Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:15:39.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Ecological Foundations of Landscape Stewardship

from Part I - Foundations of Landscape Stewardship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Claudia Bieling
Affiliation:
Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart
Tobias Plieninger
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Ecosystem services provide the ecological foundation for landscape stewardship. Variables that change slowly, such as soils, vegetation structure and species diversity, are critical to sustain because they govern ecosystem processes over the long term. Provisioning services, the goods produced by ecosystems and harvested by people, are often fast variables that are readily monetized and are therefore recognized as a high priority for management. Regulating services link ecosystems across landscapes and regions and are uniquely important to stewardship at landscape scales. Cultural services are non-material benefits, such as recreation and time spent on the land, that strongly influence people’s sense of identity, their attachment to places and their commitment to stewardship actions. Ecosystems that maintain their characteristic properties provide a broad spectrum of ecosystem services with minimal management effort. At a finer level of resolution, bundles of services can be identified that have particularly tight linkages. This creates synergies in which management practices that sustain a few key services also sustain other synergistic services.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkeland, P. W. (1999). Soils and Geomorphology. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., Siccama, T. G., Pierce, R. S. & Eaton, J. S. (1974). The export of nutrients and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard Brook. Ecological Monographs, 44, 255277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, N. C. & Weil, R. R. (2001). The Nature and Properties of Soils. 13th edn. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Regime Shifts in Lake Ecosystems: Pattern and Variation. Lodendorf/Luhe: International Ecology Institute.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. & Biggs, R. (2009). Freshwaters: Managing across scales in space and time. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World, Chapin, F. S. III, Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (eds.). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 197220.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Ludwig, D. & Brock, W. A. (1999). Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecological Applications, 9, 751771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. New York, NY: Crest.Google Scholar
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2004). The Ecosystem Approach (CBD Guidelines). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III & Knapp, C. N. (2015). Sense of place: A process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 3846.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Kofinas, G. P. & Folke, C. (eds.). (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E., Collins, S. L., Baron, J. S., Inouye, D. W. & Turner, M. G. (2015a). Earth stewardship: An initiative by the Ecological Society of America to foster engagement to sustain Planet Earth. In Earth Stewardship: Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice, Rozzi, R., Chapin, F. S. III, Callicott, J. B., Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E. & Armesto, J. J. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 173194.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Power, M. E., Pickett, S. T. A., Freitag, A., Reynolds, J. A., Jackson, R. B., Lodge, D. M., Duke, C., Collins, S. L., Power, A. G. & Bartuska, A. (2011). Earth stewardship: Science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere, 2, 120.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III & Shaver, G. R. (1985). Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology, 66, 564576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Sommerkorn, M., Robards, M. D. & Hiller-Pegram, K. (2015b). Ecosystem stewardship: A resilience framework for arctic conservation. Global Environmental Change, 34, 207217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Lavorel, S., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C. & Diaz, S. (2000). Consequences of changing biotic diversity. Nature, 405, 234242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253260.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. & Vitousek, P. M. (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass-fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 6387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
De Groot, R., Ramakrishnan, P. S., van de Berg, A., Kulenthran, T., Muller, S., Pitt, D., Wascher, D. & Wijesuriya, G. (2005). Cultural and amenity services. In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (eds.). Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 455476.Google Scholar
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B. & Norberg, J. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 488494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K. & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. J., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. (2008). Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 211219.Google Scholar
Hanley, N., Breeze, T. D., Ellis, C. & Goulson, D. (2015). Measuring the economic value of pollination services: Principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. Ecosystem Services, 14, 124132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirota, M., Holmgren, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. (2011). Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science, 334, 232235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holling, C. S. & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328337.Google Scholar
Imhoff, M. L., Bounoua, L., Ricketts, T., Loucks, C., Harriss, R. & Lawrence, W. T. (2004). Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature, 429, 870873.Google Scholar
Ives, A. R., Gross, K. & Klug, J. L. (1999). Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science, 286, 542544.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, L. & Keller, C. (2007). Eco-Spirit: Religions and Philosophy for the Earth. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.-M., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C. K. & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B: Biological Sciences), 274, 303313.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. & Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 227, 504509.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1977). Diversity and stability of ecological communities: A comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. American Naturalist, 111, 515525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current Status and Trends. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Myers, R. A. & Worm, B. (2003). Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature, 423, 283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, M. E. & Chapin, F. S. III (2009). Planetary stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E. & Wiseman, W. J. (2002). Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. ‘The dead zone’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 235263.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Gordon, L., Folke, C., Falkenmark, M. & Engvall, M. (1999). Linkages among water vapor flows, food production and terrestrial ecosystem services. Conservation Ecology, 3, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, M. & van Nes, E. H. (2004). Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 62306235.Google Scholar
Selby, M. J. (1993). Hillslope Materials and Processes. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35, 601617.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B. & Sorlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suding, K. N., Lavorel, S., Chapin, F. S. III, Cornelissen, J. H. C., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Goldberg, D., Hooper, D. U., Jackson, S. T. & Navas, M.-L. (2008). Scaling environmental change through the community level: A trait-based response- and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology, 14, 11251140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (1995). Incompletely theorized agreement. Harvard Law Review, 108, 17331772.Google Scholar
Syvitski, J. P. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J. & Green, P. A. (2005). Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science, 308, 376380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J. F. (eds.). New York, NY: Plenum Press. pp. 85125.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization) (2013). The Contribution of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies with Science. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Vannote, R. I., Minshall, G. W., Cummings, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 120137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H. & Tilman, G. D. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences. Ecological Applications, 7, 737750.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H. & Matson, P. A. (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience, 36, 368373.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Naylor, R. L., Crews, T., David, M. B., Drinkwater, L. E., Holland, E., Johnes, P. J., Katzenberger, J., Martinelli, L. A., Matson, P. A., Nzigueheba, G., Ojima, D., Palm, C. A., Robertson, G. P., Sanchez, P. A., Townsend, A. R. & Zhang, F. S. (2009). Agriculture: Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science, 324, 15191520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, B., Kinzig, A. & Langridge, J. (1999). Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2, 95113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×