Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T10:26:05.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction to principles of the radiological investigation of the neonate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Sara B. DeMauro
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
John Richard Mernagh
Affiliation:
McMaster University Medical Centre
Monica Epelman
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Haresh Kirpalani
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Haresh Kirpalani
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Monica Epelman
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
John Richard Mernagh
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

The team approach to neonatal imaging

The clinical and radiological examinations are the foundation of medical investigation of the acutely ill neonate. The proper use and interpretation of radiological studies requires teamwork and clear communication between the clinicians (including the obstetricians and surgeons, as appropriate) and the radiologists. Some literature confirms that a radiologist's interpretation oft en differs from the clinician's interpretation. In a prospective study, five pediatric intensivists interpreted 460 chest x-rays (CXRs) and were matched against a “gold-standard” opinion of a pediatric radiologist. This resulted in “important” discordance in 7% of CXRs, but most of these did not lead to management changes [1]. These data can be used to support an argument that clinicians do not need interpretative assistance. Alternatively, one could say that clinicians have an unacceptable rate of incorrect interpretation. The CXR is the most frequent radiological test in intensive care units. Differences between clinician and radiologist interpretations are greater when less common forms of radiology are evaluated. We suggest that the different perspectives of the clinician and the radiologist can be viewed as symbiotic.

With the advent of digital radiology, direct face-to-face communication with the radiologist has become less common. To facilitate a coordinated approach, regular rounds between the radiologists responsible for reporting the neonatal films and the clinical team are advised.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. G. V., Nesterova, C. A., Leftridge Jr., A. R., Natarajan, et al. Discordance in interpretation of chest radiographs between pediatric intensivists and a radiologist: impact on patient management. J Crit Care 2010; 25(2):179–83.Google Scholar
2. G., Prat, M., Lefevre, E., Nowak, et al. Impact of clinical guidelines to improve appropriateness of laboratory tests and chest radiographs. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35(6):1047–53.Google Scholar
3. A. S., Brody, D. P., Frush, W., Huda, et al. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007; 120(3):677–82.Google Scholar
4. H., Kirpalani, C., Nahmias. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):449–50.Google Scholar
5. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) Radiation and Your Patient: A Guide for Medical Practitioners. A Web Module Produced by Committee 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Available at: www.icrp.org/docs/Rad_for_GP_for_web.pdf (accessed December 12, 2007).
6. N. B., Shah, S. L., Platt. ALARA: is there a cause for alarm? Reducing radiation risks from computed tomography scanning in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20:243–7.Google Scholar
7. M. S., Linet, K. P., Kim, P., Rajaraman. Children's exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39(Suppl. 1):S4–26.Google Scholar
8. Y., Peng, J., Li, D., Ma, et al. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2009; 50:1175–81.Google Scholar
9. L. J. M., Kroft, J. J. H., Roelofs, J., Geleijns. Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16-detector row CT acquisitions. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40:294–300.Google Scholar
10. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2007) Guidelines of Perinatal Care, 6th Edition, Atlanta, ACOG.
11. A. M., Trinh, A. H., Schoenfeld, T. L., Levin. Scatter radiation from chest radiographs: is there a risk to infants in a typical NICU? Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40(5):704–7.Google Scholar
12. L., Loovere, E. M., Boyle, S., Blatz, et al. Quality improvement in radiography in a neonatal intensive care unit. Can Assoc Radiol J 2008; 59(4):197–202.Google Scholar
13. R., Smith-Bindman. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 2010; 363(1):1–4.Google Scholar
14. M. L., Wald. The frequent flier and radiation risk. The New York Times, Tuesday, June 12, 2001, pages F1 and F8.
15. G., Hejblum, L., Chalumeau-Lemoine, V., Ioos, et al. Comparison of routine and on-demand prescription of chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated adults: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, two-period crossover study. Lancet 2009; 374(9702):1687–93.Google Scholar
16. Y., Oba, T., Zaza. Abandoning daily routine chest radiography in the intensive care unit: meta-analysis. Radiology 2010; 255(2):386–95.Google Scholar
17. A., Greenough, G., Dimitriou, B. R., Alvares, et al. Routine daily chest radiographs in ventilated, very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160(3):147–9.Google Scholar
18. M., Epelman, A., Daneman, O. M., Navarro, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: review of state-of-the-art imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2007; 27(2):285–305.Google Scholar
19. D. I., Bulas. What is the evidence based role of US in evaluating the fetus? Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39(Suppl. 2):S205–8.Google Scholar
20. S., Sigaut, A., Skhiri, I., Stany, et al. Ultrasound guided internal jugular vein access in children and infant: a meta-analysis of published studies. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19(12):1199–206.Google Scholar
21. C. R., Grebenik, A., Boyce, M. E., Sinclair, et al. NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth 2004; 92(6):827–30.Google Scholar
22. L. J., Woodward, P. J., Anderson, N. C., Austin, et al. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:685–94.Google Scholar
23. L. A., Stokowski. Ensuring safety for infants undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Adv Neonatal Care 2005; 5:14–27.Google Scholar
24. D. T., Teachey. Neonatal MRI and neurodevelopmental outcomes [letter]. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(22):2373–4.Google Scholar
25. R., Wakeford. Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or aft er birth. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008; 132(2):166–74.Google Scholar
26. G., Mari, F., Hanif. Fetal Doppler: umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and venous system. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32:253–7.Google Scholar
27. J. A., Estroff. The growing role of MR imaging in the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39(Suppl. 2):S209–10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×