Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T17:42:12.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

89 - Molecular profiling and therapeutic decision-making: the promise of personalized medicine

from Part 4 - Pharmacologic targeting of oncogenic pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Susan M. Henshall
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Andrew V. Biankin
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Since the development of microarray technologies, there has been significant investment in the potential for gene-expression profiling to drive innovation in clinical diagnostics and therapy. Now, twenty years since the first prototype was developed, we assess the impact on clinical management of cancer patients through new diagnostic tools and treatment strategies developed as a result of this technology, and present a perspective to both the limitations and future promise of molecular profiling in the clinic.

The beginnings of the microarray revolution

The origins of DNA microarray technology date back to the late 1980s, when Stephen P.A. Fodor pioneered the first microarray system, the Affymetrix GeneChip® (Figure 89.1; 1). With Affymetrix commencing commercial sales of the GeneChip® system for research use in 1994, and the publication in 1995 by Patrick Brown and colleagues at Stanford University assessing gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana, the research landscape was changed irrevocably (2). While Affymetrix continued to dominate the field, the Human Genome Initiative provided the impetus for researchers to actively pursue development of alternative types of DNA microarrays, with many other platforms entering the arena (3). By the mid-1990s, microarray technology had moved from a boutique technology to an integral component of the medical research toolbox and was responsible for attracting major investment into the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector with the focus firmly on understanding the molecular basis of human disease and informing treatment decisions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 929 - 935
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fodor, SP, Read, JL, Pirrung, MC, et al. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science 1991;251:767–73.CrossRef
Schena, M, Shalon, D, Davis, RW, Brown PO. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995;270:467–70.CrossRef
Schulze, A, Downward, J. Navigating gene expression using microarrays–a technology review. Nature Cell Biology 2001;3:E190–5.
Golub, TR, Slonim, DK, Tamayo, P, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999;286:531–7.CrossRef
Perou, CM, Sorlie, T, Eisen, MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406:747–52.CrossRef
Draft Guidance for Industry, Clinical Laboratories, and FDA Staff, In vitro diagnostic multivariate index assays. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, FDA;2007.
Sotiriou, C, Piccart, MJ. Taking gene-expression profiling to the clinic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient care? Nature Reviews Cancer 2007;7:545–53.
Sotiriou, C, Pusztai, L.Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;360:790–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paik, S, Shak, S, Tang, G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351:2817–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van ‘t Veer, LJ, Dai, H, van de Vijver, MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002;415:530–6.CrossRef
Wang, Y, Klijn, J, Zhang, Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 2005;365:671–9.CrossRef
Paik, S, Tang, G, Shak, S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006;24:3726–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, L, Fritsche, H, Mennel, R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007;25:5287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, E. Getting the noise out of gene arrays. Science 2004;306:630–1.CrossRef
Shi, L, Reid, LH, Jones, WD, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nature Biotechnology 2006;24:1151–61.CrossRef
Strauss, E. Arrays of hope. Cell 2006;127:657–9.CrossRef
Desmedt, C, Piette, F, Loi, S, et al. Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13:3207–14.CrossRef
Buyse, M, Loi, S, van't Veer, L, et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006;98:1183–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression profiling improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer? Genetic Medicine 2009;11:66–73.
Karapetis, CS, Khambata-Ford, S, Jonker, DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359:1757–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordon-Cardo, C. p53 and RB: simple interesting correlates or tumor markers of critical predictive nature?Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004;22:975–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, DF, Bast, RC, Desch, CE, et al. Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996;88:1456–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CK, Lord, SJ, Coates AS, Simes RJ. Molecular biomarkers to individualise treatment: assessing the evidence. Medical Journal of Australia 2009;190:631–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Kerr, DJ, Gray, R, Quirke, P, et al. A quantitative multi-gene RT-PCR assay for prediction of recurrence in stage II colon cancer: selection of the genes in four large studies and results of the independent, prospectively designed QUASAR validation study. 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL;2009.
Quasar Collaborative Group, Gray, R, Barnwell, J, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet 2007;370:2020–9.CrossRef
Auffray, C. Sharing knowledge: a new frontier for public-private partnerships in medicine. Genome Medicine 2009;1:29.CrossRef
Sauer, U, Heinemann, M, Zamboni, N. Genetics. Getting closer to the whole picture. Science 2007;316:550–1.CrossRef
Bild, AH, Potti, A, Nevins JR. Linking oncogenic pathways with therapeutic opportunities. Nature Reviews Cancer 2006;6:735–41.CrossRef
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008;455:1061–8.CrossRef
The ROI for targeted therapies: a strategic perspective Washington, DC: Deloitte Center for Health Solutions; 2009.
van de Vijver, MJ, He, YD, van't Veer, LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2002;347:1999–2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monzon, FA, Lyons-Weiler, M, Buturovic, LJ, et al. Multicenter validation of a 1,550-gene expression profile for identification of tumor tissue of origin. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:2503–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loi, S, Haibe-Kains, B, Desmedt, C, et al. Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007;25:1239–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sotiriou, C, Wirapati, P, Loi, S, et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006;98:262–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, XJ, Patel, R, Wang, X, et al. Molecular classification of human cancers using a 92-gene real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 2006;130:465–73.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×