome. Specifically, reductions in harm avoidance across treatment and reductions in incompleteness early in treatment, were associated with better treatment outcomes.

Participants who completed group CBT for OCD experienced modest reductions in the core motivations thought to maintain OCD symptoms and these changes predicted better outcomes. However, pre-treatment levels of harm avoidance and incompleteness do not appear to moderate treatment outcome.

Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) are increasingly being used to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), despite limited evidence of their efficacy. PTSD is often comorbid with major depression, and little is known about whether comorbid depression alters the effectiveness of CBMPs.

To document the prevalence of depression among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat PTSD and to examine whether the effectiveness of CBMPs varies by depression status.

Data were available for 238 people with PTSD seeking CBMP treatment (5.9% of the treatment-seeking sample) and 3-month follow-up data were available for 116 of these. Self-reported PTSD symptoms were assessed at treatment entry and at 3-month follow-up using the PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version (PCL-C). The probable presence of comorbid depression at treatment entry was assessed using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported quality of life.

In total, 77% met screening criteria for depression, which was associated with higher levels of PTSD symptomatology (mean 67.8 v. 48.4, F(1,236) = 118.5, P < 0.001) and poorer general health, quality of life and sleep. PTSD symptomatology reduced substantially 3 months after commencing treatment (mean 58.0 v. 47.0, F(1,112) = 14.5, P < 0.001), with a significant interaction (F(1,112) = 6.2, P < 0.05) indicating greater improvement in those with depression (mean difference 15.3) than in those without (mean difference 7).

Depression is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat PTSD and is associated with greater symptom severity and poorer quality of life. Effectiveness of CBMPs for treating PTSD does not appear to be impaired in people with comorbid depression.

Cognitive problems, both complaints and objective impairments, are frequent and disabling in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and profoundly affect daily living. However, intervention studies that focus on cognitive problems that patients experience in their daily lives are limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on patient-reported cognitive complaints in MS.

In this randomized-controlled trial, MS patients with cognitive complaints completed questionnaires and underwent neuropsychological assessments at baseline, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. Patient-reported cognitive complaints were primarily investigated. Secondary outcomes included personalized cognitive goals and objective cognitive function. CRT and MBCT were compared to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) using linear mixed models.

Patients were randomized into CRT (n=37), MBCT (n=36) or ETAU (n=37), of whom 100 completed the study. Both CRT and MBCT positively affected patient-reported cognitive complaints compared to ETAU at post-treatment (p<.05), but not 6 months later. At 6-month follow-up, CRT had a positive effect on personalized cognitive goals (p=.028) and MBCT on processing speed (p=.027). Patients with less cognitive complaints at baseline benefited more from CRT on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (i.e. primary outcome measuring cognitive complaints) at post-treatment (p=.012-.040), and those with better processing speed at baseline benefited more from MBCT (p=.016).

Both CRT and MBCT alleviated cognitive complaints in MS patients immediately after treatment completion, but these benefits did not persist. In the long term, CRT showed benefits on personalized cognitive goals and MBCT on processing speed. These results thereby provide insight in the specific contributions of available cognitive treatments for MS patients.

Community reintegration and participation have been shown to be significantly correlated to improved Quality of Life (QoL) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), yet these models often come with significant levels of unaccounted variability (Pierce and Hanks, 2006). Measures for community participation frequently employ objective measures of participation, such as number of outings in a week or current employment status (Migliorini et al., 2016), which may not adequately account for lifestyle differences, especially in aging populations. Less often integrated are subjective measures of an individual’s own belongingness and autonomy within the community (Heineman et al., 2011), also referred to as their participation enfranchisement (PE). The present study examines three questions pertinent to the potential clinical value of PE. First, do measures of objective participation significantly predict an individual’s PE ratings? Second, are both types of measures equally successful predictors of QoL for aging individuals with chronic-stage msTBI. Finally, would controlling for either objective or subjective integration ratings enable neurocognitive assessments to better predict QoL post injury?

41 older-adults (M= 65.32; SD= 7.51) with a history of msTBI were included (M= 12.59 years post-injury;SD= 8.29) for analysis. Subjective community integration was measured through the Participation Enfranchisement Survey. The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) provided the objective measurement of participation. Quality of life was assessed through the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI). An estimate of neurocognitive performance was created through the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT), which includes six domains including: verbal-learning and memory (immediate and delayed recall), working memory (digit-span backwards), reasoning (number sequencing), semantic fluency (category fluency), and processing speed (backwards counting). Performance on the BTACT, PE ratings, and PART-O scores were included as the dependent variables in stepwise, linear regression models predicting QoL ratings to assess the differential contribution of the dependent variables and potential interaction effects.

While both the PART-O (f(1,39)=5.52;p=.024,n2=.124) and the PE survey (f(1,39)=14.31 ;p<.001,n2=.268) significantly predicted QoL, the addition of PE in the PART-O model resulted in significant (20.9%) reduction in unaccounted variance. Further in the model controlling for PE, PART-O no longer provides a significant (p=.15) contribution to the model estimating QoL (f(2,38)=8.41; p=.001). Performance on the BTACT correlated with PART-O (p<.0001), but not PE (p=.13) ratings. Finally, across two models controlling for BTACT performance, PE (p=.002,partial n2=.23), but not PART-O (p=.28,partial n2=.031) contributed significantly to QoL predictions. No significant interactions between PART-O, PE, and/or BTACT were observed when added to any model.

MsTBI impacts nearly every facet of an individual’s life, and as such, improving QoL post-injury requires a broad, yet well-considered approach. The objective ratings of participation, subjective PE, BTACT performance, all independently predicted quality of life in this sample. However, after controlling for neurocognitive assessment performance, PE was shown to independently contribute to quality of life, while the PART-O ratings no longer provided significant contribution. While community integration is a vital factor to consider for long-term rehabilitation, tailoring what “integration” means to the patient may hold significant potential to improve long-term quality of life.

Finding effective, innovative, and accessible methods of coping with and mitigating stress has been increasingly relevant in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, it is important to understand the impact of acute stress responses on cognition, behavior, and emotional functioning. The young adult population in particular has been known to show higher levels of stress. Studies have shown that deep breathing interventions are associated with improved affect, decreased stress levels, and improved cognitive functioning. The autonomic nervous system, particularly the functioning of the vagus nerve, has been thought to be a key mechanism in the effect of breathing on stress and mood. Most studies to date investigating the efficacy of breathing practices in stress reduction and mood improvement have lacked appropriate methodology, including adequate control groups, randomization, and cross-sectional designs. This single-blind, randomized, waitlist-controlled study investigated the feasibility of using a mobile application to train in resonance frequency breathing and its efficacy in reducing stress and improving cognitive functioning in a non-clinical sample of young adults with elevated stress.

80 healthy young adults with elevated stress levels were recruited from the NY/NJ community and the Queens College undergraduate research subject pool. Inclusion criteria: ages 18-29, Perceived Stress Scale score >13. Exclusion criteria: regular (at least 3 times per week) practice of any form of meditation, yoga, or breathing exercise; severe medical or psychiatric disorder; active suicidal ideation; drug or alcohol abuse within the past year; use of medication with a known negative impact on cognition or autonomic nervous system (ANS) arousal. Participants were randomized to a waitlist control group or breathing group. Participants in the breathing group were instructed to complete 10-minute breathing sessions using the free mobile application “The Breathing App” twice a day for five days per week for four weeks. Cognitive assessments were administered over the phone (pre and post-treatment) and self-report measures were completed online due to quarantine restrictions.

There were no significant main effects of group across any of the neuropsychological variables, including verbal memory, letter fluency, category fluency, cognitive flexibility, processing speed, basic attention span, and working memory. This indicated that breathing training did not significantly impact neuropsychological performance. Mediation analysis also demonstrated that breathing training did not indirectly lead to improvement in basic attention, processing speed, working memory, set-shifting, verbal fluency, category fluency, or cognitive flexibility, through its effects on stress reduction.

These results do not support literature suggesting that breathing at resonance frequency is associated with improved cognitive functioning such as greater cognitive flexibility, improved decision-making, stronger response inhibition, faster processing speed, and increased working memory. Future study designs should consider implementing active control groups (e.g., mindfulness meditation) and differential dosages of the breathing treatment.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.

Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.

The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p<.001).

The BSI-18 can detect changes in different domains of psychological distress as a function of TMS treatment. Unexpectedly, TMS patients with elevated levels of anxiety responded well to treatment despite comorbid anxiety often being associated with less favorable outcomes in treatment trials. The positive relationship of the BSI-D and PHQ-9 before and after treatment suggests the use of the BSI as a valid, additional measure of depressive symptoms.

The world population is rapidly aging, and consequently, cognitive decline is becoming a larger public health crisis. There is no cure for dementia, but exercise has been consistently shown to improve cognitive function and slow cognitive decline in older adults. Given the many barriers to starting an exercise routine, walking is a particularly appealing intervention because it is safe, low-impact, and highly accessible (i.e., no upfront costs, no necessary equipment, and can be done almost anywhere and by anyone, given they are ambulatory). This abstract describes a systematic review and meta-analysis on peer-reviewed studies that examined randomized walking interventions for cognitive function in older adults.

The analyses included 1,286 older adults aged 55 and older (mean age = 73.1 years) across 19 studies that met inclusion criteria. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of walking interventions with pre-post cognitive outcome data. A total of eight cognitive domains were identified: global cognition, attention, processing speed, working memory, language, visuospatial skills, declarative memory, and executive function. Effect sizes, measured as net treatment gain, were extracted and converted to Hedges’ g. Three-level meta-analysis was used to account for dependency of effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses were used to examine whether the following variables moderated effect sizes: (a) cognitive status, (b) baseline activity level, (c) age, (d) walking intervention duration, and (e) duration of individual walking sessions.

Participation in walking interventions significantly benefitted broad cognitive functioning (Hedges’ g = 0.19). The cognitive domains that specifically benefitted from walking were global cognition (g = 0.60), processing speed (g = 0.15), working memory (g = 0.22), declarative memory (g = 0.18), and executive functioning (g = 0.15). Cognitive status moderated this relationship, so that cognitively impaired older adults showed greater cognitive benefit from walking interventions. Baseline activity level did not moderate the effect; being sedentary at baseline yielded an effect size significantly greater than zero. The remaining moderator analyses were nonsignificant.

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that walking interventions are associated with broad improvement in cognitive function in older adults. Walking benefits global cognition, processing speed, working memory, declarative memory, and executive function— the same cognitive domains that decline with normal cognitive aging. These findings are particularly important because walking is among the safest and most universally accessible forms of exercise. This will help healthcare providers make better lifestyle recommendations to their older patients. Future research should more rigorously examine potential moderating variables, such as walking intensity.

Severe OCD is often nonresponsive to pharmacological and behavioral therapies and thus surgical interventions are emerging. Surgical interventions have proven to be efficacious for treating refractory OCD, however limited publications suggest 22–40% of patients experience transient apathy and disinhibition post-surgery (McLaughlin et al., 2021). Apathy is highly associated with the same brain regions, the prefrontal cortex, striatum, and thalamus, which have also been implicated in OCD symptoms (Le Heron et al., 2018). Prior research noting post-surgical changes in apathy in OCD either used physician observations or less precise surgical methods (i.e., gamma knife or radiofrequency ablation). Apathy has also been highly associated with depression and executive dysfunction (Raffard et al, 2020) and often not co-assessed in prior studies. The newest intervention, cutting-edge MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), limits damage outside the region of interest by precise control of thermal application in real-time. Thus, the current case series aims to investigate objective patient-reported change in apathy, disinhibition, depression, and executive dysfunction following anterior capsulotomy via this newest surgical approach for OCD.

In this retrospective study, the responses of ten consecutive patients pre- and post-LITT on the following measures were examined: Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to evaluate meaningful change in pre- and post-LITT self-reported levels of apathy, disinhibition, executive dysfunction, along with depressive symptoms. Per prior published guidelines, patient-reported Y-BOCS (range 0–40) scores were used to measure OCD symptoms with 24–34 % score reduction representing partial and 35% or greater score reduction representing full response (Pepper et al., 2019).

Seven patients (70%) were male, with a sample mean age of 38.4 (SD=13.6) and a mean of 14.6 (SD =2.27) years of education. Mean Y-BOCS score decreased from 32 (SD=5.3) before surgery to 18.8 (SD=11.1) after. Over 65% had partial or full response in OCD symptoms post-surgery. Six patients endorsed increased apathy, with others endorsing no change. Half of the non-responders reported this increase in apathy. The cohort remained relatively stable in disinhibition and executive dysfunction. Over half the cohort demonstrated a significant decrease in depressive symptoms. Interestingly, two of the non-responders and one responder endorsed increased apathy despite stable or improving depressive symptoms, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction.

Surgical interventions for psychiatric disorders are emerging quickly and being refined daily. In this cohort, anterior capsulotomy via LITT provided full or partial OCD recovery for most patients. However, most patients reported significant increases in apathy, despite experiencing a decrease in depressive symptoms, with stable disinhibition and executive dysfunction. Despite these promising improvements in OCD symptomatology via LITT, impact of surgery on apathy levels is clearly warranted using objective, quantifiable methods. As apathy has consistently been related to functional impairment and poorer quality of life, understanding this outcome is imperative in larger trials. Better understanding of this finding and underlying circuity will allow patients to be fully informed regarding this promising surgical intervention.

Adults with recurrent depression have been shown to have cognitive deficits also while in remission. Thus, it has been suggested that with a chronic course of depression, poorer executive control can be a vulnerability factor for depressive relapse. This has led to research on how cognitive remediation training can protect against recurrent depressive episodes. Findings indicate that such training has short term effects on cognitive functioning, and small effect on depression symptoms. Less focus has been on how “standard” psychotherapy can have positive effects on executive and attentional control. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) has been shown to be as effective as antidepressant medication in preventing relapses of depressive episodes. Mindfulness training in healthy samples seems to improve executive and attentional control. However, the few studies of MBCT in recurrent depression show mixed effects on executive and attentional control. As far as we know, no prior study has investigated the effect of MBCT in recurrent depression with the revised version of the attention network test (ANT-R). In a randomized controlled trial, we expected that the MBCT group would show enhanced executive control and lower levels of attentional fluctuations than the wait-list controls (WLC) from pre (T0) to post (T1) treatment. We further investigated if positive effects of MBCT on executive and attentional control were associated with reduction in depression symptoms.

Adults with recurrent depression in partial or full remission (N = 64) were randomized to MBCT or WLC. In the MBCT and WLC groups, 25 and 29, respectively, performed the ANT-R at T0 and T1. The attention network reaction time scores of executive control, alerting, and orienting were calculated in addition to attention fluctuations scores of intra-individual reaction time variability (IIVRT) and exgaussian-mean of longer reaction times (TAU). Self-reported depression symptoms were measured with BDI-II. The two groups were compared at baseline on full-scale IQ (WASI), executive control (D-KEFS Stroop), and processing speed (D-KEFS TMT).

The MBCT and WCL groups did not differ significantly in age or gender distribution, education, full-scale IQ or in baseline executive and attentional control as measured with the ANT-R, Stroop and TMT. The MBCT group showed a higher efficiency in conflict detection as measured with the executive control score from T0 to T1 compared to the WLC. This positive effect of MBCT on executive control was independent from the greater reductions in depression symptoms in the MBCT group compared to in the WLCs. However, reduction in depression symptoms at T1 was associated with enhanced efficiency in responding to alerting cues in conflict detection. No effects of MBCT compared to WLC were found at T1 on the attention fluctuation measures (IIVRT and TAU).

The findings from the current study indicates that MBCT enhances executive control in adults with recurrent depression. As such, MBCT may target an important cognitive vulnerability factor in the chronic course of recurrent depression that may contribute to its efficacy in preventing depressive relapses. It was also observed that reductions in depression symptoms led to higher alertness in conflict detection.

To test whether adherence to treatment in patients with MS is influenced by cognitive variables (executive functions), personality, and social support.

This is a pilot observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. 60 patients with Relapsing remitting MS ( 73.33% female; age: 41.41 ±14.00) undergoing medical treatment ( 28 dymethilfumarate, 7 ocrelizumab/ rituximab, 6 fingolimod, 5 interferon, 5 natalizumab, 4 cladribine, 3 teriflunomide, 1 alemtuzumab, 1 glatiramer acetate) underwent a comprehensive multi-component evaluation including : cognition, social support (using the self-reported record of social support scale), personality (using the NEO-FFI questionnaire) and evaluation of treatment adherence using the Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale Participants were divided into two groups according to their adherence to medical treatment, low vs. high adherence was defined using a cutoff score of 4. Differences between groups were evaluated using Student's t-test with a significance level of p<0.05, the effect size was calculated with Cohen's d test.

Groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, type of treatment, Montreal Cognitive Assesments (MoCA) or neuropsychiatric scales of depression and anxiety. Regardless of treatment type, 63.33% of the patients had high treatment adherence. Significant differences between groups were found in the Global Index of Social Support (p=0.016, Cohen's d= 0.73) and the responsibility factor of the NEO-FFI (p=0.048, Cohen's d= 0.20). Conversely, no significant differences were found in executive functions (p=0.8), Openness (p=0.062), Extraversion (p=0.5), Neuroticism (p=0.4) and Agreeableness (p=0.8).

Social support and the responsibility factor of personality are significantly different between MS patients with high and low adherence to medical treatment. The study of social support and personality may be a key component in improving adherence strategies.

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and a recognized contributor to health disparities with public health implications. Although migraine is a highly prevalent neurological condition, research on the cognitive manifestations of migraines is inconsistent. Studies have confirmed neurocognitive compromise during the presence of a migraine attack, with it’s onset and frequency being associated with greater cognitive decline. Research on the cognitive implications of migraines in underserved communities is scarce. The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study (2015) found that the prevalence of chronic migraines was the highest amongst Hispanic females compared to White females. Latina/os are 50% less likely to receive a migraine diagnosis and adequate headache medication when compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Latina women were more likely to report somatic symptoms than White and African American participants (F=8.96; p>0.001) (Liefland et al., 2014). Somatoform disorders are often diagnosed amongst Latina/os to account for medical unexplained symptoms, and if misdiagnosed can be stigmatizing and detrimental to treatment. We illustrate the critical role that neuropsychologists play by utilizing Socially Responsible Neuropsychology (SRN), a theoretical framework that promotes equitable and precise neuropsychological care to reduce misdiagnosis, elucidate cognitive implications, and address the complex medical needs of Latina/o/ patients. Given the limited literature on migraines and neurocognitive functioning, our objective is to present two case studies to illustrate the neuropsychological implications among bilingual Latina/o with chronic migraines.

Two highly educated Latina/o women, ages 39 and 41 years old, with chronic migraines, cognitive decline, diagnoses and a history of somatization symptoms. The onset of symptoms was gradual, worsening in intensity and frequency, along with notable motor symptoms (e.g., paralysis, weakness, numbness, bilateral tremors), photophobia, and phonophobia. Their cognitive complaints were conceptualized as part of a somatoform presentation by their providers.

The SRN model guided clinical decision-making to establish reliable normative anchors to identify relative impairment compared to premorbid estimates. Testing was completed in English after establishing language dominance via English and Spanish measures of verbal fluency. Cognitive profiles identified declines in attention, processing speed, language, perceptual reasoning, visual memory, executive functioning, motor functioning, and notable decline in their functioning over several years. The neuropsychological profile discounted the presence of a somatoform disorder. One case was diagnosed with an Unspecified Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, while the other case met criteria for a Major Neurocognitive Disorder due to Multiple Etiologies (i.e., vascular contribution, migraines, history of other contributions- choking episode).

Given the decline in each profile, it was hypothesized that the patients’ utilization of compensatory strategies and higher education may have masked the onset of symptoms. These complex cases highlight the need for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations that are culturally and linguistically responsive to boost the sensitivity of accurate diagnosis. The ability to objectively capture neurocognitive decline offers a unique opportunity to enhance treatment, which would have otherwise remained undetected and untreated. The SRN model enhanced diagnostic considerations, treatment planning, and allowed for advocacy strategies to improve the quality of life, and access to culturally/linguistically appropriate resources.

Episodic memory functioning is distributed across two brain circuits, one of which courses through the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Thus, delivering non-invasive neuromodulation technology to the dACC may improve episodic memory functioning in patients with memory problems such as in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). This preliminary study is a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial to examine if high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) can be a viable treatment in aMCI.

Eleven aMCI participants, of whom 9 had multidomain deficits, were randomized to receive 1 mA HD-tDCS (N=7) or sham (N=4) stimulation. HD-tDCS was applied over ten 20-minute sessions targeting the dACC. Neuropsychological measures of episodic memory, verbal fluency, and executive function were completed at baseline and after the last HD-tDCS session. Changes in composite scores for memory and language/executive function tests were compared between groups (one-tailed t-tests with a = 0.10 for significance). Clinically significant change, defined as > 1 SD improvement on at least one test in the memory and non-memory domains, was compared between active and sham stimulation based on the frequency of participants in each.

No statistical or clinically significant change (N-1 X2; p = 0.62) was seen in episodic memory for the active HD-tDCS (MDiff = 4.4; SD = 17.1) or sham groups (MDiff = -0.5; SD = 9.7). However, the language and executive function composite showed statistically significant improvement (p = 0.04; MDiff = -15.3; SD = 18.4) for the active HD-tDCS group only (Sham MDiff = -5.8; SD = 10.7). Multiple participants (N=4) in the active group had clinically significant enhancement in language and executive functioning tests, while nobody in the sham group did (p = 0.04).

HD-tDCS targeting the dACC had no direct benefit for episodic memory deficits in aMCI based on preliminary findings for this ongoing clinical trial. However, significant improvement in language and executive function skills occurred in response to HD-tDCS, suggesting HD-tDCS in this configuration has promising potential as an intervention for language and executive function deficits in MCI.

Late Life Major Depressive Disorder (LLD) and Hoarding Disorder (HD) are common in older adults with prevalence estimates up to 29% and 7%, respectively. Both LLD and HD are characterized by executive dysfunction and disability. There is evidence of overlapping neurobiological dysfunction in LLD and HD suggesting potential for compounded executive dysfunction and disability in the context of comorbid HD and LLD. Yet, prevalence of HD in primary presenting LLD has not been examined and potential compounded impact on executive functioning, disability, and treatment response remains unknown. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of co-occurring HD in primary presenting LLD and examine hoarding symptom severity as a contributor to executive dysfunction, disability, and response to treatment for LLD.

Eighty-three adults ages 65-90 participating in a psychotherapy study for LLD completed measures of hoarding symptom severity (Savings Inventory-Revised: SI-R), executive functioning (WAIS-IV Digit Span, Letter-Number Sequencing, Coding; Stroop Interference; Trail Making Test-Part B; Letter Fluency), functional ability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-II-Short), and depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) at post-treatment. Pearson's Chi-squared tests evaluated group differences in cognitive and functional impairment rates and depression treatment response between participants with (HD+LLD) and without (LLD-only) clinically significant hoarding symptoms. Linear regressions were used to examine the association between hoarding symptom severity and executive function performance and functional ability and included as covariates participant age, years of education, gender, and concurrent depression severity.

At post-treatment, 24.1% (20/83) of participants with LLD met criteria for clinically significant hoarding symptoms (SI-R.41). Relative to LLD-only, the LLD+HD group demonstrated greater impairment rates in Letter-Number Sequencing (χ2(1)=4.0, p=.045) and Stroop Interference (χ2(1)=4.8, p=.028). Greater hoarding symptom severity was associated with poorer executive functioning performance on Digit Span (t(71)=-2.4, β=-0.07, p=.019), Letter-Number Sequencing (t(70)=-2.1, β=-0.05, p=.044), and Letter Fluency (t(71)=-2.8, β=-0.24, p=.006). Rates of functional impairment were significantly higher in the LLD+HD (88.0%) group compared to the LLD-only (62.3%) group, (χ2(1)=5.41, p=.020). Additionally, higher hoarding symptom severity was related to greater disability (t(72)=2.97, β=0.13, p=.004). Furthermore, depression treatment response rates were significantly lower in the LLD+HD group at 24.0% (6/25) compared to 48.3% (28/58) in the LLD-only group, χ2(1)=4.26, p=.039.

The present study is among the first to report prevalence of clinically significant hoarding symptoms in primary presenting LLD. The findings of 24.1% co-occurrence of HD in primary presenting LLD and increased burden on executive functioning, disability, and depression treatment outcomes have important implications for intervention and prevention efforts. Hoarding symptoms are likely under-evaluated, and thus may be overlooked, in clinical settings where LLD is identified as the primary diagnosis. Taken together with results indicating poorer depression treatment response in LLD+HD, these findings underscore the need for increased screening of hoarding behaviors in LLD and tailored interventions for this LLD+HD group. Future work examining the course of hoarding symptomatology in LLD (e.g., onset age of hoarding behaviors) may provide insights into the mechanisms associated with greater executive dysfunction and disability.

Significant advances in the research of sport-related concussion (SRC) and repetitive head impacts (RHI) over the previous decade have translated to improved injury identification, diagnosis, and management. However, an objective gold standard for SRC/RHI treatment has remained elusive. SRC often result in heterogenous clinical outcomes, and the accumulation of RHI over time is associated with long-term declines in neurocognitive functioning. Medical management typically entails an amalgamation of outpatient medical treatment and psychiatric and/or behavioral interventions for specific symptoms rather than treatment of the underlying functional and/or structural brain injury. Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM), a form of light therapy, has been proposed as a non-invasive treatment for individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBI), possibly including SRC/RHI. With the present proof-of-concept pilot study, we sought to address important gaps in the neurorehabilitation of former athletes with a history of SRC and RHI by examining the effects of tPBM on neurocognitive functioning.

The current study included 49 participants (45 male) with a history of SRC and/or RHI. Study inclusion criteria included: age 18-65 years and a self-reported history of SRC and/or RHI. Exclusion criteria included: a history of neurologic disease a history of psychiatric disorder, and MRI contraindication. We utilized a non-randomized proof-of-concept design of active treatment over the course of 8-10 weeks, and neurocognitive functioning was assessed at pre- and post-treatment. A Vielight Neuro Gamma at-home brain tPBM device was distributed to each participant following baseline assessment.

Participants completed standardized measures of neurocognitive functioning, including the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-3), Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS), Continuous Performance Test (CPT-3), and The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Neurocognitive assessments were collected prior to and following tPBM treatment. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon’s signed-rank tests were used to evaluate change in performance on measures of neurocognitive functioning for normal and nonnormal variables, respectively, and estimates of effect size were obtained.

Study participants’ ability for adapting to novel stimuli and task requirements (i.e., fluid cognition; t=5.96; p<.001; d=.90), verbal learning/encoding (t=3.20; p=.003; d=.48) and delayed recall (z=3.32; p=.002; d=.50), processing speed (t=3.13; p=.003; d=.47), sustained attention (t=-4.39; p<.001; d=-.71), working memory (t=3.61; p=.001; d=.54), and aspects of executive functioning improved significantly following tPBM treatment. No significant improvements in phonemic and semantic verbal fluencies, reading ability, and vocabulary were shown following tPBM treatment.

The results of this pilot study demonstrate that following 8-10 weeks of active tPBM treatment, retired athletes with a history of SRC and/or RHI experienced significant improvements in fluid cognition, learning and memory, processing speed, attention, working memory, and aspects of executive functioning. Importantly, the majority of effect sizes ranged from moderate to large, suggesting that tPBM has clinically meaningful improvements on neurocognitive functioning across various cognitive domains. These results offer support for future research employing more rigorous study designs on the potential neurorehabilitative effects of tPBM in athletes with SRC/RHI.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy most widely used in depression, has shown evidence of secondary benefits for cognition in both neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. The recent development of more efficient stimulation protocols, such as accelerated high-dose intermittent theta burst (iTBS)-rTMS, has substantially reduced treatment burden by shortening the treatment course by >50%. This study aimed to establish the safety, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of iTBS-rTMS as a tool for bolstering cognition in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).

Twenty-four patients with aMCI were enrolled in an open-label phase I trial of iTBS-rTMS; 2 withdrew prior to initiating treatment due to personal circumstances. All participants had received a diagnosis of MCI due to possible AD from a healthcare provider (i.e., neurologist or neuropsychologist) and met actuarial neuropsychological criteria for aMCI. This sample of older adults (range: 61.5-85.2 years, M = 74.1, SD = 5.71) was predominantly White/non-Hispanic (n = 23; Black/non-Hispanic: n = 1), roughly half female (n = 13), with a college education (range: 12-20 years, M = 15.9, SD = 2.5). Participants received 24 sessions of iTBS-rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over 3 days (8 sessions each, lasting roughly 2 hours per day). Participants rated their perceptions and experience of common side effects during and after each treatment session as well as retrospectively at post-treatment and 4-week follow-up. They completed structural and functional brain MRI, neuropsychiatric evaluations, and neuropsychological assessments before and after treatment and were administered a subset of these measures at 4-week follow-up. MoCA scores were used to monitor for adverse neurocognitive effects, and the fluid cognition composite score from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery was used to test preliminary efficacy.

We achieved a high retention rate (95%), with 21 of the 22 participants completing all study procedures. There were no clinically significant adverse neuroradiological, neuropsychiatric, or neurocognitive effects of treatment. Participant reports indicated high tolerability and acceptability, with a modal rating of 0 (on a scale from 0=not at all to 10=extremely) for six common side effects (i.e., headache, pain, scalp irritation, facial twitching, fatigue, fear/anxiety), assessed both during and after each treatment session. They reported very low desire to quit despite some participants rating the treatment as moderately tiring. We observed significant, large effect-size (d = 0.98) improvements in fluid cognition from pre- to post-treatment.

Our findings support the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of iTBS-rTMS treatment in patients with aMCI. Further, although not explicitly dosed for efficacy, we provide preliminary evidence of improved fluid cognition as a function of treatment, highlighting the potential of this treatment for improving trans-domain cognitive impairment. These promising results can directly inform future trials aimed at optimizing treatment parameters, broadening the indication to other MCI subtypes, and testing the augmentation of established cognitive rehabilitation interventions when combined with rTMS.

Discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive deficit is common among patients with major depressive disorders (MDDs) and may play a key role in the mechanism linking cognition with recovery of symptom and psychosocial function. This study, therefore, explores the cognitive discrepancy, and its association with the trajectory of symptoms and functioning over a 6-month period.

We used data from the Prospective Research Observation to Assess Cognition in Treated patients with MDD (PROACT) study, from which 598 patients were included. Cognitive discrepancy scores were computed using a novel methodology, with positive values indicating more subjective than objective deficit (i.e. ‘underestimation’) and negative values indicating more objective than subjective difficulties (i.e. ‘overestimation’). Linear growth curve models were employed to examine the association of the cognitive discrepancy with the trajectory of depressive symptoms, psychosocial function, and quality of life.

About 68% of patients displayed disproportionately more objective than subjective cognitive deficit at baseline, and the mean cognitive discrepancy score was −1.4 (2.7). Overestimation was associated with a faster decrease of HDRS-17 (β = −0.46, p = 0.002) and a faster decrease of psychosocial function in social life (β = −0.13, p = 0.013) and family life (β = −0.12, p = 0.026), and a greater improvement of EQ-5D utility score (β = 0.01, p < 0.001).

We found a lower sensitivity of cognitive deficit at baseline and its decrease was associated with better health outcomes. Our findings have clinical implications of the necessity to assess both subjective and objective cognition for identification and categorization and to incorporate cognitive and psychological therapies for optimized treatment outcomes.

Restriction of food intake is a central pathological feature of anorexia nervosa (AN). Maladaptive eating behavior and, specifically, limited intake of calorie-dense foods are resistant to change and contribute to poor long-term outcomes. This study is a preliminary examination of whether change in food choices during inpatient treatment is related to longer-term clinical course.

Individuals with AN completed a computerized Food Choice Task at the beginning and end of inpatient treatment to determine changes in high-fat and self-controlled food choices. Linear regression and longitudinal analyses tested whether change in task behavior predicted short-term outcome (body mass index [BMI] at discharge) and longer-term outcome (BMI and eating disorder psychopathology).

Among 88 patients with AN, BMI improved significantly with hospital treatment (p < 0.001), but Food Choice Task outcomes did not change significantly. Change in high-fat and self-controlled choices was not associated with BMI at discharge (r = 0.13, p = 0.22 and r = 0.10, p = 0.39, respectively). An increase in the proportion of high-fat foods selected (β = 0.91, p = 0.02) and a decrease in the use of self-control (β = −1.50, p = 0.001) predicted less decline in BMI over 3 years after discharge.

Short-term treatment is associated with improvement in BMI but with no significant change, on average, in choices made in a task known to predict actual eating. However, the degree to which individuals increased high-fat choices during treatment and decreased the use of self-control over food choice were associated with reduced weight loss over the following 3 years, underscoring the need to focus on changing eating behavior in treatment of AN.

There are many barriers to engaging in current psychological treatments, including time, cost, and availability. Ultra-brief treatments overcome some of these barriers by delivering therapeutic information and skills using significantly less time than standard-length treatments. We developed a therapist-guided online ultra-brief treatment for depression and anxiety and compared it to an existing 8-week, 5-lesson therapist-guided standard-length treatment and a waitlist control.

In a randomized controlled trial, adults with self-reported depression or anxiety were randomized (1:1:1) to the ultra-brief treatment, standard-length treatment, or waitlist control. The primary outcomes were depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms assessed at baseline, 5-weeks later, 9-weeks later (primary timepoint), and 3-months later. The trial was prospectively registered.

Between 7 February 2022, and 16 August 2022, 242 participants were enrolled in the ultra-brief treatment (n = 85), standard-length treatment (n = 80), and waitlist control (n = 77). Participants were mostly women with an average age of 48.56 years. At 9-weeks post-baseline, participants in the ultra-brief treatment group reported significantly lower depression (between groups d = 0.41) and anxiety (d = 0.53) than the waitlist control. The ultra-brief treatment was non-inferior for anxiety at both 9-weeks and 3-months follow-up. Non-inferiority for depression was observed at 9-weeks.

The online ultra-brief treatment resulted in significant reductions in depression and anxiety that were non-inferior to a longer treatment course after 9-weeks. Remotely delivered ultra-brief treatments have the potential to provide accessible and effective care for those who cannot, or would prefer not to, access longer psychological interventions.

Anger has been shown to be associated with aggression and violence in adults with intellectual disabilities in both community and secure settings. Emerging evidence has indicated that cognitive behavioural anger treatment can be effective in reducing assessed levels of anger and violent behaviour in these patient populations. However, it has been suggested that the effectiveness of these types of interventions is influenced by the experience and training of the therapists.

In this service evaluation study, the pre- and post-treatment and 12-month follow-up assessment scores of 88 detained in-patient adults with intellectual disabilities and forensic histories who received cognitive behavioural anger treatment were examined in order to investigate whether participants’ responsiveness to treatment was associated with treatment being delivered by qualified versus unqualified therapists.

Overall significant reductions in self-reported measures of anger disposition and anger reactivity were found with no significant time × therapist experience interaction effects. However, the patients treated by qualified therapists improved significantly on measures of anger control compared with those allocated to unqualified therapists.

Male and female detained patients with intellectual disabilities and forensic histories can benefit from an individual cognitive behavioural anger treatment intervention delivered by qualified and unqualified therapists, but therapist experience may be important in supporting patients to develop more complex anger control coping skills.

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is considered the first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, some individuals with OCD remain symptomatic following CBT, and therefore understanding predictors of outcome is important for informing treatment recommendations.

The current study aimed to provide the first synthesis of predictors of outcome following CBT for OCD in adults with a primary diagnosis of OCD, as classified by DSM-5.

Eight studies (n=359; mean age range=29.2–37.7 years; 55.4% female) were included in the systematic review.

Congruent with past reviews, there was great heterogeneity of predictors measured across the included studies. Therefore, a narrative synthesis of findings was conducted. Findings from this systematic review indicated that some OCD-related pre-treatment variables (i.e. pre-treatment severity, past CBT treatment, and levels of avoidance) and during treatment variables (i.e. poor working alliance and low treatment adherence) may be important to consider when making treatment recommendations. However, the results also indicate that demographic variables and psychological co-morbidities may not be specific predictors of treatment response.

These findings add to the growing body of literature on predictors of CBT treatment outcomes for individuals with OCD.