Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T00:39:37.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Other Non-inflammatory Vasculopathies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2022

Anita Arsovska
Affiliation:
University of Ss Cyril and Methodius
Derya Uluduz
Affiliation:
Istanbul Üniversitesi
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rare Causes of Stroke
A Handbook
, pp. 309 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Kuroda, S, Houkin, K. Moyamoya disease: Current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11): 10561066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchino, K, Johnston, SC, Becker, KJ, Tirschwell, DL. Moyamoya disease in Washington state and California. Neurology. 2005;65(6): 956958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, RM, Smith, ER. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(12): 12261237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Research Committee on the Pathology and Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis: Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(5): 245266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, OY, Fujimura, M, Kim, SK. The pathophysiology of moyamoya disease: An update. J Stroke. 2016;18(1): 1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Greenberg, SM, Bacskai, BJ, Hernandez-Guillamon, M, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease: One peptide, two pathways. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(1): 3042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R, Dearaugo, S, Infeld, B, O’Sullivan, R, Gerraty, RP. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Review of clinico-radiological features and mimics. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018. doi: 10.1111/1754–9485.12726. Online ahead of print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, G, Carare, R, Cordonnier, C, et al. The increasing impact of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: essential new insights for clinical practice. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88(11): 982994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, SM, Charidimou, A. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Evolution of the Boston criteria. Stroke. 2018;49: 491497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Awad, AJ, Mascitelli, JR, Haroun, RR, et al. Endovascular management of fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation: The era of flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(6): E14.Google Scholar
Barletta, EA, Gaspar, RHML, Araújo, JFM, et al. Nonsaccular aneurysms: A wide comparison between the four main types. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10: 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborn, AG, Hedlund, GL, Salzman, KL. Osborn’s Brain: Imaging, Pathology, and Anatomy, 2nd Edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017. 1300.Google Scholar
Serrone, JC, Gozal, YM, Grossman, AW, et al. Vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014;25: 471484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Lee, VH, Brown, RD, Mandrekar, JN, et al. Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study. Neurology. 2006;67: 18091812.Google Scholar
Blum, CA, Yaghi, S. Cervical artery dissection: A review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome. Arch Neurosci. 2015;2(4): e26670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, AE, Zacharatos, H, Mohammad, YM, et al. Comparison of single versus multiple spontaneous extra- and/or intracranial arterial dissection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(1): 4248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debette, S, Leys, D. Cervical-artery dissections: Predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8: 668678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) Investigators, Markus, HS, Levi, C, King, A, et al. Antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulation therapy in cervical artery dissection: The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) randomized clinical trial final results. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(6): 657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×