Chinmen Island is located in the west of the Taiwan Strait, 15 km from the coast of mainland China. Mesozoic granitic gneiss forms the basement rocks of the island. High-defect kaolin deposits, both major sedimentary and minor residual types of clays, have been mined for ceramic uses for many years. The objectives of this study were to characterize the kaolin deposits and to discuss the genesis of kaolin minerals on the island. The kaolin samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction and transmission and scanning electron microscopy. In general, the particle-size distribution of the sedimentary kaolin was 0.5–5.0% sand, 15–55% silt and 30–85% clay. In the clay fraction, the ratio of kaolinite to illite ranged from 9:1 to 3:1. The sedimentary kaolin materials were originally transported by river from mainland China. Kaolinite occurred generally as pseudo-hexagonal platelets of ∼1 µm in diameter. The residual kaolin minerals resulted from the argillization of granitoid rocks by in situ weathering which possibly occurred during the Pleistocene. The residual kaolin contained more tubular halloysite.

Residual clays that developed on Permian and Carboniferous glass-rich silicic volcanic rocks (pitchstones, ignimbrites) at the Seilitz and Kemmlitz kaolin deposits, Saxony, Eastern Germany, contain locally abundant lath-shaped illite-rich illite-smectite mixed-layer minerals (I-S). Analyses by XRD and TEM-AES reveal a large illite percentage (>∼90%) and R3 ordering in I-S from Seilitz (>∼90%) and smaller illite percentage (∼70%) and R1 ordering in I-S from Kemmlitz. The clays never suffered a deep burial and there is no geological, petrographic or fluid inclusion evidence for aeolian input or hydrothermal origin of I-S at either deposit. The I-S formed exclusively at the expense of volcanic glass and not from K-feldspar. Residual quartz phenocrysts in the clays still preserve primary glassy silicate melt inclusions and lack secondary aqueous fluid inclusion trails. The dD and δ18O values of kaolinite and I-S are suggestive of low formation temperatures (<40ºC). Rb-Sr and K-Ar dating of I-S-bearing clay separates yield Lower Cretaceous ages at Seilitz and indicates the presence of excess or inherited 40Ar in illite-rich I-S. In contrast, Triassic to Jurassic Rb-Sr ages are obtained for I-S from the Kemmlitz kaolin deposit.

The numerous kaolin deposits located in Patagonia, Argentina, have been formed by hypogene or supergene processes. The primary origin has been established from O18 and D isotopic composition of the main minerals, kaolinite and/or dickite, and from the behaviour of certain elements during the alteration. The aim of this paper was to find if there is a tool, other than oxygen-deuterium data, to establish the origin of the Patagonian kaolin deposits. To handle the large number of variables per sample, a statistical multivariate study was used. The Principal Component method defines, on one hand the variables that better characterize each deposit and, on the other hand, the correlation between them. Fifty seven elements were considered and those that were not explained using these two components (which represent 75% of the total variance of the model) were discarded. As a result, the contents of Fe2O3, P2O5, LOI, Sr, Y, Zr, V, Pb, Hf, Rb, S and REE were used and the results show that the two components separate the deposits into two fields that are consistent with the process of formation. The first component indicates that Fe2O3, Y, Rb, U and HREE are more abundant in the supergene deposits, whereas, Sr, Pb, S and V are more abundant in the hypogene deposits. The second component shows that S, P2O5 and the LREE are enriched in the hydrothermal deposits, whereas Zr is more abundant in those formed under weathering conditions.

Kaolinite deposits, hosted by rhyolitic tuffs, are found in the SE of the ‘Los Menucos’ area (Province of Rio Negro, Argentina). The most representative examples are from the Blanquita and Equivocada mines. To discover the origin of these deposits, a mineralogical, geochemical (major and trace element) and stable isotope study (O and H) of kaolinite was carried out. Mineralogically, Blanquita mine is characterized by the presence of dickite, kaolinite, alunite and pyrophyllite, whereas in Equivocada mine, kaolinite is accompanied by dickite and traces of alunite (without pyrophyllite). The trace element contents and ratios of kaolin samples (P vs. S, Zr vs. Ti, (Cr + Nb) vs. (Ti + Fe), and (Ce + Y + La) vs. (Ba + Sr)) suggest that they formed from the hydrothermal alteration of the enclosing rhyolites although a possible contribution of kaolinite from residual processes cannot be discounted. δ18O values of kaolinite range from +4.8 to +10.3‰, and δD varies from −88 to −116‰. The presence of pyrophyllite in Blanquita mine suggests temperatures of formation >350°C. The calculated isotopic composition of the fluid in equilibrium with kaolinite at 350°C varies from +3.6 to +9.2‰ for O and from −74 to −103‰ for H. These values are compatible with fluids of magmatic origin or with fluids of surficial origin isotopically equilibrated with a rhyolitic magma at high temperatures. The isotope composition of kaolinite from the Blanquita and Equivocada mines is clearly different from kaolinite of residual origin from deposits in the Chubut and Santa Cruz provinces. The isotopic signature has proved to be a useful tool in discriminating between different genetic processes in the formation of kaolin deposits.