Book contents
- Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel
- Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Original Empty Formalism Objection
- 2 Freedom and Ethical Necessity
- 3 Maimonides and Kant in the Ethical Thought of Salomon Maimon
- 4 Erhard on Right and Morality
- 5 Erhard on Revolutionary Action
- 6 Elise Reimarus on Freedom and Rebellion
- 7 Freedom and Duty
- 8 Fichte’s Ethical Holism
- 9 Jacobi on Revolution and Practical Nihilism
- 10 The Political Implications of Friedrich Schlegel’s Poetic, Republican Discourse
- 11 The Limits of State Action
- 12 Echoes of Revolution
- 13 Public Opinion and Ideology in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2021
Book contents
- Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel
- Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Original Empty Formalism Objection
- 2 Freedom and Ethical Necessity
- 3 Maimonides and Kant in the Ethical Thought of Salomon Maimon
- 4 Erhard on Right and Morality
- 5 Erhard on Revolutionary Action
- 6 Elise Reimarus on Freedom and Rebellion
- 7 Freedom and Duty
- 8 Fichte’s Ethical Holism
- 9 Jacobi on Revolution and Practical Nihilism
- 10 The Political Implications of Friedrich Schlegel’s Poetic, Republican Discourse
- 11 The Limits of State Action
- 12 Echoes of Revolution
- 13 Public Opinion and Ideology in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Practical Philosophy from Kant to HegelFreedom, Right, and Revolution, pp. 249 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aaslestad, Katherine and Hagemann, Karen (2006). “1806 and Its Aftermath: Revisiting the Period of the Napoleonic Wars in German Central European Historiography,” Central European History 39:4: 547–79.Google Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried and Putter, Johann ([1750] 1995). Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts (Elementa Iuris Naturae), edited by Schröder, Jan (Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig: Insel Verlag).Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1976). “Sociology and Empirical Research,” in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, translated by Adey, Glyn and Frisby, David (London: Heinemann Educational Books), 68–86.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gerhard (1985). “Johann Albert Hinrich Reimarus und Elise Reimarus in ihren Beziehungen zu Lessing,” in Schulz, Günter (ed.), Lessing und der Kreis seiner Freunde (Heidelberg: Schneider), 129–50.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert (2002). The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert (2012). “Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights,” Ratio Juris 25:1: 2–14.Google Scholar
Altman, Matthew (2014). The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Anderson, Frank M., ed. (1908). The Constitutions and Other Select Documents Illustrative of the History of France, 1789–1907 (Minneapolis: H. W. Wilson).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (2002). On Law, Morality, and Politics, translated by Regan, Richard J. (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Aris, Reinhold ([1936] 1965). History of Political Thought in Germany from 1789 to 1815 (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Backhaus, Jürgen, ed. (1998). Christian Wolff and Law and Economics (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Backhaus, Jürgen, ed. (2001). “Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in Environmental Policy,” www.vonmisesinstitute-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Subsidiarity.Backhaus.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baker, Keith M., ed. (1987). University of Chicago Readings in Western Civilization, Volume 7: The Old Regime and the French Revolution (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Batscha, Zwi (1972). “Johann Benjamin Erhards Politische Theorie,” Jahrbuch für Deutsche Geschichte 1: 53–75.Google Scholar
Baumgardt, David (1963). “The Ethics of Salomon Maimon,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1:2: 199–210.Google Scholar
Beaulieu-Marconnay, Karl (1879). Karl von Dalberg und seine Zeit, Vol. I (Weimar: Böhlau).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1960). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1992). Enlightenment, Revolution and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. ed. (1996). The Early Writings of the German Romantics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2002). German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2005). Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-examination (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2009). Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2011). The German Historicist Tradition (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1986). Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (2014). Freedom and Its Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty, edited by Hardy, Henry (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Beyleveld, Deryck and Brownsword, Roger (1986). Law as a Moral Judgment. (London: Sweet & Maxwell).Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew (2002). Schelling and Modern European Philosophy: An Introduction (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Boyle, Nicholas (2000). Goethe: The Poet and the Age, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2016). “From Autonomy to Automata? Fichte on Formal and Material Freedom and Moral Cultivation,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte’s Addresses to the German Nation Reconsidered (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press), 21–54.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel (2021). “Formal vs. Material Freedom in the Jena Wissenschaftslehre.” In Ware, Owen and Bacin, Stefano (eds.), Fichte’s System of Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Breckman, Warren (1999). Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom (2007). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right (Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom and Stein, Sebastian, eds. (2017). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bubner, Rüdiger (2003). The Innovations of Idealism, translated by Walker, Nicholas (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Buchetmann, Elias (2020). “Hegel’s Intervention in Württemberg’s Constitutional Conflict,” History of European Ideas 46:2: 157–74.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1987). Reflections on the Revolution in France, edited by Pocock, J. G. A. (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund and Gentz, Friedrich (1991). Über die französische Revolution: Betrachtungen und Abhandlungen, edited by Klenner, Herman (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar
Burrow, John W. (1969). “Editor’s Introduction,” in Burrow, John W. (ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action (Cambridge University Press), vii–xliii.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1968). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst ([1917] 2001). Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte (Hamburg: Meiner).Google Scholar
Christ, Kurt (1998). F.H. Jacobi, Rousseaus deutscher Adept: Rousseauismus in Leben und Frühwerk Friedrich Heinrich Jacobis (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Chytry, Josef (1989). The Aesthetic State: A Quest in Modern German Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Clarke, James A. (2016). “Fichte’s Independence Thesis,” in Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 52–71.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph (2005). “Agent Causation and the Problem of Luck,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86:3: 408–21.Google Scholar
Coffman, Eldon J. (2010). “How (Not) to Attack the Luck Argument,” Philosophical Explorations 13:2: 157–66.Google Scholar
Colbois, Sylvie and Perrinjaquet, Alain (1994). “Recht zur Aufklärung und Sozialrechte. Zu J.B. Erhards Theorie der Menschenrechte,” in Buhr, Manfred (ed.), Das Geistige Erbe Europas (Biblioteca Europea 5, Naples: Vivarium), 558–72.Google Scholar
Crowe, Ben (2014). “Jacobi on Kant, or Moral Naturalism vs. Idealism,” in Altman, Matthew C. (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 205–21.Google Scholar
Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa (2012). “No Right to Resist? Elise Reimarus’s Freedom as a Kantian Response to the Problem of Violent Revolt,” Hypatia 27:4: 755–73.Google Scholar
Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa (2013). “Legality and Morality in the Political Thought of Elise Reimarus and Immanuel Kant,” in Curtis-Wendlandt, Lisa, Gibbard, Paul, and Green, Karen (eds.), Political Ideas of Enlightenment Women: Virtue and Citizenship (Burlington, VT and Farnham: Ashgate), 91–107.Google Scholar
Dalberg, C. Th. [K. von] (1791). Grundsätze der Ästhetik, deren Anwendung und künftige Entwickelung (Erfurt).Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina (2017). “Interest and Agency,” in Gabriel, Markus and Rasmussen, Moe Anders (eds.), German Idealism Today (Berlin: De Gruyter Verlag), 3–26.Google Scholar
De Pascale, Carla (1994). “Archäologie des Rechtstaates,” in Buhr, Manfred (ed.), Das geistige Erbe Europas (Naples: Vivarium, 1994), 489–505.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George (1994). “Introduction: The Unfinished Philosophy of Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi,” in The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press), 1–157.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George (2005). Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774–1800 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Eliot, George (2014). Daniel Deronda, edited by Handely, Graham (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Epstein, Klaus (1966). The Genesis of German Conservatism (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Erhard, Johann Benjamin (1993). Du droit du peuple à faire la révolution et autres écrits de philosophie politique (1793–5), translated by Perrinjaquet, Alain and Berger, Jeanclaude (Lausanne: L’Âge d’Homme).Google Scholar
Färber, Konrad (1995). “Carl von Dalberg – Reichsverräter oder Reichspatriot?,” in Hausberger, K. (ed.), Carl von Dalberg. Der letzte geistliche Reichsfürst (Regensburg: Universitätsverlag), 153–75.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc (1981). “Sur la distinction du droit et de l’éthique dans la première philosophie de Fichte,” Archives de philosophie du droit 26: 287–301.Google Scholar
Fink, Gonthier-Louis (1992). “The French Revolution as Reflected in German Literature and Political Journals from 1789 to 1800,” in Bahr, Ehrhard and Saine, Thomas P. (eds.), The Internalized Revolution: German Reactions to the French Revolution, 1789–1989 (London: Routledge), 11–31.Google Scholar
Finnis, John (1996). “The Truth in Legal Positivism,” in George, Robert P. (ed.), The Autonomy of Law: Essays in Legal Positivism (Oxford University Press), 195–214.Google Scholar
Finnis, John (1998). Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Finnis, John (2018). “Natural Law Theories,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/natural-law-theories/.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kuno (1900). Fichtes Leben, Werken, und Lehre, 4th ed. (Paderborn: Salzwasser Verlag).Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa (1981). Virtues and Vices (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzak Y., eds. (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Carlos (2009). “Maimonides and Spinoza as Sources for Maimon’s Solution of the ‘Problem Quid Juris’ in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge,” Kant-Studien 100:2: 212–40.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (1993). “Two Centuries of Philosophical Critique of Reason and its ‘Postmodern’ Radicalization,” in Freundlieb, Dieter and Hudson, Wayne (eds.), Reason and Its Other: Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and Culture (Oxford: Berg), 67–85.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (1997). “Unendliche Annäherung”: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism, translated by Millán-Zaibert, Elizabeth (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Franklin, Christopher E. (2011). “Farewell to the Luck (and Mind) Argument,” Philosophical Studies 156:2: 199–230.Google Scholar
Franks, Paul W. (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Franks, Paul W. (2007). “Jewish Philosophy after Kant,” in Morgan, Michael L. and Gordon, Peter E. (eds.), Modern Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 53–79.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon, ed. (2003a). Salomon Maimon: Rational Dogmatist, Empirical Skeptic (Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon, ed. (2003b). “Maimon’s Subversion of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason,” in Freudenthal, Gideon (ed.), Salomon Maimon: Rational Dogmatist, Empirical Skeptic (Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 144–75.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon, (2005). “Rabbinische Weisheit oder Rabbinische Philosophie? Salomon Maimon’s Kritik an Mendelssohn und Weisel,” Mendelssohn Studies 14: 31–64.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon, (2012). “Salomon Maimon’s Development from Kabbalah to Philosophical Rationalism”; in Hebrew, “Hitpathutoh shel Shelomo Maimon mikabalah l’rationalizm filosofi,” Tarbiz 80:1: 105–71.Google Scholar
Freyenhagen, Fabian (2012). “The Empty Formalism Objection Revisited: §135R and Recent Kantian Responses,” in Brooks, Thom (ed.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 43–72.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Fuchs, Erich, ed. (1992). Fichte im Gespräch, Bd. 6 (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog).Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian (2017). “The Metaphysics of Human Freedom: From Kant’s Transcendental Idealism to Schelling’s Freiheitsschrift,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25:1: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentz, Friederich (1800). Origin and Principles of the American Revolution, Compared with the Origin and Principles of the French Revolution, translated by an American gentleman [John Quincy Adams] (Philadelphia: Asbury Dickens).Google Scholar
Gesang, Bernward, ed. (2007). Kants vergessene Rezensent: die Kritik der theoretischen und praktischen Philosophie Kants in fünf frühen Rezensionene von Hermann Andreas Pistorius, Kant-Forschungen Bd. 18 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag).Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gleichen-Russwurm, Alexander, von (n.d.). “Einleitung des Herausgebers,” in von Humboldt, Wilhelm, Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen (Berlin: Deutsche Bibliothek), 9–15.Google Scholar
Gooch, George P. (1966). Germany and the French Revolution (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Grapotte, Sophie and Prunea-Bretonnet, Tinca, eds. (2011). Kant et Wolff. Héritages et ruptures (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Green, Karen (2014). A History of Women’s Political Thought in Europe, 1700–1800 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Green, Karen (2017). “Locke, Enlightenment, and Liberty in the Works of Catharine Macaulay and Her Contemporaries,” in Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen (eds.), Women and Liberty 1600–1800: Philosophical Essays (Oxford University Press), 82–94.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2010). “Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Denis, Lara (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 130–51.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016). Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2017). “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Kant and Reinhold,” in Watkins, Eric (ed.), Kant on Persons and Agency (Cambridge University Press), 120–37.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2020). Introduction to Natural Law: A Translation of the Textbook for Kant’s Lectures on Legal and Political Philosophy, by Achenwall, Gottfried, edited by Kleingeld, Pauline (London: Bloomsbury), xiii–xxxi.Google Scholar
Haasis, Hellmut G. (1970). “Nachwort,” in Erhard, Johann Benjamin, Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution und andere Schriften, edited by Haasis, Hellmut G. (Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag), 205–32.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1974). Theory and Practice, translated by Viertel, John (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by Burger, Thomas and Lawrence, Frederick (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
Hammacher, Klaus (1971). Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. Philosoph und Literat der Goethezeit: Beiträge einer Tagung in Düsseldorf 1969 aus Anlaß seines 150. Todestages und Berichte (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert (2006). “Kant, Causation and Freedom: Review of E. Watkins, Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36:2: 281–306.Google Scholar
Harris, Henry S. (1997). Hegel’s Ladder: Volume I: The Pilgrimage of Reason. Volume II: The Odyssey of Spirit (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally (2012). “Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground,” in Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique (Cambridge University Press), 446–75.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally (2017). “Racism, Ideology, and Social Movements,” Res Philosophica 94:1 (January): 1–22.Google Scholar
Hay, Carol (2013). Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (2003). Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, edited by Pacini, D. S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (2004). Grundlegung aus dem Ich: Untersuchungen zur Vorgeschichte des Idealismus (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hernández Marcos, Maximiliano (2020). “Rights-Perfectionism, from Kant’s Grundlegung to Politics: Kantian Debates,” in Moggach, Douglas, Mooren, Nadine, and Quante, Michael (eds.), Perfektionismus der Autonomie (Paderborn: Fink), 29–68.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. (2000). Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Holzman, Gitit (2013). “R. Moshe Narboni’s Commentary to Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed,” Daat 73: 197–236 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2007). “Recognition as Ideology,” in van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David (eds.), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory (Cambridge University Press), 323–47.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2010). The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory, translated by Löb, Ladislaus (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, translated by Ganahl, Joseph (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1993). “The Present Situation of Social Philosophy and the Tasks of an Institute for Social Research,” in Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings, translated by Hunger, G. Frederick, Kramer, Matthew S., and Torpey, John (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1851). Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen (Breslau: Trewendt).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1854). The Sphere and Duties of Government, translated by Coulthard, Joseph (London: John Chapman).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1963). Humanist without Portfolio: An Anthology of the Writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt, edited and translated by Cowan, Marianne (Detroit: Wayne State University Press).Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1969). The Limits of State Action, edited by Burrow, John W. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean (1973). Studies on Marx and Hegel, translated by O’Neill, John (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Ivry, Alfred (2015). “Al-Ghazali, Averroes, and Moshe Narboni: Conflict and Conflation,” in Tanner, Georges (ed.), Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazali, Vol. 1 (Leiden: Brill), 275–87.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel (2009). “Rethinking Ideology,” in de Bruin, Boudewijn and Zurn, Christopher F. (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 63–86.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel (2018). Critique of Forms of Life, translated by Cronin, Ciaran (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter (1990). “Ästhetische Revolution: Stichworte zur Einführung,” in Jaeschke, Walter and Holzhey, Helmut (eds.), Früher Idealismus und Frühromantik. Der Streit um die Grundlagen der Ästhetik (1795–1805) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag), 1–11.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter and Sandkaulen, Birgit, eds. (2004). Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. Ein Wendepunkt der geistigen Bildung der Zeit (Hamburg: Meiner).Google Scholar
Kane, Robert (1989). “Two Kinds of Incompatibilism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:2: 219–54.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1961). General Theory of Law and the State, translated by Wedberg, Anders (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1967). The Pure Theory of Law, translated by Knight, Max (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang (1992). “Politics, Freedom, and Order: Kant’s Political Philosophy,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press), 342–66.Google Scholar
Kervégan, Jean-François (2018). The Actual and the Rational: Hegel and Objective Spirit, translated by Ginsburg, Daniela and Shuster, Martin (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1999). “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16:1: 59–80.Google Scholar
Klippel, Deithelm (1998). “Der liberale Interventionsstaat. Staatszweck und Staatstätigkeit in der deutschen politischen Theorie des 18. und der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts,” in Lück, Heiner (ed.), Recht und Rechtswissenschaft im mitteldeutschen Raum (Cologne: Böhlau), 77–103.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Paul (1925). Personlichkeit und Gemeinschaft. Studien zur Staatsauffassung der deutschen Romantik (Halle: Niemeyer).Google Scholar
Kosch, Michelle (2017). “Individuality and Rights in Fichte’s Ethics,” Philosophers’ Imprint 17:12: 1–23.Google Scholar
Kraut, Richard (1979). “Two Conceptions of Happiness,” Philosophical Review 88:2: 167–97.Google Scholar
Kurt, Christ (1998). F.H. Jacobi. Rousseaus deutscher Adept. Rousseauismus in Leben und Frühwerk Friedrich Heinrich Jacobis (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Lachterman, David (1992). “Mathematical Construction, Symbolic Cognition and the Infinite Intellect: Reflections on Maimon and Maimonides,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30:4: 497–522.Google Scholar
Landau, Albert, ed. (1991). Rezensionen zur Kantischen Philosophie 1781–87 (Bebra: Albert Landau Verlag).Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel (2008). “The Legacy of Medieval Constitutionalism in the Philosophy of Right: Hegel and the Prussian Reform Movement,” History of Political Thought XXIX:4.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1887). Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Vol. 3, edited by Gerhardt, Carl I. (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1969). “Two Notions for Discussion with Spinoza,” in Philosophical Papers and Letters, translated and edited by Loemker, Leroy E. (Dordrecht: Reidel), 167–69.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1989). Philosophical Essays, translated and edited by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried ([1720] 1991). Monadology, edited by Rescher, Nicholas (University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1993). Leibniz-Thomasius. Correspondance (1663–1672), edited by Bodéus, Richard (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (2004). “Principles of Nature and Grace Based on Reason,” J. Bennett translation, www.earlymoderntexts.comGoogle Scholar
Leroux, Robert (1932a). La théorie du despotisme éclairé chez Karl Theodor Dalberg (Presses universitaires de Strasbourg).Google Scholar
Leroux, Robert (1932b). Guillaume de Humboldt: La formation de sa pensée jusqu’en 1794 (Presses universitaires de Strasbourg).Google Scholar
Locke, John ([1690] 1980). Second Treatise of Government, edited by Macpherson, Crawford B. (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Mack, Eric and Gaus, Gerald F. (2004). “Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism: The Liberty Tradition,” in The Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Gaus, Gerald F. and Kukathas, Chandran (London: Sage), 115–30.Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1778). Hesheq Shelomo (Salomon’s Desire) (Posen). National and University Library, Jerusalem (MS 806426).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1791). Philosophisches Wörterbuch, Erstes Stück (Berlin: Johann Friedrich Unger).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1793). Streifereien im Gebiete der Philosophie, Erste Teil (Berlin: Wilhelm Vieweg).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1797). Kritische Untersuchungen über den menschlichen Geist, oder der höhere Erkenntnis und Willensvermögen (Leipzig: Gerhard Fleicher dem Jünger).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1965). Give’at ha-Moreh, edited by Bergmann, Samuel H. and Rotenstreich, Nathan (Jerusalem: Israeli Academy of Science).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (1999). Commentaires de Maïmonide, translated and edited by Hayoun, Maurice-Ruben (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (2010). Essay Concerning Transcendental Philosophy, translated by Midgley, Nick, Somers-Hall, Henry, Welchman, Alistair, and Reglitz, Merten (New York: Continuum Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (2018a). “Attempt at a New Presentation of the Principle of Morality and a Deduction of Its Reality,” translated by Timothy Sean Quinn. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27:1: 1–27.Google Scholar
Maimon, Salomon (2018b). The Autobiography of Salomon Maimon: The Complete Translation, translated by Reitter, Paul and edited by Melamed, Yitzhak and Socher, Abraham (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses (1974). The Guide of the Perplexed, translated by Pines, Shlomo (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Maliks, Reidar (2012). “Revolutionary Epigones: Kant and His Radical Followers,” History of Political Thought XXXIII:4: 647–71.Google Scholar
Manson, Neil A. (2002). “Formulating the Precautionary Principle,” Environmental Ethics 24:3: 263–74.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak (2004). “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in Germany,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42:1: 67–96.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart ([1873] 1960). Autobiography of John Stuart Mill (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart ([1859] 1991). On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas (2008). “Schiller, Scots, and Germans: Freedom and Diversity in The Aesthetic Education of Man,” Inquiry 51:1: 16–36.Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas, Mooren, Nadine, and Quante, Michael, eds. (2020). Der Perfektionismus der Autonomie (Paderborn: Fink).Google Scholar
Morris, Michael (2016). Knowledge and Ideology: The Epistemology of Social and Political Critique (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Möser, Justus (1965). “Über das Recht der Menschheit, in so fern es zur Grundlage eines Staates dienen kann,” in Lenz, Georg (ed.), Deutsches Staatsdenken im 18. Jahrhundert (Neuwied and Berlin: Luchterhand), 273–91.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2005). “Natural Law Theory,” in Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 15–28.Google Scholar
Nance, Michael and Yonover, Jason (2020). “Introduction to Salomon Maimon’s ‘On the First Grounds of Natural Right’ (1795),” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published online 7 May 2020.Google Scholar
National Assembly of France (1961). “Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen,” in Harris, Marvin, Morgenbesser, Sidney, Rothschild, Joseph, and Wishy, Bernard (eds.), Introduction to Contemporary Civilization in the West: A Source Book, Volume 2 (New York: Columbia University Press), 33–5.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2000). Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2016). “Fichte’s Separation of Right from Morality,” in Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 32–51.Google Scholar
Ng, Karen (2015). “Ideology Critique from Hegel and Marx to Critical Theory,” Constellations 22:3: 393–404.Google Scholar
Niezen, Roland (2009). “The Aufklärung’s Human Discipline: Comparative Anthropology According to Kant, Herder and Wilhelm von Humboldt,” Intellectual History Review 19:2: 177–95.Google Scholar
Nisenbaum, Karin (2018). For the Love of Metaphysics: Nihilism and the Conflict of Reason from Kant to Rozenzweig (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Novakovic, Andreja (2017). Hegel on Second Nature in Ethical Life (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy (2007). “Is It All Just a Matter of Luck?,” Philosophical Explorations 10: 157–61.Google Scholar
Oncina Coves, Faustino (1997). “Wahlverwandschaften zwischen Fichtes, Maimons und Erhards Rechtslehren,” Fichte-Studien 11: 63–84.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2001). “Fichte’s Alleged Subjective, Psychological, One-Sided Idealism,” in Sedgwick, Sally S. (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel (Cambridge University Press), 147–70.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander (2006). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Reimarus, Johann (1803). Entwurf eines allgemeinen Staats-Unterrichts für künftigen Bürger (Hamburg: Campe).Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl L. (2008). Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, Bd. II (Basel: Schwabe).Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim (1982). Hegel and the French Revolution: Essays on the Philosophy of Right, translated by Winfield, Richard Dien (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
Rohls, Michael (2004). Kantisches Naturrecht und historisches Zivilrecht. Wissenschaft und bürgerliche Freiheit bei Gottlieb Hufeland (1760–1817) (Baden-Baden: Nomos).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques ([1762] 1963). Du contrat social (Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions).Google Scholar
Rush, Fred (2016). Irony and Idealism: Rereading Schlegel, Hegel, and Kierkegaard (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1945). History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (2005). “Leibniz on Spontaneity,” in Rutherford, Donald and Cover, J. A. (eds.), Leibniz: Nature and Freedom (Oxford University Press), 156–80.Google Scholar
Sandkaulen, Birgit (2000). Grund und Ursache. Die Vernunftkritik Jacobis (Munich: Fink).Google Scholar
Saul, Nicholas (2003). “The Pursuit of the Subject: Literature as Critic and Perfecter of Philosophy 1790–1830,” in Saul, Nicholas (ed.), Philosophy and German Literature 1700–1990 (Cambridge University Press), 57–101.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich (1882). Friedrich Schlegel: Seine prosaische Jugendschriften 1792–1802. 2 vols., edited by Minor, Jakob (Vienna: C. Konegan).Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, ed. (1996). What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, ed. (1998). “Cabbage Heads and Gulps of Water: Hegel on the Terror,” Political Theory 26:1: 4–32.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2009). Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics, translated by Janaway, Christopher (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schottky, Richard (1995). Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der staatsphilosophischen Vertragstheorie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau-Fichte) mit einem Beitrag zum Problem der Gewaltenteilung bei Rousseau und Fichte (Amsterdam: Rodopi).Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally S. (1996). “Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Empiricism and the Categorical Imperative,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 50:4 (Oct.–Dec.), 563–84.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. (1994). A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution: The Abbé Sieyes and What Is the Third Estate? (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Shatz, David (2005). “Maimonides’ Moral Theory,” in Sesskin, Kenneth (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Maimonides (Cambridge University Press), 167–92.Google Scholar
Shelby, Tommie (2003). “Ideology, Racism, and Critical Social Theory,” The Philosophical Forum 34:2: 153–88.Google Scholar
Shelby, Tommie (2014). “Racism, Moralism, and Social Criticism,” DuBois Review 11:1: 57–74.Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig (2002). “La systématique de l’esprit pratique chez Wolff, Kant, Fichte et Hegel,” Revue germanique internationale 18: 105–19.Google Scholar
Sieveking, Heinrich (1940). “Elise Reimarus (1735–1805) in den geistigen Kämpfen ihrer Zeit,” Zeitschrift des Vereins für Hamburgische Geschichte 39: 86–138.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. (1990). “Hegel and the French Revolution: An Epitaph for Republicanism,” in Feher, Ferenc (ed.), The French Revolution and the Birth of Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press), 219–39.Google Scholar
Socher, Abraham (2006). The Radical Enlightenment of Salomon Maimon (Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Spalding, Almut (2005). Elise Reimarus (1735–1805): The Muse of Hamburg: A Woman of the German Enlightenment (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Spalding, Almut (2006). “Siblings, Publications, and the Transmission of Memory: Johan Albert Hinrich and Elise Reimarus,” in Miller, Naomi J. and Yavneh, Naomi (eds.), Sibling Relations and Gender in the Early Modern World: Sisters, Brothers and Others (Aldershot and Burlington, VA: Ashgate), 216–27.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2006). “Hegel’s Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44:2: 235–66.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2012). “On Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Ethics: Beyond the Empty Formalism Objection,” in Brooks, Thom (ed.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 43–72.Google Scholar
Suter, Jean-François (1971). “Burke, Hegel and the French Revolution,” in Pelczynski, Zbigniew A. (ed.), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge University Press), 52–72.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1997). “Was ist Liberalismus?,” in Hegelpreis 1997 (Stuttgart: Suhrkamp), 25–54.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith (1988). Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Valjavec, Fritz (1951). Die Entstehung der politischen Strömungen in Deutschland, 1770–1815 (Munich: R. Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
Verweyen, Hansjürgen (1975). Recht und Sittlichkeit in J. G. Fichtes Gesellschaftslehre (Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag).Google Scholar
Völker, Martin (2006). Raumphantasien, narrative Ganzheit und Identität. Eine Rekonstruktion des Ästhetischen aus dem Werk und Wirken der Freiherren von Dalberg (Hannover: Wehrhahn).Google Scholar
Walz, Gustav A. (1928). Die Staatsidee des Rationalismus und der Romantik und die Staatsphilosophie Fichtes (Berlin-Grunewald: W. Rothschild).Google Scholar
Weigend-Abendroth, Freidrich (1980). Der Reichsverräter am Rhein. Carl von Dalberg und sein Widerspruch (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, Leonard A. (1967). “Introduction,” in Schiller, Friedrich, On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, translated by Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, Leonard A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press), xi-cxcvi.Google Scholar
Wilson, Eric (2008). “Kantian Autonomy and the Moral Self,” The Review of Metaphysics 62:2: 355–81.Google Scholar
Winegar, Reed. (2021). “Elise Reimarus: Reason, Religion, and Enlightenment.” In Women and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Germany, edited by Dyck, Corey W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wokler, Robert (1998). “Contextualizing Hegel’s Phenomenology of the French Revolution and the Terror,” Political Theory 26:1: 33–55.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian ([1754] 1969). Institutiones juris naturae et gentium. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 26, edited by Thomann, M. (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian ([1721] 1971). Vernünftige Gedanken von dem gesellschaftlichen Leben der Menschen und insonderheit dem gemeinen Wesen.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian ([1758] 1988). Principes du droit de la nature et des gens, extrait du grand ouvrage latin, par Formey, M., tome premier (Presses Universitaires de Caen).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian ([1723] 2010). Vernünftige Gedanken von den Wirkungen der Natur. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 6 (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar