Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Grofman, Bernard
2004.
DOWNS AND TWO-PARTY CONVERGENCE.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Martin, Christian W.
and
Plümper, Thomas
2005.
Number of Parties, Endogenous Partisan Preferences, and Electoral Turnout Rates.
Social Science Computer Review,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
347.
EZROW, LAWRENCE
2005.
Are moderate parties rewarded in multiparty systems? A pooled analysis of Western European elections, 1984–1998.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 6,
p.
881.
Shikano, Susumu
2006.
Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie.
p.
47.
Yamamoto, Koji
2006.
How Political Parties Follow the Partisanss Preferences: Simulation Based on Statistical Estimates of Japanese Voting Behavior.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
ADAMS, JAMES
and
MERRILL, SAMUEL
2006.
Why Small, Centrist Third Parties Motivate Policy Divergence by Major Parties.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
403.
Adams, James
Dow, Jay
and
Merrill, Samuel
2006.
The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to Presidential Elections.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Adams, James
Clark, Michael
Ezrow, Lawrence
and
Glasgow, Garrett
2006.
Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
513.
Grofman, Bernard
2007.
toward a science of politics?.
European Political Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
143.
Macdonald, Stuart Elaine
Rabinowitz, George
and
Listhaug, Ola
2007.
Simulating Models of Issue Voting.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
406.
Debus, Marc
2007.
Bestimmungsfaktoren des Wahlverhaltens in Deutschland bei den Bundestagswahlen 1987, 1998 und 2002: Eine Anwendung des Modells von Adams, Merrill und Grofman.
Politische Vierteljahresschrift,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 2,
p.
269.
Merrill, Samuel
and
Adams, James
2007.
The effects of alternative power-sharing arrangements: Do “moderating” institutions moderate party strategies and government policy outputs?.
Public Choice,
Vol. 131,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
413.
Kitschelt, Herbert
2007.
Growth and Persistence of the Radical Right in Postindustrial Democracies: Advances and Challenges in Comparative Research.
West European Politics,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1176.
Sanders, David
Clarke, Harold D.
Stewart, Marianne C.
and
Whiteley, Paul
2007.
Does Mode Matter For Modeling Political Choice? Evidence From the 2005 British Election Study.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
257.
Levine, Renan
2007.
Sources of Bias in Voter Expectations under Proportional Representation.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
215.
Tavits, Margit
2007.
Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Dalton, Russell J.
2008.
The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 7,
p.
899.
Herrmann, Michael
2008.
Moderat bevorzugt, extrem gewählt. Zum Zusammenhang von Präferenz und Wahlentscheidung in räumlichen Modellen sachfragenorientierten Wählens.
Politische Vierteljahresschrift,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Schofield, Norman
2008.
Power, Freedom, and Voting.
p.
259.
Hindmoor, Andrew
2008.
Policy Innovation and the Dynamics of Party Competition: A Schumpeterian Account of British Electoral Politics, 1950–2005.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
492.
