Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:51:14.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Inheritable genetic modification as moral responsibility in a creative universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

John Rasko
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Gabrielle O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Rachel Ankeny
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

The transformation of history begins with the history of transformations.

Modern technology has introduced action of such moral scale, objects and consequences that the framework of former ethics can no longer contain them.

Introduction

In February 1997, Ian Wilmut of Edinburgh's Roslin Institute introduced Dolly, the recently cloned ewe, to the world. President Bill Clinton and Pope John Paul II responded with caution to the success of this project and took initiatives to prevent any future attempts to clone human beings. The President and the Pope were, of course, responding from within two quite different moral universes. Clinton, the classical sophist, tailored his response to the dictates of his pollsters and spin-doctors, and fashioned his rhetoric to appeal to the dominant mood and fears of the American people. The Pope responded from within the long tradition of natural law theory in which human beings are morally subject to the natural order of things ordained by God. Both were responding on the basis of what can be argued to be a scientifically outmoded cosmology.

All moral orientations and theories arise from one or another conception of the structure and operation of the universe. We call the theoretical account of the nature of the universe “cosmology.” The morality of society changes when the cosmology of a society changes. According to the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, shards of older moral traditions persist, sometimes for many centuries, emerging to challenge the validity of any new morality, even though these traditions have outlived the context within which they originally made sense.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×