During the last decade there has been no lack of controversy on the subject of rock classification, but the dispute has concerned igneous rocks almost entirely. Petrography has been threatened by an effort to reduce it to an independent science of igneous rocks, and in consequence of this there has been a tendency to neglect its wider aspects. Important as igneous rocks are, their formation is less well understood than is that of some other sub-groups of rocks ; moreover, they constitute one only of some six or seven sub-groups, and it is the business of petrography as a science to deal with these rocks as a whole. The student of petrography should be encouraged to take this wider view. He shonld look at these different sub-groups of rocks in their proper geological perspective, and approach the study of the classification of igneous rocks with a knowledge of the principles that are applicable to the classification of rocks as a whole.
The discussion concerning the classification of ore deposits has proceeded on independent lines, and in a more well-balanced manner than has that of rocks. With ore deposits, as with rocks generally, genetic principles have triumphed; but the application of these principles to rocks long preceded their application to ore deposits. Iu recent years it has become apparent that the fundamental requirements for the classification of rocks and ore deposits are essentially the same ; and in view of the identity of their interests, both subjects are treated in this paper.
The aims of this paper are : To define the basis of genetic classification ; to give a brief historical account of classification on genetic-geological principles ; to point out defects in the present system of arrangement ; and to suggest an altemmtive scheme of grouping that is in closer accord with geological and genetic principles.