Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T08:29:46.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population studies on the infective stage of some nematode parasites of sheep

III. The distribution of strongyloid egg output in flocks of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. D. Donald
A. D. Donald
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies have been undertaken to examine the alternative hypotheses of a Poisson or a negative binomial distribution of the numbers of strongyloid nematode eggs in deposits of faeces produced by flocks of grazing sheep, which were proposed in certain mathematical models for the distribution of strongyloid infective larvae on pastures.

Observations were made on the distribution of the weights of faecal deposits produced by flocks of ewes and lambs. In all cases the distribution was found to be significantly positively skewed. A possible fundamental basis for this skewness has been suggested.

The distribution of strongyloid egg concentration in random samples of faecal deposits collected from pasture, and the distribution of egg concentration for the single species N. battus and N. filicollis in rectal samples of faeces collected from a lamb flock, have both shown highly significant departures from a Poisson distribution. This, coupled with the fact that the weights of individual deposits vary widely, provide strong empirical grounds for rejecting the Poisson distribution as a model for the distribution of egg numbers per deposit.

An examination of the distribution of egg counts for N. battus and N. filicollis in samples of faeces collected from a lamb flock at weekly intervals through the spring and summer has suggested that the distribution tends to become more overdispersed with the passage of time and as the mean egg count is falling.

Fundamental grounds for preferring a more general model, such as the negative binomial, to describe the distribution of strongyloid egg output in flocks of sheep have been discussed.

These studies were carried out under the supervision of Dr H. D. Crofton, to whom I am deeply grateful for his stimulating encouragement and constructive criticism. My thanks go also to Professor J. E. Harris, C.B.E., F.R.S., for the provision of facilities in the Department of Zoology, and to Professor T. K. Ewer and Mr M. R. McCrea for the provision and handling of pastures and sheep at the School of Veterinary Science, Langford. This work was undertaken during tenure of a C.S.I.R.O. Overseas Research Studentship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 951 - 960
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, F. J. (1950). Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. Biometrika 37, 358–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data, and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassie, R. M. (1962). Frequency distribution models in the ecology of plankton and other organisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 31, 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1954). Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms. I. Worm egg counts in ewes. Parasitology 44, 465–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofton, H. D. (1958 a). Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms. V. Further observations on the post-parturient rise and a discussion of its significance. Parasitology 48, 243–50.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1958 b). Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms. VI. Sheep behaviour and nematode infections. Parasitology 48, 251–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, A. D. (1969). Population studies on the infective stage of some nematode parasites of sheep. II. The distribution of faecal deposits on fields grazed by sheep. Parasitology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, H. McL. & Whitlock, H. V. (1939). A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. J. Coun. Sci. industr. Res. Aust. 12, 50–2.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. C. & Quenouille, M. H. (1952). A statistical examination of the worm egg count sampling technique for sheep. J. Helminth. 26, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. S. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th ed.Ames, Iowa. Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Tallis, G. M. & Donald, A. D. (1964). Models for the distribution on pasture of infective larvae of the gastro-intestinal nematode parasites of sheep. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 504–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetley, J. H. (1941). The differentiation of the eggs of the trichostrongylid species Nematodirus filicollis and N. N. spathiger. J. Parasit. 27, 473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. J. (1959 a). A comparative study of the life histories of Nematodirus battus and N. filicollis, nematode parasites of sheep. Parasitology 49, 374–86.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. J. (1959 b). Field studies on the seasonal incidence of Nematodirus battus and N. filicollis in sheep. Parasitology 49, 387–410.Google Scholar