Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T00:49:10.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Balancing recreation and wildlife conservation of charismatic species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

Birgit Friedl
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in Economics Department of Economics, University of Graz, Austria
Doris A. Behrens
Affiliation:
Professor in Environmental Economics Department of Economics, University of Klagenfurt, Austria
Andreas Kontoleon
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Unai Pascual
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Timothy Swanson
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Out of the four components of biodiversity (UNEP 1992, Art. 2, Par. 2), two of them, namely species diversity and ecosystem diversity, focus on the fauna and flora in ecosystems and implicitly stress the importance of non-domesticated organisms living in their natural habitats. The term wildlife is used to scientifically describe plant and, more commonly, animal species without any serious human influence on habitats or population numbers. According to the Red List of Threatened Species, 1 per cent of all described species and 41 per cent of the species evaluated worldwide are seriously threatened by extinction (IUCN 2004). The dramatic increase in the rates of extinction can be expected to lead to a loss of half of all existent birds and mammals within the next 2–5 centuries (Wilson 1992; Stork 1997).

Species extinction is closely linked to (economically motivated) human activities such as land conversion, hunting and tourism. Irrespective of its immediate causes, species extinction is most often due to habitat modification and fragmentation (Groombridge 1992; MEA 2005). Thus, measures to protect habitats or ecosystems constitute the core of wildlife (or ‘in situ’) conservation. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) developed a classification and certification scheme for protected area management, reaching from human exclusion (strict nature reserve; category Ia) to coexistence of conservation and recreation (national park; category II) and to sustainable use (managed resource protected area; category VI). Therefore, an ecosystem (or habitat) approach targets at protecting representative samples of ecosystems or habitat types through control of land use.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biodiversity Economics
Principles, Methods and Applications
, pp. 531 - 556
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alden, D. 1997. Recreational user management of parks: an ecological economic framework. Ecological Economics. 23. 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AQUILALP 2003. AUQILALP.NET newsletter 2003. Der Steinadler in den Ostalpen (The Golden Eagle in the Eastern Alps). http://www.aquilalp.net
Aubrecht, P. and Petz, K. 2002. Naturschutzfachlich bedeutende Gebiete in Österreich, Eine Übersicht. Monographien. 134. Vienna: Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
Begon, M., Harper, J. L., Townsend, C. R. 1996. Ecology. Individuals, Populations and Communities. 3rd ed. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, D. A., Friedl, B. 2004. Is protecting the charismatic species really enough? Tourism strategies to optimally balance recreation and conservation in a predator-prey system. ORDYS Discussion Paper No. 289. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
Boxall, P., Rollins, K. and Englin, J. 2003. Heterogeneous preferences for congestion during a wilderness experience. Resource and Energy Economics. 25. 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulte, E. H. and Kooten, G. C. 2001. Harvesting and conserving a species when numbers are low: population viability and gambler's ruin in bioeconomic models. Ecological Economics. 37. 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. W. 1990. Mathematical Bioeconomics. The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Conrad, J. M. and Adu-Asamoah, R. 1986. Single and multi-species systems: the program of tuna in the Eastern Tropical Atlantic. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 13. 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J. M. and Salas, G. 1993. Economic strategies for coevolution: timber and butterflies in Mexico. Land Economics. 69 (4). 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crépin, A. S. 2003. Multiple species forests – what Faustmann missed. Environmental and Resource Economics. 26. 625–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, D. and Shogren, J. F. 2001. An update on priorities and expenditures under the endangered species act. Land Economics. 77 (4). 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockner, E. and Feichtinger, G. 1991. On the optimality of limit cycles in dynamic economic systems. Journal of Economics. 53 (1). 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffus, D. A. and Dearden, P. 1990. Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: a conceptual framework. Biological Conservation. 53. 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvorak, M. and Karner, E. 1995. Important bird areas in Austria. Monographien. 71. Vienna: Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
Feenstra, T., Cesar, H. and Kort, P. 1999. Optimal control theory in environmental economics, in Bergh, J. C. J. M. (ed.). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger, G. and Hartl, R. 1986. Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse – Anwendung des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnoff, D. and Tschirhart, J. 2003. Harvesting in an eight-species ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 45. 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaaten, O. 1991. Bioeconomics of Sustainable Harvests of Competing Species. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 20. 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groombridge, B. (ed.). 1992. Global Biodiversity. Status of the Earth's Living Resources. London, Glasgow, New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Grubb, T. G. and King, R. M. 1991. Assessing human disturbance of breeding bald eagles with classification tree models. Journal of Wildlife Management. 55. 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannesson, R. 1983. Optimal harvesting of ecological interdependent fish species. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 10. 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J. and Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2005. Harvesting and conservation in a predator-prey system. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 29 (6). 1097–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly. The Canadian Entomologist. 151. 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (World Conservation Union) 2004. The red list of threatened species. http://www.redlist.org
Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. 1991. Dynamic Optimization, the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kontoleon, A. and Swanson, T. 2003. The willingness to pay for property rights for the Giant Panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation?Land Economics. 79 (4). 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leader-Williams, N. and Dublin, H. T. 2000. Charismatic megafauna as flagship species. In Entwistle, A. and Dunstone, N. (eds.). Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had its Day? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehar, G. 2004. Besucherzählung, Motiv- und Wertschöpfungserhebung im Nationalpark Hohe Tauern. University of Innsbruck: Institut für Verkehr und Tourismus.Google Scholar
Léonard, D. and Long, N. V. 1992. Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. B. and White, D. S. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics. 18. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrick, A. and Weitzman, M. L. 1996. Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics. 72 (1). 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrick, A. and Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Conflicts and choices in biodiversity conservation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 12. 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Myerscough, M. R., Darwen, M. J. and Hogarth, W. L. 1996. Stability, persistence and structural stability in a classical predator-prey model. Ecological Modelling. 89. 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, P. A. L. D., Bergh, J. C. J. M. and Nijkamp, P. 2003. The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity – Methods and Policy Applications. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pedrini, P. and Sergio, F. 2002. Regional conservation priorities for a large predator: golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the Alpine range. Biological Conservation. 103. 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, H. H. T. and Grootenhuis, J. G. 2000. Introduction: The value of priceless wildlife. In Prins, H. H. T., Grootenhuis, J. G. and Dolan, T. T. (eds.). Wildlife Conservation by Sustainable Use. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragozin, D. L. and Brown, G. J. 1985. Harvest policies and nonmarket valuation in a predator-prey system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 12. 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regev, U., Gutierrez, A. P., Schreiber, S. J. and Zilberman, D. 1998. Biological and economic foundations of renewable resource exploitation. Ecological Economics. 26. 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 1990. Ecology. 3rd ed. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rondeau, D. 2001. Along the way back from the brink. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 42. 156–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. and MacArthur, R. H. 1963. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. The American Naturalist. 162. 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmler, W. and Sievekig, M. 1994. On the optimal exploitation of interacting resources. Journal of Economics. 59 (1). 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era?Biological Conservation. 83 (3). 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skonhoft, A. 2007. Modeling the re-colonisation of native species. In Kontoleon, A., Pascual, U. and Swanson, T. (eds.). Biodiversity Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stork, N. E. 1997. Measuring global biodiversity and its decline. In Reaka-Kudla, M. L., Wilson, D. E. and Wilson, E. O. (eds.). Biodiversity Ⅱ: Understanding and Protecting Our Biological Resources. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Ströbele, J. and Wacker, H. 1995. The economics of harvesting predator-prey systems. Journal of Economics. 61 (1). 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschirhart, J. 2000. General equilibrium of an ecosystem. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 203. 13–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Germany, WWF. 2004. The Alps: A Unique Cultural Heritage. A Common Vision for the Conservation of their Biodiversity. Frankfurt am Main: WWF.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×