Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T16:17:29.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Video laryngoscopy for emergency intubation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

By
Kenneth P. Rothfield  and
John C. Sakles
Edited by
Lauren C. Berkow  and
John C. Sakles
Lauren C. Berkow
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John C. Sakles
Affiliation:
University of Arizona College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cases in Emergency Airway Management , pp. 200 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lee, C, Russell, T, Firat, M, Cooper, RM. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(5):492–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, PM, Loh, FL, Youssef, HN, Turkstra, TP. A randomized comparison of the GlideRite(R) rigid stylet to a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation by novices using the GlideScope(R). Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (Journal canadien d’anesthesie). 2011;58(3):256–61.Google Scholar
Sakles, JC, Kalin, L. The effect of stylet choice on the success rate of intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2012;19(2):235–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aziz, MF, Dillman, D, Fu, R, Brambrink, AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):629–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aziz, MF, Healy, D, Kheterpal, S, et al. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the GlideScope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 GlideScope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(1):34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosier, JM, Whitmore, SP, Bloom, JW, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Critical Care. 2013;17(5):R237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niforopoulou, P, Pantazopoulos, I, Demestiha, T, Koudouna, E, Xanthos, T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2010;54(9):1050–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolini, JB, Donati, F, Drolet, P. Review article: video-laryngoscopy: another tool for difficult intubation or a new paradigm in airway management? Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (Journal canadien d’anesthesie). 2013;60(2):184–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Griesdale, DE, Liu, D, McKinney, J, Choi, PT. GlideScope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia (Journal canadien d’anesthesie). 2012;59(1):41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, DW, Maties, O, Hovord, D, Kheterpal, S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiology. 2012;12:32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, CA 3rd, Bair, AE, Pallin, DJ, Laurin, EG, Walls, RM. Improved glottic exposure with the Video Macintosh laryngoscope in adult emergency department tracheal intubations. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2010;56(2):83–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakles, JC, Mosier, J, Chiu, S, Cosentino, M, Kalin, L. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2012;60(6):739–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platts-Mills, TF, Campagne, D, Chinnock, B, et al. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2009;16(9):866–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeatts, DJ, Dutton, RP, Hu, PF, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013;75(2):212–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wayne, MA, McDonnell, M. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Prehospital Emergency Care: Official Journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors. 2010;14(2):278–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kory, P, Guevarra, K, Mathew, JP, Hegde, A, Mayo, PH. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2013;117(1):144–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakles, JC, Patanwala, AE, Mosier, JM, Dicken, JM. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2014;9(1):93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michailidou, M, O’Keeffe, T, Mosier, JM, et al. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World Journal of Surgery. 2015;39(3):782–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverberg, MJ, Li, N, Acquah, SO, Kory, PD. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine. 2015;43(3):636–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakles, JC, Mosier, J, Patanwala, AE, et al. The C-MAC video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first attempt intubations in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015 Mar;48(3):280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakles, JC, Mosier, J, Patanwala, AE, Dicken, J. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;15(7):930–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakles, JC, Javedani, PP, Chase, E, et al. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015;22(6):700–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard-Quijano, KJ, Huang, YM, Matevosian, R, Kaplan, MB, Steadman, RH. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2008;101(4):568–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, D, Healy, D, Rasburn, N. The use of the BERCI DCI video laryngoscope for teaching novices direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(2):195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mort, TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2004;99(2):607–13, table of contents.Google ScholarPubMed
Sakles, JC, Chiu, S, Mosier, J, Walker, C, Stolz, U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013;20(1):71–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakles, JC, Mosier, JM, Chiu, S, Keim, SM. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012;42(4):400–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothfield, KP, Russo, SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? A pro–con debate. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2012;24(7):593–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×