Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Leiden Journal of International Law
  4. Volume 3
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 3 - December 1990

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Book Reviews

Front matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. f1-f5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Table of Cases

Correction

  • Correction

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, p. 112

  • The following corrections have been made to the article “The Hague Evidence Convention: Practice in the Netherlands”, written by E.P.A. Keyzer and M.T. Nijhuis (attorneys-at-law, Loeff & Van der Ploeg, Advocaten en Notarissen) and appearing in the last issue of the Leiden Journal of International Law (Vol. 2, No. 2, 1989).

    On page 162 of that issue two unrelated notes were put together (the two judgments of the Dutch Supreme Court have no bearing with the article of P. Herdenberger).

    On page 164, the second phrase (“Risks for Dutch parties in case they do not comply with dicovery orders”) should have been used to mark a new sub-paragraph and is not a phrase which fits within the article.

    On page 165, in sub-paragraph 4.3. the words “from the Communities” were mistakenly added to the phrase “In 1983 the N.V. Philips Gloeilampenfabriek (hereinafter ‘Philips’) in Eindhoven requested an exemption”. This addition did not appear in the original text and does not enhance the meaning of the text.

    We regret any inconvenience to our readers and extend our sincerest apologies.

    The Editorial Staff

Back matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Table of Cases

Front matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. b1-b2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • LJL volume 3 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 July 2009, pp. b1-b2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 3