In this paper we show that it is consistent with ZFC that the cardinality of every maximal cofinitary group of Sym(ω) is strictly greater than the cardinal numbers and .

Let ℜ be an expansion of a dense linear order (R, <) without endpoints having the intermediate value property, that is, for all a, b ∈ R, every continuous (parametrically) definable function f: [a, b] → R takes on all values in R between f(a) and f(b). Every expansion of the real line (ℝ, <), as well as every o-minimal expansion of (R, <), has the intermediate value property. Conversely, some nice properties, often associated with expansions of (ℝ, <) or with o-minimal structures, hold for sets and functions definable in ℜ. For example, images of closed bounded definable sets under continuous definable maps are closed and bounded (Proposition 1.10).

Of particular interest is the case that ℜ expands an ordered group, that is, ℜ defines a binary operation * such that (R, <, *) is an ordered group. Then (R, *) is abelian and divisible (Proposition 2.2). Continuous nontrivial definable endo-morphisms of (R, *) are surjective and strictly monotone, and monotone nontrivial definable endomorphisms of (R, *) are strictly monotone, continuous and surjective (Proposition 2.4). There is a generalization of the familiar result that every proper noncyclic subgroup of (ℝ, +) is dense and codense in ℝ: If G is a proper nontrivial subgroup of (R, *) definable in ℜ, then either G is dense and codense in R, or G contains an element u such that (R, <, *, e, u, G) is elementarily equivalent to (ℚ, <, +, 0, 1, ℤ), where e denotes the identity element of (R, *) (Theorem 2.3).

Here is an outline of this paper. First, we deal with some basic topological results. We then assume that ℜ expands an ordered group and establish the results mentioned in the preceding paragraph. Some examples are then given, followed by a brief discussion of analytic results and possible limitations. In an appendix, an explicit axiomatization (used in the proof of Theorem 2.3) is given for the complete theory of the structure (ℚ, <, +, 0, 1, ℤ).

In the early eighties, answering a question of A. Macintyre, J. H. Schmerl ([13]) proved that every countable recursively saturated structure, equipped with a function β encoding the finite functions, is the β-closure of an infinite indiscernible sequence. This result implies that every countably saturated structure, in a countable but not necessarily recursive language, is an Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski model, by which we mean that the structure expands, in a countable language, to the Skolem hull of an infinite indiscernible sequence (in the new language).

More recently, D. Lascar ([5]) showed that the saturated model of cardinality ℵ1 of an ω-stable theory is also an Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski model.

These results naturally raise the following problem: which (countable) complete theories have an uncountably saturated Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski model. We study a generalization of this question. Namely, we call ACI-model a structure which can be expanded, in a countable language L′, to the algebraic closure (in L′) of an infinite indiscernible sequence (in L′). And we try to characterize the λ-saturated structures which are ACI-models.

The main results are the following. First it is enough to restrict ourselves to ℵ1-saturated structures: if T has an ℵ1-saturated ACI-model then, for every infinite λ, T has a λ-saturated ACI-model. We obtain a complete answer in the case of stable theories: if T is stable then the three following properties are equivalent: (a) T is ω-stable, (b) T has an ℵ1-saturated ACI-model, (c) every saturated model of T is an Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski model. The unstable case is more complicated, however we show that if T has an ℵ1-saturated ACI-model then T doesn't have the independence property.

The Mycielski ideal is defined to consist of all sets A ⊆ ℕk such that {f ↾ X : f ∈ A} ≠ Xk for all . It will be shown that the covering numbers for these ideals are all equal. However, the covering numbers of the closely associated Rosłanowski ideals will be shown to be consistently different.

We show that the lattice L20 is not embeddable into the lattice of ideals of computably enumerable Turing degrees (ℐ), We define a structure called a pseudolattice that generalizes the notion of a lattice, and show that there is a Π2 necessary and sufficient condition for embedding a finite pseudolattice into ℐ.

We determine the exact bounds for the length of an arbitrary reduction sequence of a term in the typed λ-calculus with β-, ξ- and η-conversion. There will be two essentially different classifications, one depending on the height and the degree of the term and the other depending on the length and the degree of the term.

We point out that the theory of difference fields with algebraically closed fixed field has no model companion.

We prove that any 1-closed (see def 1.1) model of the Π2 consequences of PA satisfies ¬Cons PA which gives a proof of the second Gödel incompleteness theorem without the use of the Gödel diagonal lemma. We prove a few other theorems by the same method.

Acceptable programming systems have many nice properties like s-m-n-Theorem, Composition and Kleene Recursion Theorem. Those properties are sometimes called control structures, to emphasize that they yield tools to implement programs in programming systems. It has been studied, among others by Riccardi and Royer, how these control structures influence or even characterize the notion of acceptable programming system. The following is an investigation, how these control structures behave in the more general setting of complete numberings as defined by Mal'cev and Eršov.

A sequent calculus is given in which the management of weakening and contraction is organized as in natural deduction. The latter has no explicit weakening or contraction, but vacuous and multiple discharges in rules that discharge assumptions. A comparison to natural deduction is given through translation of derivations between the two systems. It is proved that if a cut formula is never principal in a derivation leading to the right premiss of cut, it is a subformula of the conclusion. Therefore it is sufficient to eliminate those cuts that correspond to detour and permutation conversions in natural deduction.

The Alperin-Goldschmidt Fusion Theorem [1, 5], when combined with pushing up [7], was a useful tool in the classification of the finite simple groups. Similar theorems are needed in the study of simple groups of finite Morley rank, in the even type case (that is, when the Sylow 2-subgroups are of bounded exponent, as in algebraic groups over fields of characteristic 2). In that context a body of results relating to fusion of 2-elements and the structure of 2-local subgroups is needed: pushing up, and the classification of groups with strongly or weakly embedded subgroups, or have strongly closed abelian subgroups (c.f, [2]). Two theorems of Alperin-Goldschmidt type are proved here. Both are needed in applications.

The following is an exact analog of the Alperin-Goldschmidt Fusion Theorem for groups of finite Morley rank, in the case of 2-elements:

Theorem 1.1. Let G be a group of finite Morley rank, and P a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. If A, B ⊆ P are conjugate in G, then there are subgroups Hi ≤ Pand elementsxi ∈ N(Hi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, and an elementy ∈ N(P), such that for all i:

1. Hi is a tame intersection of two Sylow 2-subgroups;

2. CP(Hi) ≤ Hi;

3. N(Hi)/Hiis 2-isolated

and

(a)

(b) .

We prove a main gap theorem for locally saturated submodels of a homogeneous structure. We also study the number of locally saturated models, which are not elementarily embeddable into each other.

We fix an arbitrary o-minimal structure (R, ω, …), where (R, <) is a dense linearly ordered set without end points. In this paper “definable” means “definable with parameters from R”, We equip R with the interval topology and Rn with the induced product topology. The main result of this paper is the following.

Theorem. Let V ⊆ Rnbe a definable open set and suppose that f: V → Rnis a continuous injective definable map. Then f is open, that is, f(U) is open whenever U is an open subset of V.

Woerheide [6] proved the above theorem for o-minimal expansions of a real closed field using ideas of homology. The case of an arbitrary o-minimal structure remained an open problem, see [4] and [1]. In this paper we will give an elementary proof of the general case.

Basic definitions and notation. A box B ⊆ Rn is a Cartesian product of n definable open intervals: B = (a1, b1) × … × (an, bn) for some ai, bi, ∈ R ∪ {−∞, +∞}, with ai < bi, Given A ⊆ Rn, cl(A) denotes the closure of A, int(A) denotes the interior of A, bd(A) ≔ cl(A) − int(A) denotes the boundary of A, and ∂A ≔ cl(A) − A denotes the frontier of A, Finally, we let π: Rn → Rn− denote the projection map onto the first n − 1 coordinates.

Background material. Without mention we will use notions and facts discussed in [5] and [3]. We will also make use of the following result, which appears in [2].

By the theory TT is meant the higher order predicate logic with the following recursively defined types:

(1) 1 is the type of individuals and [] is the type of the truth values:

(2) [τ1…..τn] is the type of the predicates with arguments of the types τ1…..τn.

The theory ITT described in this paper is an intensional version of TT. The types of ITT are the same as the types of TT, but the membership of the type 1 of individuals in ITT is an extension of the membership in TT. The extension consists of allowing any higher order term, in which only variables of type 1 have a free occurrence, to be a term of type 1. This feature of ITT is motivated by a nominalist interpretation of higher order predication.

In ITT both well-founded and non-well-founded recursive predicates can be defined as abstraction terms from which all the properties of the predicates can be derived without the use of non-logical axioms.

The elementary syntax, semantics, and proof theory for ITT are defined. A semantic consistency proof for ITT is provided and the completeness proof of Takahashi and Prawitz for a version of TT without cut is adapted for ITT: a consequence is the redundancy of cut.

The following theorems on the structure inside nonrecursive truth-table degrees are established: Dëgtev's result that the number of bounded truth-table degrees inside a truth-table degree is at least two is improved by showing that this number is infinite. There are even infinite chains and antichains of bounded truth-table degrees inside every truth-table degree. The latter implies an affirmative answer to the following question of Jockusch: does every truth-table degree contain an infinite antichain of many-one degrees? Some but not all truth-table degrees have a least bounded truth-table degree. The technique to construct such a degree is used to solve an open problem of Beigel, Gasarch and Owings: there are Turing degrees (constructed as hyperimmune-free truth-table degrees) which consist only of 2-subjective sets and therefore do not contain any objective set. Furthermore, a truth-table degree consisting of three positive degrees is constructed where one positive degree consists of enumerable semirecursive sets, one of coenumerable semirecursive sets and one of sets, which are neither enumerable nor coenumerable nor semirecursive. So Jockusch's result that there are at least three positive degrees inside a truth-table degree is optimal. The number of positive degrees inside a truth-table degree can also be some other odd integer as for example nineteen, but it is never an even finite number.

We define a class of productiveσ-ideals of subsets of the Cantor space 2ω and observe that both σ-ideals of meagre sets and of null sets are in this class. From every productive σ-ideal we produce a σ-ideal of subsets of the generalized Cantor space 2κ. In particular, starting from meagre sets and null sets in 2ω we obtain meagre sets and null sets in 2ω, respectively. Then we investigate additivity, covering number, uniformity and cofinality of . For example, we show that

Our results generalizes those from [5].

In spite of the analogies between ℚp and which became evident through the work of Ax and Kochen, an adaptation of the complete recursive axiom system given by them for ℚp, to the case of does not render a complete axiom system. We show the independence of elementary properties which express the action of additive polynomials as maps on . We formulate an elementary property expressing this action and show that it holds for all maximal valued fields. We also derive an example of a rather simple immediate valued function field over a henselian defectless ground field which is not a henselian rational function field. This example is of special interest in connection with the open problem of local uniformization in positive characteristic.

We present an axiomatic framework for nonstandard analysis—the Nonstandard Class Theory (NCT) which extends von Neumann–Gödel–Bernays Set Theory (NBG) by adding a unary predicate symbol St to the language of NBG (St(X) means that the class X is standard) and axioms—related to it—analogs of Nelson's idealization, standardization and transfer principles. Those principles are formulated as axioms, rather than axiom schemes, so that NCT is finitely axiomatizable. NCT can be considered as a theory of definable classes of Bounded Set Theory by V. Kanovei and M. Reeken. In many aspects NCT resembles the Alternative Set Theory by P. Vopenka. For example there exist semisets (proper subclasses of sets) in NCT and it can be proved that a set has a standard finite cardinality iff it does not contain any proper subsemiset. Semisets can be considered as external classes in NCT. Thus the saturation principle can be formalized in NCT.

We prove that the strong Martin conjecture is false. The counterexample is the first-order theory of infinite atomic Boolean algebras. We show that for this class of Boolean algebras, the classification of their (ω + ω)-elementary theories can be reduced to the classification of the elementary theories of their quotient algrbras modulo the Frechét ideals.

We prove weak elimination of imaginary elements for Boolean orderings with finitely many atoms. As a consequence we obtain equivalence of the two notions of o-minimality for Boolean ordered structures, introduced by C. Toffalori. We investigate atoms in Boolean algebras induced by algebraically closed subsets of Boolean ordered structures. We prove uniqueness of prime models in strongly o-minimal theories of Boolean ordered structures.