![](http://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:book:9781847425959/resource/name/9781847425959i.jpg)
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Dedication
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- one Fleeing Ireland: social exclusion and the flight of Irish ‘unmarried mothers’ to England in the 1950s and 1960s
- two Responses in Britain to the PFIs: the repatriation of ‘unmarried mothers’ to Ireland in the 1950s and 1960s
- three The ‘daring experiment’: London County Council and the discharge from care of children to Ireland in the 1950s and 1960s
- four ‘Race’, ethnicity and Irish ‘invisibility’
- five Social services departments and Irish children and families in the early 21st century
- six ‘Maximising things for your community’: the views of social workers
- Conclusion
- References
- Appendix A Information derived from the Department of Health ‘Children in Need’ (CIN) survey, September-October 2001
- Appendix B Statistical responses to the questionnaire mailed to social services departments in England and Wales
- Index
- To order further copies of this publication or any other Policy Press titles please contact:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Dedication
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- one Fleeing Ireland: social exclusion and the flight of Irish ‘unmarried mothers’ to England in the 1950s and 1960s
- two Responses in Britain to the PFIs: the repatriation of ‘unmarried mothers’ to Ireland in the 1950s and 1960s
- three The ‘daring experiment’: London County Council and the discharge from care of children to Ireland in the 1950s and 1960s
- four ‘Race’, ethnicity and Irish ‘invisibility’
- five Social services departments and Irish children and families in the early 21st century
- six ‘Maximising things for your community’: the views of social workers
- Conclusion
- References
- Appendix A Information derived from the Department of Health ‘Children in Need’ (CIN) survey, September-October 2001
- Appendix B Statistical responses to the questionnaire mailed to social services departments in England and Wales
- Index
- To order further copies of this publication or any other Policy Press titles please contact:
Summary
In the late 1990s and early 21st century, politicians and commentators in Britain have looked on, in puzzled wonderment, at the arrival of the so-called ‘Celtic Tiger’ economy in the Republic of Ireland. It has even been asserted that the Irish, with their allegedly ostentatious new-found wealth, are the “playboys of Europe” (The Observer, 22 July 2001). Recent representations of Irish people have also tended to centre on popular culture: the Riverdance phenomenon, U2 and The Corrs (Stevens et al, 2000; see also West, 2002). Indeed, the popularity of a particular construction of Irishness led one British newspaper to contend, in the mid-1990s: “If you’re hip, you must be Irish” (O’Sullivan, 1996). In the same article, a writer and cultural commentator mused: “Irish culture is seductive. It has become a signifier for hedonism with soul” (see also ‘Dubliners come home to find boom prices in Cool Hibernia’, The Independent, 30 May 1998, p 14). More generally, within the field of cultural studies, it has been claimed that ‘Irishness’ has ‘cachet’ and that it has attained the ‘status of cultural capital’ (Thompson, 2001, p 1; see also, however, Maddox, 1996).
All of these notions are, of course, highly debatable. Cultural commodification is, of course, a key characteristic of Late Capitalism and this can be related to what has also been dubbed ‘Cool Hibernia’ and the ‘commodification of Irishness’ (McGovern, 2002; see also Fish, 1997). Thus, throughout the late 1990s, this was evidenced in the marketing of alcoholic drinks (Armstrong, 1996; see also ‘Special brew of trendy ales and blarney rakes in cash’, The Guardian, 1 May 1997). More recently, it has been possible to detect a certain wane in corporate interest in utilising ‘Irishness’ to promote consumption (see, for example, ‘Breweries call time on “Oirish” theme pubs’, The Irish Post, 5 May 1999; ‘Irish acts in doldrums as festival is axed’, The Observer, 1 June 2003). Nonetheless, these developments do highlight the new centrality of Ireland and ‘Irishness’ in the field of cultural studies (see also Kirby et al, 2002b). In contrast, with social work – and social policy – in Britain, there has been an embedded failure to recognise the specificity of Irish people.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Work and Irish People in BritainHistorical and Contemporary Responses to Irish Children and Families, pp. 1 - 20Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2004