Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:05:41.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Fuzhi Cheng
Affiliation:
Cornell University
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Tim Josling
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Chinese agricultural policy has undergone some fundamental changes in the past decade, with major policy shifts in pricing, marketing, trade, investment, and technology. Most notably, China has implemented a series of new policies that directly favor the agricultural sector. These policies include direct payments to farmers, agricultural input subsidies, agricultural tax elimination, protective and minimum prices, dismantling of barriers to private entry into agricultural marketing channels, and increased spending on rural infrastructure, research and development. The policy changes have resulted in higher support for the agricultural sector, which has been documented in various studies. Considering this finding in combination with empirical evidence disclosing disprotection in agriculture in earlier periods, one can conclude that there has been a transition of government policy stance from taxing agriculture to supporting the sector. Recent economic growth has made these subsidy policy changes fiscally feasible.

The agricultural policy changes reflect the Chinese leadership's renewed attention to agricultural problems, concisely described in official documents as the San Nong issue (agriculture, rural areas, and peasants). The policy changes also arrived amidst a sharply widening rural–urban income gap as well as rising social unrest and political tension. In a series of No.1 Documents issued by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, it is reiterated that increasing farm incomes is at the top of the leadership's agenda.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade
, pp. 310 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler, D., and Blandford, D.. 2005. A review of empirical studies of the acreage and production response to US production flexibility contract payments under the FAIR Act and related payments under supplementary legislation. OECD report AGR/CA/APM(2004)21/Final.
Burfisher, M., and Hopkins, J.. 2003. Decoupled payments: Household income transfers in contemporary US agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 822, USDA, Economic Research Service.
Cheng, F., and Orden, D.. 2007. Exchange rate misalignment and producer support estimates (PSEs) of China. Paper presented at the Symposium on China's Agricultural Trade: Issues and Prospects, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Beijing, July 8–9.
Crook, F., and Diao, X.. 2000. Water pressure in China: Growth strains resources. Agricultural Outlook January–February:25–29.Google Scholar
Evenett, S., and Braga, C.. 2005. WTO accession: Lessons from experience. Trade Note No. 22, World Bank.
Fan, S., and Chan-Kang, C.. 2005. Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture. Agricultural Economics 32(1):135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, S., and Thorat, S.. 2007. Public investment, growth, and poverty reduction: A comparative analysis of India and China. In The Dragon and the Elephant: Agricultural and Rural Reforms in China and India, ed. Fan, S. and Gulati, A.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, C., and Beghin, J.. 2000. Food self-sufficiency, comparative advantage, and agricultural trade: A policy analysis matrix for Chinese agriculture. Working Paper 99-WP 223 (revised October 2000), Iowa State University.
,FAOSTAT. 2009. FAO Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (accessed November 20, 2009).
Frankel, J. 2006. On the yuan: The choice between adjustment under a fixed exchange rate and adjustment under a flexible rate. CESifo Economic Studies 52: 246–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, F., Lohmar, B., and Tuan, F.. 2005. China's new farm subsidies. Report WRS-05–01, USDA, Economic Research Service.
Goldstein, M. 2007. A (lack of) progress report on China's exchange rate policies. Working Paper 07–5, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Goodwin, B., and Mishra, A.. 2006. Are “decoupled” farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(1): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J., and Rozelle, S.. 2002. Changes in China's agricultural sector: Trade, market and policy reform. Proceedings of the WCC-101, Washington, DC, April 14–16.
Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Martin, W., and Liu, Y.. 2007. Distortions to agricultural incentives in China. Agricultural Distortions Working Paper 29, World Bank.
Huang, J., Liu, Y., Martin, W., and Rozelle, S.. 2009. Changes in trade and domestic distortions affecting China's agriculture. Food Policy 34(5): 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. 1998. Agricultural Reform in China: Getting Institutions Right. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W. I. 1995. The World Bank and Irrigation. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ke, B. 2007. Agricultural marketing reforms in China: Striking a balance between sequencing and speed. In The Dragon and the Elephant: Agricultural and Rural Reforms in China and India, ed. Fan, S. and Gulati, A.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kwiecinski, A., and Tongeren, F.. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of a decade of agricultural policies in China: 1995–2005. Paper presented at the Symposium on China's Agricultural Trade: Issues and Prospects, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Beijing, July 8–9.
Martin, W. 2003. Implications of reform and WTO accession for China's agricultural policies. In Agricultural Trade and Policy in China: Issues, Analysis and Implications, ed. Rozelle, S. and Sumner, D.. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
,MOA (Ministry of Agriculture). Various years. China Agricultural Yearbook.
,MOA (Ministry of Agriculture) 2001. State Council's decision on deeping reform of the grain circulation system. http:// cctw.cn/zcfg/nyfg/t20060123_540652.htm, (accessed December 20, 2007).
,MOF (Ministry of Finance). 2007a. China to eliminate export tax rebates on grains and processed grain products. www.mof.gov.cn/news/20071218_1500_29938.htm (accessed December 20, 2007).
,MOF (Ministry of Finance) 2007b. Strengthening agricultural subsidies. www.mof.gov.cn/news/ 20070212_3137_24064.htm (accessed December 20, 2007).
,MOF (Ministry of Finance) 2008a. China to levy export taxes on grains and processed grain products. www.mof.gov.cn/news/20071230_1500_30186.htm (accessed January 2, 2008).
,MOF (Ministry of Finance) 2008b. Temporary import tariffs on soybeans to be effective through September 30, 2008. www.mof.gov.cn/news/20080307_2119_31956.htm (accessed March 6, 2008).
,MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce). 2008. China puts quota on grain powder exports to stabilize domestic prices. http://gpj2.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/workaffair/200801/20080105314447.html (accessed January 12, 2008).
,NBS (National Bureau of Statistics). Various years. China Statistical Yearbook.
,OECD. 2005. Review of Agricultural Policies – China. Paris.Google Scholar
,OECD 2009. PSE Database. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/21/38525182.xls (accessed January 2010).
Qiao, F., Lohmar, B., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., and Zhang, L.. 2003. Producer benefits from input market and trade liberalization: The case of fertilizer in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(5): 1223–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repetto, R. 1986. Skimming the water: Rent-seeking and the performance of public irrigation systems. Research Report No. 4, World Resources Institute.
,USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2009. USDA agricultural projections to 2018. www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/ag_baseline.htm (accessed December 11, 2009).
,WTO. 2008. Trade Policy Review – China. WT/TPR/S/161/Rev.1.
Net, Xinhua. 2007. China should increase minimum prices for grains. http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2007–05/26/content_6156143.htm (accessed January 13, 2008).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • China
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • China
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • China
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.010
Available formats
×