Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:18:04.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Edited by
Jeroen van den Hoven  and
John Weckert
John Weckert
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , pp. 397 - 400
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, L. 1977. Property rights: Philosophic foundations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. 2004. Expanding dialogue: The public sphere, the Internet and transnational democracy, in Roberts, J. and Crossley, N. (Eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the public sphere. London: Blackwell, pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Pettit, P. 2004. The economy of esteem: An essay on civil and political society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynum, T. W. 1999. The development of computer ethics as a philosophical field of study. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Bynum, T. W. 2005. The impact of the ‘Automatic Age’ on our moral lives, in Cavalier, R. (Ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, New York: State University of New York Press pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
Bynum, T. W., and Moor, J. H. (Eds.). 1998. The digital phoenix: How computers are changing philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2003. Natural-born cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cocking, D., and Kennett, J. 1998. Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108, 3, 502–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1988. The public and its problems, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 2). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. 1996. A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. 2001. On the Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ess, C. 2002a. Cultures in collision: Philosophical lessons from computer-mediated communication, in Moor, J. H. and Bynum, T. W. (Eds), CyberPhilosophy: The intersection of philosophy and computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 219–242.Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. 1991. Varieties of moral personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 1999. Information ethics: On the theoretical foundations of computer ethics, Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 1, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. 2003. On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 4, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1988. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person, in The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B. (Ed.). 1997. Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions, 3, 6, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems, in Zhang, P., and Galletta, D. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2004. The need for social epistemology, in Leiter, B. (Ed.), The future for philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–207.Google Scholar
Graham, G. 1999. The Internet, a philosophical inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, B. 2002. Ethical questions: East and West. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommuikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. Translated by T. McCarthy as The theory of communicative action and published by Beacon Press, Boston, 1984 (Vol. 1) and 1987 (Vol. 2).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1992. The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21, 4, 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, E. C. 1989. Justifying intellectual property. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
Hinman, L. M. 1998. Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 1994. Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Introna, L. D., and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16, 3, 169–185.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. G. 2001. Computer ethics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Joy, B. 1999. Why the future doesn't need us. Wired, 8, 4.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuflik, A. 1999. Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy?Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 3, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupfer, J. 1987. Privacy, autonomy, and self-concept. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 81–89.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1999. Citizenship in an era of globalization, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 1999. Code and other laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1988. Two treatises of government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, S. 2001. Social action: A teleological account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitcham, C. 1995. Ethics into design, in Buchanan, R. and Margolis, V. (Eds.), Discovering design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 173–179.Google Scholar
Moor, James H. 1985. What is computer ethics? in Bynum, T. W. (Ed.), Computers and Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 263–275. [Also published as the October 1985 special issue of Metaphilosophy, 16, 4.]Google Scholar
Moor, J. H., and Weckert, J. 2004. Nanoethics: Assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view, in Baird, D., Nordmann, A., and Schummer, J. (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 301–310.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1998. Concealment and exposure. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, 1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, A. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1995. The cunning of trust. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 202–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, J. C. 2000. Thinking about technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
Pohl, K.-H. 2002. Chinese and Western values: Reflections on a cross-cultural dialogue on a universal ethics, in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (Eds.), Komparative Ethik: das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen. München: Chora, pp. 213–232.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. 2005. Catastrophe, risk and response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1984. Minds, brains and science. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. 1994. Ethics of scientific research. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. 1978. The Computer Revolution in Philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Stallman, R. 2002. Free software, free society. Boston: GNU Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 2006. Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavani, H. 2004. Ethics and technology: Ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology. Danvers, MA: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Velleman, D. J. 2000. Well-being and time, in The possibility of practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–84.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1984. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1976. Computer power and human reason: From judgement to calculation. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics, or, Control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Technology Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiener, N. 1950/1954. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York: Houghton Mifflin. (Second revised edition published by Doubleday Anchor, 1954.)Google Scholar
Wiener, N. 1964. God & Golem, Inc. – A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winner, L. 1986. Do artifacts have politics? in The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
Yu, J. Y. 2003. Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle, in Jiang, X. (Ed.), The examined life: The Chinese perspective. Binghamton, NY: Global Publications, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Zatz, N. D. 1998. Sidewalks in Cyberspace: Making space for public forums in the electronic environment. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 12, 149.Google Scholar
Becker, L. 1977. Property rights: Philosophic foundations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. 2004. Expanding dialogue: The public sphere, the Internet and transnational democracy, in Roberts, J. and Crossley, N. (Eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the public sphere. London: Blackwell, pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
Brennan, G., and Pettit, P. 2004. The economy of esteem: An essay on civil and political society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynum, T. W. 1999. The development of computer ethics as a philosophical field of study. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Bynum, T. W. 2005. The impact of the ‘Automatic Age’ on our moral lives, in Cavalier, R. (Ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, New York: State University of New York Press pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
Bynum, T. W., and Moor, J. H. (Eds.). 1998. The digital phoenix: How computers are changing philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2003. Natural-born cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cocking, D., and Kennett, J. 1998. Friendship and the self. Ethics, 108, 3, 502–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1988. The public and its problems, in John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1927 (Vol. 2). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. 1996. A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. 2001. On the Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ess, C. 2002a. Cultures in collision: Philosophical lessons from computer-mediated communication, in Moor, J. H. and Bynum, T. W. (Eds), CyberPhilosophy: The intersection of philosophy and computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 219–242.Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. 1991. Varieties of moral personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 1999. Information ethics: On the theoretical foundations of computer ethics, Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 1, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. 2003. On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere, Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 4, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1988. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person, in The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B. (Ed.). 1997. Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions, 3, 6, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems, in Zhang, P., and Galletta, D. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2004. The need for social epistemology, in Leiter, B. (Ed.), The future for philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–207.Google Scholar
Graham, G. 1999. The Internet, a philosophical inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, B. 2002. Ethical questions: East and West. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommuikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. Translated by T. McCarthy as The theory of communicative action and published by Beacon Press, Boston, 1984 (Vol. 1) and 1987 (Vol. 2).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1992. The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21, 4, 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, E. C. 1989. Justifying intellectual property. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
Hinman, L. M. 1998. Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 1994. Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Introna, L. D., and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16, 3, 169–185.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. G. 2001. Computer ethics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Joy, B. 1999. Why the future doesn't need us. Wired, 8, 4.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuflik, A. 1999. Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy?Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 3, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupfer, J. 1987. Privacy, autonomy, and self-concept. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 81–89.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1999. Citizenship in an era of globalization, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (Eds.), Democracy's edges. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 1999. Code and other laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1988. Two treatises of government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, S. 2001. Social action: A teleological account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitcham, C. 1995. Ethics into design, in Buchanan, R. and Margolis, V. (Eds.), Discovering design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 173–179.Google Scholar
Moor, James H. 1985. What is computer ethics? in Bynum, T. W. (Ed.), Computers and Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 263–275. [Also published as the October 1985 special issue of Metaphilosophy, 16, 4.]Google Scholar
Moor, J. H., and Weckert, J. 2004. Nanoethics: Assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view, in Baird, D., Nordmann, A., and Schummer, J. (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 301–310.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1998. Concealment and exposure. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, 1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, A. 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1995. The cunning of trust. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 202–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, J. C. 2000. Thinking about technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
Pohl, K.-H. 2002. Chinese and Western values: Reflections on a cross-cultural dialogue on a universal ethics, in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (Eds.), Komparative Ethik: das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen. München: Chora, pp. 213–232.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. 2005. Catastrophe, risk and response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1984. Minds, brains and science. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. 1994. Ethics of scientific research. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sloman, A. 1978. The Computer Revolution in Philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Stallman, R. 2002. Free software, free society. Boston: GNU Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 2006. Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavani, H. 2004. Ethics and technology: Ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology. Danvers, MA: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Velleman, D. J. 2000. Well-being and time, in The possibility of practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–84.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1984. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1976. Computer power and human reason: From judgement to calculation. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics, or, Control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Technology Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiener, N. 1950/1954. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York: Houghton Mifflin. (Second revised edition published by Doubleday Anchor, 1954.)Google Scholar
Wiener, N. 1964. God & Golem, Inc. – A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winner, L. 1986. Do artifacts have politics? in The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
Yu, J. Y. 2003. Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle, in Jiang, X. (Ed.), The examined life: The Chinese perspective. Binghamton, NY: Global Publications, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Zatz, N. D. 1998. Sidewalks in Cyberspace: Making space for public forums in the electronic environment. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 12, 149.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, John Weckert, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
  • Book: Information Technology and Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, John Weckert, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
  • Book: Information Technology and Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, John Weckert, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
  • Book: Information Technology and Moral Philosophy
  • Online publication: 21 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.020
Available formats
×