Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:10:07.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Delay and de jure standardization: exploring the slowdown in Internet standards development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Timothy Simcoe
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Strategy Rotman School of Management University of Toronto
Shane Greenstein
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Victor Stango
Affiliation:
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College
Get access

Summary

Abstract

While the welfare implications of de jure standardization is an extremely complex question, economic theorists and standards practitioners alike have suggested that speed is an important dimension of performance for non-market Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs). A variety of factors may influence the timeliness of SSOs, including the complexity of the underlying technology; the commercial significance of the proposed standard; and the rules governing the consensus decision-making process. This chapter uses data from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to take a preliminary look at the relationship between the size, scope, and composition of SSO committees and the time required for those groups to reach a consensus. In particular, it documents a significant slowdown in IETF standard setting that coincides with the commercialization of the Internet during the 1990s. The chapter concludes by discussing several open questions related to the political economy of voluntary standards creation and suggesting that the increased availability of archival data – from institutions such as the IETF – makes this a promising area for empirical research.

Introduction

In 1986, twenty-one people attended the first meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) – the organization that creates and maintains the technical standards used to run the Internet. Over the next fifteen years, the rapid growth and commercialization of the Internet helped make the IETF an important Standard Setting Organization (SSO) for the rapidly converging fields of computing and communications. By 2001, its meetings regularly drew more than 2,000 participants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berners-Lee, Tim, and Fischetti, Mark 1999. Weaving the web. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Besen, S. M., and Farrell, J. 1994. “Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradner, S. 1996. “RFC 2026: The Internet standards process – Revision 3,” Network Working Group, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt?number=2026.
Bradner, S.2003. “An alternative for the IETF standards track,” http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-bradner-ietf-stds-trk-00.txt.
Brim, S. 2004. RFC 3669: “Guidelines for working groups on intellectual property issues,” Network Working Group, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3669.txt?number=3669.
Cargill, Carl F. 1989. Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations. Bedford, MA: Digital Press.Google Scholar
David, P. A., and Greenstein, S. 1990. “The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Elwyn B. 2004. “RFC 3774: IETF Problem Statement,” Network Working Group, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3774.txt?number=3774.
Davies, Elwyn B., and J. Hofmann (eds.) 2004. “RFC3844: IETF Problem Resolution Process.” Networking Group, Internet Engineering Task Force, http://rfc3844.x42.com/.
Farrell, J. 1996. “Choosing the rules for formal standardization,” unpublished manuscript, http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/farrell/ftp/choosing.pdf.
Farrell, J., and Saloner, G. 1988. “Coordination through committees and markets,” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foray, D. 1995. “Coalitions and committees: How users get involved in information technology standardization,” in Standards, innovation and competitiveness, Hawkins, R., Mansell, R., and Skea, J. (eds.), Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 192–212.Google Scholar
Higgins, K. J. 1997. “The squeeze is on at IETF,” InternetWeek, November.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force), June 1990. Internet Monthly Report. Internet Engineering Task Force, http://sunsite.utk.edu/ftp/usr-218-2/internet-monthly-reports/imr9006.txt.
Lemley, M. 2002. “Intellectual property rights and standard setting organizations,” California Law Review 90: 1889–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J., and J. Tirole 2004. “A model of forum shopping with special reference to standard setting organizations,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10664.
Mowery, D. C., and Simcoe, T. 2002. “Is the Internet a US invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking,” Research Policy 31: 1369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council 1990. Crossroads of Information Technology Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rutkowski, A. 1995. “Today's cooperative competitive standards environment and the Internet standards-making model,” in Standards policy for information infrastructure, Kahin, Brian and Abbate, Janet (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 594–653.Google Scholar
Simcoe, T. 2004. “Committees and the creation of technical standards,” unpublished manuscript, http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/imio/simcoe012204.pdf.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×