Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:01:32.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - “This paper thinks …”: Investigating the acceptability of the metaphor an essay is a person

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

Graham Low
Affiliation:
English as a Foreign Language Unit, University of York, UK
Lynne Cameron
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Graham Low
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The following passage comes from a book of edited research papers on language programme evaluation and formed the starting point for the present study.

… assessment is not only a difficult area but dangerous and sensitive too. And if it's difficult and dangerous to assess other people, is it more or less difficult and dangerous to assess ourselves? This paper doesn't know the answer to that question…. Can learners really begin to diagnose themselves with regard to their own educational attainments as these must have some bearing on their future requirements?

This paper thinks that they might, and more to the point thinks in addition that in certain situations there is no valid educational alternative.

[Paragraph concluding that tests resemble teaching materials in that they are educationally unsound if they ‘fail to further, or even detract from’ learning]

It is for this reason that this paper, accepting that educational systems are at present dependent on an amount of assessment activities, has been arguing for self-assessment as an improvement over testing.

(Kenny & Hall, 1987: 462–463)

I have to teach university students how to improve their academic writing in English as a foreign language and thus need to provide them with guidelines on acceptability. To me, the first four bolded expressions in the extract above are totally unacceptable English, whether in a research paper or anywhere else; papers cannot think, know or accept. The fifth (arguing) is a grey area; I am not sure whether it sounds acceptable or not.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×