Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:11:33.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking phonological theories of reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Kathleen Rastle
Kathleen Rastle*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One key insight of Frost's target article is that morphology has priority over phonology in writing and in cognitive processing. I argue that this insight raises challenges for theories that put phonology at the heart of the reading process. Instead, it highlights the potential importance of a morphemically based visual pathway to meaning in this process.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 303 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frost, R. (1998) Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123(1):71–99.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2011) Reading processes and reading problems: Progress toward a universal reading science. In: Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link, ed. McCardle, P., Miller, B., Lee, J. R. & Tzeng, O. J. L., pp. 18–32. Brookes.Google Scholar
Rastle, K. & Davis, M. H. (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:942–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar