Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:19:57.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Biology of Human Culture and Ethics: An Evolutionary Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

Stefano Parmigiani
Affiliation:
University of Parma
Gabriele De Anna
Affiliation:
University of Udine
Danilo Mainardi
Affiliation:
University of Venezia
Paola Palanza
Affiliation:
University of Parma
Giovanni Boniolo
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Gabriele De Anna
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

I searched for great human beings; I always found the apes of their ideals.

Nietzsche, Götzen-Dämmerung

The human scientists proclaim that animals are irrelevant to the study of human beings and that there is no such thing as a universal human nature. The consequence is that science, so coldly successful at dissecting DNA, has proved spectacularly inept at tackling what the philosopher David Hume called the greater question of all: why is human nature what it is?

Ridley 1993

The traditional nature-nurture controversy concerns whether ethical norms and social practices depend on cultural influences on individuals and societies or whether they are based on the particular features of our nature. In this chapter, we argue that nature and nurture cannot be sharply distinguished, as some scientists have tried to do in the past. Evolutionary considerations lead us to conclude that facts about our nature and the ways in which we come to form cultural traditions are entrenched in evolutionary processes. Before turning to the issue, though, we thought it might be worthwhile to deal first with two possible misunderstandings.

First, when we claim that we are concerned with the “bases” of ethical norms and practices, we do not mean that we offer a precise account of the ways in which such bases are relevant for the explanation or the justification of ethics. In particular, we do not deal with the question whether ethical systems or moral norms can be reduced to natural facts or cultural facts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buss, D. 1989. Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypothesis Testing in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. 1992. Preference Mechanisms in Human Mating: Implications for Mate Choice and Intrasexual Competition. In The Adapted Mind, ed. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., 249–266. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Buss, D. 2001. The Dangerous Passion. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Cartwright, J. 2000. Evolution and Human Behavior. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cavalli Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Cronin, H. 1992. The Ant and the Peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1872. Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1989. Human Ethology. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. 1974. Infanticide among Animals: A Review, Classification and Examination of the Implication for the Reproductive Strategies of Females. Ethology and Sociobiology 1: 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. 1966. On Aggression. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Mainardi, D. 2001. L'animale irrazionale. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Miller, G. 1992. Sexual Selection for Protean Expressiveness: A New Model of Hominid Encephalization. Paper presented at the 4th annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Miller, G. 2000. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, S., Ferrari, P. F., and Palanza, P. 1998. An Evolutionary Approach to Behavioral Pharmacology: Using Drugs to Understand Proximate and Ultimate Mechanisms of Different Forms of Aggression in Mice. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 23: 143–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmigiani, S., and Palanza, P. 1991. Fluprazine Inhibits Intermale Attack and Infanticide, but Not Predation in Male Mice. Neuroscience and Neurobehavioral Reviews 15: 511–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmigiani, S., and Saal, F. 1994. Infanticide and Parental Care. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 1993. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Viking: London.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. 1990. On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation. Journal of Personality 57: 17–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. 1930. Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. 1971. Die Biologie der zehn Gebote. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., and Daly, M. 1994. The Psychology of Parenting in Evolutionary Perspective and the Case of Human Filicide. In Infanticide and Parental Care, ed. Parmigiani, S. and vom Saal, F., 73–105. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Zechner, U.. 2001. A High Density of X-Linked Genes for Cognitive Ability: A Run-Away Process Shaping Human Evolution?Trends in Genetics 17: 697–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×