Abrahamson, A. (1991). Home Unpleasant During House Arrest, Judge Learns. Corrections Today, 53: 76Google Scholar

Ahmed, E., Harris, N., Braithwaite, J., and Braithwaite, V. (2001). Shame Management Through Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Albrecht, H-J. and Kalmthout, A. (eds.) (2002). Community Sanctions and Measures in Europe and North America. Freiburg: Edition iuscrim

Ancel, M. (1971). Suspended Sentence. London: Heinemann

Ansay, S. J. and Benveneste, D. (1999). Equal application or unequal treatment: practical outcomes for women on community control in Florida. Women and Criminal Justice, 10: 121–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aungles, A. (1994). The Prison and the Home. Sydney, Australia: Institute of Criminology Monograph No. 5

Bacchus, S. (1999). The Role of Victims in the Sentencing Process. In J. V. Roberts and D. Cole (eds.) Making Sense of Sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto PressCrossRef

Bagaric, M. (2002). Home Truths About Home Detention. Journal of Criminal Law, 66: 425–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, S. and Wagner, D. (1990). Measuring Diversion: The Florida Community Control Program. Crime and Delinquency, 36: 112–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, R., Huff, C., and Lilly, J. (1988). House Arrest and Correctional Policy. Doing Time at Home. Newbury Park: Sage

Ball, R. and Lilly, J. (1985). Home Incarceration: An International Alternative to Institutional Incarceration. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 9: 85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, R. and Lilly, J. (1986). A Theoretical Examination of Home Incarceration. Federal Probation, 50: 17–24Google Scholar

Ball, R. and Lilly, J. (1988). Home Incarceration with Electronic Monitoring. In J. Scott and T. Hirschi (eds.) Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice. Newbury Park: Sage

Barclay, G. and Tavares, C. (2002). International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics 2000. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics

Barclay, G. and Tavares, C. (2003). International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics 2001. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics

Baumer, T. L. and Maxfield, M. G. (1993). A Comparative Analysis of Three Electronically Monitored Home Detention Programs. Justice Quarterly, 10: 121–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumer, T. L. and Mendelsohn (1992).Electronically Monitored Home Confinement: Does it Work? In J. Byrne, A. Lurigio, and J. Petersilia (eds.) Smart Sentencing. The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications

Beattie, J. (1986). Crime and the Courts in England, 1660–1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Beck, J. L. and Klein-Saffran, J. (1991). Home Confinement. The Use of New Technology in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Federal Prisons Journal, 2: 23–7Google Scholar

Beck, J. L., Klein-Saffran, J., and Wooten, H. (1990). Home Confinement and the Use of Electronic Monitoring with Federal Parolees. Federal Probation, 54: 22–33Google Scholar

Bellamy, J. (1973). Crime and Public Order in England in the Late Middle Ages. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Bishop, N. (1988). Non-Custodial Alternatives in Europe. Helsinki: Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention and Control Affiliated with the United Nations

Blomberg, T. G., Bales, W., and Reed, K. (1993). Intermediate Punishment: Redistributing or Extending Social Control?Crime, Law and Social Change, 19: 187–201Google Scholar

Bondeson, U. (2002). Alternatives to Imprisonment. Intentions and Reality. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers

Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., and Rooney, J. (1999). Electronic Monitoring in Canada. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada

Bottoms, A. (1981). The Suspended Sentence in England, 1967–1978. British Journal of Criminology, 21: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottoms, A. (2001). Compliance and Community Penalties. In Bottoms, A., Gelsthorpe, L., and Rex, S. (eds.) (2001). Community Penalties. Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Bottoms, A., Gelsthorpe, L., and Rex, S. (eds.) (2002) Community Penalties. Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press

Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Braithwaite, J. (2002). In Search of Restorative Jurisprudence. In R. Walgrave (ed.) Restorative Justice and the Law. Cullompton: Willan PublishingCrossRef

Brodeur, J. P., Roberts, J. V., Mohr, R., and Markham, K. (1988). Views of Sentencing: A Survey of Judges in Canada. Ottawa: Research Reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission, Department of Justice Canada

Brookbank, C. and Kingsley, B. (1999). Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 1997–98. Juristat, 18, 14Google Scholar

Brown, M. P. and Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic House Arrest: An Examination of Citizen Attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41: 332–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, M. P. and Elrod, P. (1999). Citizens' Perceptions of a ‘Good’ Electronic House Arrest Program. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3: 37–42Google Scholar

Brown, D. and Wilkie, M. (2002). Prisoners as Citizens. Human Rights in Australian Prisons. Sydney: The Federation Press

Brown, M. and Young, W. (2000). Recent Trends in Sentencing and Penal Policy in New Zealand. International Criminal Justice Review, 10: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlee, I. (1988). Community Punishment. A Critical Introduction. London: Longman

Bureau of Justice Statistics (2000). National Crime Victimization Survey Violent Crime Trends. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs

Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987). Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada

Carlisle, R. (1988). Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative Sentencing Tool – or My Week on an Electronic Ball and Chain. Georgia State Bar Journal, 24: 131–5Google Scholar

Carcach, C. and Grant, A. (1999).Imprisonment in Australia: Trends in Prison Populations and Imprisonment Rates 1982–1998. Trends and Issues, No. 130. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology

Carriere, D. (2003) Adult Correctional Services in Canada, 2001/2. Juristat: 23, no. 11Google Scholar

Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2002). The Penal System. An Introduction. 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications

Challinger, D. (1994). An Australian Case Study: The Northern Territory Home Detention Scheme. In U. Zvekic (ed.) Alternatives to Imprisonment in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers

Chicknavorian, E. (1990). House Arrest: A Viable Alternative to the Current Prison System. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Commitment, 16: 53–66Google Scholar

Christiansen, K. (1981). The American Experience of Imprisonment, 1607–1776. PhD Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany

Church, A. and Dunstan, S. (1997). Home Detention: The Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Programme 1995–1997. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Justice. Available at www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/1997/homedetention/Default.htm

Clark, C. (2002). The Use of Home Detention Since the Introduction of the Sentencing and Parole Acts on June 30 2002. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Justice, Research and Evaluation Unit

Clear, T. (1997). Evaluating Intensive Probation: The American Experience. In G. Mair (ed.) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community Penalties. Aldershot: Avebury

Committee to Remember Kimberly Rogers (2003). Justice with Dignity. Available at http://dawn.thot.net/Kimberly_Rogers

Connelly, L. (2001). Electronic Monitoring in the United States. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 6: 326–35Google Scholar

Courtright, K., Berg, B., and Mutchnik, R. (2000). Rehabilitation in the New Machine? Exploring Drug and Alcohol Use and Variables Related to Success Among DUI Offenders Under Electronic Monitoring – Some Preliminary Outcome Results. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44: 293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Covell, K. and Howe, B. (1996). Public Attitudes and Juvenile Justice in Canada. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 4: 345–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crouch, B. (1993). Is Incarceration Really Worse? Analysis of Offenders' Preferences for Prison over Probation. Justice Quarterly, 10: 67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullen, F., Fisher, B., and Applegate, B. (2000). Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 27. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Cullen, F., Wright, J., and Applegate, B. (1996).Control in the Community? The Limits of Reform? In A. Harland (ed.) Choosing Correctional Options that Work. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Cusson, M. (1998)Peines intermédiares, surveillance electronique et abolitionisme. Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique et scientifique, 1: 34–45Google Scholar

Daly, K. (2003). Mind the Gap: Restorative Justice in Theory and Practice. In A. von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach, and M. Schiff, M. (eds.) Restorative and Criminal Justice. Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Oxford: Hart Publishing

Daubney, D. and Parry, G. (1999). An Overview of Bill C-41. (The Sentencing Reform Act). In J. V. Roberts and D. Cole (eds.) Making Sense of Sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Davies, M. (1993). Punishing Criminals. Developing Community-Based Intermediate Sanctions. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press

Davies, M., Takala, J.-P. and J. Tyver (1996). Penological Esperanto and Sentencing Parochialism. A Comparative Study of the Search for Non-Prison Punishments. Aldershot: Dartmouth

Department of Justice Canada. (1994).Minister of Justice Introduces Sentencing Reform Bill. News Release,13 June 1994

Dictionnaire historique de la langue francaise. Tome 3. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert

Dignan, J. (1984). The Sword of Damocles and the Clang of the Prison Gates: Prospects on the Inception of the Partly Suspended Sentence. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 23: 183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doble, J. (1987). Crime and Punishment: The Public's View. New York: Public Agenda Foundation

Doble Research Associates (1995a). Crime and Corrections: The Views of the People of Oklahoma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Doble Research Associates

Doble Research Associates (1995b). Crime and Corrections: The Views of the People of North Carolina. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Doble Research Associates

Doble Research Associates (1998). Crime and Corrections: The Views of the People of New Hampshire. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Doble Research Associates

Dodgson, K. and Mortimer, E. (2000). Home Detention Curfew: The First Year of Operation. London: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate. Research Findings No. 110

Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N. and Weiner, M. (2001). Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: An Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. HORS 222. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Doherty, D. (1995). Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family. In K. Schulz (ed.) Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, the Operation, the Research. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University

Doob, A. N. (1990). Community Sanctions and Imprisonment: Hoping for a Miracle but not Bothering Even to Pray for it. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32: 415–28Google Scholar

Doob, A. N. (2001). Youth Court Judges' Views of the Youth Justice System: The Results of a Survey. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto

Doob, A. N. and Marinos, V. (1995). Reconceptualizing Punishment: Understanding the Limitations on the Use of Intermediate Punishments. University of Chicago Roundtable, 2: 413–33Google Scholar

Doob, A. N. and Roberts, J. V. (1983). Sentencing: An Analysis of the Public's View. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada

Doob, A. N. and Roberts, J. V. (1988).Public Punitiveness and Public Knowledge of the Facts: Some Canadian Surveys. In N. Walker and M. Hough (eds.) Public Attitudes to Sentencing. Surveys from Five Countries. Aldershot: Gower

Doob, A. N., Sprott, J. B., Marinos, V. and Varma, K. (1998). An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto

Doob, A. N. and Webster, C. (2004). Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research, 30: 143–95

Dowds, L. (1995). The Long-Eyed View of Law and Order: A Decade of British Social Attitudes Survey Results. London: Home Office

Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Duff, R. A. (2002). Restorative Punishment and Punitive Restoration. In L. Walgrave (ed.) Restorative Justice and the Law. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Duguid, S. (2000). Can Prisons Work? The Prisoner as Object and Subject in Modern Corrections. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Elrod, P. and Brown, M. P. (1996). Predicting Public Support for Electronic House Arrest. American Behavioral Scientist, 39: 461–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, K., Crouch, J. and Pullen, S. (1989). Attitudes toward Crime: A Survey of Colorado Citizens and Criminal Justice Officials. Denver, Colorado: Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice

Fattah, E. (1982). Public Opposition to Prison Alternatives and Community Corrections: A Strategy for Action. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 24: 371–85Google Scholar

Faugeron, C. (1996). The Changing Functions of Imprisonment. In R. Mathews and P. Francis (eds.) Prisons 2000. An International Perspective on the Current State and Failure of Imprisonment. London: MacMillan PressCrossRef

Flanagan, T. (1996). Community Corrections in the Public Mind. Federal Probation, 60: 3–9Google Scholar

Florida Department of Corrections (1997). Corrections in Florida: What the Public Thinks. Results of a March 1997 Survey of Floridians. Miami: Florida Department of Corrections

Florida Corrections Commission (2003). A Review of the Community Control Program and Electronic Monitoring within the Florida Department of Corrections. Miami: Florida Corrections Commission

Flynn, L. (1986).House Arrest. Corrections Today, July issue

Freiberg, A. (2002). What's it Worth? A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison of Sentence Severity. In C. Tata and N. Hutton (eds.) Sentencing and Society. International Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate

Frost, S. and Stephenson, G. (1989). A Simulation Study of Electronic Tagging as a Sentencing Option. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 28: 91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabel, K. and Johnston, D. (eds.) (1995). Children of Incarcerated Parents. New York: Lexington Books

Gainey, R. R. and Payne, B. (2003). Changing Attitudes Toward House Arrest With Electronic Monitoring: The Impact of a Single Presentation?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47: 196–209Google Scholar

Gainey, R. R. and Payne, B. (2000). Understanding the Experience of House Arrest with Electronic Monitoring: An Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Data. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44: 84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galaway, B. (1984). A Survey of Public Acceptance of Restitution as an Alternative To Imprisonment for Property Offenders. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 17: 108–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallup (2000). The Gallup Monthly, no. 420. Princeton: The Gallup Poll

Gandy, J. and Galaway, B. (1980).Restitution as a Sanction for Offenders: A Public's View. In J. Hudson and B. Galaway (eds.) Victims, Offenders, and Alternative Sanctions. Toronto: Lexington Books

Garland, D. (2001a). The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Garland, D. (2001b). Mass Imprisonment. Social Causes and Consequences. London: Sage

Gibbs, A. and King, D. (2001). The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Development, Operation and Impact of Home Detention in New Zealand. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago, Department of Community and Family Studies

Gibbs, A. and King, D. (2003a). Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring: The New Zealand Experience. Criminal Justice, 3: 199–211Google Scholar

Gibbs, A. and King, D. (2003b). The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Operation and Impact of Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36: 1–17Google Scholar

Gottfredson, S. and Taylor, R. (1984). Public Policy and Prison Populations: Measuring Opinions about Reform. Judicature, 68: 190–201Google Scholar

Graham, J. (1990). Decarceration in the Federal Republic of Germany. British Journal of Criminology, 30: 150–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harkins, J. R. (1990). House Arrest in Oregon: A Look at What Goes on Inside the Home. Corrections Today, 52: 146–52Google Scholar

Harris, J. (1995). Foreword. In K. Gabel and D. Johnston (eds.) Children of Incarcerated Parents. New York: Lexington Books

Harris, J. (1968). Changing Public Attitudes Toward Crime and Corrections. Federal Probation, 32: 9–16Google Scholar

Haverkamp, R. (2003). Implementing Electronic Monitoring. A Comparative, Empirical Study on Attitudes towards the Measure in Germany and Sweden. Available at www.iuscrim.mpg.de/forsch/krim/haverkamp

Hayes, B. (2002). Making a Case for House arrest. Halifax Herald, Friday December 6, 2002

Heggie, K. (1999). Review of the NSW Home Detention Scheme. Research Publication, no. 41. Sydney, NSW: NSW Department of Corrective Services

Hendrick, D., Martin, M., and Greenberg, P. (2003). Conditional Sentencing Data in Canada: A Statistical Profile 1997–2001. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry

Hobbes, T. (1651/1957 (reprint)). Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Hollis, V. and Cross, I. (2003). Prison Population Brief. England and Wales: April 2003. London: Home Office

Holman, B. and Brown, R. (2004) Beyond Bricks, Bars, and Barbed Wire: The Genesis and Proliferation of Alternatives to Incarceration in the United States. In C. Sumner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Criminology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Holman, J. and Quinn, J. (1992). Dysphoria and Electronically Monitored Home Confinement. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13: 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home Office (1999). Prison Statistics. England and Wales. 1998. Cm 4430. Norwich: The Stationery Office

Home Office (2001). Making Punishments Work. Report of a review of the sentencing framework for England and Wales. London: Home Office

Home Office (2002). Criminal Statistics England and Wales. 1998. Cm 5696. Norwich: The Stationery Office

Home Office (2003). Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime. London: Home Office

Hough, M. and Park, A. (2002). How Malleable are Attitudes to Crime and Punishment? Findings from a British Deliberative Poll. In J. V. Roberts and M. Hough (eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Public Opinion, Crime, and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Hough, M. and Roberts, J. V. (1998). Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study 179. London: Home Office

Hough, M. and Roberts, J. (1999) Sentencing Trends in Britain Public Knowledge and Public Opinion. Punishment and Society. The International Journal of Penology, 1: 7–22Google Scholar

Hough, M. and Roberts, J. (2002).Public Knowledge and Public Opinion of Sentencing: Findings from Five Jurisdictions. In N. Hutton and C. Tata (eds.) Sentencing and Society: International Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company

Hough, M. and Roberts, J. (2004a). Public Confidence in Justice: Findings from Around the World. ICPR Research Paper No 1. London: Kings College

Hough, M. and Roberts, J. (2004b). Youth Crime and Youth Justice: An Analysis of Public Opinion in Great Britain. ICPR Research Paper No 3. London: Kings College

Hough, M., Jacobson, J., and Millie, A. (2003).The Decision to Imprison. Sentencing and the Prison Population. London: The Prison Reform Trust

Howard, J. (1929). The State of the Prisons. New York: J. M. Dent and Sons

Hume, D. (1834) . The History of England, vol. 2. London: A. Valfy

Johnson, B., Haugen, L., Maness, J. and Ross, P. (1989). Attitudes Toward Electronic Monitoring of Offenders: A Survey of Probation Officers and Prosecutors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 5: 153–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, S. (1979/reprint edition). A Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Arno Press

Johnstone, G. (2002). Restorative Justice. Ideas, Values, Debates. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Joint Commission on Correctional Manpower and Training (1968). The Public Looks at Corrections. Washington: DC: Joint Commission on Correctional Manpower and Training

Jolin, A. and Stipak, B. (1992). Drug Treatment and Electronically Monitored Home Confinement: An Evaluation of a Community-Based Sentencing Option. Crime and Delinquency, 38: 158–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keay, N. (2000). Home Detention – An Alternative to Prison. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 12: 98–105Google Scholar

Kemp, B. (1981). The Impact of Enforced Separation on Prisoners' Wives. Research Bulletin No. 4. New South Wales Department of Corrective Services

King, D. and Gibbs, A. (2003). Is Home Detention in New Zealand Disadvantaging Women and Children?Probation Journal, 50: 115–26Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, J. (ed.) (1880). MacKenzie's Studies in Roman Law, 5th edn. Edinburgh: Blackwood

Kommer, M. (2003). Punitiveness in Europe Revisited. Criminology in Europe, 3: 1–12Google Scholar

Kong, R., Johnson, H., Beattie, S., and Cardillo, A. (2003). Sexual Offences in Canada. Juristat, 23, no. 6Google Scholar

Kuhn, A. (2003). Prison Population Trends in Western Europe. Criminology in Europe, 2: 1–16Google Scholar

Kury, H., Obergfell-Fuchs, J., Smartt, U. and Wurger, M. (2002). Attitudes to Punishment: How Reliable are International Crime Victim Surveys?International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 2: 133–50Google Scholar

Landreville, P. (1987). Surveiller et prévenir: L'assignation à domicile sous surveillance electronique. Déviance et Société, 11: 251–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landreville, P. (1999). La Surveillance electronique des délinquants: une marche en expansion. Déviance et Société, 23: 105–21Google Scholar

Langan, P. (1998). Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Sanctions. In J. Petersilia (ed.) Community Corrections. Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press

Lappi-Seppala, T. (2001). Sentencing and Punishment in Finland: The Decline of the Repressive Ideal. In M. Tonry and R. Frase (eds.) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. New York: Oxford University Press

Lappi-Seppala, T. (2002). Prisoner Rates: Global Trends and Local Exceptions. Helsinki: National Research Institute of Legal Policy

Lappi-Seppala, T. (2003). Non-Custodial Sanctions in Finland. Helsinki: National Research Institute of Legal Policy

Law Reform Commission of New South Wales (1996). Sentencing. (Report 79) chapter 7: Home Detention. Available at www.agd.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf

Le Soleil (2002). Sondage pancanadien: La justice n'est pas assez dure pour les crimes sexuels. 9 April 2002, page a3

Leibrich, J. (1994). What Do Offenders Say About Supervision and Going Straight?Federal Probation, 58: 41–6Google Scholar

Lilly, J. R. (1990). Tagging Reviewed. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 29: 229–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lilly, J. and Ball, R. (1987). A Brief History of House Arrest and Electronic Monitoring. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 13: 343–74Google Scholar

Lilly, J., Ball, R., Curry, G. and Smith, R. (1992) The Pride, Inc., Program: An Evaluation of Five Years of Electronic Monitoring. Federal Probation, 56: 42–53Google Scholar

Logan, R. (2001). Crime Statistics in Canada, 2000. Juristat, 21, no. 8Google Scholar

Mande, M. and English, K. (1989). The Effect of Public Opinion on Correctional Policy: A Comparison of Opinions and Practice. Denver: Colorado Department of Public Safety

Maidment, M. R. (2002). Toward a ‘Woman-Centred’ Approach to Community-Based Corrections: A Gendered Analysis of Electronic Monitoring (EM) in Eastern Canada. Women and Criminal Justice, 13: 47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainprize, S. (1995). Social, Psychological, and Familial Impacts of Home Confinement and Electronic Monitoring: Exploratory Research Findings From B. C.'s Pilot Project. In K. Schulz (ed.) Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, the Operation, the Research. Burnaby, B.C.: Simon Fraser University

Mair, G. (2001). A Decade of Electronic Monitoring in England and Wales. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 6: 317–26Google Scholar

Mair, G. (2002). Technology and the future of community penalties. In A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds.) Community Penalties. Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Mair, G. and Nee, C. (1990). Electronic Monitoring: The Trials and Their Results. Home Office Research Study No. 120. London: HMSO

Mair, G. and Mortimer, E. (1996). Curfew Orders with Electronic Monitoring: An Evaluation of the First Twelve Months of the Trials in Greater Manchester, Norfolk, and Berkshire, 1995–1996. London: Home Office

Mande, M. and Butler, P. (1982). Crime in Colorado. A Survey of Citizens. Boulder: Division of Criminal Justice

Manson, A. (2001). The Law of Sentencing. Toronto: Irwin Law

Marinos, V. and Doob, A. N. (1999). Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment. Criminal Reports, 21: 31–41Google Scholar

Martinovic, M. (2002). The Punitiveness of Electronically Monitored Community Based Programs. Paper presented at the Probation and Community Corrections Conference, Perth, September 2002

Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good. How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological AssociationCrossRef

Mathieson, T. (2000). Prison on Trial (2nd edn) Winchester: Waterside Press

Mattinson, J. (2002). Results from the 2000 BCS. Personal Communication with author

Mattinson, J, and Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000). Attitudes to Crime and Criminal Justice: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. HORS 200. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Mayhew, P. and van Kesteren, J. (2002). Cross-National Attitudes to Punishment. In J. V. Roberts and M. Hough (eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Public Opinion, Crime, and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

McGarrell, E. F. and Sandys, M. (1996). The Misperception of Public Opinion toward Capital Punishment: Examining the Spuriousness Explanation of Death Penalty Support. American Behavioral Scientist, 39: 500–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMahon, M. (1990). ‘Net-Widening’. Vagaries in the Use of a Concept. British Journal of Criminology, 30: 121–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirrlees-Black, C. (2001). Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Findings from the 2000 British Crime Survey. Research Findings No. 137. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Mitchell, K. (1999). Home Detention. New Zealand Law Journal,. October: 363–6

Moore, M. (1997). The Strategic Management of Intermediate Sanctions. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1: 44–52Google Scholar

MORI Social Research Institute (2000). Crime and Punishment Survey. London: MORI House

MORI Social Research Institute (2003). Criminal Justice System Confidence Survey. Topline Results. London: MORI House

Morris, A. (2004). Youth Justice in New Zealand. In M. Tonry and A. Doob (ed.) Youth Crime and Youth Justice. Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Chicago. University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Morris, N. and Tonry, M. (1990). Between Prison and Probation. Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press

Muncie, J. (1990). ‘A Prisoner in my Own Home’: The Politics and Practice of Electronic Monitoring. Probation Journal, 37: 72–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagin, D. (1998). Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Nellis, M. (1991). The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 31: 165–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nellis, M. (2002). Community Penalties in Historical Perspective. In A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex. (eds.) Community Penalties. Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (2002). Local Courts Statistics. Available at www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au

Newburn, T. (2003). Crime and Criminal Justice Policy (2nd edn) Harlow: Pearson Education

Northern Territory of Australia (1996). Prisons (Correctional Services) (Home Detention Orders) Regulations. Available at www.nt.gov.au/justice

Observer (2003). Crime Uncovered. A Nation under the Cosh? The Truth about Crime in Britain in 2003. The Observer Magazine, 27 April

O'Malley, P. (2004) Penal Policies and Contemporary Politics. In C. Sumner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Criminology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Oxford English Dictionary (1933/61). Vol. ⅴ. Oxford: The Clarendon Press

Parisi, N. (1980). Part-Time Imprisonment: The Legal and Practical Issues of Periodic Confinement. Judicature, 63: 385–95Google Scholar

Payne, B. and Gainey, R. (1998). A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42: 149–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, B. and Gainey, R. (2000). Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Issues. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31: 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, B. and Gainey, R. (2002). The Influence of Demographic Factors on the Experience of House Arrest. Federal Probation, 66: 64–71Google Scholar

Petersilia, J. (1990). When Probation Becomes More Dreaded Than Prison. Federal Probation, 54: 23–7Google Scholar

Petersilia, J. and Piper Deschenes, E. (1994). Perceptions of Punishment: Inmates and Staff Rank the Severity of Prison Versus Intermediate Sanctions. The Prison Journal, 74: 306–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersilia, J. and Piper Deschenes, E. (1998). What Punishes? Inmates Rank the Severity of Prison Versus Intermediate Sanctions. In J. Petersilia (ed.) Community Corrections. Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press

Petersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1998). Prison versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism. In J. Petersilia (ed.) Community Corrections. Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press

Pranis, K. and Umbreit, M. (1992). Public Opinion Research Challenges Widespread Public Demand for Harsh Punishment. Minneapolis: Citizens' Council

Pratt, J. (1992). Punishment and the Lessons from History. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 25: 97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pratt, J. (2000). Emotive and Ostentatious Punishment. Its Decline and Resurgence in Modern Society. Punishment and Society, 2: 417–41Google Scholar

Quinn, J. and Holman, J. (1991). Intrafamilial Conflict Among Felons Under Community Supervision: An Examination of the Co-Habitants of Electronically Monitored Offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16: 177–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. v. Brady 121 Canadian Criminal Cases (3d) 504

R. v. Gladue (1999). 1. SCR 688

R. v. Jurisic (1998). 101 Australian Criminal Reports 259

R. v. Knoblauch (2000). 149 Canadian Criminal Cases (3d) 1

R. v. Proulx (2000). 30 Criminal Reports (5th) 1, 140 CCC (3d) 449 (SCC)

R. v. Sangster (1973). 21 CRNS 339 (Quebec Court of Appeal)

Rackmill, S. J. (1994). An Analysis of Home Confinement as a Sanction. Federal Probation, 58: 45–52Google Scholar

Reed, M. and Roberts, J. V. (1999). Adult Correctional Services in Canada, 1997–98. Juristat, 19, no. 4Google Scholar

Reitz, K. (2001). The Dissasembly and Reassembly of US Sentencing Practices. In M. Tonry and R. Frase (eds.) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Nations. New York: Oxford University Press

Renaud, G. (1999) Conditions, Conditions, Conditions. Available at Alan Gold Newsletter, Quicklaw, June 17

Renzema, M. (1992). Home Confinement Programs: Development, Implementation, and Impact. In J. Byrne, A. Lurigio, and J. Petersilia (eds.) Smart Sentencing. The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications

Rethinking Crime and Punishment (2002). What Does the Public Think about Prison? Available at www.rethinking.org.uk

Roach, K. (1999). Due Process and Victims' Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Roach, K. (2000). Changing Punishment at the Turn of the Century: Restorative Justice on the Rise. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42: 249–80Google Scholar

Robert, L. and Peters, T. (2003). How Restorative Justice is able to Transcend the Prison Walls: A Discussion of the ‘Restorative Detention’ Project. In E. Weitekamp and H.-J. Kerner (eds.) Restorative Justice in Context. International Practice and Directions. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Roberts, J. and Smith, M. (2003). Custody Plus, Custody Minus. In M. Tonry (ed.) Confronting Crime. Crime Control Policy under New Labour. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research, vol. 16. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Roberts, J. V. (1997). Conditional Sentencing: Sword of Damocles or Pandora's Box?Canadian Criminal Law Review, 2: 183–206Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (1999a). The Hunt for the Paper Tiger: Conditional Sentencing after the judgment in R. v. Brady. Criminal Law Quarterly, 42: 38–66Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (1999b). Sentencing Patterns and Sentencing Disparity. In J. V. Roberts and D. Cole (eds.) Making Sense of Sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Roberts, J. V. (2001). Unearthing the Sphinx: The Evolution of Conditional Sentencing. Canadian Bar Review, 80: 1019–38Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2002a). The Evolution of Conditional Sentencing in Canada. Criminal Reports, 3 (6th Series): 268–82Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2002b).Public Attitudes to Community-Based Sanctions. In J. V. Roberts and M. Hough (eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Public Opinion, Crime, and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Roberts, J. V. (2002c). Determining Parole Eligibility Dates for Life Prisoners: Lessons from Jury Hearings in Canada. Punishment and Society. The International Journal of Penology, 4: 103–14Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2003a). Evaluating the Pluses and Minuses of Custody: Sentencing Reform in England and Wales. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 229–47Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2003b). Sentencing Reform in New Zealand: An Analysis of the Sentencing Act 2002. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36: 249–71Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. (2003c). Victim Impact Statements and the Sentencing Process: Recent Developments and Findings. Criminal Law Quarterly, 47: 365–96Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V., Antonowicz, D. and Sanders, T. (2000). Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment: An Empirical Analysis of Conditions. Criminal Reports, 30: 113–25Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Bala, N. (2003). Understanding Sentencing under theYouth Criminal Justice Act. Alberta Law Review, 41: 395–423Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Cole, D. (eds.) (1999). Making Sense of Sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Roberts, J. V., Doob, A. N. and Marinos, V. (2000). Judicial Attitudes to Conditional Terms of Imprisonment: Results of a National Survey. Ottawa: Department of Justice

Roberts, J. V. and Edgar, A. (2003). Victim Impact Statements: Findings from a survey of the judiciary in Canada. International Journal of Victimology, 1, no. 4 (online journal)

Roberts, J. V. and Gabor, T. (2004). Living in the Shadow of Prison: Lessons from the Canadian Experience in Decarceration, British Journal of Criminology, 39: 92–112Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Grimes, C. (2000). Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 1998/99. Juristat, 20, no. 1Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Healy, P. (2001) The Future of Conditional Sentencing. Criminal Law Quarterly, 44: 309–41Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Hough, M. (2001). Public Opinion, Sentencing and Parole: International Trends. In R. Roesch, R. Corrado and R. Dempster (eds.) Psychology in the Courts: International Advances in Knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic

Roberts, J. V. and Hough, M. (eds.) (2002). Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Public Opinion, Crime, and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Roberts, J. V. and Hough, M. (forthcoming). Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press

Roberts, J. V., Maloney, L. and Vallis, R. (2003). Coming Home to Prison. A Study of Offender Experiences of Conditional Sentencing. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada

Roberts, J. V. and Melchers, R. (2003). The Incarceration of Aboriginal Offenders: An Analysis of Trends, 1978–2001. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45: 211–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, J. V., Nuffield, J. and Hann, R. (2000). Parole and the Public: Attitudinal and Behavioural Responses. Empirical and Applied Criminal Justice Research 1: 1–29Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Reed, M. (1999). Adult Correctional Services in Canada. In A Statistical Overview of the Canadian Criminal Justice System. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing

Roberts, J. V. and Roach, K. (2003).Restorative Justice in Canada: From Sentencing Circles to Sentencing Principles. In A. von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach and M. Schiff. (eds.) Restorative and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Roberts, J. V. and Roach, K. (2004) Community-Based Sentencing: The Perspectives of Crime Victims. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada

Roberts, J. V. and Stalans, L. S. (1997). Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press

Roberts, J. V. and Stalans, L. S. (2004). Restorative Justice and the Sentencing Process: Exploring the Views of the Public. Social Justice Research, in press

Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. S., Indermaur, D. and Hough, M. (2003). Penal Populism and Public Opinion. New York: Oxford University Press

Roberts, J. V. and Verdun-Jones, S. (2002). Directing Traffic at the Crossroads of Criminal Justice and Mental Health: Implications of the Supreme Court Judgment in R. v. Knoblauch. Alberta Law Review, 39: 788–809Google Scholar

Roberts, J. V. and Hirsch, A. (1998) Conditional Sentencing and the Fundamental Principle of Proportionality in Sentencing. Criminal Reports, 10: 222–31Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2003). Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 2001/2. Juristat, 23, no. 2Google Scholar

Rogers, R. and Jolin, A. (1989). Electronic Monitoring: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 5: 141–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, B. (1990) Offender attitudes toward home arrest. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 3: 8, 10–11Google Scholar

Sanders, T. and Roberts, J. V. (2000). Public Attitudes toward Conditional Sentencing: Results of a National Survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32: 199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, T. and Roberts, J. V. (2004).Exploring public attitudes to conditional sentencing. In J. Winterdyk, L. Coates and S. Brodie (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Toronto: Pearson

Scher, S. J. and Darley, J. M. (1997). How Effective are the things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26: 127–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sebba, L. (1996). Third Parties. Victims in the Criminal Justice System. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press

Secretary of State (2002a). Criminal Statistics for England and Wales 2001. Cm 5696. London: Secretary of State

Secretary of State (2002b). Justice for All. London: The Stationery Office

Selke, W. (1993). Prisons in Crisis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Sherman, L. (1992). Policing Domestic Violence. New York: Free Press

Sigler, R. and Lamb, D. (1996). Community-Based Alternatives to Prison: How the Public and Court Personnel View Them. Federal Probation, 59: 3–9Google Scholar

Smith, M. (1934/reprint 1970). Prisons and a Changing Civilisation. London: John Lane and The Bodley Head Ltd

Smykla, J. and Selke, W. (1982). The Impact of Home Detention: A Less Restrictive Alternative to the Detention of Juveniles. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, May: 3–9CrossRef

Somer, R. (1976). The End of Imprisonment. New York: Oxford University Press

Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics (2003). Attitudes towards Severity of Courts. Table 2.54. Available at www.albany.edu/sourcebook

Spelman, W. (1995). The Severity of Intermediate Sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32: 107–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spier, P. (2002). Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1992 to 2001. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Justice

Stando-Kawecka, B. (2002). Community Sanctions in Polish Penal Law. In H.-J. Albrecht and A. van Kalmthout (eds.) Community Sanctions and Measures in Europe and North America. Freiberg: Edition iuscrim

Stanley, S. and Baginsky, M. (1984). Alternatives to Prison. An Examination of Non-Custodial Sentencing of Offenders. London: Peter Owen Publishers

Stanz, R. and Tewksbury, R. (2000). Predictors of Success and Recidivism in a Home Incarceration Program. The Prison Journal, 80: 326–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statistics New Zealand (2002). Overall Offence Rate. Available at www.stats.govt.nz

Stern, V. (1998). A Sin Against the Future. Imprisonment in the World. London: Penguin Books

Stinchcomb, J. (2002). Prisons of the Mind: Lessons Learned from Home Confinement. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13: 463–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugg, D., Moore, L., and Howard, P. (2001). Electronic Monitoring and Offending Behaviour – Reconviction Results for the Second Year of Trials of Curfew Orders. Home Office Findings 141. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Sykes, G. (1958). The Society of Captives. A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Thomas, M. (2002). Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 2000/1. Juristat, 22, no.2Google Scholar

Thompson, B. (1996). Trends in Custodial Sentences in NSW: 1990–1995. Research Bulletin. New South Wales: Department of Corrective Services

Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press

Tonry, M. (1998). Intermediate Sanctions in Sentencing Guidelines. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef

Tonry, M. (2002).Community Penalties in the United States. In H.-J. Albrecht and A. van Kalmthout (eds.) Community Sanctions and Measures in Europe and North America. Freiberg: Edition iuscrim

Tufts, J. and Roberts, J. V. (2002). Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: Comparing Public Preferences and Judicial Practice. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13: 46–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, J. (1993). Sentencing in Adult Criminal Provincial Courts: A Study of Six Canadian Jurisdictions, 1991 and 1992. Ottawa: Statistics Canada

Turner, M. (1964). A Pretty Sort of Prison. London: Pall Mall Press

Turner, M., Cullen, F., Sundt, J. and Applegate, B. (1997). Public Tolerance for Community-Based Sanctions. The Prison Journal, 77: 6–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

US Department of Justice (2003). Felony Sentences in State Courts, 2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics

US Department of Justice (2004). Prison Statistics. Summary Findings. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/prisons.htm

University of Arkansas (1998). Arkansas Crime Poll. Little Rock: University of Arkansas, Department of Criminal Justice

van Ness, D. and Strong, K. (2002). Restoring Justice (2nd edn) Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co

Zyl Smit, D. (1994). Degrees of Freedom. Criminal Justice Ethics, 13: 31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Kalmthout, A. (2002).From Community Service to Community Sanctions: Comparative Perspectives. In H.-J. Albrecht and A. vanKalmthout (eds.) Community Sanctions and Measures in Europe and North America. Freiberg: Edition iuscrim

Vass, A. (1990). Alternatives to Prison: Punishment, Custody and the Community. London: Sage Publications

Vollum, S. and Hale, C. (2002). Electronic Monitoring: A Research Review. Corrections Compendium, 27: 1–4; 23–7Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. (1990). The Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions. Crime and Delinquency, 36: 162–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Hirsch A. (1993). Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press

von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A., Burney, E., and Wikstrom, P.-O. (1999). Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity. An Analysis of Recent Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing

von Hirsch, A. and Narayan, U. (1993).Degradingness and Intrusiveness. Ch. 8 in von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press

von Hirsch, A., Roberts, J. V., Bottoms, A., Roach, K. and Schiff, M. (eds.) (2003). Restorative and Criminal Justice. Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Oxford: Hart Publishing

Walters, I. (2002). Evaluation of the National Roll-Out of Curfew Orders. Home Office On-line Report 15/02. London: Home Office: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Weitekamp, E. and Kerner, H.-J. (2003). Restorative Justice in Context. International Practice and Directions. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Walgrave, L. (2002). Restorative Justice and the Law. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Walmsley, R. (2002). World Prison Population List (3rd edn). Research Findings. No. 166. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate

Wasik, M. (1994). Sentencing Guidelines: The Problem of Conditional Sentences. Criminal Justice Ethics, 13: 50–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (unabridged). Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster

West, T. (1997). Prisons of Promise. Winchester: Waterside Press

Whitfield, D. (1997). Tackling the Tag. The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Winchester: Waterside Press

Whitfield, D. (2001). The Magic Bracelet. Technology and Offender Supervision. Winchester: Waterside Press

Willis, A. (1986). Alternatives to Imprisonment: An Elusive Paradise? In J. Pointing (ed.) Alternatives to Custody. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Wright, M. (1982). Making Good. Prisons, Punishment and Beyond. London: Burnett Books Limited

Young, A. (1988). The Role of An Appellate Court in Developing Sentencing Guidelines. Research Reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada

Young, A. (2001). The Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process. A Literature Review, 1989–1999. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada

Young, A. and Hoyle, C. (2003). Restorative Justice and Punishment. In S. McConville (ed.) The Uses of Punishment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing

Young, A. and Roberts, J. V. (2001). Research on the Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process in Canada. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada

Zamble, E. and Kalm, K. (1990). General and Specific Measures of Public Attitudes toward Sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22: 327–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamble, E. and Porporino, F. (1988). Coping, Behavior and Adaptation in Prison Inmates. New York: Springer

Zvekic, U. (e319 (1994). Alternatives to Imprisonment in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers