Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:04:41.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and complications of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

Nele Steenackers
Affiliation:
Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Bart Van der Schueren
Affiliation:
Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Patrick Augustijns
Affiliation:
Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Tim Vanuytsel
Affiliation:
Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Christophe Matthys*
Affiliation:
Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author: Christophe Matthys, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of bariatric surgery has encouraged the use of bariatric procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities, with sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the most common procedures. Notwithstanding its success, bariatric procedures are recognised to predispose the development of nutritional deficiencies. A framework is proposed that provides clarity regarding the immediate role of diet, the gastrointestinal tract and the medical state of the patient in the development of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery, while highlighting different enabling resources that may contribute. Untreated, these nutritional deficiencies can progress in the short term into haematological, muscular and neurological complications and in the long term into skeletal complications. In this review, we explore the development of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery through a newly developed conceptual framework. An in-depth understanding will enable the optimisation of the post-operative follow-up, including detecting clinical signs of complications, screening for laboratory abnormalities and treating nutritional deficiencies.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

The double burden of malnutrition

In the past decades, obesity has become an international public health issue. The prevalence continues to increase at an alarming rate, even though there is a growing awareness regarding the burden of obesity(1). Despite the likelihood of apparent overconsumption of calories in people with obesity, a paradoxical challenge is the co-existence of overnutrition alongside undernutrition known as the ‘double burden of malnutrition’. Within an individual, household or population, the double burden of malnutrition manifests through the simultaneous development of undernutrition (e.g. stunting, wasting or nutritional deficiencies) alongside overnutrition (e.g. overweight, obesity or other diet-related non-communicable diseases) across the life course(2). In reality, the double burden of malnutrition is more complex than a simple co-existence. Both undernutrition and overnutrition can propagate long-term effects due to interconnected biological pathways that involve metabolic dysregulation, inflammation and gut microbiome imbalance. Moreover, life-course exposure can increase the risk of developing non-communicable diseases by imposing a high metabolic load on a depleted metabolic capacity(Reference Wells, Sawaya and Wibaek3). In case of scarcity, micronutrients will be allocated to the functions needed for short-term survival rather than those required for long-term health, also known as the triage theory(Reference Ames4). The former will contribute to the development of certain chronic non-communicable diseases that are already prevalent in individuals with obesity (e.g. type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cancer)(Reference Astrup and Bugel5). Due to the severity of health implications, the United Nations have provided an umbrella of policies, programmes and plans within their decade of action on nutrition that aims to eliminate malnutrition in all forms by 2030(6). While there has been some progress, the prevalence of obesity continues to grow and is outweighing the efforts taken to prevent a further rise(1,Reference Steenackers, Mutwiri, van der Schueren and Matthys7) . As prevention fails, obesity treatment remains pivotal.

Obesity management

Due to the multifactorial nature of obesity, treatment is challenging. To achieve weight loss and improve obesity-related risk factors, guidelines recommend lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery depending on the severity of overweight and associated health risks(Reference Bray, Fruhbeck, Ryan and Wilding8,Reference Magkos, Fraterrigo and Yoshino9) . Lifestyle changes should be the foundation of every obesity treatment. These changes include dietary alterations, increased physical activity and behavioural training(Reference Bray, Fruhbeck, Ryan and Wilding8,Reference Yumuk, Tsigos and Fried10,Reference Jensen, Ryan and Apovian11) . Failure of lifestyle change to induce (<5% of total body weight loss) or sustain (<1 year) weight loss indicates the necessity of complementary treatment options(Reference Bray, Fruhbeck, Ryan and Wilding8,Reference Yumuk, Tsigos and Fried10,Reference Jensen, Ryan and Apovian11) . Pharmacotherapy can result in durable weight loss beyond what lifestyle changes alone may produce(Reference Bray, Fruhbeck, Ryan and Wilding8,Reference Yumuk, Tsigos and Fried10,Reference Jensen, Ryan and Apovian11) . Until recently, long-term pharmacotherapy with suitable efficacy, tolerability and safety was perceived as a utopia. Nonetheless, recent studies showed that semaglutide at a dose of 2·4 mg can lower and sustain body weight loss by 15% after 1 year of treatment in combination with a diet and increased physical activity(Reference Davies, Færch and Jeppesen12Reference Rubino, Abrahamsson and Davies14). Although that amount of weight loss is clinically relevant, it may seem insignificant compared with the results obtained by surgical intervention. A range of surgical or bariatric procedures has been developed that historically has been categorised as ‘restrictive’, ‘malabsorptive’ or ‘combined restrictive–malabsorptive’. Surgical procedures were deemed ‘restrictive’ when they limit food intake by reducing gastric volume, while procedures that affect nutrient absorption through an intestinal bypass were deemed ‘malabsorptive’(Reference Arterburn and Courcoulas15). Although this approach sounded appealing at first, a vast amount of evidence supports that the underlying mechanism is profoundly physiological rather than solely anatomical(Reference Stefater, Wilson-Pérez, Chambers, Sandoval and Seeley16,Reference Angrisani, Santonicola and Iovino17) . Decades of research have now linked weight loss to reduced appetitive behaviour and potentially increased energy expenditure. Underlying mechanisms that associate the rearrangement of the gastrointestinal tract with the favourable metabolic outcomes include at least central appetite control, the release of gut hormones, changes in microbiota composition and diversity, and changes in bile acid levels. For now, the exact response, combination and timing of signals remain largely unknown(Reference Akalestou, Miras, Rutter and le Roux18). To date, the main bariatric procedures are sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In a sleeve gastrectomy, the greater curvature of the stomach is longitudinally resected. In a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the stomach is reduced in size by forming a small gastric pouch without a pylorus and then a part of the small intestine is bypassed (Fig. 1)(Reference Nguyen and Varela19Reference Steenackers, Vanuytsel and Augustijns21).

Fig. 1. Sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

These anatomical changes trigger a vast amount of physiological and hormonal changes that contribute to the favourable aspects of bariatric surgery. Irrespective of the type of procedure, the beneficial outcomes include substantial weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and prolonged survival(Reference Maciejewski, Arterburn and Van Scoyoc22Reference Carlsson, Jacobson and Peltonen25). Despite its effectiveness, bariatric surgery can result in complications due to the invasive nature of the procedure and the need for lifelong adjustment afterwards. Complications are commonly categorised into early (e.g. anastomotic leakage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, internal hernia, obstruction, perforation, venous thromboembolism and wound infection) and late complications (e.g. anastomotic stricture, cholelithiasis, dumping syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux, gastrointestinal fistula, gastrointestinal ulceration, internal hernia, malnutrition, nutritional deficiencies and obstruction)(Reference Brethauer, Kim and Chaar26Reference Thereaux, Lesuffleur and Czernichow28). Despite a diversity of complications, nutritional deficiencies are the most common repercussion of bariatric surgery.

Development of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery

The pathological onset of nutritional deficiencies is not yet fully understood, but a variety of determinants are involved. Therefore, we developed a new framework to provide conceptual clarity on the role of key determinants in the development of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery (Fig. 2). The framework acknowledges the immediate role of diet, the gastrointestinal tract and the medical state of the patient while highlighting different enabling resources.

Fig. 2. Determinants of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.

Immediate and underlying determinants: diet

Vitamins and minerals are micronutrients that are essential for normal functioning, disease prevention and wellbeing. With some exceptions, micronutrients cannot be produced in the body and thus must be derived from the diet. If micronutrient intake is unable to compensate for its loss, nutritional deficiencies can arise with or without clinical symptoms and signs(Reference Berger, Shenkin and Schweinlin29). After bariatric surgery, a patient’s diet can be inadequate to meet his/her nutritional needs due to different underlying determinants: (i) reduced dietary intake, (ii) food intolerance, (iii) food aversion and (iv) non-compliance with dietary and supplementation recommendations (Fig. 2).

Reduced dietary intake

To determine if there are changes in dietary intake, several studies investigated the impact of different bariatric procedures on overall energy intake. A recent meta-analysis observed that caloric intake decreased significantly after sleeve gastrectomy (weighted mean difference: 939·8 kilocalories (kcal)/d; 95% CI 647·66–1231·10) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (weighted mean difference: 1215·16 kcal/d; 95% CI 887·66–1542·67)(Reference Janmohammadi, Sajadi, Alizadeh and Daneshzad30). The reduction in caloric intake goes hand in hand with a reduction in micronutrient intake. Inadequate intake of various micronutrients has been extensively investigated by different research groups after both sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Table 1)(Reference Bavaresco, Paganini and Lima31Reference Warde-Kamar, Rogers, Flancbaum and Laferrere45). Importantly, different research methods and recommendations have been applied throughout these studies, although they do indicate inadequate micronutrient intake as a challenge after bariatric surgery(46). While there is still some uncertainty regarding the dietary mechanisms underpinning this reduction in micronutrient intake, decreased portion sizes and altered food preferences are recognised as important players(Reference Al-Najim, Docherty and le Roux47). Evidently, the size of the gastric pouch or sleeve acts as a physical barrier for (excessive) eating initially after surgery(Reference Laurenius, Larsson and Bueter48). Therefore, specific eating behaviours are recommended, including but not limited to eating at a slow pace (specific dietary recommendations are reviewed elsewhere)(Reference Dagan, Goldenshluger and Globus49). In addition, post-operative changes in appetite, smell and taste may drive changes in food preference(Reference Makaronidis, Neilson and Tymoszuk50). Food cravings may be exacerbated in cases of nutritional deficiencies, whereby the patient desires essential nutrients. Interestingly, food urges has been identified as one of the strongest predictors of weight regain(Reference Odom, Zalesin and Washington51).

Table 1. Micronutrient intake after bariatric surgery

Abbreviations: AI, adequate intake; ASMBS, American Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery; DRI, dietary reference intake; EAR, estimated average requirements; IOM, Institute of Medicine; RDA, recommended dietary allowance; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG, sleeve gastrectomy.

Legend: (1)Dietary intake refers to micronutrient intake from food, while total intake refers to micronutrient intake from food and nutritional supplements.; (2)Adequate intake refers to a recommended average daily intake level based on observed or experimentally determined approximations or estimates of nutrient intake by a group (or groups) of apparently healthy people that are assumed to be adequate.; (Reference Wells, Sawaya and Wibaek3)Dietary reference intake refers to a set of nutrient-based reference values that can be used for planning and assessing diets.; (Reference Ames4)Estimated average requirements refers to the average daily intake value that is estimated to meet the nutrient requirements in 50% of the individuals in a particular life stage and gender group.; (Reference Astrup and Bugel5)Recommended dietary allowance refers to the average daily intake value that is estimated to meet the nutrient requirements in 97–98% of the individuals in a particular life stage and gender group.(46)

Food intolerance and aversion

Beyond food portions and preferences, some food items may be harder to tolerate, which may lead to the avoidance of specific food groups. Consequently, food intolerance and aversion may contribute to the reduced micronutrient intake after bariatric surgery(Reference Zarshenas, Tapsell, Neale, Batterham and Talbot52). Given its subjective nature, research on dietary intolerance varies widely due to differences in the applied definition of intolerance and the given research methodology(Reference Freeman, Overs, Zarshenas, Walton and Jorgensen53Reference Overs, Freeman, Zarshenas, Walton and Jorgensen65). In general, most reported intolerances are bread, cereals, dairy, fibrous vegetables, meat, pasta and rice(Reference Zarshenas, Tapsell, Neale, Batterham and Talbot52). Some of these intolerances may impose a risk on diet quality. For instance, avoidance of red meat may imply a lower iron intake, whereas other intolerances may improve diet quality by avoiding specific food items(Reference Nicoletti, de Oliveira and Barbin66). For instance, dumping syndrome may restrain patients from consuming energy-dense food items after surgery. The ingestion of refined sugar and fat triggers an exaggerate release of gut hormones (especially GLP-1) and the rapid entry of water into the intestinal lumen. This phenomenon of post-prandial hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia is characterised by the occurrence of non-specific symptoms including a broad spectrum of presentations related to Whipple’s triad for hypoglycaemia (e.g. symptomatic hypoglycaemia, documented low plasma glucose level, and resolution of symptoms after glucose administration). For hypoglycaemia, symptoms are categorised as autonomic (e.g. sweating, tremor and palpitation) or neuroglycopenic (e.g. confusion, weakness, light-headedness, dizziness, blurred vision, disorientation and eventually loss of consciousness)(Reference Tack and Deloose67Reference Eisenberg, Azagury, Ghiassi, Grover and Kim69). From a patient’s perspective, dumping syndrome has been described as an unpleasant protection mechanism to avoid the consumption of energy-dense food items(Reference Laurenius and Engström70). The effect on micronutrient intake may be rather small as energy-dense foods are often poor in micronutrient content(Reference Monsivais and Drewnowski71). Overall, food tolerance improves over time after both sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Sherf Dagan, Keidar and Raziel56Reference Novais, Junior, Shiraga and de Oliveira60,Reference Coluzzi, Raparelli and Guarnacci62,Reference Harbottle63) . On the basis of these individual physiological responses, efforts should be made to work towards personalising dietary recommendations based on physiological and tolerance response.

Non-compliance with dietary and supplementation recommendations

Another nutritional aspect that negatively affects nutrient intake is non-compliance with dietary recommendations and follow-up(Reference Smelt, Pouwels, Smulders and Hazebroek72,Reference Luca, Nicolas, Marina, Sarah and Andrea73) . Dietetic counselling and nutritional supplementation is recommended to prevent nutritional complications after bariatric surgery(Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74,Reference Busetto, Dicker and Azran75) . However, the majority of research on non-compliance focuses on dietary recommendations and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Elkins, Whitfield and Marcus76,Reference James, Lorentz and Collazo-Clavell77) . Regarding nutritional supplementation, non-compliance is frequently encountered in clinical practice. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis observed that guideline compliance rate for nutritional supplementation does not exceed 20% after bariatric surgery(Reference Ha, Kwon and Kwon78). However, research indicates that supplementation compliance is associated with more favourable biochemical assessments of nutritional status(Reference Henfridsson, Laurenius and Wallengren79,Reference Ledoux, Calabrese and Bogard80) . Previously, increasing age and medicine intake were identified as positive predictors of compliance. While experiencing barriers was identified as a negative predictor of compliance. Most common barriers for supplement use are forgetfulness, price of supplements and experience of side effects(Reference Steenackers, Vandewynckel and Boedt81).

Immediate and underlying determinants: gastrointestinal tract

Nutrient bioavailability refers to ‘the efficiency with which a dietary component is used systemically through normal metabolic pathways’. It covers every step from the release of the nutrient, digestion, absorption, distribution, deposition, metabolic and functional use up to its excretion(Reference Aggett82). The gastrointestinal tract with its defined anatomy and physiology is responsible for the first steps from the release up to nutrient absorption across the length of the small intestine(Reference Kiela and Ghishan83). One might assume that the anatomical alterations of bariatric surgery affect digestion and absorption and contribute to the increased risk of developing nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.

The ‘bariatric’ gastrointestinal tract at a glance

Traditionally, the presence of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery was solely attributed to the mechanical aspects of inducing ‘restriction’ and ‘malabsorption’. However, this mechanical hypothesis does not provide an adequate explanation for why some nutritional deficiencies are equally common after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Moize, Andreu and Flores41,Reference Kwon, Kim and Menzo84) . In theory, it is plausible to assume that the drastic anatomical alterations of bariatric procedures influence gastrointestinal physiology. In turn, the anatomical and supposed physiological alterations imposed by the different types of bariatric procedures define the type and extent of nutritional deficiencies(Reference Syn, Cummings and Wang85). An overview of potential physiological alterations is visualised in Fig. 3 and reviewed elsewhere(Reference Steenackers, Vanuytsel and Augustijns21).

Fig. 3. Potential physiological alterations of sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

The ability of the gastrointestinal tract to digest food and absorb nutrients might be compromised by the profound anatomical and physiological alterations of bariatric surgery. Regarding digestion, the stomach needs an acidic environment for the initiation of macronutrient digestion (e.g. pepsinogen activation for protein digestion) and optimising micronutrients for absorption (e.g. releasing vitamin B12 from protein, optimising calcium and iron solubility and reducing ferric iron into the absorbable ferrous form)(Reference Pohl, Fox and Fried86). It is plausible that the resection and bypass of the oxyntic glands of the stomach affects digestion and nutrient absorption after surgery. In addition, this may as well reduce gastric secretion of intrinsic factor and, as such, affect vitamin B12 absorption further on in the ileum(Reference Marcuard, Sinar, Swanson, Silverman and Levine87). Moreover, a reduced gastric mixing and accelerated gastric emptying delivers partially undigested nutrients rapidly into the small intestine. This could delay protein, carbohydrate and lipid digestion until the ingested food reaches the pancreatic and biliary fluids that only appear in the common limb after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. As a consequence, malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins can occur that in turn affect other nutrients (e.g., vitamin D–calcium interaction). Beyond delaying digestion, a major area for nutrient absorption with transporters is bypassed after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as visualised in Fig. 4. Altogether, changes in gastrointestinal physiology have serious implications for digestion and nutrient absorption.

Fig. 4. Gastrointestinal micronutrient absorption after sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

Immediate and underlying determinants: patients’ medical history and therapy

When facing an abnormal biochemical parameter, micronutrient blood levels should be interpreted with special attention to the patient’s medical history and treatment regimen. In particular, the presence of concomitant drug intake may complicate biochemical interpretation. Various drugs can affect a patient’s nutritional status by affecting the nutrikinetic properties of a micronutrient or by intervening in the transport pathway of the nutrient(Reference Chan88,Reference Boullata and Hudson89) . From a nutrikinetic perspective, drugs can interfere with micronutrient absorption by (i) reducing gastric acid secretion, (ii) altering gastrointestinal motility or (iii) forming insoluble complexes. Additionally, drugs can affect the body’s use and/or excretion of micronutrients. The proposed nutrikinetic mechanism of various drugs and their effect is summarised in Table 2 (Reference Mason90,Reference Mohn, Kern, Saltzman, Mitmesser and McKay91) . Clinically relevant data on potential drug–nutrient interactions after bariatric surgery have not been explored so far. The effect of drug–nutrient interactions differs between patients but is generally more pronounced in patients on multiple or chronic treatment(Reference Chan88,Reference Mason90,Reference Prescott, Drake and Stevens92) . Therefore, the risk of potential drug–nutrient interaction should be recognised as a part of patient assessment after bariatric surgery due to the presence of persisting obesity-related comorbidities or complications that may require therapy. Beyond drug–nutrient interaction, the presence of inflammation in the context of infection, trauma or surgery is under-recognised as a potential confounder of biochemical micronutrient levels. However, it has been shown that inflammation may induce a redistribution of micronutrients from blood to other organs(Reference Berger, Shenkin and Schweinlin29). Consequently, decreased plasma micronutrient concentration is not necessarily an indication of micronutrient depletion or deficiency (e.g. vitamins A, B6, C and D and zinc)(Reference Duncan, Talwar, McMillan, Stefanowicz and O’Reilly93). On the contrary, inflammation can also increase micronutrient markers, meaning that a plasma micronutrient concentration within the reference range does not exclude the presence of micronutrient depletion or deficiency (e.g. iron)(Reference Duncan, Talwar, McMillan, Stefanowicz and O’Reilly93). After bariatric surgery, clinical interpretation of plasma micronutrient concentration should therefore always be combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) as a surrogate marker of inflammation.

Table 2. Drug–nutrient interactions and their proposed mechanism(Reference Mason90,Reference Mohn, Kern, Saltzman, Mitmesser and McKay91)

Enabling determinants: resources

To ensure maximal benefits and minimal complications, strict adherence to pre-operative screening and post-operative lifelong follow-up is pivotal after bariatric surgery. Pre-operative care should include an intake consultation with the surgeon, an internist, dietitian and psychologist, who gather (e.g. medical and psychosocial history) and provide information (e.g. bariatric procedures, benefits and risks). Different pre-surgical assessments are recommended including but not limited to physical examination and biochemical blood analysis. Post-operative surgery care differs in the early and late phases. A peri-operative enhanced recovery clinical pathway should be implemented in all patients who undergo a bariatric procedure, followed by rigorous lifelong follow-up on a regular basis(Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74,Reference Busetto, Dicker and Azran75,Reference Stenberg, Dos Reis Falcão and O’Kane95) . Cancer research indicates that a multidisciplinary approach results in more beneficial treatment outcomes, but evidence for bariatric surgery patients is still lacking(Reference Bullen, Parmar and Gilbert96). Besides a multidisciplinary approach, lifelong follow-up is advised. Depending on the type of bariatric procedure and length of follow-up, non-compliance ranges between 3% and 63%(Reference Moroshko, Brennan and O’Brien97). Nonetheless, follow-up visits provide the patient with a medical support network, the opportunity to detect nutritional deficiencies early on and a check-up of their dietary regimen(Reference Wheeler, Prettyman, Lenhard and Tran98). Consequently, evidence indicates that post-bariatric patients have more nutritional deficiencies when being non-compliant to follow-up compared with compliant patients(Reference Ledoux, Calabrese and Bogard80). Moreover, serious nutritional complications are more common in non-compliant patients than in patients with partial or perfect follow-up (hazard ratio (HR) 3·09; 95% CI 1·74–5·50)(Reference Bielawska, Ouellette-Kuntz, Zevin, Anvari and Patel99). It is generally accepted that the financial impact of bariatric surgery is an important determinant of non-compliance. The financial resources needed for the multidisciplinary follow-up consultations with a dietitian and nutritional supplementation can be seen as an obstacle for some patients(Reference Bielawska, Ouellette-Kuntz, Zevin, Anvari and Patel99). Therefore, the development of micronutrient deficiencies after bariatric surgery would likely be prevented if follow-up care is reimbursed.

Nutritional complications in obesity and after bariatric surgery

Together, an inadequate diet, altered gastrointestinal tract and a patient’s medical history may predispose post-bariatric patients to develop nutritional deficiencies. As micronutrients are essential, nutritional deficiencies can have severe consequences including haematological, musculoskeletal or neurological complications. Most patients experience mild symptoms, but serious and even life-threatening cases have been reported as well(Reference Nuzzo, Czernichow and Hertig101). Severe nutritional complications occur at an incidence rate of 4·5 per 1000 person-years, which is similar to the incidence rate of surgical complications(Reference Bielawska, Ouellette-Kuntz, Patel, Anvari and Zevin102). Despite being not as rare as generally believed, nutritional complications receive less research attention compared with surgical complications(Reference Rives-Lange, Rassy and Carette103). Current available screening and supplementation recommendations for the discussed micronutrients are summarised in Table 3 (Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74).

Table 3. Nutritional screening and supplementation recommendations after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74)

Haematological complications

Nutritional anaemia is a common complication of bariatric surgery. The prevalence of anaemia ranges between 3·6% and 52·7% and 6·0% and 63·6% after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, respectively. These high rates of anaemia may reflect a variety of vitamin or mineral deficiencies but are predominantly the result of iron, vitamin B12 or folate deficiency. Less common causes involve copper (deficiency), zinc (excessive intake), vitamin A (deficiency) and vitamin E (deficiency)(Reference Steenackers, Van der Schueren and Mertens94,Reference von Drygalski and Andris104) .

Iron deficiency

Microcytic and hypochromic erythrocytes are considered the hallmark finding of iron deficiency, which reduces the oxygen-carrying capacity of the erythrocytes(Reference Steenackers, Van der Schueren and Mertens94). Symptoms and signs of iron deficiency with/without anaemia include fatigue, lethargy, reduced concentration, dizziness, paleness, dry skin, dry hair, alopecia, koilonychia and atrophic glossitis, but can be asymptomatic as well(Reference Pasricha, Tye-Din, Muckenthaler and Swinkels105). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis observed that the risk of developing iron deficiency is comparable after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (relative risk (RR) 1·27; 95% CI 0·98–1·64; P = 0·069)(Reference Kwon, Ha and Lee106). Increased divalent metal transporter expression may increase the absorptive capacity of the remaining nutrient-exposed intestine to compensate for the bypassed biliopancreatic limb with its nutrient transporters after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Marambio, Watkins and Castro107). Iron status monitoring and daily nutritional supplementation is recommended independently of the type of procedure. In case of deficiency, oral supplementation should be increased or replaced by intravenous administration for patients with severe intolerance or refractory iron deficiency(Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74).

Vitamin B12 deficiency

Another frequent cause of nutritional anaemia is vitamin B12 or cobalamin deficiency. Given vitamin B12 body stores can last for 3–5 years, vitamin B12 deficiency usually only becomes clinically relevant several years after bariatric surgery(Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108). Contrary to iron deficiency, the risk of post-operative vitamin B12 deficiency is higher after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with sleeve gastrectomy (RR 1·86; 95% CI 1·15–3·02; P = 0·012)(Reference Kwon, Ha and Lee106). Severe vitamin B12 deficiency is characterised by macrocytic erythrocytes, leading to megaloblastic anaemia(Reference Stover109). Symptoms and signs of vitamin B12 with/without anaemia resemble the symptoms of iron deficiency (anaemia) including fatigue and glossitis. Beyond haematological complications, vitamin B12 deficiency can contribute to neurological complications such as myelopathy, neuropathy, paraesthesia and ataxia. As the morphological features of vitamin B12 deficiency are camouflaged in case of iron deficiency and symptoms are similar, vitamin B12 status should always be monitored in combination with iron status(Reference Nuzzo, Czernichow and Hertig101,Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108,Reference Hunt, Harrington and Robinson110) .

Vitamin B9 or folate deficiency

Although less common, folate deficiency is another potential cause of nutritional anaemia. Folate absorption can occur along the entire small intestine, which explains the low incidence of folate deficiency, especially when supplemented with folic acid. The risk of developing folate deficiency is comparable after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RR 0·79; 95% CI 0·47–1·35; P = 0·391)(Reference Kwon, Ha and Lee106). Similar to vitamin B12, severe folate deficiency is characterised by macrocytic erythrocytes that lead to megaloblastic anaemia(Reference Stover109). Symptoms include weakness, anorexia and weight loss(Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108). Considering the risk of neural tube defects in the foetus, it is advised that women who underwent a bariatric procedure receive between 400 and 1000 µg of folic acid in the peri-conceptional period(Reference Mechanick, Apovian and Brethauer74,Reference Vynckier, Ceulemans and Vanheule111) .

Musculoskeletal complications

Calcium and vitamin D deficiency

Bone fragility has emerged as a common and severe complication of bariatric surgery. Different mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to bone fragility, including (i) micronutrient malabsorption, (ii) mechanical unloading and (iii) changes in sex, gut and adipose-derived hormones(Reference Corbeels, Verlinden and Lannoo112). Among micronutrients, calcium and vitamin D are essential to ensure bone health. After surgery, malabsorption of calcium and vitamin D may cause a hypocalcaemic state. As a result, the parathyroid glands will secrete higher levels of parathyroid hormone. Under the control of parathyroid hormone, urinary calcium secretion is decreased and skeletal calcium is mobilised to maintain serum calcium(Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108,Reference Corbeels, Verlinden and Lannoo112) . In the short term, the clinical symptoms of calcium and vitamin D deficiency include muscle weakness, muscle cramps and back pain(Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108,Reference Bouillon, Manousaki and Rosen113) . In the long term, bone loss can manifest and translate into fracture risk. Fracture risk seems to increase following mixed restrictive and malabsorptive bariatric procedures with a predominance of fractures at osteoporotic sites (RR 1·4–2·3 depending on the study). Mounting data indicate that fracture risk manifests in the long term, whereas bone remodelling already occurs within the first year after surgery(Reference Saad, Ghezzawi, Habli, Alami and Chakhtoura114,Reference Gagnon and Schafer115) . To date, it remains unclear whether sleeve gastrectomy has the same effect on skeletal health as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(Reference Krez and Stein116). Due to the multifactorial skeletal effect of bariatric surgery, a multidisciplinary approach of screening and supplementation is recommended(Reference Beavers, Greene and Yu117).

Neurological complications

A large spectrum of neurological complications can arise after bariatric surgery with an assumed prevalence between 1% and 16%. These complications are related to a variety of micronutrients that vary from time to presentation. In the short term, Wernicke’s encephalopathy or acute polyradiculoneuropathy can arise. Long-term complications include optic neuropathy, myelopathy, peripherical neuropathy and myopathy(Reference Landais118). Prevention, recognition and management are crucial as most complications are reversible or improve over time under therapy.

Water-soluble vitamins B1, B9 and B12

Vitamin B1 or thiamine is an essential micronutrient for myelin formation in the nerve cells with limited body storage. Encephalopathy is a major nutritional complication of vitamin B1 deficiency that mainly develops in the first week or first months after surgery. After surgery, inadequate dietary intake or vomiting can lead to depleted stores. In turn, severe thiamine deficiency results in selective neuronal cell death that can culminate into acute and chronic encephalopathy. Wernicke’s encephalopathy is an acute neurological condition that is characterised by a triad of symptoms including ophthalmological problems, ataxia and consciousness disturbances. When left untreated, Wernicke’s encephalopathy can progress to Korsakoff syndrome, which is characterised by a chronic state of mental dysfunction with permanent memory impairment(Reference Landais118). In severe cases, thiamine deficiency may result in death(Reference Haid, Gutmann and Crosby119). Another rare complication associated with vitamin B1 deficiency is acute polyradiculoneuropathy. It presents as pain in the lower limbs, followed by ascending paralysis, ataxia, areflexia and sensory loss, which resembles Guillain–Barré syndrome(Reference Yasawy and Hassan120,Reference AlShareef, Albaradei, AlOtaibi, Alanazy and Abuzinadah121) . Although the risk of thiamine deficiency is highest in the first months after surgery, it can present lifelong, especially in combination with inadequate intake due to persisting vomiting and supplementation non-compliance or alcohol abuse(Reference Oudman, Wijnia, van Dam, Biter and Postma122). In addition to thiamine, other water-soluble vitamins can result in neurological complications. Although uncommon, folate deficiency may lead to peripheral neuropathy or restless leg syndrome, while vitamin B12 deficiency can manifest neurologically by presenting as myelopathy, neuropathy, paraesthesia and ataxia(Reference Berger123).

Fat-soluble vitamins A and E

Given that fat-soluble vitamins require bile acids for absorption, deficiencies of fat-soluble vitamins with neurological manifestations may arise after bariatric surgery. Due to its role in photoreceptor function, vitamin A deficiency can result in optic neuropathy, xerophthalmia and night blindness(Reference Spits, De Laey and Leroy124,Reference Lee, Hamilton, Harris and Schwab125) . Vitamin E is essential for normal neurological functioning and for protecting neural cell membranes from oxidative damage. After bariatric surgery, the clinical presentation of vitamin E deficiency is rarely documented. However, vitamin E deficiency may present as peripheral neuropathy, skeletal myopathy, gait disturbances, head titubation, decreased sensation, ataxia, ophthalmologic disorders and nystagmus(Reference Sherf-Dagan, Buch, Ben-Porat, Sakran and Sinai126).

Copper and zinc deficiency

Mineral and trace-element deficiencies have seldom been described after bariatric surgery. Although human cases are rare, copper deficiency can manifest neurologically as myelopathy and peripheral neuropathy after bariatric surgery(Reference Kumar, McEvoy and Ahlskog127), while zinc deficiency can manifest as a myeloneuropathy-like disorder with spastic gait and sensory ataxia(Reference Bal, Finelli, Shope and Koch108).

Conclusion

Taken together, the pathological onset of nutritional deficiencies is not yet fully understood, but the immediate role of diet, the gastrointestinal tract and the medical state of the patient cannot be ignored. Financial resources needed for the multidisciplinary follow-up consultations with a dietitian and nutritional supplementation can be seen as an obstacle for some patients. These determinants predispose post-bariatric patients to develop nutritional deficiencies. As micronutrients are essential, deficiencies can have severe consequences, including haematological, musculoskeletal or neurological complications. Most patients present with mild symptoms, but serious and even life-threatening cases have been reported. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to monitor the nutritional status of patients before and after bariatric surgery.

Acknowledgements

N.S. is supported by a KU Leuven research grant (C32/17/046). B.V.d.S. and T.V. received senior clinical research fellowships from FWO, the Flemish Research Council.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

N.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript, revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

Organization, WH (2020) Overweight and Obesity: Fact Sheet, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.Google Scholar
WHO (2017) The Double Burden of Malnutrition. Policy Brief. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wells, JC, Sawaya, AL, Wibaek, R, et al. (2020) The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet 395, 7588. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32472-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ames, BN (2006) Low micronutrient intake may accelerate the degenerative diseases of aging through allocation of scarce micronutrients by triage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 1758917594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608757103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astrup, A & Bugel, S (2019) Overfed but undernourished: recognizing nutritional inadequacies/deficiencies in patients with overweight or obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 43, 219232. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0143-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2017) Work Programme of the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016–2025), https://www.un.org/nutrition/sites/www.un.org.nutrition/files/general/pdf/work_programme_nutrition_decade.pdf.Google Scholar
Steenackers, N, Mutwiri, L, van der Schueren, B & Matthys, C (2020) Do we need dietary reference values for people with obesity? Nutr Bull 45, 358361. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, GA, Fruhbeck, G, Ryan, DH & Wilding, JP (2016) Management of obesity. Lancet 387, 19471956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00271-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magkos, F, Fraterrigo, G, Yoshino, J, et al. (2016) Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab 23, 591601. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.02.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yumuk, V, Tsigos, CFried, M, et al. (2015) European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts 8, 402424. doi: 10.1159/000442721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, MD, Ryan, DH, Apovian, CM, et al. (2014) 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 63, 29853023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M, Færch, L, Jeppesen, OK, et al. (2021)Semaglutide 2.4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 397, 971984. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00213-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadden, TA, Bailey, TS, Billings, LK, et al. (2021) Effect of subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo as an adjunct to intensive behavioral therapy on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubino, D, Abrahamsson, N, Davies, M, et al. (2021) Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325, 14141425. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arterburn, DE & Courcoulas, AP (2014) Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. BMJ 349, g3961. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefater, MA, Wilson-Pérez, HE, Chambers, AP, Sandoval, DA & Seeley, RJ (2012) All bariatric surgeries are not created equal: insights from mechanistic comparisons. Endocr Rev 33, 595622. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrisani, L, Santonicola, A, Iovino, P, et al. (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 28, 37833794. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akalestou, E, Miras, AD, Rutter, GA & le Roux, CW (2022) Mechanisms of weight loss after obesity surgery. Endocr Rev 43, 1934. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, NT & Varela, JE (2017) Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14, 160169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J, Billing, J & Billing, P (2016) Metabolism and Pathophysiology of Bariatric Surgery: Nutrition, Procedures, Outcomes and Adverse Effects, 103112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128040119/metabolism-and-pathophysiology-of-bariatric-surgery.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenackers, N, Vanuytsel, T, Augustijns, P, et al. (2021) Adaptations in gastrointestinal physiology after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 225237. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30302-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maciejewski, ML, Arterburn, DE, Van Scoyoc, L, et al. (2016) Bariatric surgery and long-term durability of weight loss. JAMA Surg 151, 10461055. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, SH, Stoll, CRT, Song, J, et al. (2014) The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg 149, 275287. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, L, Rodrigues, D, Gomes, L & Carrilho, F (2017) Short- and long-term mortality after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 19, 12231232. doi: 10.1111/dom.12922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, LMS, Jacobson, P & Peltonen, M (2021) Life expectancy after bariatric surgery – the Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Reply. N Engl J Med 384, 89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2033331.Google Scholar
Brethauer, SA, Kim, J, Chaar, M, et al. (2015) Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11, 489506. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003.Google ScholarPubMed
Arterburn, DE, Telem, DA, Kushner, RF & Courcoulas, AP (2020) Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: a review. JAMA 324, 879887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thereaux, J, Lesuffleur, T, Czernichow, S, et al. (2019) Long-term adverse events after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a 7-year nationwide, observational, population-based, cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7, 786795. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30191-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, MM, Shenkin, A, Schweinlin, A, et al. (2022) ESPEN micronutrient guideline. Clin Nutr. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janmohammadi, P, Sajadi, F, Alizadeh, S & Daneshzad, E (2019) Comparison of energy and food intake between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg 29, 10401048, doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03663-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bavaresco, M, Paganini, S, Lima, TP, et al. (2010) Nutritional course of patients submitted to bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 20, 716721. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9721-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, JJ, Lee, W-J, Almalki, O, et al. (2017) Dietary intake and weight changes 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 27, 32403246. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2765-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colossi, FG, Casagrande, DS, Chatkin, R, et al. (2008) Need for multivitamin use in the postoperative period of gastric bypass. Obes Surg 18, 187191. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9384-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cominetti, C, Garrido, AB & Cozzolino, SMF (2006) Zinc nutritional status of morbidly obese patients before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg 16, 448453. doi: 10.1381/096089206776327305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Torres Rossi, RG, Dos Santos, MT, de Souza, FI, de Cassia de Aquino, R & Sarni, RO (2012) Nutrient intake of women 3 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 22, 15481553. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0688-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freire, RH, Borges, MC, Alvarez-Leite, JI & Correia, MITD (2012) Food quality, physical activity, and nutritional follow-up as determinant of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Nutrition 28, 5358. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gesquiere, I, Foulon, V, Augustijns, P, et al. (2017) Micronutrient intake, from diet and supplements, and association with status markers in pre- and post-RYGB patients. Clin Nutr 36, 11751181. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.009.Google ScholarPubMed
Leiro, LS & Melendez-Araujo, MS (2014) Diet micronutrient adequacy of women after 1 year of gastric bypass. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27 (Suppl 1), 2125. doi: 10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercachita, TN, Santos, ZL, Limão, J, Carolino, E & Mendes, L (2014) Anthropometric evaluation and micronutrients intake in patients submitted to Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a postoperative period of ≥ 1 year. Obes Surg 24, 102108. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1057-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, GD, Norris, A & Fernandez, A (2014) Changes in nutrients and food groups intake following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Obes Surg 24, 19261932. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1259-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moize, V, Andreu, A, Flores, L, et al. (2013) Long-term dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies following sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-En-Y gastric bypass in a Mediterranean population. J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 400410. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.11.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Netto, BD, Moreira, EAM, Patiño, JSR, et al. (2012) Influence of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on vitamin C, myeloperoxidase, and oral clinical manifestations: a 2-year follow-up study. Nutr Clin Pract 27, 114121. doi: 10.1177/0884533611431462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novais, PF, Rasera, I Jr, Leite, CV, Marin, FA & de Oliveira, MR (2012) Food intake in women two years or more after bariatric surgery meets adequate intake requirements. Nutr Res 32, 335341. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.03.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedt, CS, Brolin, RE, Sherrell, RM, Field, MP & Shapses, SA (2006) True fractional calcium absorption is decreased after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity 14, 19401948. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warde-Kamar, J, Rogers, M, Flancbaum, L & Laferrere, B (2004) Calorie intake and meal patterns up to 4 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 14, 10701079. doi: 10.1381/0960892041975668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Subcommittee on Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes & Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes (2000) DRI Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, US.Google Scholar
Al-Najim, W, Docherty, NG & le Roux, CW (2018) Food intake and eating behavior after bariatric surgery. Physiol Rev 98, 11131141. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurenius, A, Larsson, I, Bueter, M, et al. (2012) Changes in eating behaviour and meal pattern following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Int J Obes (Lond) 36, 348355. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagan, SS, Goldenshluger, A, Globus, I, et al. (2017) Nutritional recommendations for adult bariatric surgery patients: clinical practice. Adv Nutr 8, 382394. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makaronidis, JM, Neilson, S, Tymoszuk, U, et al. (2016) Reported appetite, taste and smell changes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: effect of gender, type 2 diabetes and relationship to post-operative weight loss. Appetite 107, 93105. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odom, J, Zalesin, KC, Washington, TL, et al. (2010) Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 20, 349356. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9895-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarshenas, N, Tapsell, LC, Neale, EP, Batterham, M & Talbot, ML (2020) The relationship between Bariatric surgery and diet quality: a systematic review. Obes Surg 30, 17681792. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04392-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, RA, Overs, SE, Zarshenas, N, Walton, KL & Jorgensen, JO (2014) Food tolerance and diet quality following adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Res Clin Pract 8, e115e200. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cano-Valderrama, O, Sanchez-Pernaute, A, Rubio-Herrera, MA, Dominguez-Serrano, I & Torres-Garcia, AJ (2017) Long-term food tolerance after Bariatric surgery: comparison of three different surgical techniques. Obes Surg 27, 28682872. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2703-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafri, N, Valfer, R, Nativ, O, Shiloni, E & Hazzan, D (2011) Health behavior, food tolerance, and satisfaction after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7, 8288. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherf Dagan, S, Keidar, A, Raziel, A, et al. (2017) Do bariatric patients follow dietary and lifestyle recommendations during the first postoperative year? Obes Surg 27, 22582271. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2633-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suter, M, Calmes, JM, Paroz, A & Giusti, V (2007) A new questionnaire for quick assessment of food tolerance after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 17, 28. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9016-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sioka, E, Tzovaras, G, Oikonomou, K, et al. (2013) Influence of eating profile on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 23, 501508. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0831-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweiger, C, Weiss, R & Keidar, A (2010) Effect of different bariatric operations on food tolerance and quality of eating. Obes Surg 20, 13931399. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0233-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novais, PF, Junior, IR, Shiraga, EC & de Oliveira, MR (2011) Food aversions in women during the 2 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 21, 19211927. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0342-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moize, V, Geliebter, A, Gluck, ME, et al. (2003) Obese patients have inadequate protein intake related to protein intolerance up to 1 year following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 13, 2328. doi: 10.1381/096089203321136548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coluzzi, I, Raparelli, L, Guarnacci, L, et al. (2016) Food intake and changes in eating behavior after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26, 20592067. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2043-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbottle, L (2011) Audit of nutritional and dietary outcomes of bariatric surgery patients. Obes Rev 12, 198204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega, J, Ortega-Evangelio, G, Cassinello, N, Sebastia, V & Sebastia, V (2012) What are obese patients able to eat after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? Obes Facts 5, 339348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overs, SE, Freeman, RA, Zarshenas, N, Walton, KL & Jorgensen, JO (2012) Food tolerance and gastrointestinal quality of life following three bariatric procedures: adjustable gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22, 536543. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0573-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoletti, CF, de Oliveira, BPD, Barbin, R, et al. (2015) Red meat intolerance in patients submitted to gastric bypass: a 4-year follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11, 842846. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.10.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tack, J & Deloose, E (2014) Complications of bariatric surgery: dumping syndrome, reflux and vitamin deficiencies. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28, 741749. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.07.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Beek, AP, Emous, M, Laville, M & Tack, J (2017) Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Obes Rev 18, 6885. doi: 10.1111/obr.12467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, D, Azagury, DE, Ghiassi, S, Grover, BT & Kim, JJ (2017) ASMBS position statement on postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13, 371378. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurenius, A & Engström, M (2016) Early dumping syndrome is not a complication but a desirable feature of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Clin Obes 6, 332340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsivais, P & Drewnowski, A (2009) Lower-energy-density diets are associated with higher monetary costs per kilocalorie and are consumed by women of higher socioeconomic status. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 814822. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smelt, HJM, Pouwels, S, Smulders, JF & Hazebroek, EJ (2020) Patient adherence to multivitamin supplementation after bariatric surgery: a narrative review. J Nutr Sci 9, e46. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luca, P, Nicolas, C, Marina, V, Sarah, B & Andrea, L (2021) Where are my patients? Lost and found in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 31, 19791985. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05186-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mechanick, JI, Apovian, C, Brethauer, S, et al. (2020) Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures – 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric surgery, obesity medicine association, and American Society of anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring) 28, O1O58. doi: 10.1002/oby.22719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busetto, L, Dicker, D, Azran, C, et al. (2017) Practical recommendations of the obesity management task force of the European Association for the Study of Obesity for the post-bariatric surgery medical management. Obes Facts 10, 597632. doi: 10.1159/000481825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, G, Whitfield, P, Marcus, J, et al. (2005) Noncompliance with behavioral recommendations following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 15, 546551. doi: 10.1381/0960892053723385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, H, Lorentz, P & Collazo-Clavell, ML (2016) Patient-reported adherence to empiric vitamin/mineral supplementation and related nutrient deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 26, 26612666. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2155-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ha, J, Kwon, Y, Kwon, J-W, et al. (2021) Micronutrient status in bariatric surgery patients receiving postoperative supplementation per guidelines: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Obes Rev 22, e13249. doi: 10.1111/obr.13249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henfridsson, P, Laurenius, A, Wallengren, O, et al. (2019) Micronutrient intake and biochemistry in adolescents adherent or nonadherent to supplements 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15, 14941502. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledoux, S, Calabrese, D, Bogard, C, et al. (2014) Long-term evolution of nutritional deficiencies after gastric bypass: an assessment according to compliance to medical care. Ann Surg 259, 11041110. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenackers, N, Vandewynckel, S, Boedt, T, et al. (2022) Compliance and patients’ perspectives towards nutritional supplementation following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 32, 18041813. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06047-3.Google Scholar
Aggett, PJ (2010) Population reference intakes and micronutrient bioavailability: a European perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 1433S1437S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiela, PR & Ghishan, FK (2016) Physiology of intestinal absorption and secretion. Best Pract Res: Clin Gastroenterol 30, 145159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, Y, Kim, HJ, Menzo, EL, et al. (2014) Anemia, iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10, 589597. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syn, NL, Cummings, DE, Wang, LZ, et al. (2021) Association of metabolic–bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants. Lancet 397, 18301841. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00591-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohl, D, Fox, M, Fried, M, et al. (2008) Do we need gastric acid? Digestion 77, 184197. doi: 10.1159/000142726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcuard, SP, Sinar, DR, Swanson, MS, Silverman, JF & Levine, JS (1989) Absence of luminal intrinsic factor after gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Dig Dis Sci 34, 12381242. doi: 10.1007/BF01537272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, LN (2013) Drug–nutrient interactions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 37, 450459. doi: 10.1177/0148607113488799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boullata, JI & Hudson, LM (2012) Drug–nutrient interactions: a broad view with implications for practice. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 506517. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, P (2010) Important drug–nutrient interactions. Proc Nutr Soc 69, 551557. doi: 10.1017/S0029665110001576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohn, ES, Kern, HJ, Saltzman, E, Mitmesser, SH & McKay, DL (2018) Evidence of drug–nutrient interactions with chronic use of commonly prescribed medications: an update. Pharmaceutics 10, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, JD, Drake, VJ & Stevens, JF (2018) Medications and micronutrients: identifying clinically relevant interactions and addressing nutritional needs. J Pharm Technol 34, 216230. doi: 10.1177/8755122518780742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, A, Talwar, D, McMillan, DC, Stefanowicz, F & O’Reilly, DS (2012) Quantitative data on the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response and its effect on micronutrient status based on plasma measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 95, 6471. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.023812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenackers, N, Van der Schueren, B, Mertens, A, et al. (2018) Iron deficiency after bariatric surgery: what is the real problem? Proc Nutr Soc 77, 445455. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118000149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenberg, E, Dos Reis Falcão, LF, O’Kane, M, et al. (2022) Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: a 2021 update. World J Surg 46, 729751. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bullen, NL, Parmar, J, Gilbert, J, et al. (2019) How effective is the multidisciplinary team approach in bariatric surgery? Obes Surg 29, 32323238. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03975-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moroshko, I, Brennan, L & O’Brien, P (2012) Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg 22, 16401647. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0691-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, E, Prettyman, A, Lenhard, MJ & Tran, K (2008) Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4, 515520. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.01.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielawska, B, Ouellette-Kuntz, H, Zevin, B, Anvari, M & Patel, SV (2021) Early postoperative follow-up reduces risk of late severe nutritional complications after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a population based study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 17, 17401750. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.05.035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Heede, K, Ten Geuzendam, B, Dossche, D, et al. (2020) Bariatric Surgery in Belgium: Organisation and Payment of Care Before and after Surgery. KCE Reports 329. D/2020/10.273/06. Health Services Research (HSR). Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE).Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A, Czernichow, S, Hertig, A, et al. (2021) Prevention and treatment of nutritional complications after bariatric surgery. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 238251. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30331-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielawska, B, Ouellette-Kuntz, H, Patel, SV, Anvari, M & Zevin, B (2020) Severe nutritional complications after bariatric surgery in Ontario adults: a population-based descriptive study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16, 17841793. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.06.028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rives-Lange, C, Rassy, N, Carette, C, et al. (2022) Seventy years of bariatric surgery: a systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev, e13420. doi: 10.1111/obr.13420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Drygalski, A & Andris, DA (2009) Anemia after bariatric surgery: more than just iron deficiency. Nutr Clin Pract 24, 217226. doi: 10.1177/0884533609332174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasricha, SR, Tye-Din, J, Muckenthaler, MU & Swinkels, DW (2021) Iron deficiency. Lancet 397, 233248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32594-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, Y, Ha, J, Lee, Y-H, et al. (2022) Comparative risk of anemia and related micronutrient deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 23, e13419. doi: 10.1111/obr.13419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marambio, A, Watkins, G, Castro, F, et al. (2014) Changes in iron transporter divalent metal transporter 1 in proximal jejunum after gastric bypass. World J Gastroenterol. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bal, BS, Finelli, FC, Shope, TR & Koch, TR (2012) Nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8, 544556. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stover, PJ (2004) Physiology of folate and vitamin B12 in health and disease. Nutr Rev 62, S3S12; discussion S13. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00070.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, A, Harrington, D & Robinson, S (2014) Vitamin B12 deficiency. BMJ 349, g5226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vynckier, AK, Ceulemans, D, Vanheule, G, et al. (2021) Periconceptional folate supplementation in women after bariatric surgery-a narrative review. Nutrients 13. doi: 10.3390/nu13051557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbeels, K, Verlinden, L, Lannoo, M, et al. (2018) Thin bones: vitamin D and calcium handling after bariatric surgery. Bone Rep 8, 5763. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2018.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouillon, R, Manousaki, D, Rosen, C, et al. (2022) The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: evidence from human studies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 18, 96110. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00593-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saad, RK, Ghezzawi, M, Habli, D, Alami, RS & Chakhtoura, M (2022) Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 33, 511526. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06206-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagnon, C & Schafer, AL (2018) Bone health after bariatric surgery. JBMR Plus 2, 121133. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krez, AN & Stein, EM (2020) The skeletal consequences of bariatric surgery. Curr Osteoporos Rep 18, 262272. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00579-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beavers, KM, Greene, KA & Yu, EW (2020) Management of endocrine disease: bone complications of bariatric surgery: updates on sleeve gastrectomy, fractures, and interventions. Eur J Endocrinol 183, R119R132. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landais, A (2014) Neurological complications of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 24, 18001807. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1376-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haid, RW, Gutmann, L & Crosby, TW (1982) Wernicke–Korsakoff encephalopathy after gastric plication. JAMA 247, 25662567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasawy, ZM & Hassan, A (2017) Post bariatric surgery acute axonal polyneuropathy: doing your best is not always enough. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 20, 309312. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_24_17.Google ScholarPubMed
AlShareef, A, Albaradei, O, AlOtaibi, HA, Alanazy, MH & Abuzinadah, AR (2019) Acute paralytic post-bariatric surgery axonal polyneuropathy: clinical features and outcome. Eur Neurol 81, 239245. doi: 10.1159/000503286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oudman, E, Wijnia, JW, van Dam, M, Biter, LU & Postma, A (2018) Preventing wernicke encephalopathy after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 28, 20602068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, JR (2004) The neurological complications of bariatric surgery. Arch Neurol 61, 11851189. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.8.1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spits, Y, De Laey, JJ & Leroy, BP (2004) Rapid recovery of night blindness due to obesity surgery after vitamin A repletion therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 88, 583585. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.022459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, WB, Hamilton, SM, Harris, JP & Schwab, IR (2005) Ocular complications of hypovitaminosis a after bariatric surgery. Ophthalmology 112, 10311034. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherf-Dagan, S, Buch, A, Ben-Porat, T, Sakran, N & Sinai, T (2021) Vitamin E status among bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 17, 816830. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, N, McEvoy, KM & Ahlskog, JE (2003) Myelopathy due to copper deficiency following gastrointestinal surgery. Arch Neurol 60, 17821785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Determinants of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.

Figure 2

Table 1. Micronutrient intake after bariatric surgery

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Potential physiological alterations of sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Gastrointestinal micronutrient absorption after sleeve gastrectomy (left) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (right).

Figure 5

Table 2. Drug–nutrient interactions and their proposed mechanism(90,91)

Figure 6

Table 3. Nutritional screening and supplementation recommendations after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(74)