In 1998 Łuczak Rödl and Szemerédi [7] proved, by means of the Regularity Lemma, that there exists n0 such that, for any n ≥ n0 and two-edge-colouring of Kn, there exists a pair of vertex-disjoint monochromatic cycles of opposite colours covering the vertices of Kn. In this paper we make use of an alternative method of finding useful structure in a graph, leading to a proof of the same result with a much smaller value of n0. The proof gives a polynomial-time algorithm for finding the two cycles.

We provide an estimate, sharp up to poly-logarithmic factors, of the asymptotic almost sure mixing time of the graph created by long-range percolation on the cycle of length N (). While it is known that the asymptotic almost sure diameter drops from linear to poly-logarithmic as the exponent s decreases below 2 [4, 9], the asymptotic almost sure mixing time drops from N2 only to Ns-1 (up to poly-logarithmic factors).

A partition of a positive integer n is a finite sequence of positive integers a1, a2, . . ., ak such that a1+a2+ċ ċ ċ+ak=n and ai+1 ≥ ai for all i. Let d be a fixed positive integer. We say that we have an ascent of size d or more if ai+1 ≥ ai+d.

We determine the mean, the variance and the limiting distribution of the number of ascents of size d or more (equivalently, the number of distinct part sizes of multiplicity d or more) in the partitions of n.

Semple and Welsh [5] introduced the concept of correlated matroids, which relate to conjectures by Grimmett and Winkler [2], and Pemantle [4], respectively, that the uniformly random forest and the uniformly random connected subgraph of a finite graph have the edge-negative-association property. In this paper, we extend results of Semple and Welsh, and show that the Grimmett and Winkler, and Pemantle conjectures are equivalent to statements about correlated graphic matroids. We also answer some open questions raised in [5] regarding correlated matroids, and in particular show that the 2-sum of correlated matroids is correlated.

We use a greedy probabilistic method to prove that, for every ε > 0, every m × n Latin rectangle on n symbols has an orthogonal mate, where m = (1 − ε)n. That is, we show the existence of a second Latin rectangle such that no pair of the mn cells receives the same pair of symbols in the two rectangles.

Both the hopcount HN (the number of links) and the weight WN (the sum of the weights on links) of the shortest path between two arbitrary nodes in the complete graph KN with i.i.d. exponential link weights is computed. We consider the joint distribution of the pair (HN, WN) and derive, after proper scaling, the joint limiting distribution. One of the results is that HN and WN, properly scaled, are asymptotically independent.

In a random passive intersection graph model the edges of the graph are decided by taking the union of a fixed number of cliques of random size. We give conditions for a random passive intersection graph model to have a limiting vertex degree distribution, in particular to have a Poisson limiting vertex degree distribution. We give related conditions which, in addition to implying a limiting vertex degree distribution, imply convergence of expectation.

If G is a graph with vertex set [n] then is G-intersecting if, for all , either A ∩ B ≠ ∅ or there exist a ∈ A and b ∈ B such that a ~Gb.

The question of how large a k-uniform G-intersecting family can be was first considered by Bohman, Frieze, Ruszinkó and Thoma [2], who identified two natural candidates for the extrema depending on the relative sizes of k and n and asked whether there is a sharp phase transition between the two. Our first result shows that there is a sharp transition and characterizes the extremal families when G is a matching. We also give an example demonstrating that other extremal families can occur.

Our second result gives a sufficient condition for the largest G-intersecting family to contain almost all k-sets. In particular we show that if Cn is the n-cycle and k > αn + o(n), where α = 0.266. . . is the smallest positive root of (1 − x)3(1 + x) = 1/2, then the largest Cn-intersecting family has size .

Finally we consider the non-uniform problem, and show that in this case the size of the largest G-intersecting family depends on the matching number of G.

For a graph G and an integer t we let mcct(G) be the smallest m such that there exists a colouring of the vertices of G by t colours with no monochromatic connected subgraph having more than m vertices. Let be any non-trivial minor-closed family of graphs. We show that mcc2(G) = O(n2/3) for any n-vertex graph G ∈ . This bound is asymptotically optimal and it is attained for planar graphs. More generally, for every such , and every fixed t we show that mcct(G)=O(n2/(t+1)). On the other hand, we have examples of graphs G with no Kt+3 minor and with mcct(G)=Ω(n2/(2t−1)).

It is also interesting to consider graphs of bounded degrees. Haxell, Szabó and Tardos proved mcc2(G) ≤ 20000 for every graph G of maximum degree 5. We show that there are n-vertex 7-regular graphs G with mcc2(G)=Ω(n), and more sharply, for every ϵ > 0 there exists cϵ > 0 and n-vertex graphs of maximum degree 7, average degree at most 6 + ϵ for all subgraphs, and with mcc2(G) ≥ cϵn. For 6-regular graphs it is known only that the maximum order of magnitude of mcc2 is between and n.

We also offer a Ramsey-theoretic perspective of the quantity mcct(G).

Let the random graph Rn be drawn uniformly at random from the set of all simple planar graphs on n labelled vertices. We see that with high probability the maximum degree of Rn is Θ(ln n). We consider also the maximum size of a face and the maximum increase in the number of components on deleting a vertex. These results extend to graphs embeddable on any fixed surface.

For a fixed ρ ∈ [0, 1], what is (asymptotically) the minimal possible density g3(ρ) of triangles in a graph with edge density ρ? We completely solve this problem by proving that where is the integer such that .

Given a set of s points and a set of n2 lines in three-dimensional Euclidean space such that each line is incident to n points but no n lines are coplanar, we show that s = Ω(n11/4). This is the first non-trivial answer to a question recently posed by Jean Bourgain.