Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Collective Guilt
- Section 1 Defining the nature of collective guilt
- Section 2 The Relationship Between Group Identification and Collective Guilt
- Section 3 Consequences for Intergroup Relations
- 11 Intergroup Forgiveness and Guilt in Northern Ireland: Social Psychological Dimensions of “The Troubles”
- 12 Intergroup Reconciliation Processes in Israel: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Findings
- 13 On Whether to Apologize to Indigenous Australians: The Denial of White Guilt
- 14 Racial Wrongs and Restitutions: The Role of Guilt and Other Group-Based Emotions
- 15 Importance of Social Categorization for Forgiveness and Collective Guilt Assignment for the Holocaust
- Section 4 Commentary on the Volume
- Index
- References
14 - Racial Wrongs and Restitutions: The Role of Guilt and Other Group-Based Emotions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of Contributors
- Collective Guilt
- Section 1 Defining the nature of collective guilt
- Section 2 The Relationship Between Group Identification and Collective Guilt
- Section 3 Consequences for Intergroup Relations
- 11 Intergroup Forgiveness and Guilt in Northern Ireland: Social Psychological Dimensions of “The Troubles”
- 12 Intergroup Reconciliation Processes in Israel: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Findings
- 13 On Whether to Apologize to Indigenous Australians: The Denial of White Guilt
- 14 Racial Wrongs and Restitutions: The Role of Guilt and Other Group-Based Emotions
- 15 Importance of Social Categorization for Forgiveness and Collective Guilt Assignment for the Holocaust
- Section 4 Commentary on the Volume
- Index
- References
Summary
Racial inequality is everywhere. Throughout the world, people of color tend to be disadvantaged relative to those classified as “White.” There is little doubt that the historical indenture, enslavement, and colonization of people of color has contributed to this systemic inequality. It is also clear that contemporary forms of group privilege and discrimination carry racial inequality into the present and future. This seeming intransigence has led many observers to conclude that racial inequality is an unavoidable product of diverse societies (e.g., Sidanius & Pratto, 1999).
Given the apparent inevitability of racial inequality, one might wonder how anyone is able to muster opposition to it. Yet, a subset of people in every society opposes racial inequality, sometimes at great personal risk. This surprising, and extremely important, fact is our focus. We want to know why people oppose racial inequality. We are especially interested in why members of advantaged groups oppose systems of inequality from which they benefit.
In this chapter we examine how members of advantaged groups come to recognize, and react against, the illegitimacy of racial inequality. We give special attention to group-based guilt as one way in which the advantaged respond to racial wrongs. The first section of the chapter reviews the conceptual and empirical arguments for what racial guilt is. Because it is an unpleasant feeling of self-blame that people prefer to assuage, group-based guilt is associated with efforts to make restitution to those harmed. This is what guilt does to motivate opposition to racial inequality.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Collective GuiltInternational Perspectives, pp. 262 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Anti racism campaign (2000). Stand up against racism. Available at http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/arc/leaflets/stand_up_oct00.html
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial emotion: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 65–122). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 282–316). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill
, , & (1995). Subjective and experiential correlates of guilt in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1256–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
Brasel, B. (1999). Little White lies: An interview with anti-racist activist Tim Wise. Available at http://www.tbwt.com/views/feat/feat1456.asp
Brooks, R. (1999). When sorry isn't enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice. New York: New York University Press
Constable, P. (2001, September 9). Racism meeting reaches accord but delegates remain divided. The Washington Post, p. A20
, , , & (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada-Hollenbach, M. & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 215–31). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press
, , & (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, D. J. (2001). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Hitchcock, J. (1999). The quest for innocence. Available at http://www.euroamerican.org/editorials/the_quest.asp
(1999). Affirmative action in employment: Recent court approaches to a difficult concept. International Labour Review, 138, 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (1976). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313). New York: Academic Press
Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Empathy and prosocial activism. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp. 65–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
, , & (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Japanese premier tells Koreans of his remorse. (2001, October 16). San Francisco Chronicle, p. B6
Kravitz, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Turner, M. E., Levine, E. L., Chaves, W., Brannick, M. T., Denning, D. L., Russell, C. J., & Conrad, M. A. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Kristof, K. (2002, April 13). IRS has paid millions in illegal slavery credits; taxes: The agency says the bogus filings have soared and it mistakenly accepted some claims. The Los Angeles Times, p. A1
& (1992). On conceptualizing and assessing guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 318–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Democracy's dilemma: Explaining racial inequality in egalitarian societies. Sociological Forum, 17 681-690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136–63). New York: Cambridge University Press
& (2001). Apologising to the stolen generations: Argument, rhetoric, and identity in public reasoning. Australian Psychologist, 36, 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsitz, G. (1998). The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W. Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2002). Collective guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. Unpublished Manuscript, Australian National University
McIntosh, P. (1989). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Peace and Freedom, July/August 1989, 10–12
Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press
& (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). The Japanese-American internment: Perceptions of moral community, fairness, and redress. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 133–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , & (1997). Interpersonal guilt: The development of a new measure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 73–893.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, , , , & (2000). Attitudes toward Indigenous-Australians in city and country settings. The Australian Psychologist, 35, 109–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, A., Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2002). Unpublished data file. Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia
, & (1999). The significance of affirmative action for the souls of White folk: Further implications of a helping model. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 787–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., & Rosenhan, D. L. (1991). Mood and helping: Mood as a motivator of helping and helping as a regulator of mood. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 215–37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Salovey, P. & Rosenhan, D. L. (1989). Mood states and prosocial behavior. In H. Wagner & A. Manstead (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 371–91). New York: Wiley
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
, & (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward a new conceptualization of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Smith, V. E. (2001, August 27). Debating the wages of slavery. Newsweek, 20–4
Steele, S. (1990). The content of our character. New York: Harper Perennial
, & (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.). (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of guilt, shame, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford
, , , & (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1999). Policy of preference: Lessons from India, the United States, and South Africa. Public Administration Review, 59, 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, J. C., Mansell, T. K., Koh, K. J., Raja, M., & Pedersen, A. (2001). Unpublished data file. Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia
Weiner, B. (1982). The emotional consequences of causal attributions. In M. S. Clark, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 185–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
- 46
- Cited by