Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T18:49:27.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

APPENDIX B - POLICY CATEGORIES USED FOR MMC LAWS IN CHAPTER 3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John D. Huber
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles R. Shipan
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Listed here are additional examples of policy instructions written into MMC legislation.

General Policy Language

Washington, 1993 – SB5304: The legislature establishes the rationale for the MMC program.

BASIC HEALTH PLAN – FINDINGS. (1) The legislature finds that:

  1. (a) A significant percentage of the population of this state does not have reasonably available insurance or other coverage of the costs of necessary basic health care services;

  2. (b) This lack of basic health care coverage is detrimental to the health of the individuals lacking coverage and to the public welfare, and results in substantial expenditures for emergency and remedial health care, often at the expense of health care providers, health care facilities, and all purchasers of health care, including the state; and

  3. (c) The use of managed health care systems has significant potential to reduce the growth of health care costs incurred by the people of this state generally, and by low-income pregnant women, and at-risk children and adolescents who need greater access to managed health care.

Provider Responsibilities and Rights

Florida's SB321 (1989): Provides a good example of how legislatures provide specific reporting requirements for participating HMOs:

6.4. Any HMO participating in the state group insurance program shall, upon the request of the department, submit to the department standardized data for the purpose of comparison of the appropriateness, quality, and efficiency of care provided by the HMO. Such standardized data shall include: membership profiles; inpatient and outpatient utilization by age and sex, type of service, provider type, and facility; and emergency care experience. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Deliberate Discretion?
The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy
, pp. 233 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×