Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: Interpreting the Violent State
- PART I ON THE FORMS OF STATE KILLING
- 2 The Innocuousness of State Lethality in an Age of National Security
- 3 Oedipal Sovereignty and the War in Iraq
- 4 Sacrifice and Sovereignty
- 5 Due Process and Lethal Confinement
- 6 From Time to Torture: The Hellish Future of the Criminal Sentence
- 7 The Child in the Broom Closet: States of Killing and Letting Die
- 8 The Lethality of the Canadian State's (Re)cognition of Indigenous Peoples
- PART II INVESTIGATING THE DISCOURSES OF DEATH
- Index
- References
3 - Oedipal Sovereignty and the War in Iraq
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: Interpreting the Violent State
- PART I ON THE FORMS OF STATE KILLING
- 2 The Innocuousness of State Lethality in an Age of National Security
- 3 Oedipal Sovereignty and the War in Iraq
- 4 Sacrifice and Sovereignty
- 5 Due Process and Lethal Confinement
- 6 From Time to Torture: The Hellish Future of the Criminal Sentence
- 7 The Child in the Broom Closet: States of Killing and Letting Die
- 8 The Lethality of the Canadian State's (Re)cognition of Indigenous Peoples
- PART II INVESTIGATING THE DISCOURSES OF DEATH
- Index
- References
Summary
You know, of course, that one does not count the dead in the same way from one corner of the globe to another.
– Jacques DerridaThat the dead are not always counted in the same way because the dead do not count in the same way is manifest in the United States' invasion of Iraq in 2003. Justifications for the invasion, proffered from various positions on both the right and the left, reveal through their absence the dead bodies of those who are not and perhaps cannot be counted. What the invasion of Iraq has also revealed is a paradoxical aspect of sovereign power, an effect of sovereignty that traditional juridical accounts of sovereign power cannot explain: sovereignty is the cause of the very problems it claims the right to solve. The invasion of Iraq produced a specific space of violence that did not preexist the invasion, and since that time the United States has continued to claim the right to rid the space that it has created of the violence within. Far from being a war of defense and being not quite a war of aggression or territorial conquest, the invasion of Iraq was carried out in the name of the sovereign right to protect against a violence that did not in fact exist, and a threat that many justifiably claimed would never materialize.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- States of ViolenceWar, Capital Punishment, and Letting Die, pp. 51 - 82Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009