Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:13:45.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion: Unshackling memory, rememorying agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2018

Get access

Summary

Studies in post-apartheid memory abound, but these are usually limited to the study of colonial and/or apartheid memory. This book makes an intervention by reading slave memory post-apartheid, recognising that ‘sites of cultural displacement and encounter may thus be seen to offer, albeit chaotic and unguaranteed, revised definitions of the self within a wider political, geographical and cultural dimension’ (Thomas 2000: 12). In order to do so, I have explicitly chosen a postcolonial feminist location because it privileges subaltern compositions and valuation of meanings, rather than an outward-looking explanatory framework.

My chosen critical vocabulary, methodological stance and theoretical tools are well suited to uncovering the new ways in which slave memory functions in unpredictable, sometimes contradictory ways for different groups in contemporary South Africa. This multiplicity and conceptual untidiness has been read through frameworks that highlight movement, such as the echo chamber and helix-like postcolonial memory. My explicit discussions of Morrison's rememory, Pennington's helix-shaped memory and Williams's memory as a shadow – all three my key theoretical models – directly address the refusal (or failure) of memory to be flattened or made linear/truth. For example, the claims to an indigenous Khoi ancestry have worked to inconsistent ends for both Khoisan and white societies, as shown in Chapters 1 and 3. This shows that claims to historically indigenous identities are made for reasons that are not always progressive (Strauss 2009).

The paucity of written material by enslaved people dating from this era, as well as the short trajectory of the historiography focusing on slavocratic South Africa, mean that explorations of slave pasts need to be self-consciously excavatory. Perhaps this is why the archaeological dig has been so popular as a means of opening up this debate. Historians of slavery, such as Susan Newton-King, Patricia van der Spuy, Robert Shell, Wayne Dooling, Pamela Scully, Robert Ross, and Nigel Worden have done enormous work in this regard in a very short space of time. Nonetheless, that very few specific names come to mind in relation to this topic also points to the novelty of the subject within the South African context.

Type
Chapter
Information
What is Slavery to Me?
Postcolonial/Slave Memory In Post-Apartheid South Africa
, pp. 201 - 213
Publisher: Wits University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×