Abstract

This chapter aims to demonstrate the pertinence of micro-historical sources to the comparative study of political institutions. We conduct two case studies of urban intellectual circles in thirteenth-century Song China and sixteenth-century France, comparing the intellectual output and personal networks of the Parisian printer Robert Estienne and of Chen Qi, a publisher in the Southern Song capital Hangzhou. Robert Estienne built his father's printing business into a formidable European publishing house, publishing more than 500 works in his lifetime and gaining eminence as a scholar of Greek and the New Testament. His differences with the theological faculty of Paris over his critical editions of the bible eventually led him to move his workshop to Geneva. Some 300 years earlier, Chen Qi was exiled from Hangzhou following his publication of the Rivers and Lakes Collection 江湖集 (Jianghu ji), which was deemed slanderous against the Southern Song Chief Councillor Shi Miyuan. The juxtaposition of the two cases allows us to inquire into the political dimension of their publishing activity and to contextualize the micro-historical narratives within regional histories of institutional development: to what extent were Chen Qi and Robert Estienne subjected to political arbitrariness? Was the forced exile and temporary character demolition of Chen Qi, compared to the career-enhancing self-exile of Robert Estienne, the result of a weaker institutionalization of censorship? What role did personal networks play in the development of political patronage?

Keywords: Chen Qi, Robert Estienne, censorship, Reformation, Southern Song (Chinese) Renaissance