Adams, Gordon, The Politics of Defense Contracting: the Iron Triangle (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor, Negative Dialectics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973).Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor and Horkheimer, Max, Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. Cumming, J. (London: Allen Lane, 1973).Google Scholar

Allison, Graham, Nuclear Terrorism: the Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (New York: Times Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Anderson, Martin, An Insurance Missile Defense (Stanford, CA: The Hoover Institution, 1986).Google Scholar

Anderson, Martin, Revolution: the Reagan Legacy (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988).Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry, ‘The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci’, New Left Review, 100 (November 1976–January 1977) pp. 5–78.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew and Gebhardt, Eike (eds.) The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).

Armacost, Michael H., The Politics of Weapons Innovation: the Thor–Jupiter Controversy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Augelli, Enrico and Murphy, Craig, America's Quest for Supremacy and the Third World (London: Pinter, 1988).Google Scholar

Bacevich, Andrew J., The New American Militarism: How Americans are Seduced by War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, trans. Emerson, C., and Holquist, M. (ed.) (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Barnaby, Frank, How Nuclear Weapons Spread: Nuclear Weapon Proliferation in the 1990s (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baucom, Donald R., The Origins of SDI, 1944–1983 (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1992).Google Scholar

Baylis, John and Garnett, John (eds.) Makers of Nuclear Strategy (London: Pinter, 1991).

Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations (New York: Shocken Books, 1969).Google Scholar

Bjiker, Wiebe E., Thomas, P. Hughes and Trevor, J. Pinch, The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Bjork, Rebecca S., The Strategic Defense Initiative: Symbolic Containment of the Nuclear Threat (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Boese, Wade, ‘Missile Defense Aims to Hit Target in ’06', Arms Control Today, September (2004), www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_09/MissileDefenseAims.asp?print [last accessed 20 January 2009].Google Scholar

Booth, Ken, ‘Nuclearism, Human Rights and Constructions of Security (Part 1)’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 3:2 (1999) pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, Ken, ‘Nuclearism, Human Rights and Constructions of Security (Part 2)’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 3:3 (1999) pp. 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, Ken, ‘Security and Emancipation’, Review of International Studies, 17:4 (1991) pp. 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, Ken, Strategy and Ethnocentrism (New York: Homes and Meier, 1979).Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005).Google Scholar

Booth, Ken and Wright, Moorhead (eds.) American Thinking about Peace and War (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1978).

Bormann, Natalie, National Missile Defense and the Politics of US Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottomore, Tom, The Frankfurt School (London: Tavistock, 1984).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power, ed. and introduced by Thompson, John B. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Boyer, Paul S., By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon, 1986).Google Scholar

Brandist, Craig, ‘Gramsci, Bakhtin and the Semiotics of Hegemony’, New Left Review, 216 (March–April 1996) pp. 94–109.Google Scholar

Brandist, Craig, ‘The Official and the Popular in Gramsci and Bakhtin’, Theory, Culture and Society, 13:2 (1996) pp. 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braudel, Fernand, On History, trans. Matthews, Sarah (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1980).Google Scholar

Broad, William J., ‘“Star Wars” Traced to Eisenhower Era’, New York Times, 28 October 1986, pp. C1, C3.Google Scholar

Broad, William J., Teller's War: the Top-Secret Story Behind the Star Wars Deception (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard, Strategy in the Missile Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Bronner, Stephen Eri and MacKay Kellner, Douglas (eds.) Critical Theory and Society: a Reader (New York: Routledge, 1989).

Brosnan, Mark, Technophobia: the Psychological Impact of Information Technology (London: Routledge, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Michael E. (ed.) Grave New World: Security Challenges in the 21st Century (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003).

Brzezinski, Zbigniew (ed.) Promise or Peril: the Strategic Defense Initiative (Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Centre, 1986).

Bulkeley, Rip and Spinardi, Graham, Space Weapons: Deterrence or Delusion? (Oxford: Polity Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Herring, Eric, The Arms Dynamic in World Politics (London: Lynne Rienner, 1998).Google Scholar

Cahn, Anne Hessing, ‘Team B: the Trillion Dollar Experiment (Part I)’, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April (1993) pp. 22–7.

Caldicott, Helen, The New Nuclear Danger: George W. Bush's Military-Industrial Complex (New York: The New Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Cannon, Lou, President Reagan: the Role of a Lifetime (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991).Google Scholar

Causewell, Erin V. (ed.) National Missile Defense: Issues and Developments (New York: Novinka Books, 2002).

Cerf, Christopher and Navasky, Victor, The Experts Speak (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Chant, Colin (ed.) Science, Technology and Everyday Life 1870–1950 (London: The Open University, 1990).

Chayes, Abram and Jerome, B. Wiesner (eds.) ABM: an Evaluation of the Decision to Deploy an Anti-Ballistic Missile System (London: MacDonald, 1970).

Cirincione, Joseph, ‘Why the Right Lost the Missile Defense Debate’, Foreign Policy, 106, Spring (1997) pp. 39–55.Google Scholar

Cirincione, Joseph, Jon, B. Wolfstahl and Miriam, Rajkumar, Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005).Google Scholar

Codevilla, Angelo, While Others Build: the Commonsense Approach to the Strategic Defense Initiative (New York: Macmillan, 1988).Google Scholar

Coker, Christopher, Waging War without Warriors? The Changing Culture of Military Conflict (London: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W., ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10:2 (1982) pp. 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crockatt, Richard and Smith, Steve (eds.) The Cold War Past and Present (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).

Croft, Stuart, Culture, Crisis and America's War on Terror (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daalder, Ivo H. and Lindsay, James M., America Unbound: the Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Dalby, Simon, Creating the Second Cold War: the Discourse of Politics (London: Pinter, 1990).Google Scholar

Danchev, Alex (ed.) Fin de Siècle: the Meaning of the Twentieth Century (London: I. B. Tauris, 1995).

Derian, James, Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Dickson, David, Alternative Technology and the Politics of Technical Change (Glasgow: Fontana, 1974).Google Scholar

Disch, Thomas M., The New Improved Sun: an Anthology of Utopian Science Fiction (New York: Harper, 1976).Google Scholar

Divine, Robert A., The Sputnik Challenge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Dockrill, Saki, Eisenhower's New-Look National Security Policy, 1953–61 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolman, Everett C., Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age (London: Frank Cass, 2002).Google Scholar

Dolman, Everett C., ‘US Military Transformation and Weapons in Space’ (2005), www.e-parl.net/pages/space_hearing.htm [last accessed 20 January 2009].

Dyson, Freeman, Weapons and Hope (London: Harper and Row, 1984).Google Scholar

Eberhart, Sylvia, ‘How American People Feel about the Atomic Bomb’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 3: 4–5 (April–May 1947) pp. 146–9, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eden, Lynn, Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge and Nuclear Weapons Devastation (New York: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Edwards, Paul N., The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Eisendrath, Craig, Melvin, A. Goodman and Gerald, E. Marsh, The Phantom Defense: America's Pursuit of the Star Wars Illusion (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001).Google Scholar

Ellul, Jacques, The Technological Society, trans. Wilkinson, J. (New York: Vintage, 1964).Google Scholar

Erickson, John, The Military Technical Revolution: Its Impact on Strategy and Foreign Policy (New York: F. A. Praeger, 1966).Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman, Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language (London: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman, Discourse and Social Change (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew, Critical Theory of Technology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew, ‘From Essentialism to Constructivism: Philosophy of Technology at the Crossroads’, undated paper available from www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4.html [last accessed 20 January 2009].

Feenberg, Andrew, Questioning Technology (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew, Transforming Technology: a Critical Theory Revisited (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Feld, B. T., Greenwood, G. W., Rathjens, G. W. and Weinberg, S. (eds.) The Impact of New Technologies on the Arms Race (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971).

Fitzgerald, Frances, Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar

Forgacs, David (ed.) The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings 1916–1935 (New York: New York University Press, 2000).

Franklin, H. Bruce, War Stars: the Superweapon and the American Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, 3rd edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence, The Revolution in Strategic Affairs, Adelphi Paper 318 (London: International Institute of Strategic Studies, 1998).Google Scholar

Fuller, J. F. C, Armament and History: a Study of the Influence of Armament on History from the Dawn of Classical Warfare to the Second World War (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1946).Google Scholar

Galbraith, J. K., The New Industrial State (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974).Google Scholar

Garfinkle, Adam M., The Politics of the Nuclear Freeze (Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute, 1984).Google Scholar

Gill, Stephen (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRef

Gilpin, Robert, American Scientists and Nuclear Weapons Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRef

Gilpin, Robert and Wright, Christopher (eds.) Scientists and National Policy-Making (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964).

Goldfischer, David, The Best Defense: Policy Alternatives for US Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Graham, Bradley, Hit To Kill: the New Battle over Shielding America from Missile Attack (New York: Public Affairs, 2003).Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel O., The Non-Nuclear Defense of Cities: the High Frontier Space-Based Defense against ICBM Attack (Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel O. and Gregory, A. Fossedal, A Defense that Defends: Blocking Nuclear Attack (Old Greenwich, CT: Devin-Adair, 1983).Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. by Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1973).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., Another Bloody Century: Future Warfare (London: Weidenfield Military, 2005).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., ‘Dangerous to Your Health: the Debate over Nuclear Strategy and War’, Orbis, 26 (1982) pp. 327–49.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., ‘European Perspectives on US Ballistic Missile Defense’, Comparative Strategy, 21 (2002) pp. 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S., The Geopolitics of the Nuclear Era: Heartland, Rimlands and the Technological Revolution (New York: Crane, Russak 1977).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., House of Cards: Why Arms Control Must Fail (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., ‘Nuclear Strategy: the Case for a Theory of Victory’, International Security, 4:1 (1979), pp. 54–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S., Nuclear Strategy and National Style (London: Hamilton Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., The Second Nuclear Age (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., Weapons Don't Make War: Policy, Strategy and Military Technology (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1993).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin and Payne, Keith, ‘Victory is Possible’, Foreign Policy, 39 (1980) pp. 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, Ted, ‘Why Military Technology is Difficult to Restrain’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15:4 (1990) pp. 412–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronlund, Lisbeth, Wright, David and Young, Stephen, ‘An Assessment of the Intercept Test Program of the Ground-based Midcourse National Missile Defense System’, Defense and Security Analysis, 18:3 (2002) pp. 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guerrier, Steven W. and Wayne, C. Thompson (eds.) Perspectives on Strategic Defense (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987).

Gusterson, Hugh, Nuclear Rites: a Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Gusterson, Hugh, People of the Bomb: Portraits of America's Nuclear Complex (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Future of Human Nature (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, trans. Shapiro, J. J. (London: Heineman, 1971).Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left (London: Verso, 1988).Google Scholar

Handberg, Roger, Ballistic Missile Defense and the Future of American Security: Agendas, Perceptions, Technology and Policy (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002).Google Scholar

Hanssen, Beatrice, Critique of Violence: Between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: the Reinvention of Nature (London: Free Association, 1991).Google Scholar

Hartung, William D. with Frida, Berrigan, Ciarrocca, Michelle and Wingo, Jonathan, ‘Tangled Web 2005: a Profile of the Missile Defense and Space Weapons Lobbies’, report by the World Policy Institute, www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/tangledweb.html [last accessed 20 January 2009].

Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, trans. Lovitt, W. (London: Harper and Row, 1977).Google Scholar

Held, David, Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (London: Hutchison, 1980).Google Scholar

Hildreth, Steven A. (ed.) Missile Defense: the Current Debate (New York: Novinka Books, 2004).

Hitch, Charles and McKean, Roland, The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age (New York: Atheneum, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, Gulliver's Troubles, Or the Setting of American Foreign Policy (New York: McGraw Hill, 1968).Google Scholar

Hogan, J. Michael, The Nuclear Freeze Campaign: Rhetoric and Foreign Policy in the Telepolitical Age (East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1994).Google Scholar

Holst, Johan J., and Schneider, William, Why ABM? Policy Issues in the Missile Defense Controversy (New York: Pergamon, 1969).Google Scholar

Holub, Renate, Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, Critical Theory: Selected Essays, trans. O'Connell, Matthew J. and others (New York: Seabury Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, Eclipse of Reason (New York: Seabury Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas P., American Genesis: a Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas P., (ed.) Changing Attitudes Toward American Technology (New York: Harper and Row, 1975).

Humphrey, Hubert H. and William, O. Douglas, Anti-Ballistic Missile: Yes or No? (New York: Hill and Wang, 1968).Google Scholar

Ikle, Fred C.Annihilation from Within: the Ultimate Threat to Nations (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikle, Fred C., Every War Must End (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Ikle, Fred C., ‘Nuclear Strategy: Can There be a Happy Ending?’, Foreign Affairs, 63:4 (1985) pp. 810–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikle, Fred C. ‘The Second Coming of the Nuclear Age’, Foreign Affairs, 75:1 (1996) pp. 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanov, Igor, ‘The Missile Defense Mistake: Undermining Strategic Stability and the ABM Treaty’, Foreign Policy, 79:5 (2000) pp. 15–20.Google Scholar

Ives, Peter, Gramsci's Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Carl G. (ed.) The Uncertain Course: New Weapons, Strategies and Mind-Sets (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).

Jastrow, Robert, ‘Reagan vs. the Scientists: Why the President is Right about Missile Defense’, Commentary, 77:1 (1984) pp.23–31.Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam and Coupland, Nikolas (eds.) The Discourse Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).

Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob, The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Johnson, Robert H., Improbable Dangers: US Conceptions of Threat in the Cold War and After (New York: St Martin's Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Johnson, Robert H., ‘Periods of Peril: the Window of Vulnerability and Other Myths’, Foreign Affairs, 61:4 (1983) pp. 950–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Herman, On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1965).Google Scholar

Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Karp, Aaron, ‘The New Indeterminancy of Deterrence and Missile Defense’, Contemporary Security Policy, 25: 1 (2004) pp. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karp, Aaron and Karp, Regina, ‘Preface: From Strategy to Domestic Debate’, Contemporary Security Policy, 26:3 (2005) pp. v–vi.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).

Kennan, George, Russia, the Atom and the West (New York: Harper, 1958).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Edward M. and Mark, O. Hatfield, Freeze! How You Can Help Prevent Nuclear War (New York: Bantam Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Robert F., Thirteen Days: a Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971).Google Scholar

Killian, James R., Sputnik, Scientists and Eisenhower (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Klein, Bradley S., Strategic Studies and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kovel, Joel, Against the State of Nuclear Terror (London: Pan, 1983).Google Scholar

Krause, Keith (ed.) Culture and Security: Multilateralism, Arms Control and Security Building (London: Frank Cass, 1999).

Krause, Keith and Michael, C. Williams (eds.) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (London: UCL Press, 1997).

Krepon, Michael, ‘Weapons in the Heavens: a Radical and Reckless Option’, Arms Control Today, 34:9 (2004) pp. 11–18.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (London: New Left Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd edition (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar

LaFeber, Walter, The American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad, 1750 to the Present (New York: Norton, 1994).Google Scholar

Landy, Marcia, Film, Politics and Gramsci (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Lapp, Ralph E., Arms Beyond Doubt: the Tyranny of Weapons Technology (New York: Cowles, 1970).Google Scholar

Lasch, Christopher, The True and Only Heaven: Progress and its Critics (New York: W.W. Norton, 1991).Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard N., Nuclear Crisis Management: a Dangerous Illusion (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Leiss, William, The Domination of Nature (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Leiss, William, Under Technology's Thumb (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Lennon, Alexander T. J. (ed.) Contemporary Nuclear Debates: Missile Defense, Arms Control, and Arms Races in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).

Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl, G. Press, ‘The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of US Primacy’, International Security, 30:4 (2006) pp. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieber, Kier A. and Daryl, G. Press, ‘The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy’, Foreign Affairs, March/April (2006) pp. 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lifton, Robert Jay and Falk, Richard, Indefensible Weapons: the Political and Psychological Case against Nuclearism (New York: Basic Books, 1982).Google Scholar

Lifton, Robert Jay and Markusen, Eric, The Genocidal Mentality: the Nazi Holocaust and Nuclear Threat (London: Macmillan, 1991).Google Scholar

Linenthal, Edward T., Symbolic Defense: the Cultural Significance of the Strategic Defense Initiative (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Lowy, Michael, Redemption and Utopia: Jewish Libertarian Thought in Central Europe (London: Athlone, 1992).Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg, ‘Technology and Social Relations’, New Left Review, 39 (1966) pp. 27–34.Google Scholar

Luongo, Kenneth N. and Thomas Wander, W. (eds.) The Search for Security in Space (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).

McCarthy, Thomas, The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar

McClean, Douglas (ed.) The Security Gamble: Deterrence Dilemmas in the Nuclear Age (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld, 1984).

MacKenzie, Donald A., Inventing Accuracy: a Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man (London: Sphere, 1967).Google Scholar

McNamara, Robert, ‘Apocalypse Soon’, Foreign Policy, May/June (2005) pp. 29–35.

McNamara, Robert, The Essence of Security: Reflections in Office (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1968).Google Scholar

Maley, Terry, ‘Max Weber and the Iron Cage of Technology’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24:1 (2004) pp. 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mao, Tse-Tung, ‘The Chinese People Cannot Be Cowed by the Atom Bomb’, Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung, Vol. V (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, Negations: Essays in Critical Theory (London: Allen Lane, 1968).Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, Reason and Revolution (Boston: Beacon Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert, Technology, War and Fascism: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, ed. Kellner, Douglas (London: Routledge, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl, The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1977).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, The German Ideology (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1965).Google Scholar

Marx, Leo, The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Mathers, Jennifer, The Russian Nuclear Shield from Stalin to Yeltsin (Basingstoke: MacMillan, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John, ‘Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War’, The Atlantic Monthly, 266:2 (1990) pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

Medhurst, Martin J. and Brands, H. W. (eds.) Critical Reflections on the Cold War: Linking Rhetoric and History (College Station, TX: Texas A&M Press, 2000).

Mehan, Hugh, Charles, E. Nathanson and James, M. Skelly, ‘Nuclear Discourse in the 1980s: the Unravelling Conventions of the Cold War’, Discourse and Society, 1:2 (1990) pp. 134–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, Hugo A., ‘The Technological Concept in American Social History: 1750–1860’, PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1956.

Mendelsohn, Jack, ‘Arms Control after the Summit’, Arms Control Today, 23:4 (1993) pp. 10–14.Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, Jack, ‘Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons’, Issues in Science and Technology, Spring (2006), www.issues.org/22.3/mendelsohn.html [last accessed 20 January 2009].Google Scholar

Miller, Steven E., The Nuclear Weapons Freeze and Arms Control (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1985).Google Scholar

Milliken, Jennifer, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: a Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:2 (1999) pp. 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Gordon R., Strategic Deception: Rhetoric, Science and Politics in Missile Defense Advocacy (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Gordon R., ‘Team B Intelligence Coups’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92:2 (2006) pp. 144–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moltz, James Clay (ed.) New Challenges in Missile Proliferation, Missile Defense and Space Security (Southampton: Mountbatten Centre for International Studies, 2003).

Mooney, Chris, The Republican War on Science (New York: Basic Books, 2005).Google Scholar

Morera, Esteve, Gramsci's Historicism: a Realist Interpretation (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J., Scientific Man versus Power Politics (London: Latimer House, 1947).Google Scholar

Morris, Pam (ed.) The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov (London: Edward Arnold, 1994).

Mouffe, Chantal (ed.) Gramsci and Marxist Theory (London: Routledge, 1979).

Mumford, Lewis, The Pentagon of Power: the Myth of the Machine, Volume II (New York: Harvest, 1970).Google Scholar

Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Civilization (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1934).Google Scholar

Murnion, Philip J. (ed.) Catholics and Nuclear War (New York: Crossroad, 1983).

Mutimer, David, The Weapons State: Proliferation and the Framing of Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000).Google Scholar

Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988).CrossRef

Neustadt, Richard E. and Ernest, R. May, Thinking in Time: the Uses of History for Decision Makers (New York: The Free Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Nitze, Paul, ‘Assuring Strategic Stability in an Era of Détente’, Foreign Affairs, 54:2 (1976) pp. 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noble, David F., Forces of Production (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

O'Hanlon, Michael E., Neither Star Wars nor Sanctuary: Constraining the Military Uses of Space (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Robert, Oppenheimer, J. ‘Atomic Weapons and American Policy’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9:6 (July 1953) pp. 202–5.Google Scholar

Paret, Peter (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).

Payne, Keith B., ‘Action–Reaction Metaphysics and Negligence’, The Washington Quarterly, 24:4 (Autumn 2001) pp. 109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘The Case against Nuclear Abolition and for Nuclear Deterrence’, Comparative Strategy, 17 (1998) pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘The Case for a National Missile Defense’, 27 May 2005, www.nipp.org/publications.php [last accessed 7 March 2007].

Payne, Keith B., Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age (Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1996).Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., The Fallacies of Cold War Deterrence and a New Direction (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., Missile Defense in the 21st Century: Protection against Limited Threats, Including Lessons from the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘National Missile Defense: Why? And Why Now?’, FPRI Wire (2000), www.nipp.org/Adobe/fpri.pdf#search=%22National%20Missile%20Defense%3A%20Why%3F%20And%20Why%20Now%3F%22 [last accessed 20 January 2009].Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., The Nuclear Freeze Controversy (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984).Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘The Nuclear Posture Review and Deterrence for a New Age’, Comparative Strategy, 23 (2004) pp. 411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘The Nuclear Posture Review: Setting the Record Straight’, The Washington Quarterly, 28:3 (2005) pp. 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Keith B., ‘Weaponry: the Nuclear Jitters’, The National Review, 30 June 2003, www.nipp.org/Adobe/the%20nuclear%20jitters.pdf#search=%22Weaponry%3A%20The%20Nuclear%20Jitters%22 [last accessed 20 January 2009].Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B., Strategic Defense: ‘Star Wars’ in Perspective (London: Hamilton Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Payne, Keith and Kortunov, Andrei, ‘The Character of the Problem’, Comparative Strategy, 16 (1997) pp. 127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peoples, Columba, ‘Technology and Politics in the Missile Defence Debate: Traditional, Radical and Critical Approaches’, Global Change, Peace and Security, 19:3 (2007) pp. 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pipes, Richard, US–Soviet Relations in the Era of Détente (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Pipes, Richard, ‘Why the Soviet Union Thinks it Could Fight and Win a Nuclear War’, Commentary, 64:1 (1977) pp. 21–34.Google Scholar

Postol, Theodore A., ‘Lessons of the Gulf War Experience with Patriot’, International Security, 16 (1991/2) pp. 119–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prados, John, The Soviet Estimate: US Intelligence Analysis and Soviet Strategic Forces (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Prados, John, ‘Team B: the Trillion Dollar Experiment (Part II)’, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April (1993), pp. 22/27–31.Google Scholar

Pratt, Erik K., Selling Strategic Defense: Interests, Ideologies and the Arms Race (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1990).Google Scholar

Pursell, Carroll W., Jr., Readings in Technology and American Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Purvis, Trevor and Hunt, Alan, ‘Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology …’, British Journal of Sociology, 44:3 (1999) pp. 473–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, Edward, The Strategic Defense Initiative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reppy, Judith ‘The Technological Imperative in Strategic Thought’, Journal of Peace Research' 27:1 (1990) pp. 101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, Richard (ed.) Visions of Technology: a Century of Vital Debate about Machines, Systems and the Human World (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1999).

Roman, Peter J., Eisenhower and the Missile Gap (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Rosen, Steven (ed.) Testing the Theory of the Military-Industrial Complex (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1973).

Ruhle, Hans and Ruhle, Michael, ‘A View from Europe – Missile Defense for the 21st Century: Echoes of the 1930s’, Comparative Strategy, 20 (2001) pp. 221–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rupert, Mark, ‘Globalising Common Sense: A Marxian–Gramscian (re-)Vision of the Politics of Governance/Resistance’, Review of International Studies, 29 (2003) pp. 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rupert, Mark, Producing Hegemony: the Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Sagan, Scott D. and Kenneth, N. Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: a Debate (New York: W.W. Norton, 1995).Google Scholar

Sarkesian, Sam C. (ed.) The Military-Industrial Complex: a Reassessment (Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, 1972).

Scheer, Robert, With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush, and Nuclear War (New York: Random House, 1982).Google Scholar

Schell, Jonathan, The Abolition (London: Picador, 1984).Google Scholar

Schell, Jonathan, The Fate of the Earth (London: Picador, 1982).Google Scholar

Schell, Jonathan, The Unfinished Twentieth Century: the Crisis of Weapons of Mass Destruction (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Segal, Howard P., Future Imperfect: the Mixed Blessings of Technology in America (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Segal, Howard P., Technological Utopianism in American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Seng, Tan See, What Fear Hath Wrought: Missile Hysteria and the Writing of ‘America’, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies Working Paper (Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, 2002).Google Scholar

Shaw, Martin, The New Western Way of War: Risk-Transfer War and its Crisis in Iraq (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michael, The Arms Race (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).Google Scholar

Silverstein, Ken, Private Warriors (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Slater, Phil (ed.) Outlines of a Critique of Technology (London: Ink Links, 1980).

Smith, Hedrick, The Power Game: How Washington Works (London: Collins, 1988).Google Scholar

Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRef

Sokolovskii, V. D., Soviet Military Strategy (New York: Praeger, 1963).Google Scholar

Stares, Paul B., Space Weapons and US Strategy: Origins and Development (London: Croom Helm, 1985).Google Scholar

Stein, Jonathan B., From H-Bomb to Star Wars: the Politics of Strategic Decision Making (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986).Google Scholar

Steinberg, Gerald M. (ed.) Lost in Space: the Domestic Politics of the Strategic Defense Initiative (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988).

Stern, Thomas A., The USAF Scientific Advisory Board: Its First Twenty Years, 1944–1964 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1986).Google Scholar

Talbott, Strobe, Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace (New York: Knopf, 1988).Google Scholar

Teller, Edward, Better a Shield than a Sword: Perspectives on Defense and Technology (New York: The Free Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Teller, Edward, Freedom in an Age of Technology: an Address (New York: International and Academic Technical Publications, 1972).Google Scholar

Teller, Edward, The Legacy of Hiroshima (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1962).Google Scholar

Thatcher, Margaret, ‘Deterrence is Not Enough: Security Requirements for the 21st Century’, Comparative Strategy, 18 (1999) pp. 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Edward P. (ed.) Exterminism and Cold War (London: Verso, 1982).

Thompson, Edward P. (ed.) Star Wars (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).

Thompson, John B., ‘Rationality and Social Rationalization: an Assessment of Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action', Sociology, 17:2 (1983) pp. 278–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, John B., Studies in the Theory of Ideology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Tirman, John (ed.) The Fallacy of Star Wars: Based on Studies Conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists (New York: Vintage Books, 1984).

Tucker, Robert W., The Nuclear Debate: Deterrence and the Lapse of Faith (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985).Google Scholar

Tyroler, Charles, II (ed.) Alerting America: the Papers of the Committee on the Present Danger (Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassy's, 1984).

Uhler, Walter C., ‘Missile Shield or Holy Grail?’, The Nation, 28 January 2002, www.thenation.com/doc/20020128/uhler [last accessed 20 January 2009].Google Scholar

,Union of Concerned Scientists, Beyond the Freeze: the Road to Nuclear Sanity (Boston: Beacon Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Utgoff, Victor A. (ed.) The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, US Interests, and World Order (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000).

Cleave, William, Fortress USSR: the Soviet Strategic Defense Initiative and the US Strategic Defense Response (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Creveld, Martin, Technology and War: From 2000 BC to the Present (New York: The Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Vlahos, Michael, Strategic Defense and the American Ethos: Can the Nuclear World be Changed? (Boulder, CO: Foreign Policy Institute, 1986).Google Scholar

Walt, Stephen M., ‘Rush to Failure: the Flawed Politics and Policies of Missile Defense’, Harvard Magazine, 102, May–June (2000) pp. 31–5.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May be Better, Adelphi Paper 171 (London: International Institute of Strategic Studies, 1981).Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw Hill, 1979).Google Scholar

Weigley, Russell F., The American Way of War: a History of the United States Military Strategy and Policy (New York: Macmillan, 1973).Google Scholar

Weinberger, Caspar W., ‘US Defense Strategy’, Foreign Affairs, 64 (1986) pp. 695–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weldes, Jutta, ‘Constructing National Interests’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:3 (1996) pp. 275–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weldes, Jutta, Laffey, Mark, Gusterson, Hugh and Duvall, Raymond (eds.) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).

Wenger, Andreas, Living with Peril: Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nuclear Weapons (Oxford: Rowan and Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar

Francis, Wheen, Marx's Das Kapital: a Biography (London: Atlantic Books).

Williams, Michael C., Culture and Security: the Reconstruction of Security in the Post-Cold War Era (London: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Michael C., ‘Rethinking the “Logic” of Deterrence’, Alternatives, 17 (1992) pp. 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Michael C., ‘What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 11:3 (2005) pp. 307–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Raymond, Keywords: a Vocabulary of Culture and Society (London: Fontana, 1983).Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond, Problems in Materialism and Culture (London: Verso, 1980).Google Scholar

Wilson, H. T., The American Ideology: Science, Technology, and Organization as Modes of Rationality in Advanced Industrial Societies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977).Google Scholar

Winkler, Allan M., Life under a Cloud: American Anxiety about the Bomb (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Winner, Langdon, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Wirtz, James J. (ed.) Rocket's Red Glare: Missile Defenses and the Future of World Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001).

Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘The Delicate Balance of Terror’, Foreign Affairs, 37:2 (1959) pp. 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘Is There a Strategic Arms Race?’, Foreign Policy, 15 (1974) pp. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘Optimal Ways to Confuse Ourselves’, Foreign Policy, 20 (1975) pp. 997–1002.Google Scholar

Wohlstetter, Albert, ‘Rivals but No Race’, Foreign Policy, 16 (1974) pp. 170–98.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Alan, The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Threat (Boston, MA: Southend Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Wolfe, Tom, The Right Stuff (New York: Bantam, 1980).Google Scholar

WrightMills, C Mills, C., The Power Elite (London: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Wyn Jones, Richard, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (London: Lynne Rienner, 1999).Google Scholar

Wyn Jones, Richard, (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001).

Yanarella, Ernest J., The Missile Defense Controversy: Technology in Search of a Mission (Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2002).Google Scholar

York, Herbert F., Race to Oblivion: a Participant's View of the Arms Race (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1970).Google Scholar

Yost, David S., Soviet Ballistic Missile Defense and the Western Alliance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Zagacki, Kenneth and King, Andrew ‘Reagan, Romance and Technology: a Critique of “Star Wars”’, Communication Studies, 40 (1989) pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, 1998 BMDO Technologies – Improving the Environment (1998), www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/specialreports.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, BMDO Technology and the Electric Utility Industry (1997), www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/specialreports.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Ballistic Missile Defense Organization Office of the Chief Scientist (BMDO/ST) Technology Applications Program, The 2000 BMDO Technology Applications Report: Technology, Working for You Now (2000), www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/specialreports.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

Barton, David K., Falcone, Roger, Kleppner, Danielet al., ‘Report of the American Physical Society Group on Boost-Phase Intercept Systems for National Missile Defense: Scientific and Technical Issues, pp. xxi–xxii, www.aps.org/public_affairs/popa/reports/nmd03.cfm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

Carter, Ashton B., Directed Energy Missile Defense in Space: Background Paper (Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, 1984).Google Scholar

,Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, Report of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, Executive Summary, 15 July 1998, www.fas.org/irp/threat/bm-threat.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, Report of the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, Executive Summary, 11 January 2001, www.defenselink.mil/pubs/space20010111.html [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Congressional Budget Office, The Long-Term Implications of Current Defense Plans and Alternatives: Detailed Update for Fiscal Year 2006 (2006), http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=7004&sequence=0&from=7 [last accessed 7 March 2007].

Davis, Paul K., Analytic Architecture for Capabilities-Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation, RAND 2002, MR-1513-OSD, www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1513/index.html [last accessed 20 January 2009].

,Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, 30 September 2001, www.defenselink.mil/pubs/qdr2001.pdf#search=%22Quadrennial%20Defense%20Review%20Report%22 [last accessed 20 January 2009].

,Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, 6 February 2006, www.comw.org/qdr/qdr2006.pdf [last accessed 7 March 2007].

Hitchens, Theresa, Katz-Hyman, Michael, Lewis, Jeffrey and Samson, Victoria, Space Weapons Spending in the Fiscal Year 2006 President's Request: a Preliminary Assessment, 10 February 2005, www.cdi.org/PDFs/FY06–1.pdf [accessed 07 September].

,Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‘Joint Vision 2010’ and ‘Joint Vision 2020’, www.dtic.mil/jv2010/jvpub.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Missile Defense Agency Advanced Systems (MDA/AS) Technology Applications Program, 2003 Technology Applications Report (2003), www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/specialreports.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Missile Defense Agency Advanced Systems (MDA/AS) Technology Applications Program, 2004 Technology Applications Report (2004), www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/specialreports.htm [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,National Institute for Public Policy, Rationale and Requirements for US Nuclear Forces and Arms Control (National Institute for Public Policy, 2001).Google Scholar

,National Intelligence Officer for Strategic and Nuclear Programs, Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States through 2015, September 1999, www.dni.gov/nic/PDF_GIF_otherprod/missilethreat2001.pdf#search=%22Foreign%20Missile%20Developments%20and%20the%20Ballistic%20Missile%20Threat%20to%20the%20United%20States%20through%202015%22 [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Union of Concerned Scientists, ‘Countermeasures’, www.armscontrol.org/subject/md/?print [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,Union of Concerned Scientists, ‘Technical Realities: an Analysis of the 2004 Deployment of a US National Missile Defense System’, www.ucsusa.org/global_security/missile_defense/technical-realities-national-missile-defense-deployment-in-2004.html [last accessed 7 March 2007].

,United States Central Intelligence Agency, Intelligence Community Experiment in Competitive Analysis: Soviet Strategic Objectives, an Alternative View: Report of Team ‘B’ (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1976); declassified 16 September 1992.Google Scholar