Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Epigraph
- Dedication
- Contents
- Analytical table of contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The global energy system
- 3 Virtue and energy efficiency
- 4 Utility and energy externalities
- 5 Energy and human rights
- 6 Energy and due process
- 7 Energy poverty, access, and welfare
- 8 Energy subsidies and freedom
- 9 Energy resources and future generations
- 10 Fairness, responsibility, and climate change
- 11 The imperative of making just energy decisions
- Index
- References
10 - Fairness, responsibility, and climate change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Epigraph
- Dedication
- Contents
- Analytical table of contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The global energy system
- 3 Virtue and energy efficiency
- 4 Utility and energy externalities
- 5 Energy and human rights
- 6 Energy and due process
- 7 Energy poverty, access, and welfare
- 8 Energy subsidies and freedom
- 9 Energy resources and future generations
- 10 Fairness, responsibility, and climate change
- 11 The imperative of making just energy decisions
- Index
- References
Summary
Imagine for a moment that you are the governor of the state of Washington in the United States, and that you are entering the final year of your first term. You fully intend to run again. Before then, however, you need to decide your position in a fierce debate that has emerged over the 6,809 MW Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia River, the largest hydroelectric power station in the country and a key source of energy for Washington State. On the one hand, the dam itself is old – built originally between 1933 and 1942 – and most of its thirty-three hydroelectric generators are in need of expensive refurbishing and upgrades. It lacks a fish ladder, meaning that the Department of the Interior informs you that it permanently blocks fish migration, removing more than 1,700 square kilometers of critical spawning habitat for salmon. Naturalists and recreationists have called the facility an “eyesore,” and your officers tell you that removing it would enable the Washington State Parks Foundation to convert Franklin Delano Roosevelt Lake and Banks Lake, currently reservoirs for the dam, into a kayaking tourist attraction. You have read studies that project that closing and removing the dam will cost $100 million, but that the state will receive $310 million per year from increased fisheries and tourism revenues – enough to pay for the construction of new power plants in other places, offset the cost of dam removal, and still produce extra revenue for the state.
On the other hand, closing down the dam means that you may have to approve three new coal-fired power plants to offset the reduction in electrical capacity, thus doubling the state’s GHG emissions. Farmers across the Columbia River Basin warn that without the irrigable water that the dam provides, they would need to switch to more pesticide- and fertilizer-intensive crops, contributing even more to future emissions. Your advisors tell you that the remodeled Roosevelt Lake could become such an attractive tourist option that you would need to build a new highway and hotels, which would both need more energy-intensive materials (while they are being built) and sources of energy (once they are operational), again contributing to climate change.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Energy JusticeProblems, Principles, and Practices, pp. 319 - 352Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, , and , The History of Large Federal Dams: Planning, Design, and Construction (Washington State: US Department of the Interior, 2005)Google Scholar
, The Mightiest of Them All: Memories of Grand Coulee Dam (Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1993)Google Scholar
and , Grand Coulee Dam and the Columbia Basin Project USA, Annexes (Cape Town: World Commission on Dams, 2000)Google Scholar
, , , et al., “Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?,” Atmospheric Science Journal 2 (2008), pp. 217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Fate of Fossil Fuel CO2 in Geologic Time,” Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005), pp. 26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , “The Geoengineering Option: A Last Resort against Global Warming?,” Foreign Affairs, 88 (2009), p. 65Google Scholar
, “Summary for Policymakers,” in , , , , , , , and (eds.), Climate Change: 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
and , “A Robust Strategy for Sustainable Energy,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (2004), pp. 215–248Google Scholar
, , , , , , et al., “Attributing Physical and Biological Impacts to Anthropogenic Climate Change,” Nature 453 (May 15, 2008), pp. 353–357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , “Fifty Year Record of Glacier Change,” U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009–3046 (July 6, 2009)Google Scholar
, , , and , “Glacier Mass-Balance Fluctuations in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska,” USA: Annals of Glaciology, 46 (2007), pp. 291–296Google Scholar
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and , “Probabilistic Forecast for Twenty-First-Century Climate Based on Uncertainties in Emissions (without Policy) and Climate Parameters,” Journal of Climate 22(19) (October 2009), pp. 5175–5204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., “Assessing Dangerous Climate Change through an Update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ‘Reasons for Concern,’” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(11) (March 17, 2009), pp. 4133–4137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., “A Review of Recent Developments in Climate Change Science. Part I: Understanding of Future Change in the Large-Scale Climate System,” Progress in Physical Geography 35(3) (June 2011), pp. 281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., “A Review of Recent Developments in Climate Change Science. Part II: The Global-Scale Impacts of Climate Change,” Progress in Physical Geography 35(4) (August 2011), pp. 443–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Fast Forward: Ethics and Politics in the Age of Global Warming (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2010)Google Scholar
“The Melting North,” Economist, Special Report on the Arctic, June 16, 2012, pp. 3–4
, “Defining Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(11) (2009), pp. 4065–4066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, “The Clean Development Mechanism and Its Implications for Climate Justice,” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 34(2) (2009), pp. 513–540Google Scholar
, “How Deep Should the Deep Cuts Be? Optimal CO2 Emissions over Time under Uncertainty,” Climate Policy 9(1) (2009), pp. 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Integrated Assessment Modeling of Adaptation Costs and Benefits (Paris: OECD, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Climate Change and Human Security,” in and (eds.), Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007), pp. 161–180Google Scholar
, , , and , “Joint CO2 and CH4 Accountability for Global Warming,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Early Edition, July 11, 2013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Climate Change and the Poor: Adapt or Die,” Economist, September 11, 2008, p. 51
and , “Ethical Dimensions of Adapting to Climate Change-Imposed Risks,” in (ed.), The Ethics of Global Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Toward Justice in Adaptation to Climate Change,” in , , , and (eds.), Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), pp. 1–19Google Scholar
, “Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Global Climate Change,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19(2) (July 2006), pp. 255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “The Global Commons and Environmental Justice – Climate Change,” in , , and (eds.), Environmental Justice: Discourses in International Political Economy (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2002), p. 173Google Scholar
, Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence, and Politics (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 179Google Scholar
, Making the Case for Environmental Justice in Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest: CEU Center for Environmental Law and Policy, March 2007)Google Scholar
, “Responsibility to Future Generations and the Technological Transition,” in and (eds.), Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005), pp. 265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Climate,” in (ed.), A Companion to Environmental Philosophy (Maldon, MA: Blackwell, 2001), pp. 450–477Google Scholar
, “Revisiting the Doctrine of Intergenerational Equity in Global Environmental Governance,” Dalhousie Law Journal 30 (2007), pp. 79–140Google Scholar
, “Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change,” Leiden Journal of International Law 18 (2005), pp. 747–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U. S. Foreign Policy (Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
, “Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions,” Law Policy 15 (1993), pp. 39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “‘Decent Living’ Emissions: A Conceptual Framework,” Sustainability 4 (2012), pp. 656–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Unavoidability of Justice,” in The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 373–397Google Scholar
, Climate Change and Human Rights: A Rough Guide (Versoix, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2008)Google Scholar
, “Ethics and Global Climate Change,” in , , , and (eds.), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
, “In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Ecological Economics 33 (2000), pp. 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Introduction: Cosmopolitanism and Climate Change Policy,” in (ed.), Ethics and Global Environmental Policy: Cosmopolitan Conceptions of Climate Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Subsistence, Affluence and U. S. Foreign Policy, 2nd edn. (Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, The Ethics of Climate Change: Right and Wrong in a Warming World (London: Continuum, 2008)Google Scholar
, “The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business,” European Management Journal 25(6) (2007), pp. 453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , “Greenhouse Development Rights: Towards an Equitable Framework for Global Climate Policy,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21(4) (December 2008), pp. 649–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , The Right to Development in a Carbon Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework (Washington, DC: Heinrich Boll Foundation, November 2007)Google Scholar
, , , et al., “Equity and Greenhouse Gas Responsibility,” Science 289 (5488) (2000), p. 2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Seeing the Light: Adapting to Climate Change with Decentralized Renewable Energy in Developing Countries (Winnipeg: IISD, 2004)Google Scholar
, Shaping Climate-Resilient Development: A Framework for Decision-Making (Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility, European Commission, McKinsey & Company, The Rockefeller Foundation, Standard Chartered Bank, and Swiss Re, 2009)Google Scholar
and , “Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change: Strengthening Resilience through Development,” Environment 51(4) (July/August 2009), pp. 22–31Google Scholar
and , The Climate Crisis: An Introductory Guide to Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
, , et al., “National Responsibilities for Adaptation Strategies: Lessons from Four Modeling Frameworks,” in and (eds.), Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 87–112Google Scholar
, The Economics of Climate Change in Southeast Asia: A Regional Review (Manila: Asian Development Bank, April 2009)Google Scholar
and , Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011)Google Scholar
, , , and , “Expert Views of Climate Change Adaptation in Least Developed Asia,” Journal of Environmental Management 97(30) (April 2012), pp. 78–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and , “Improving Climate Change Adaptation in Least Developed Asia,” Environmental Science & Policy 21(8) (August 2012), pp. 112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies,” Science 305 (August 13, 2004), pp. 968–972CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Characterization of US Energy Resources and Reserves (Washington, DC: DOE/CE-0279, 1989)Google Scholar
, Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments (Washington, DC: NRC, 2010), p. 4Google Scholar
, Renewable Electricity Futures Study, ed. , , , , , , , , and , 4 vols. NREL/TP-6A20–52409 (Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012), available at Google Scholar
and , “Evaluation of Global Wind Power,” Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005), pp. 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Going Completely Renewable: Is it Possible (Let Alone Desirable)?,” Electricity Journal 22(4) (May 2009), pp. 95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Least Cost 100% Renewable Electricity Scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market,” Energy Policy 59 (2013), pp. 270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Providing All Global Energy with Wind, Water, and Solar Power, Part I: Technologies, Energy Resources, Quantities and Areas of Infrastructure, and Materials,” Energy Policy 39 (2011), pp. 1154–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Providing All Global Energy with Wind, Water, and Solar Power, Part II: Reliability, System and Transmission Costs, and Policies,” Energy Policy 39 (2011), pp. 1170–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (Geneva: IPCC, 2011)Google Scholar
, , , and , “SunShot Solar Power Reduces Costs and Uncertainty in Future Low-Carbon Electricity Systems,” Environmental Science & Technology 47(16) (2013), pp. 9053–9060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., “The Possible Role and Contribution of Geothermal Energy to the Mitigation of Climate Change,” in and (eds.), IPCC Scoping Meeting 3 on Renewable Energy Sources (Lübeck, Germany: IPCC Geothermal, January 2008)Google Scholar
, “Does a Big Economy Need Big Power Plants?,” New York Times Freakonomics Guest Post, February 9, 2009Google Scholar
and , “Wind Turbines and Invisible Technology: Unarticulated Reasons for Local Opposition to Wind Energy,” Technology & Culture 54(4) (October 2013), pp. 705–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , A Renewable World: Energy, Ecology, Equality (London: Green Books, 2009), pp. 162–169Google Scholar
, “Beyond Business as Usual: Alternative Wedges to Avoid Catastrophic Climate Change and Create Sustainable Societies,” in (ed.), The Ethics of Global Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 192–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and , “Implementing the Behavioral Wedge: Designing and Adopting Effective Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs,” Environmental Law Reporter 40 (2010), pp. 10547–10554Google Scholar
, Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U. S. Energy Policy (Takoma Park, MD: Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, July 2007)Google Scholar