Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:10:05.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Rentierism, Dependency and Sovereignty in Central Asia

from SECTION V - Empire and External Sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Wojciech Ostrowski
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews
Sally Cummings
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews
Raymond Hinnebusch
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews
Get access

Summary

Twenty years after becoming independent states, all five Central Asian republics can be broadly characterized as either rentier or semi/quasirentier states. The “classic” rentier states – Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan – rely on rent (wealth) derived directly from the sale of oil and gas. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan rely on rent from a combination of indirect taxation on labor remittances from Kazakhstan and Russia, international aid, the leasing of access to their territory and the drug trade. Uzbekistan, relying heavily on the sale of cotton, gold and gas on the international market, along with labor remittances and to a lesser degree leasing access to territory, falls somewhere in between. The economic composition of the Central Asian region, which began taking its current shape with the unprecedented increase in oil prices at the beginning of 2000s, has started to mirror the Middle Eastern-style “division of labor” that developed between oil-rich Gulf and oil-poor Arab countries, as well as Pakistan and other states which have remained greatly dependent on labor remittances earned in the oil-rich states.

The dependency of the Central Asian republics on rent has a far-reaching impact on these countries' foreign policies, their relationship with Russia and state sovereignty. In the case of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, the lack of viable alternatives to oil and gas exports and full dependency – until very recently – on the Russian-controlled pipeline system, have substantially narrowed their room for maneuver and allowed Russia to maintain the upper hand in its relationship with Central Asian oil and gas exporters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sovereignty after Empire
Comparing the Middle East and Central Asia
, pp. 282 - 303
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×