Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T18:17:42.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Operational sex ratios and mating competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Charlotta Kvarnemo
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Sweden
Ingrid Ahnesjö
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

This chapter deals with the operational sex ratio (OSR) and its importance for understanding mating competition, which is a key component of sexual selection. We focus on OSR as an empirical measurement with important applications in sexual selection, but we also pay considerable attention to the question of how to estimate sexual differences in potential reproductive rates (PRR). The sexual difference in PRR and the adult (or qualified) sex ratio are the most important factors influencing the OSR, and thus the pattern of sexual selection in a population. We illustrate our points using examples from a wide range of taxa. In particular, we investigate how environmental factors, through their effects on PRR and OSR, often add a dynamic to mating competition, which sometimes results in different sex roles and varying intensities being displayed in different populations or at different times within a breeding season. Finally, we consider some examples of contrasting patterns, how OSR relates to mate choice and prospects for further research.

Sexual selection

Males of many animals have evolved conspicuous traits that seem to reduce their survival. Darwin (1871) proposed the theory of sexual selection to explain the evolution of such traits. Sexual selection arises through competition over mates or matings, and assumes that individuals with a certain trait, whether a red tail or a specific behaviour, will have an advantage when competing for matings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 366 - 382
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, L (1995) Sex-biased predation on moths by insectivorous bats. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahnesjö, I (1995) Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahnesjö, I, Kvarnemo, C & Merilaita, S (2001) Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almada, V C, Gonçalves, E J, Oliveira, R F & Santos, A J (1995) Courting females: ecological constraints affect sex roles in a natural population of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1125–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Pimentel, H & Papaj, D R (1996) Operational sex ratio versus gender density as determinants of copulation duration in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson M B (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Andersson, M & Iwasa, Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 53–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnqvist G (1997) The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In: J C Choe & B J Crespi (eds) The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, pp 146–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Balshine-Earn, S (1996) Reproductive rates, operational sex ratios and mate choice in St. Peter's fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A (1991) Egg competition in a sex-role reversed pipefish: subdominant females trade reproduction for growth. Evolution, 45, 770–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A (1994) The operational sex ratio influences choosiness in a pipefish. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A & Rosenqvist, G (1990) Mate limitation of female reproductive success in a pipefish: effects of body size differences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A & Rosenqvist, G (1993) Selective males and ardent females in pipefishes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A & Rosenqvist, G (2001a) Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A & Rosenqvist, G (2001b) Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. Animal Behaviour, 61, 345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A, Rosenqvist, G & Svensson, I (1989) Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. American Naturalist, 133, 506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead T R & M⌀ller A P (eds) (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Cambridge: Academic Press
Björklund, M (1991) Coming of age in fringillid birds: heterochrony in the ontogeny of secondary sexual characters. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 4, 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush S L (1993) Courtship and Male Parental Care in the Mallorcan Midwife Toad, Alytes muletensis. Ph.D. thesis. Norwich: University of East Anglia
Bush, S L & Bell, D I (1997) Courtship and female competition in the Majorcan midwife toad, Alytes muletensis. Ethology, 103, 292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S J (1988) The effects of operational sex ratio and food deprivation on copulation duration in the water strider (Gerris remigis Say). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock T H (1991) The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Clutton-Brock, T H & Parker, G A (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 437–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H & Vincent, A C J (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rate of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, M A & Oring, L W (1988) Sex ratios and intrasexual competition for mates in a sex-role reversed shorebird, Wilson's phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C R & LeBoeuf, B J (1977) Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. American Naturalist, 111, 317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray
Debuse, V J, Addison, J T & Reynolds, J D (1999) The effects of sex ratio on sexual competition in the European lobster. Animal Behaviour, 58, 973–981CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emlen, S T (1976) Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1, 283–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S T & Oring, L W (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enders, M M (1993) The effect of male size and operational sex ratio on male mating success in the common spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Kock (Acari: Tetranychidae). Animal Behaviour, 46, 835–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R M (1990) The relationship between parental input and investment. Animal Behaviour, 39, 797–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsgren, E, Kvarnemo, C & Lindström, K (1996) Modes of sexual selection determined by resource abundance in two sand goby populations. Evolution, 50, 646–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J W A, Casey, P C, Bryant, M J & Shahsavarani, A (1995) Mate choice by Japanese medaka (Pisces, Oryziidae). Animal Behaviour, 50, 1425–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne DT (1983) Male nutritional investment and the evolution of sexual differences in the Tettigoniidae and other Orthoptera. In: D T Gwynne & G K Morris (eds) Orthopteran Mating Systems: Sexual Competition in a Diverse Group of Insects, pp 337–366. Boulder: Westview Press
Gwynne, D T (1990) Testing parental investment and the control of sexual selection in katydids: the operational sex ratio. American Naturalist, 136, 474–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, D T & Simmons, L W (1990) Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature, 346, 172–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, D T, Bailey, W J & Annells, A (1998) The sex in short supply for matings varies over small scales in a katydid (Kawanaphila nartee, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, J, Montgomerie, R & Widemo, F (1993) Costs and consequences of variation in the size of ruff leks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, N (1993) Biased operational sex ratio causes the female giant water bug Lethocerus deyrollei to destroy egg masses. Journal of Ethology, 11, 151–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirotkul, M (1999) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 58, 287–294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, R A (1997) The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R A, Reynolds, J D & Deutsch, J C (1996) Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution, 50, 1382–1391CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A G, Rosenqvist, G, Berglund, A & Avise, J C (1999) The genetic mating system of a sex-role reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): a molecular inquiry. Behavioral Ecology Sociology, 46, 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A G, Walker, D E, Kvarnemo, C, Lindström, K & Avise, J C (2001). How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 9151–9156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jormalainen, V (1998) Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quarterly Review of Biology, 73, 275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapton, R W (1984) Parental investment: the problem of currency. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 2673–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokko, H & Monaghan, P (2001) Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecology Letters, 4, 159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, W F (1989) Is male back space limiting? An investigation into the demography of the giant water bug Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour, 2, 623–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, K C (1990) Male backspace availability in the giant waterbug (Belostoma flumineum Say). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C (1994) Temperature differentially affects male and female reproductive rates in the sand goby: consequences for operational sex ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 256, 151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C (1996) Temperature affects operational sex ratio and intensity of male-male competition: an experimental study of sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C (1997) Food affects the potential reproductive rates of sand goby females but not of males. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C & Ahnesjö, I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 404-408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kvarnemo, C & Forsgren, E (2000) The influence of potential reproductive rates and variation in mate quality on male and female choosiness in the sand goby. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C & Simmons, L W (1998) Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1499–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C & Simmons, L W (1999) Variance in female quality affects male mate choice in a bushcricket. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvarnemo, C, Forsgren, E & Magnhagen, C (1995) Effects of sex ratio on intra- and intersexual behaviour in sand gobies. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1455–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kynard, B E (1978) Breeding behaviour of a lacustrine population of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour, 67, 178–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, T & Shine, R (1993) Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. American Naturalist, 141, 167–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masonjones, H D & Lewis, S M (2000) Differences in potential reproductive rates of male and female seahorses related to courtship roles. Animal Behaviour, 59, 11–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, M R (1998) Seasonal adult sex ratio shift in the praying mantid Iris oratoria (Mantodea: Mantidae). Environmental Entomology, 27, 318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLain, D K (1989) Prolonged copulation as a post-insemination guarding tactic in a natural population of the ragwort seed bug. Animal Behaviour, 38, 659–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, G R & McLean, I G (1996) Reproductive behaviour and operational sex ratio in Rickardson's ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 52, 743–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M⌀ller, A P & Birkhead, T R (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48, 1089–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S D (1987) Male-biased mortality in the butterfly Euphydryas editha: A novel cost of mate acquisition. American Naturalist, 130, 306–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R F, Almada, V C, Forsgren, E & Gonçalves, E J (1999) Temporal variation in male traits, nesting aggregations and mating success in the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology, 54, 499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otronen, M (1996) Effects of seasonal variation in operational sex ratio and population density on the mating success of different sized and aged males in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria.Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 8, 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, I P F & Thompson, D B A (1994) Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 258, 93–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, I P F, Burke, T & Thompson, D B A (1994) Extraordinary sex roles in the Eurasian dotterel: female mating arenas, female-female competition, and female mate choice. American Naturalist, 144, 76–100Google Scholar
Parker, G A (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: P Bateson (ed) Mate Choice, pp 141–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Parker, G A & Simmons, L W (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 263, 315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G A, Ball, M A, Stockley, P & Gage, M J G (1996) Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, series B, 263, 1291–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitnick, S (1993) Operational sex ratios and sperm limitation in populations of Drosophila pachea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pröhl, H & Hödl, W (1999) Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvarnström, A & Forsgren, E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 498–501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Real, L (1990) Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist, 136, 376–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J D (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 68–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, J D, Colwell, M A & Cooke, F (1986) Sexual selection and spring arrival times of red-necked and Wilson's phalaropes. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 18, 303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, L, Arnqvist, G, Sih, A & Krupa, J J (1994) Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 289–293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, L W (1992) Quantification of role reversal in relative parental investment in a bushcricket. Nature, 358, 61–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L W (1995) Relative parental expenditure, potential reproductive rates, and the control of sexual selection in katydids. American Naturalist, 145, 797–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L W & Bailey, W J (1990) Resource influenced sex roles of zaprochiline tettigoniids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Evolution, 44, 1853–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L W & Gwynne, D T (1991) The refractory period of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): sexual conflict over the remating interval?Behavioral Ecology, 2, 276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L W & Kvarnemo, C (1997) Ejaculate expenditure by male bushcrickets decreases with sperm competition intensity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 264, 1203–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, L W & Parker, G A (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: can sperm competition affect the direction of sexual competition?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 263, 515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souroukis, K & Murray, A-M (1995) Female mating behavior in the field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) at different operational sex ratios. Journal of Insect Behavior, 8, 269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, K (1992) Dart-poison frogs and the control of sexual selection. Ethology, 91, 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swensson, R O (1997) Sex-role reversal in the tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 50, 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tejedo, M (1988) Fighting for females in the toad Bufo calamita is affected by the operational sex ratio. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1765–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, S R & Dangerfield, J M (1990) Manipulation of the sex ratio and duration of copulation in the tropical millipede Alloporus uncinatus: a test of the copulatory mate guarding hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 40, 984–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill R & Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B G Campbell (ed) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, pp 136–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine
Vepsäläinen, K & Savolainen, R (1995) Operational sex ratios and mating conflict between the sexes in the water strider Gerris lacustris. American Naturalist, 146, 869–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, A, Ahnesjö, I, Berglund, A & Rosenqvist, G (1992) Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 237–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, A, Ahnesjö, I & Berglund, A (1994) Operational sex ratios and behavioural sex differences in a pipefish population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waights, V (1996) Female sexual interference in the smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris vulgaris. Ethology, 102, 736–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P J, Arnqvist, G & Stallman, R R (1998) Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. American Naturalist, 151, 46–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittingham, L A & Robertson, R J (1994) Food availability, parental care and male mating success in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widemo, F & F, Owens I P (1995) Male mating skew and the evolution of lekking. Nature, 373, 148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, C, Kaitala, A & Wedell, N (1998) Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×