Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:59:37.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Weak Values and Quantum Nonlocality

from Part III - Nonlocality: Illusion or Reality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Yakir Aharonov
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University and Chapman University
Eliahu Cohen
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
Get access

Summary

Entanglement and nonlocality are studied in the framework of pre-/postselected ensembles with the aid of weak measurements and the two-state-vector formalism. In addition to the EPR–Bohm experiment, we revisit the Hardy and Cheshire Cat experiments, whose entangled pre- or postselected states give rise to curious phenomena. We then turn to even more peculiar phenomenon suggesting “emerging correlations” between independent preand postselected ensembles of particles. This can be viewed as a quantum violation of the classical “pigeonhole principle.”

Introduction

It is seldom acknowledged that seven years before the celebrated Bell paper [1], Bohm and Aharonov [2] published an analysis of the EPR paradox [3]. They suggested an experimental setup, based on Compton scattering, for testing nonlocal correlations between the polarizations of two annihilation photons. In 1964, Bell proposed his general inequality, thereby excluding local realism. During the same time, Aharonov et al. constructed the foundations of a time-symmetric formalism of quantum mechanics [4]. While Bell's proof utilizes entanglement to demonstrate nonlocal correlations,wewill describe inwhat follows the emergence of nonlocal correlations between product states. For this purpose, however, we shall invoke weak measurements of pre- and postselected ensembles.

In classical mechanics, initial conditions of position and velocity for every particle fully determine the time evolution of the system. Therefore, trying to impose an additional final condition would lead either to redundancy or to inconsistency with the initial conditions. This is radically different in quantum mechanics. Because of the uncertainty principle, an initial state vector does not fully determine, in general, the outcome of a future measurement. However, adding a final (backward-evolving) state vector results in a more complete description of the quantum system in between these two boundary conditions, which has a bearing on the determination of measurement outcomes.

The basis for this time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics was laid down by Aharonov, Bergman, and Lebowitz (ABL), who derived a symmetric probability rule concerning measurements performed on systems, while taking into account the final state of the system, in addition to the usual initial state [4].

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantum Nonlocality and Reality
50 Years of Bell's Theorem
, pp. 305 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J.S., Bell, On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox, Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).Google Scholar
[2] D., Bohm, Y., Aharonov, Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–76 (1957).Google Scholar
[3] A., Einstein, B., Podolsky, N., Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–80 (1935).Google Scholar
[4] Y., Aharonov, P.G., Bergmann, J.L., Lebowitz, Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement, Phys. Rev. B 134, 1410–16 (1964).Google Scholar
[5] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, The two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics, in J.M., Muga et al. (eds.), Time in Quantum Mechanics, Springer, 369–412 (2002).
[6] B., Reznik and Y., Aharonov, Time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2538–50 (1995).Google Scholar
[7] L., Vaidman, Past of a quantum particle, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013).Google Scholar
[8] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen, E., Gruss, T., Landsberger, Measurement and collapse within the two-state-vector formalism, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 1, 133–46 (2014).Google Scholar
[9] Y., Aharonov, D.Z., Albert, L., Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351–4 (1988).Google Scholar
[10] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen, A.C., Elitzur, Foundations and applications of weak quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052105 (2014).Google Scholar
[11] O., Hosten, P. Kwiat Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements, Science 319, 787–90 (2008).Google Scholar
[12] D.J., Starling, P.B., Dixon, A.N., Jordan, J.C., Howell, Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041803 (2009).Google Scholar
[13] X.Y., Xu, Y., Kedem, K., Sun, L., Vaidman, C.F., Li, G.C., Guo, Phase estimation with weak measurement using a white light source, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033604 (2013).Google Scholar
[14] A.N. Jordan, J. Tollaksen, J.E. Troupe, J. Dressel, Y. Aharonov, Heisenberg scaling with weak measurement: A quantum state discrimination point of view, arXiv:1409.3488 (2014).
[15] L., Hardy, Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992).Google Scholar
[16] Y., Aharonov, A., Botero, S., Popescu, B., Reznik, J., Tollaksen, Revisiting Hardy's paradox: Counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values, Phys. Lett. A 301, 130–38 (2002).Google Scholar
[17] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen, S., Ben-Moshe, Unusual interactions of pre- and past-selected particles, EPJ Web Conf. 70, 00053 (2014).Google Scholar
[18] Y., Aharonov, S., Popescu, D., Rohrlich, P., Skrzypczyk, Quantum Cheshire cats, New J. Phys. 15, 113015 (2013).Google Scholar
[19] Y., Aharonov, D., Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, Ch. 17 (2005).
[20] Y., Aharonov, S., Nussinov, S., Popescu, and L., Vaidman, Peculiar features of entangled states with postselection, Phys. Rev. A 87, 014105 (2012).Google Scholar
[21] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen, D., Grossman, A.C., Elitzur, Can weak measurement lend empirical support to quantum retrocausality? EPJ Web Conf. 58 (2013).Google Scholar
[22] Y., Aharonov, D.Z., Albert, L., Vaidman, Measurement process in relativistic quantum theory, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1805–13 (1986).Google Scholar
[23] A., Brodutch, E., Cohen, Nonlocal measurements via quantum erasure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070404 (2016).Google Scholar
[24] Y., Aharonov, F., Colombo, S., Popescu, I., Sabadini, D.C., Struppa, J., Tollaksen, Quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 532–5 (2016).Google Scholar
[25] S., Marcovitch, B., Reznik, L., Vaidman, Quantum-mechanical realization of a Popescu–Rohrlich box, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022102 (2007).Google Scholar
[26] B.S., Cirel'son, Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93–100 (1980).Google Scholar
[27] S., Popescu, D., Rohrlich, Quantum nonlocality as an axiom, Found. Phys. 24, 379–85 (1994).Google Scholar
[28] G., Horowitz, J., Maldacena, The black hole final state, J. High Energy Phys. 2004. 02, 008 (2004).Google Scholar
[29] Y., Aharonov, S., Popescu, J., Tollaksen, Each instant of time a new universe, in Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story, Springer, Milan, pp. 21–36 (2014).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×